Multiple embryo manipulations in PGT-A cycles may result in inferior clinical outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do embryos that undergo a thaw, biopsy and re-vitrification (TBR) for pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) have different ploidy and transfer outcomes compared with fresh biopsied embryos? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of all embryos that underwent the following procedures: fresh biopsy for PGT-A (fresh biopsy); embryos that were warmed, biopsied for PGT-A and re-vitrified (single biopsy TBR); embryos with a no signal result after initial biopsy that were subsequently warmed, biopsied and re-vitrified (double biopsy TBR). The patients who underwent transfers of those embryos at a single academic institution between March 2013 and December 2021 were also studied. RESULTS: About 30% of embryos planned for TBR underwent attrition. Euploidy rates were similar after biopsy: fresh biopsy (42.7%); single biopsy TBR (47.5%) (adjusted RR: 0.99, 0.88 to 1.12); and double biopsy TBR 50.3% (adjusted RR: 0.99, 0.80 to 1.21). Ongoing pregnancy over 8 weeks was not statistically significant (double biopsy TBR: 6/19 [31.6%] versus fresh biopsy: 650/1062 [61.2%]) (adjusted RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.03). The miscarriage rate increased (double biopsy TBR: 4/19 [21.1%] versus fresh biopsy: 66/1062 [6.2%])(RR 3.39, 95% CI 1.38 to 8.31). Live birth rate was also lower per transfer for the double biopsy TBR group (double biopsy TBR [18.75%] versus fresh biopsy [53.75%]) (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.98), though not after adjustment (adjusted RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.09). These differences were not seen when single biopsy TBR embryos were transferred. CONCLUSIONS: Embryos that undergo TBR have an equivalent euploidy rate to fresh biopsied embryos. Despite that, double biopsy TBR embryos may have impaired transfer outcomes.

Reproductive decision-making and the utilization of preimplantation genetic testing among individuals with inherited aortic or vascular disease.

Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) is a reproductive technology used in conjunction with in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to reduce the risk of passing on a known genetic condition from parent to child. There is limited research describing the experience and emotional impact of PGT-M among individuals with inherited aortic or vascular disease (IAVD). Our qualitative study aims to explore the factors that influence reproductive decision-making and the uptake of PGT-M within this population. Individuals diagnosed with IAVD who have considered PGT-M, and/or their reproductive partner, were recruited using internal clinical databases and advocacy organizations. Virtual semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide that included questions related to participants' lived experience of their condition, risk perception, reproductive history, familiarity with PGT-M/IVF, and financial/psychosocial considerations. A total of 17 interviews were completed (13 affected individuals, 4 unaffected partners) and analyzed using thematic analysis. Emergent themes included: (1) the lived experience and perceived severity of disease; (2) need for comprehensive, balanced, and timely information; (3) and impact of personal values and circumstances. When discussing the impact of lived experience on reproductive decision-making, participants identified the physical and emotional impact of disease and variability of disease as factors influencing the uptake of PGT-M. Many described PGT-M as the only reproductive option presented to them by providers. Even so, participants expressed gaps in their understanding of PGT-M, particularly regarding cost/insurance coverage and the experience of IVF. Finally, participants recognized that the decision to pursue PGT-M primarily requires introspection and evaluation of one's values, but that cost remains a significant consideration. The findings from our study highlight the complexity of reproductive decision-making for individuals with IAVD and provide insight into their psychological and informational needs when engaging in this process. Providers can use these findings to tailor their discussions about reproductive decision-making with this patient cohort.

