Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Telemed J E Health ; 30(4): e1071-e1080, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37883644

ABSTRACT

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, care shifted from exclusively telemedicine to hybrid models with in-person, video, and telephone visits. We explored how patient satisfaction and visit preferences have changed by comparing in-person versus virtual visits (telephone and video) in an ambulatory neurology practice across three time points. Methods: Patients who completed a virtual visit in March 2020 (early-pandemic), May 2020 (mid-pandemic), and March 2021 (later-pandemic) were contacted. Patients were assessed for visit satisfaction and desire for future telemedicine. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine factors independently associated with video visit completion. Results: Four thousand seven hundred seventy-eight the number of ambulatory visits (n = 4,778) were performed (1,004 early; 1,265 mid; and 2,509 later); 1,724 patients (36%) assented to postvisit feedback; mean age 45.8 ± 24.4 years, 58% female, 79% white, and 56% with Medicare/Medicaid insurance. Patient satisfaction significantly increased (73% early, 79% mid, 81% later-pandemic, p = 0.008). Interest in telemedicine also increased for patients completing telephone visits (40% early, 50% mid, 59% later, p = 0.027) and video visits (52% early, 59% mid, 62% later, p = 0.035). Patients satisfied with telemedicine visits were younger (p < 0.001). White patients were more interested in future telemedicine (p = 0.037). Multivariable analysis showed that older patients (for each 1 year older), Black patients, and patients with Medicare/Medicaid were 2%, 45%, and 54% less likely to complete a video visit than telephone, respectively. Discussion: Patients, especially younger ones, have become more satisfied and more interested in hybrid care models during the COVID-19 pandemic. Barriers to conducting video visits persist for older, Black patients with Medicare or Medicaid insurance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neurology , Telemedicine , United States , Humans , Aged , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , Patient Satisfaction , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , North Carolina/epidemiology , Medicare , Personal Satisfaction
2.
MedEdPORTAL ; 19: 11367, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38098759

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a large increase in telemedicine encounters. Despite this rise in virtual visits, patients who speak non-English languages have experienced challenges accessing telemedicine. To improve health equity, medical education on telehealth delivery should include instruction on working with interpreters in telehealth. Methods: We developed a 25-minute self-directed module with collective expertise of faculty with experience in medical education, interpreter training, and communication training. The module was delivered online as part of a longitudinal health equity curriculum for third-year medical students. In addition to didactic information, the module contained video examples of interpreter interactions in telehealth. Results: Sixty-four third-year medical students participated in the study, and 60 completed a postmodule survey. Students were satisfied with the content of the module, as well as the duration of time required to complete the tasks. Approximately 90% would recommend it to future students. Nearly 80% of students rated the module as being quite effective or extremely effective at increasing their comfort level with visits with patients with non-English language preference. Discussion: Our module provides a basic framework for medical students on how to successfully work with interpreters during a language-discordant virtual visit. This format of asynchronous learning could also be easily expanded to resident physicians and faculty seeking more resources around working with interpreters in telemedicine.


Subject(s)
Pandemics , Telemedicine , Humans , Communication , Language , Curriculum
3.
Wounds ; 35(6): E193-E196, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37347595

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Identifying a bioindicator of healing capacity would be beneficial in guiding treatment of and reducing morbidity in patients with DFU. Hypoalbuminemia is a well-established risk factor for amputation and, thus, a promising candidate. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to examine whether albumin values over a 12-week treatment course for DFU correlated with ulcer size and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 793 patients who presented to the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Wound Care and Hyperbaric Center between 2010 and 2022. Sixty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Albumin values and wound size data were collected monthly over a 12-week treatment course. RESULTS: Initial albumin values were not significantly different between patients healed by 12 weeks compared with nonhealed patients. Healed proportion and average initial ulcer size in patients with at least 1 hypoalbuminemia value (<3.0 g/dL) were not significantly different from those in patients with normal albumin levels. Patients who trended from normoalbuminemia to hypoalbuminemia displayed significantly increased wound sizes compared to patients with albumin changes within the normal range (0.04 cm² and -1.17 cm², respectively; P < .05). Monthly changes in albumin correlated poorly with wound healing (r = 0.144, P = .240), and large negative albumin trends (>0.5 g/dL per month) did not correlate with increased wound sizes compared with stable or positive trends. CONCLUSION: Albumin's utility as a bioindicator of short-term healing capability is limited to below-normal values.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Hypoalbuminemia , Humans , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Environmental Biomarkers , Retrospective Studies , Wound Healing
4.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 11(3): 232-241, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34484890

