ABSTRACT
Tongue defects following resection of cancers, have a major effect on speech and swallowing, impairing the quality of life. Free flaps such as the free radial artery forearm flap and anterolateral thigh flap have been ideal for the reconstruction of such defects depending upon the volume of tissue loss. Local flaps such as the submental flap and pectoralis major myocutaneous flap serve as an alternative in decreasing morbidity and improving functional outcomes. Surgical outcomes associated with submental flaps used in the reconstruction of tongue defects were evaluated in our study. This is a retrospective analysis of 545 patients, where the submental flap was used for the repair of tongue defects for cancer resections. Oncological safety was studied in 375 patients with a median follow-up of 48 months. 140 patients were studied for their functional outcomes using the parameters, adapted from the University of Washington- Quality of Life questionnaire. Complete flap loss was seen in 15(2.75%) patients while 22(4.03%) patients had partial loss of flap. Locoregional Recurrences, second primary, and distant metastases were noted in 91 of the 375 patients studied. The mean score for swallowing, speech, and taste were 72,71, and 69 respectively. The submental flap is an effective and reliable alternative for the reconstruction of tongue defects. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03858-3.
ABSTRACT
Background: Operable stage IV gingivobuccal complex cancer is classified as Stage IVA and IVB. Among patients with Stage IVA disease, different subgroups with likely different prognoses are combined. Patients with advanced nodal status tend to have a poorer prognosis. We divided these patients into four groups: group I (T4aN0), group II (T4aN1-2), group III (T1-3N2) constituting stage IVA category, and group IV (TanyN3) representing stage IVB. This study assesses if these patients can be prognostically subgrouped based on nodal status. Methods: It is a prospective observational study done at a tertiary care center from July 2017 to June 2020. This study aims to analyze survival outcomes in these subgroups using Kaplan Meir, univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The study enrolled 113 patients of operable gingivobuccal complex stage IVA cancer with a median follow up of 26 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was 74% for group 1, while it was 55%, 26% and 32.2% for group 2, group 3 and group 4 respectively. Patients with T4N3 disease had DFS of just 15%. Patients in group 3 and 4 had the worst outcomes in terms of DFS and Overall Survival(OS) with HR-3.7 and 3.3 and 3.3 and 3.8 respectively (p value-0.001). Conclusion: The nodal status is the most important prognostic factor affecting DFS and OS. Patients with small primary but advanced nodal stage do poorly than patients with advanced primary and node-negative disease. There is a need for subgrouping patients with Stage IVA tumors based on nodal status for better prognostication.
ABSTRACT
Amongst oral cancers, malignancies of the palate and the upper gingivo-buccal complex are relatively uncommon. Following resection, defects in the palate lead to a nasal speech and nasal regurgitation on swallowing. This is best overcome with a prosthetic obturator which occludes the palatal defect and has dentures for the upper alveolus. It may not be possible to fit a prosthetic obturator in edentulous patients and in patients with trismus. Microvascular free flaps though commonly used for such defects, are time consuming, expensive and require a specialised setup. This study assesses the submental flap for its feasibility to repair palatal defects, the sturdiness of the flap, its functional outcome and the oncological safety in using the flap. This is a retrospective analysis of 46 patients, where palatal defects for oral cancers were reconstructed with the submental flap. Oncological safety was studied in 41 patients with a median follow-up of 34.5 months. 20 patients were studied for their functional outcomes using the parameters, adopted from the University of Washington-Quality of Life questionnaire. Complete flap loss was seen in 4 (8.7%) patients while 2 (4.35%) patients had minor dehiscence. No donor site morbidity was reported. Locoregional Recurrences and distant metastasis were noted in 13 of the 41 patients studied. The mean score was highest for speech at 95.5% while the lowest mean score was for mouth opening at 42.5%. The submental flap is an effective and reliable alternative for the reconstruction of palatal defects.