Postnatal genetic testing on cord blood for prenatally identified high-probability cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of postnatal genetic testing on umbilical cord blood (CB) for prenatally identified high-probability fetuses. METHOD: CB for genetic testing was offered to individuals who met one of the following criteria: (i) fetal anomaly, (ii) positive non-invasive prenatal screening by cfDNA or biochemical analysis, or (iii) family history. Individuals with diagnostic testing, but not microarray, were also included when recommended by society guidelines. CB was collected at Brigham and Women's and Emerson Hospitals between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: 448 individuals consented for cord blood testing (370 (82.6%) for fetal anomalies, 51 (11.4%) for high-probability cfDNA, and 27 (6.0%) for family history) and a total of 393 (87.7%) samples were analyzed. Genetic testing yielded a diagnosis in 92 (23.4%) neonates by karyotype (n = 37), chromosomal microarray (CMA) (n = 32), and other molecular analysis (n = 23). Testing averaged 10.3 days (range 1-118 days). 68 (73.9%) diagnoses potentially impacted neonatal management. MCC could not be definitively excluded in only 1.4% (6/418) of samples. CONCLUSION: Prenatal identification of high-probability fetuses and genetic testing on CB facilitates timely genetic diagnoses and neonatal management. Testing provides reassurance and reduces a postnatal diagnostic odyssey for high-probability neonates.

Single gene non-invasive prenatal screening for autosomal dominant conditions in a high-risk cohort.

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of single gene non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS-SGD) in a high-risk reproductive genetics clinic. METHODS: A clinical pilot for NIPS-SGD was conducted from March 2020 to November 2021. A NIPS-SGD panel assessing pathogenic variants in 30 genes was offered to pregnant individuals for the following indications: (1) advanced sperm age ≥40 years, (2) nuchal translucency (NT) ≥ 3.5 mm, (3) fetal anomaly, or (4) family history of a condition covered by the panel. Diagnostic testing was offered concurrently. RESULTS: NIPS-SGD was ordered for 253 individuals: 88 (34.8%) for fetal anomalies, 96 (37.9%) for advanced sperm age, 37 (14.6%) for increased NT, and 5 (2.0%) for family history. Among 228 (90.1%) completed tests, 8 (3.5%) were positive. Diagnostic testing for 78 individuals revealed no false positive or negative results. Of 41 (25.9%) individuals who received a molecular diagnosis, 34 (82.9%) were outside the scope of NIPS-SGD. Positive NIPS-SGD altered medical management in five cases. CONCLUSIONS: NIPS-SGD in a high-risk population can lead to earlier prenatal diagnosis, enhanced surveillance, and targeted genetic analysis, but should not replace clinically indicated diagnostic testing. Potential incidental findings include parental diagnoses and misattributed parentage.

Use of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and subsequent prenatal care and diagnostic testing.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic or single gene defects (PGT-M) is to identify inherited pathogenic variants in the embryo prior to embryo transfer, increasing the likelihood of an unaffected child. Prenatal diagnostic testing is recommended to confirm the results of PGT-M. The purpose of this study was to characterize the population undergoing PGT-M over time. METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients who had a positive pregnancy test after PGT-M from 2012 to 2019. A query of the internal assisted reproductive technology database and chart review were used. RESULTS: One hundred and 42 patients completed IVF cycles for PGT-M during this time period and progressed past 10 weeks gestation. There were more PGT-M cycles over time with 46 cycles between 2012 and 2015 and 96 cycles between 2016 and 2019. Patients varied on the decision to pursue prenatal diagnostic testing after PGT-M. For those with known follow-up (130/142), 16 patients underwent diagnostic testing (12%) and 114 did not. CONCLUSION: As PGT-M is increasingly utilized prior to pregnancy, it is important for genetic counselors and OB/GYNs to understand the characteristics and outcomes of the population of patients undergoing PGT-M, including how to counsel about the residual risk of an affected pregnancy after PGT-M.

Utility of noninvasive genome-wide screening: a prospective cohort of obstetric patients undergoing diagnostic testing.

PURPOSE: Copy-number variant (CNV) assessment is recommended for patients undergoing prenatal diagnostic testing. Noninvasive screening tests have not been extensively validated for CNV detection. The objective of this study was to compare the ability of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) to chromosomal microarray to detect clinically significant findings. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 198 subjects at the time of consent for diagnostic prenatal testing. Genome-wide NIPS results were compared with diagnostic testing results to assess NIPS test performance (n = 160, 38 subjects without microarray results excluded). Cohen's kappa statistic was used to assess test agreement. RESULTS: Genome-wide NIPS did not detect clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities at the same rate as diagnostic testing, κ = 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.87). When excluding CNVs <7 Mb and findings outside the limits of genome-wide NIPS, test agreement improved, κ = 0.88 (0.79-0.97) driven by agreement for common aneuploidies (κ = 1.0). However, among patients with an abnormal fetal survey, agreement was only fair, κ = 0.38 (0.08-0.67). CONCLUSION: While NIPS is an excellent screening test for common aneuploidies, genome-wide NIPS misses clinically significant findings detected on routine diagnostic testing. False positive and false negative cases highlight the importance of pretest counseling regarding NIPS limitations, especially in the setting of fetal anomalies.