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe rapid implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess for disparities in video visit implementation in the Appalachian region of the United States. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients seen in the first 4 weeks of telehealth implementation was identified from the Neurology Ambulatory Practice at a large academic medical center. Telehealth visits defaulted to video, and when unable, phone-only visits were scheduled. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the telehealth visit type: video or phone only. Clinical variables were collected from the electronic medical record including age, sex, race, insurance status, indication for visit, and rural-urban status. Barriers to scheduling video visits were collected at the time of scheduling. Patient satisfaction was obtained by structured postvisit telephone call. RESULTS: Of 1,011 telehealth patient visits, 44% were video and 56% phone only. Patients who completed a video visit were younger (39.7 vs 48.4 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be female (63% vs 55%, p < 0.007), be White or Caucasian (p = 0.024), and not have Medicare or Medicaid insurance (p < 0.001). The most common barrier to scheduling video visits was technology limitations (46%). Although patients from rural and urban communities were equally likely to be scheduled for video visits, patients from rural communities were more likely to consider future telehealth visits (55% vs 42%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Rapid implementation of ambulatory telemedicine defaulting to video visits successfully expanded video telehealth. Emerging disparities were revealed, as older, male, Black patients with Medicare or Medicaid insurance were less likely to complete video visits.

6.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 11(6): 484-496, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34992956

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient experiences with rapid implementation of ambulatory telehealth during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was performed to characterize the patients' experience with neurology telehealth visits during the first 8 weeks of the COVID-19 response. Consecutive patients who completed a telehealth visit were contacted by telephone. Assenting patients completed a survey quantifying satisfaction with the visit followed by a semistructured telephone interview. Qualitative data were analyzed using the principles of thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2,280 telehealth visits were performed, and 753 patients (33%) were reached for postvisit feedback. Of these, 47% of visits were by video and 53% by telephone. Satisfaction was high, with 77% of patients reporting that all needs were met, although only 51% would consider telehealth in the future. Qualitative themes were constructed, suggesting that positive patient experiences were associated not only with the elimination of commute time and associated costs but also with a positive physician interaction. Negative patient experiences were associated with the inability to complete the neurologic examination. Overall, patients tended to view telehealth as a tool that should augment, and not replace, in-person visits. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory telehealth, patients valued convenience, safety, and physician relationship. Barriers were observed but can be addressed.

7.
J Neurosurg Pediatr ; 27(2): 203-212, 2020 Nov 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33254134

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy and safety of combined bilateral ventralis oralis posterior/ventralis intermedius (Vop/Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of acquired dystonia in children and young adults. Pallidal DBS is efficacious for severe, medication-refractory isolated dystonia, providing 50%-60% long-term improvement. Unfortunately, pallidal stimulation response rates in acquired dystonia are modest and unpredictable, with frequent nonresponders. Acquired dystonia, most commonly caused by cerebral palsy, is more common than isolated dystonia in pediatric populations and is more recalcitrant to standard treatments. Given the limitations of pallidal DBS in acquired dystonia, there is a need to explore alternative brain targets. Preliminary evidence has suggested that thalamic stimulation may be efficacious for acquired dystonia. METHODS: Four participants, 3 with perinatal brain injuries and 1 with postencephalitic symptomatic dystonia, underwent bilateral Vop/Vim DBS and bimonthly evaluations for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) scores between the baseline and 12-month assessments. Video documentation was used for blinded ratings. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score), quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory [PedsQL] and modified Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II [UPDRS-II] scores), and neuropsychological assessments. Adverse events were monitored for safety. RESULTS: All participants tolerated the procedure well, and there were no safety concerns or serious adverse events. There was an average improvement of 21.5% in the BFMDRS motor subscale score, but the improvement was only 1.6% according to the BADS score. Following blinded video review, dystonia severity ratings were even more modest. Secondary outcomes, however, were more encouraging, with the BFMDRS disability subscale score improving by 15.7%, the PedsQL total score by 27%, and the modified UPDRS-II score by 19.3%. Neuropsychological assessment findings were unchanged 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral thalamic neuromodulation by DBS for severe, medication-refractory acquired dystonia was well tolerated. Primary and secondary outcomes showed highly variable treatment effect sizes comparable to those of pallidal stimulation in this population. As previously described, improvements in quality of life and disability were not reflected in dystonia severity scales, suggesting a need for the development of scales specifically for acquired dystonia.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03078816 (clinicaltrials.gov).


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Dystonia/therapy , Thalamus , Adolescent , Brain Injuries/complications , Brain Injuries/surgery , Child , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Disability Evaluation , Dystonia/etiology , Dystonia/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Globus Pallidus , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Ventral Thalamic Nuclei , Young Adult
8.
Mov Disord Clin Pract ; 7(5): 548-551, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626800

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pallidum has been the preferred DBS target for dystonia, but recent studies have shown equal or greater improvement in patients implanted in the STN.1 Transient stimulation-induced dyskinesia (SID) is frequently observed when stimulating this novel target, and there are no previously published video case reports of this phenomenon. CASES: We describe in detail the SID phenomenology experienced by 4 patients who had been implanted with STN DBS for isolated dystonia. CONCLUSIONS: SID can occur in focal, segmental, axial, or generalized distribution, can resemble levodopa-induced dyskinesia choreiform or dystonic movements observed in Parkinson's disease, and is generally transient and resolves with customized DBS programming. Providers should be aware that SID can occur after STN DBS when treating isolated dystonia and not assume movements are the result of worsening or spread of the underlying dystonia.

