Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Mol Oncol ; 15(5): 1277-1288, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33734563

ABSTRACT

There is a persistent variation in cancer outcomes among and within European countries suggesting (among other causes) inequalities in access to or delivery of high-quality cancer care. European policy (EU Cancer Mission and Europe's Beating Cancer Plan) is currently moving towards a mission-oriented approach addressing these inequalities. In this study, we used the quantitative and qualitative data of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes' Accreditation and Designation Programme, relating to 40 large European cancer centres, to describe their current compliance with quality standards, to identify the hallmarks common to all centres and to show the distinctive features of Comprehensive Cancer Centres. All Comprehensive Cancer Centres and Cancer Centres accredited by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes show good compliance with quality standards related to care, multidisciplinarity and patient centredness. However, Comprehensive Cancer Centres on average showed significantly better scores on indicators related to the volume, quality and integration of translational research, such as high-impact publications, clinical trial activity (especially in phase I and phase IIa trials) and filing more patents as early indicators of innovation. However, irrespective of their size, centres show significant variability regarding effective governance when functioning as entities within larger hospitals.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Academies and Institutes/standards , Academies and Institutes/statistics & numerical data , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/standards , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Medical Oncology/standards , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Patient-Centered Care/statistics & numerical data , Translational Research, Biomedical/methods , Translational Research, Biomedical/organization & administration , Translational Research, Biomedical/statistics & numerical data
2.
Tumori ; 101 Suppl 1: S6-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27098181

ABSTRACT

The Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) launched a program for accreditation and designation (A&D) of cancer centers in Europe based on voluntary participation in 2008. In 2012, the Italian Ministry of Health decided to fund cancer centers in Italy, members of the Alleanza Contro il Cancro (ACC), to go through the OECI accreditation program. Ten centers participated in the program and 10 completed the full cycle of the OECI A&D process in consecutive series over a 2-year period. The process was successfully completed within the planned timeline and the overall findings were presented to the Italian Ministry of Health and representatives of all the participating centers in November 2015. The program had a considerable team-building effect, which will likely continue as the improvement plans are implemented. Centers fed back to OECI that the A&D program had led to better formal organization of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) and cancer care pathways, and had helped them to harmonize the integration of research into clinical practice. Centers also concluded that they benefited from recognition through an international accreditation system, and that it had led to them developing better patient information and involvement. The importance of the improvement plans that each center had to produce following the audit reviews cannot be underestimated. The OECI concludes that implementation of the A&D program at the national level is feasible despite national peculiarities related to health planning and organization in each member state. This is a good example of an EU project working well, with member states helping each other and learning from best practice, to improve the overall quality of cancer care and research and to establish consistency. The initial accreditation is the first part of an ongoing process of improving comprehensive cancer care, integrating bench to bedside.


Subject(s)
Accreditation , Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Care Team , Quality Improvement , Europe , Humans , International Cooperation , Italy , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...