When ultrasound anomalies are present: An estimation of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities not detected by cell-free DNA aneuploidy screens.

OBJECTIVES: This study characterizes cytogenetic abnormalities with ultrasound findings to refine counseling following negative cell-free DNA (cfDNA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of pregnancies with chromosome abnormalities and ultrasound findings was examined to determine the residual risk following negative cfDNA. Cytogenetic data was categorized as cfDNA detectable for aneuploidies of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, or Y or non-cfDNA detectable for other chromosome abnormalities. Ultrasound reports were categorized as structural anomaly, nuchal translucency (NT) ≥3.0 mm, or other "soft markers". Results were compared using chi squared and Fishers exact tests. RESULTS: Of the 498 fetuses with cytogenetic abnormalities and ultrasound findings, 16.3% (81/498) had non-cfDNA detectable results. In the first, second, and third trimesters, 12.4% (32/259), 19.5% (42/215), and 29.2% (7/24) had non-cfDNA detectable results respectively. The first trimester non-cfDNA detectable results reduced to 7.7% (19/246) if triploidy was detectable by cfDNA testing. For isolated first trimester NT of 3.0-3.49 mm, 15.8% (6/38) had non-cfDNA detectable results, while for NT ≥3.5 mm, it was 12.3% (20/162). For cystic hygroma, 4.3% (4/94) had non-cfDNA detectable results. CONCLUSIONS: Counseling for residual risk following cfDNA in the presence of an ultrasound finding is impacted by gestational age, ultrasound finding, and cfDNA detection of triploidy.

The influence of noninvasive prenatal testing on gestational age at time of abortion for aneuploidy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the gestational age at termination for trisomy 13, 18, or 21 (aneuploidy) before and after the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of women undergoing termination for aneuploidy at two academic institutions and one private clinic. We compared two time periods: before and after the introduction of NIPT (2006-2011 and 2012-2014, respectively). Maternal demographics and clinical characteristics were abstracted from the medical record. Nonparametric statistical methods were used to compare the two cohorts. RESULTS: Our cohort included 93 women: 41 prior to NIPT and 52 post-NIPT. Maternal age (38 post-NIPT vs 37 pre-NIPT; p = 0.17) did not differ between the time periods. Women in the post-NIPT were less likely to undergo diagnostic testing (82.7% vs 97.6%; p < 0.01) before proceeding to abortion after a positive screening result. In the post-NIPT period, there was a significant decrease in the gestational age at time of invasive testing (13.0 vs 15.7 weeks; p < 0.01) and women were more likely to undergo chorionic villous sampling (CVS) (59.6% vs 41.5%; p < 0.01). There was a significant decrease in the gestational age at termination (14.2 vs 17.2; p < 0.01). Women in the post-NIPT group were less likely to have terminations after 16 weeks (25.0% vs 61.0%; p < 0.01), 18 weeks (7.7% vs 39.0%; p < 0.01), or 20 weeks (3.9% vs 12.2%; p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: With the introduction of NIPT, the median gestational age at diagnosis and termination for women with Trisomy 13, 18, or 21 was 3 weeks earlier. Women were four times less likely to have a termination after 18 weeks and three times less likely to have a termination after 20 weeks. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Sex chromosome aneuploidy detection by noninvasive prenatal testing: helpful or hazardous?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence of sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) predicted by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), assess test performance, and compare it with nuchal translucency (NT) screening among patients seen in our prenatal diagnosis center. METHODS: We identified suspected cases of SCA by reviewing results from all NIPT samples sent from our center to commercial laboratories offering analysis by cell-free DNA between 1 December 2012 and 31 July 2015. Records of pregnancies positive for SCA were reviewed for ultrasound findings, NIPT indications, and karyotype results on maternal, fetal, and postnatal samples. Other SCA cases presenting during this period regardless of NIPT status were identified from genetic counseling and cytogenetics laboratory logbooks. RESULTS: Noninvasive prenatal testing predicted SCA in 18/2851 patients (0.63%). All had diagnostic testing of fetal or newborn samples. No patients terminated pregnancies on the basis of NIPT. NIPT suggested triple X in five cases, two with elevated NT: all were confirmed on karyotype. Two Klinefelter syndrome cases were also accurately predicted by NIPT. NIPT indicated monosomy X in 11 cases. Only one was a true positive. Ten were false positives, with 46, XX found on fetal or newborn karyotype. Maternal karyotype was mosaic (45, X[4], 46, XX[26]) in one case. Over the same time period, four additional cases of 45, X were confirmed on fetal samples, all with cystic hygromas. One of these had had a false negative NIPT result. The remaining patients pursued only direct testing via CVS or amniocentesis. CONCLUSIONS: Sex chromosome aneuploidy was frequently suspected on NIPT. False positive rate for monosomy X was surprisingly high (91%). Prediction of other SCA was more accurate. Diagnostic fetal chromosome analysis should be offered after abnormal NIPT or in the presence of cystic hygromas despite normal NIPT. NIPT limitations should be explained in pretest counseling. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Patient choice and clinical outcomes following positive noninvasive prenatal screening for aneuploidy with cell-free DNA (cfDNA).