9.
Neurology ; 89(11): 1152-1161, 2017 Sep 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28814455

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing remote neurologic care into the homes of people with Parkinson disease (PD) is feasible, beneficial, and valuable. METHODS: In a 1-year randomized controlled trial, we compared usual care to usual care supplemented by 4 virtual visits via video conferencing from a remote specialist into patients' homes. Primary outcome measures were feasibility, as measured by the proportion who completed at least one virtual visit and the proportion of virtual visits completed on time; and efficacy, as measured by the change in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, a quality of life scale. Secondary outcomes included quality of care, caregiver burden, and time and travel savings. RESULTS: A total of 927 individuals indicated interest, 210 were enrolled, and 195 were randomized. Participants had recently seen a specialist (73%) and were largely college-educated (73%) and white (96%). Ninety-five (98% of the intervention group) completed at least one virtual visit, and 91% of 388 virtual visits were completed. Quality of life did not improve in those receiving virtual house calls (0.3 points worse on a 100-point scale; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.0 to 2.7 points; p = 0.78) nor did quality of care or caregiver burden. Each virtual house call saved patients a median of 88 minutes (95% CI 70-120; p < 0.0001) and 38 miles per visit (95% CI 36-56; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Providing remote neurologic care directly into the homes of people with PD was feasible and was neither more nor less efficacious than usual in-person care. Virtual house calls generated great interest and provided substantial convenience. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02038959. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with PD, virtual house calls from a neurologist are feasible and do not significantly change quality of life compared to in-person visits. The study is rated Class III because it was not possible to mask patients to visit type.


Subject(s)
House Calls , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Telemedicine , Aged , Caregivers/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , House Calls/economics , Humans , Male , Parkinson Disease/economics , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Physicians/psychology , Quality of Health Care/economics , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telemedicine/economics , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Neurology ; 88(1): 25-35, 2017 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27903810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of a large cohort of patients with medically refractory isolated dystonia treated with subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS). METHODS: Twenty patients (12 male, 8 female; mean age 49 ± 16.3 years) with medically refractory isolated dystonia were studied (14 were followed for 36 months). The primary endpoints were change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score and Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total score at 36 months compared to preoperative baseline. Multiple secondary outcomes were also assessed (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00773604). RESULTS: Eighteen of 20 patients showed improvement 12 months after STN DBS with sustained benefit persisting for 3 years (n = 14). At 36 months, BFMDRS motor scores improved 70.4% from a mean 17.9 ± 8.5 to 5.3 ± 5.6 (p = 0.0002) and total TWSTRS scores improved 66.6% from a mean 41.0 ± 18.9 to 13.7 ± 17.9 (p = 0.0002). Improvement at 36 months was equivalent to that seen at 6 months. Disability and quality of life measures were also improved. Three hardware-related and 24 stimulation-related nonserious adverse events occurred between years 1 and 3 (including 4 patients with dyskinesia). CONCLUSIONS: This study offers support for long-term tolerability and sustained effectiveness of STN DBS in the treatment of severe forms of isolated dystonia. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that STN DBS decreases long-term dystonia severity in patients with medically refractory isolated dystonia.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Dystonia/therapy , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
11.
Telemed J E Health ; 22(7): 590-8, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26886406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delivering specialty care remotely directly into people's homes can enhance access for and improve the healthcare of individuals with chronic conditions. However, evidence supporting this approach is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Connect.Parkinson is a randomized comparative effectiveness study that compares usual care of individuals with Parkinson's disease in the community with usual care augmented by virtual house calls with a Parkinson's disease specialist from 1 of 18 centers nationally. Individuals in the intervention arm receive four virtual visits from a Parkinson's disease specialist over 1 year via secure, Web-based videoconferencing directly into their homes. All study activities, including recruitment, enrollment, and assessments, are conducted remotely. Here we report on interest, feasibility, and barriers to enrollment in this ongoing study. RESULTS: During recruitment, 11,734 individuals visited the study's Web site, and 927 unique individuals submitted electronic interest forms. Two hundred ten individuals from 18 states enrolled in the study from March 2014 to June 2015, and 195 were randomized. Most participants were white (96%) and college educated (73%). Of the randomized participants, 73% had seen a Parkinson's disease specialist within the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with Parkinson's disease, national interest in receiving remote specialty care directly into the home is high. Remote enrollment in this care model is feasible but is likely affected by differential access to the Internet.


Subject(s)
House Calls , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Remote Consultation/organization & administration , Videoconferencing , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Internet , Research Design , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...