ABSTRACT
AIM: The morbidity of surgical site infections (SSIs) were compared in patients who underwent open (OS) vs laparoscopic (LS) colorectal surgery. METHOD: Data from 603 consecutive LS patients and 2246 consecutive OS patients were prospectively recorded. Morbidity of SSIs was assessed by the need for emergency department (ED) evaluation, subsequent hospital re-admission and re-operation. The cost of wound care was measured by the need for home healthcare, wound vacuum assisted closure (VAC) or independent patient wound care. RESULTS: SSIs were identified in 5.8% (n = 25) of LS patients and 4.8% (n = 65) of OS patients. ED evaluation for the infection was needed in 24% of the LS group and 42% of the OS group. Hospital re-admission was needed in one LS patient and in 52% OS patients. No LS patient needed re-operation compared with 12% of OS patients. HHC ($162/dressing change) was required in 63% of the OS group compared with 8% of LS group. A home wound VAC system ($107/day) was utilized in 12% of the OS patients but in none of the LS patients. Dressing changes were managed independently by the patient in 92% of the LS compared with 37% of the OS patients. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery patients experience less morbidity when they develop SSIs incurring less cost compared with open colorectal surgery patients.