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate patient choices and outcomes following positive cfDNA. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study of women with positive cfDNA through two academic centers between March 2012 and December 2014. Patients were screened based on ACOG indications. Medical records reviewed for counseling, ultrasound findings, diagnostic testing, karyotype and outcome. RESULTS: CfDNA was positive in 114 women; 105 singletons and 9 twin pairs. CfDNA was positive for autosomal trisomy (21, 18, 13) in 96 (84.2%) and sex chromosome aneuploidy in 18 (15.8%). Certified genetic counselors performed 95% of post-cfDNA counseling. Prenatal diagnostic testing was pursued by 71/114 (62%). Karyotype was available in 91/105 (86.7%) singletons and confirmed aneuploidy in 75/91 (82.4%); the PPV of cfDNA with any ultrasound finding was 93.6% versus 58.6% without a finding. An abnormal sonographic finding was seen in 4/16 (25%) singletons with false positive cfDNA. Fetal termination occurred in 53/79 (67%) singletons and 3/5 (60%) twins with prenatal abnormal or unknown karyotype for autosomal trisomy. Eleven fetuses (11/56, 19.6%) were terminated for suspected autosomal trisomy without karyotype confirmation. CONCLUSION: Patient choices following positive cfDNA are varied. Ultrasound modifies the PPV of cfDNA. Termination rates for aneuploidy are not higher than historical controls. Recommendation for karyotype confirmation prior to termination is not universally followed. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

What is the role of the 11- to 14-week ultrasound in women with negative cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidy?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the role of the 11- to 14-week ultrasound in women with negative cell-free DNA screening. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women at increased risk for aneuploidy based on age or medical history and negative cell-free DNA screening between March 2012 and March 2014 was conducted. Patients were included if they had an 11- to 14-week ultrasound and obstetrical care at our center(s). Primary outcome was an unexpected finding at ultrasound. Imaging findings were compared with obstetrical outcome by medical record review. RESULTS: Study group was composed of 1739 patients. An unexpected finding was identified in 60/1739 (3.5%). An abnormal fetal finding occurred in 37 living fetuses (2.1%); 33 had a nuchal translucency (NT) ≥ 3 mm, including four 'isolated' cystic hygroma and three with a structural abnormality. Four fetuses had a structural anomaly without a thick NT. Karyotype confirmed euploidy in 98.7% of available cases. Pregnancy termination was chosen by 63.6% of those with cystic hygroma or anomaly at the 11- to 14-week scan. Unexpected multiples were identified in 13 (0.7%) women and a fetal demise in 10 (0.6%). CONCLUSION: Unexpected findings at the 11- to 14-week scan occur in 3.5% of patients with negative cell-free DNA. Recognition provides options for comprehensive testing, consultation, and management.

