1.
Aust Dent J
; 20(3): 176-82, 1975 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-1057906
ABSTRACT
Four methods were compared for determining the setting rate of amalgams. The resultant order of preference as a standard method was compressive strength at 30 minutes after preparation of the specimen, the time to the last transverse cut on a cylindrical specimen with a "guillotine" blade and the time to nonfracture of a ball of a amalgam with a final set Gillmore needle. A mercury absorption method was unacceptable. Alloys labelled fast and standard setting could be separated and limits between fast and standard alloys have been examined for each method.
Subject(s)
Chemistry, Physical/methods , Dental Amalgam , Absorption , Hardness Tests , Mercury , Needles , Pressure , Stress, Mechanical , Time Factors
2.
Reumatologia
; 12(2): 13-9, 1974.
Article
in Spanish
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-4840148
3.
Aust Orthod J
; 3(4): 128-31, 1973 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-4586720
4.
Acta Odontol Venez
; 11(1): 13-9, 1973 Apr.
Article
in Spanish
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-4143793
5.
Aust Dent J
; 16(3): 145-51, 1971 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-5285734
6.
Aust Dent J
; 15(4): 303-9, 1970 Aug.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-4919880
Subject(s)
Dental Materials , Polymers , Cementation , Crowns , Dental Impression Technique , Dentures , Humans , Root Canal Filling Materials
7.
Dent Mag Oral Top
; 87(2): 67-8, 1970 Apr.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-5268365
8.
Aust Dent J
; 14(5): 295-301, 1969 Oct.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-5264542
9.
Aust Dent J
; 12(4): 317-22, 1967 Aug.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-5233630