ABSTRACT
(1) To study layer of invasion as predictor of cervical lymph node metastasis. (2) To decide a cut off depth according to layer of invasion for neck dissection. It is a prospective study with sample size of 220 patients at tertiary care hospital with previously untreated operable buccal mucosa carcinoma over period of 21 months. The factors considered under the study were Tumor layer of invasion, lymph node metastasis, Ultrasonography doppler neck, CT scan and gender. Wide excision of the lesion and reconstruction was done. Histopathological analysis of resected specimen were recorded as part of data collection for all the cases. Quantitative data represented using Mean ± SD (Standard Deviation) and median and interquartile range compared using Chi square test. Standard principles of univariate analysis was used according to statistical methods. Depth when measured according to layer of invasion, was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis with 89% of the muscle as layer of invasion being Lymph node positive (p = 0.009). There is 1.39 times chances of lymph nodal metastasis in patients with muscle invasion as compared to submucosal invasion. Tumour layer of invasion plays important role in predicting chances of nodal metastasis in clinically N0 neck in buccal mucosa cancer. According to the study, we should electively proceed with ipsilateral lymph node dissection once the layer of tumour invasion is muscle. This study is limited by sample size and short duration of one year and nine months.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Free-flap reconstructions (FFRs) are the standard-of-care following resections for oral cancer. This study assessed an alternative, the pedicled submental flap (SF) for its versatility, oncological outcomes, and comparative operative time and cost. METHODS: This was a longitudinal prospective study of 1169 patients of oral cancer reconstructed with the SF. Oncological outcomes in terms of recurrence rate and disease-free survival (DFS), were analyzed in 730 cases with a minimum of 18 months follow-up. Surgical time and cost were compared between 20 SFs and 14 FFRs performed consecutively. RESULTS: SF was used to reconstruct defects in the cheek (29.2%), mandible (41.6%), tongue (26.3%) and palate (2.7%) with a 94% flap survival. N+ at level 1 did not adversely affect the recurrence rate as compared with N+ at levels other than level 1 (27.52% vs 29.81%). SFs took a shorter time (186 minutes vs 474 minutes) and cost significantly less than FFRs (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: SF can reconstruct various oral defects, is sturdy, and esthetically and functionally satisfactory. The procedure time is much shorter than for FFR and costs considerably less. With careful case selection and meticulous clearance, SF reconstruction is oncologically safe even in N+ neck.
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of oral cancer patients who had undergone surgical reconstruction with nasolabial flap. A cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of 1 year at a tertiary care hospital and 128 subjects were included. The subjective assessment of quality of life using The University of Washington QOL Questionnaire including physical, socio-emotional, composite and overall QOL, Objective assessment of functional mouth opening and Nasolabial crease scar assessment using Vancouver scar scale was done. Majority of the subjects, 98.4% were male. Maximum cases were involving the lower gingivobuccal complex and retromolar trigone followed by buccal mucosa. Majority of the tumors were T2, 53.1% followed by T1, 18.8%. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference was found in relation to age, tumor size (T1, T2, T3), absence of adjuvant radiation therapy, presence or absence of neck dissection, tumor site; buccal mucosa and lower gingivobuccal complex plus retromolar trigone and intact bone status in physical functional, social-emotional subscores, composite score and overall QOL assessment. Improved mouth opening postoperatively was statistically significant (p < 0.05) in T1 and T2 lesions of buccal mucosa and lower gingivobuccal complex plus retromolar trigone who did not receive radiation and with intact bone status. Majority of the cases, 36.7% had a nasolabial crease scar score 2. Nasolabial flap is a viable option in the reconstruction of small and medium sized oral defects with good quality of life (QOL) outcome and objective outcome as depicted by significantly improved mouth opening. The aesthetic outcome of nasolabial crease scar is good in our study.
ABSTRACT
Re-surfacing after a total hand degloving injury is one of the most difficult management problems in hand surgery. We present one such case that was managed using three flaps for cover. The radial forearm flap is very thin and pliable, resulting in satisfactory coverage of first web space and the thumb remnant, and facilitates a mobile thumb. The groin-hypogastric flap covered the remnant fingers admirably. The patient had a good first web and could use the hand to lift objects and hold a pen to write legibly within 2 months of the injury.