Monozygotic twins with trisomy 21 and partial agenesis of the corpus callosum.

Trisomy 21 is the most common viable trisomy. Although it is invariably associated with mild to severe developmental delay and intellectual disability, no gross central nervous system malformation has been consistently identified in individuals with trisomy 21. We present the case of a monozygotic twin pregnancy in which both fetuses were identified as having trisomy 21 and partial agenesis of the corpus callosum. We discuss this rare association in the context of an emerging understanding of the neurobiology of trisomy 21.

Human fetal sacrococcygeal extension or 'tail' in the second trimester: prenatal diagnosis, associated findings, and clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: There are over 30 cases of prenatally diagnosed sacral extensions or human 'tails' in the literature, including isolated and syndromic etiologies. Most cases were reported to resolve by the second trimester and postnatal course was benign. Our objective was to describe the prenatal findings, associated anomalies, and clinical outcome of a series of seven fetuses diagnosed prenatally with fetal sacrococcygeal extension. METHODS: In a prospective study on a series of 4040 consecutive patients seen through our clinic in a 10-year period, 7 patients had a sacrococcygeal extension identified on fetal imaging. Fetal sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, results of genetic testing, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: All seven fetuses had associated anomalies, including neurologic, craniofacial, cardiac, spinal, renal, and musculoskeletal abnormalities, or abnormal ultrasound findings including growth restriction and abnormal umbilical cord Doppler. There were two cases of trisomy 13 and one case of Pfeiffer syndrome. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 19.3 weeks. CONCLUSION: When a sacrococcygeal extension is seen on fetal imaging, work-up should include detailed fetal imaging and karyotype, and fetal growth should be monitored. Our experience with fetal sacrococcygeal extension demonstrates variability in the underlying presentation and etiology, making counseling in a prenatal setting challenging.

Familial case of prenatally diagnosed intralobar and extralobar sequestrations with cystadenomatoid change.

Hybrid lesions are part of a spectrum of rare pulmonary diseases that are characterized as having elements of both congenital pulmonary airway malformation and bronchopulmonary sequestration. Fetal thoracic masses arise from alterations during lung development that are separated by timing of the inciting event and are often associated with an underlying degree of bronchial atresia. There are a handful of documented reports of sequestrations occurring in siblings, but no known reports of prenatally diagnosed lesions occurring in families. We present a case of 2 siblings diagnosed prenatally with fetal thoracic lesions who underwent postnatal resection revealing hybrid lesions on pathologic examination. Newer radiologic techniques have increased our ability to detect these masses prenatally, as well as follow them throughout pregnancy to determine their natural history. Ongoing laboratory investigation into the etiology of congenital lung lesions has brought forth more questions and suggested a familial component at a cellular level that has not yet been fully discovered. We reviewed the current literature of factors contributing to the development of congenital lung lesions and suggest that there is a familial link in certain patient populations where screening may be indicated.

The ribosomal basis of Diamond-Blackfan Anemia: mutation and database update.

Diamond-Blackfan Anemia (DBA) is characterized by a defect of erythroid progenitors and, clinically, by anemia and malformations. DBA exhibits an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance with incomplete penetrance. Currently nine genes, all encoding ribosomal proteins (RP), have been found mutated in approximately 50% of patients. Experimental evidence supports the hypothesis that DBA is primarily the result of defective ribosome synthesis. By means of a large collaboration among six centers, we report here a mutation update that includes nine genes and 220 distinct mutations, 56 of which are new. The DBA Mutation Database now includes data from 355 patients. Of those where inheritance has been examined, 125 patients carry a de novo mutation and 72 an inherited mutation. Mutagenesis may be ascribed to slippage in 65.5% of indels, whereas CpG dinucleotides are involved in 23% of transitions. Using bioinformatic tools we show that gene conversion mechanism is not common in RP genes mutagenesis, notwithstanding the abundance of RP pseudogenes. Genotype-phenotype analysis reveals that malformations are more frequently associated with mutations in RPL5 and RPL11 than in the other genes. All currently reported DBA mutations together with their functional and clinical data are included in the DBA Mutation Database.