Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm ; 11: 100295, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37404594

ABSTRACT

Background: The federal 340B drug program was designed to stretch scarce federal resources to provide more comprehensive services for more eligible patients. To help satisfy community needs, 340B Prescription Assistance Programs (PAPs) allow eligible patients to access medications at significantly reduced costs. Objectives: To measure the impact of reduced-cost medications for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through a 340B PAP on all-cause hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Methods: This multi-site, retrospective, single-sample, pre-post cohort study involved patients with COPD who used a 340B PAP to fill prescriptions for an inhaler or nebulizer between April 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019. Data from included subjects were evaluated and compared in the year before and after each individual patient's respective prescription fill in the 340B PAP. The primary outcome evaluated the impact of 340B PAP on all-cause hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Secondary outcomes evaluated the financial impact associated with program use. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to assess changes in the outcome measures. Results: Data for 115 patients were included in the study. Use of the 340B PAP resulted in a significant reduction in the composite mean number of all-cause hospitalizations and emergency department visits (2.42 vs 1.66, Z = -3.12, p = 0.002). There was an estimated $1012.82 mean cost avoidance per patient due to reduction in healthcare utilization. Annual program-wide prescription cost savings for patients totaled $178,050.21. Conclusions: This study suggested that access to reduced-cost medications through the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program was associated with a significant reduction in hospitalizations and emergency department visits for patients with COPD, decreasing patients' utilization of healthcare resources.

2.
Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) ; 10(3): 119-124, jul.-sept. 2012. tab, ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-107868

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the direct financial impact for patients resulting from Medication Therapy Management (MTM) interventions made by community pharmacists. Secondary objectives include evaluating the patient and physician acceptance rates of the community pharmacists’ recommended MTM interventions. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at 20 Price Chopper and Hen House grocery store chain pharmacies in the Kansas City metro area from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. Study patients were Medicare Part D beneficiaries eligible for MTM services. The primary outcome was the change in patient out-ofpocket prescription medication expense as a result of MTM services. Results: Of 128 patients included in this study, 68% experienced no out-of-pocket financial impact on their medication expenses as a result of MTM services. A total of 27% of the patients realized a cost-savings (USD440.50 per year, (SD=289.69)) while another 5% of patients saw a cost increase in out-of-pocket expense (USD255.66 per year, (SD=324.48)). The net financial impact for all 128 patients who participated in MTM services was an average savings of USD102.83 per patient per year (SD=269.18, p<0.0001). Pharmacists attempted a total of 732 recommendations; 391 (53%) were accepted by both the patient and their prescriber. A total of 341 (47%) recommendations were not accepted because of patient refusal (290, 85%) or prescriber refusal (51, 15%). Conclusions: Patient participation in MTM services reduces patient out-of-pocket medication expense. However, this savings is driven by only 32% of subjects who are experiencing a financial impact on out-of-pocket medication expense. Additionally, the majority of the pharmacists’ recommended interventions (53%) were accepted by patients and prescribers (AU)


Objetivo: Determinar el impacto financiero directo para los pacientes resultando de las intervenciones de Gestión de la Medicación (MTM) hechas por farmacéuticos comunitarios. Los objetivos secundarios incluían evaluar las tasas de aceptación por pacientes y médicos de las recomendaciones de MTM de los farmacéuticos. Métodos: Fue un estudio observacional retrospectivo realizado en 20 tiendas de la cadena de farmacias Price Chopper and Hen House de la zona metropolitana de Kansas City desde 1 de enero 2010 a 31 de diciembre 2010. Los pacientes en estudio eran beneficiarios de Medicare Part D elegibles para servicios de MTM. El resultado primario fue los cambios en gastos sufragados por los pacientes de la medicación prescrita como resultado de los servicios de MTM. Resultados: De los 128 pacientes incluidos en el estudio, el 68% no experimentó impacto en sus gastos en medicación como resultado de los servicios de MTM. Un 27% de los pacientes consiguió un ahorro (USD440,50 por año, (SD=289,69)) mientras que otro 5% de pacientes vio incrementado su gasto en medicación (USD255,66 por año, (SD=324,48)). El impacto financiero neto para los 128 pacientes que participaron en el estudio fue un ahorro medio de USD102,83 por paciente y año (SD=269,18; p<0,0001). Los farmacéuticos intentaron un total de 732 recomendaciones; 391 (53%) fueron aceptadas tanto por pacientes como por prescriptor. Un total de 341 (47%) recomendaciones no fueron aceptadas, por negativa del paciente (290; 85%) o por negativa del prescriptor (51; 15%). Conclusiones: La participación de los pacientes en servicios de MTM reduce el gasto en medicamentos del paciente. Sin embargo, este ahorro se materializa sólo en un 32% de pacientes que sufren impacto financiero. Asimismo, la mayoría (53%) de las intervenciones recomendadas por el farmacéutico fueron aceptadas por pacientes y prescriptores (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pharmacies/organization & administration , Medication Systems/economics , Medication Systems, Hospital/economics , Prescription Drugs/economics , Medication Systems, Hospital/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies , Health Expenditures/trends , Drug Prescriptions/economics
3.
W V Med J ; 108(1): 23-6, 28-30, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25134189

ABSTRACT

Excess weight is a known risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) and a large percentage of overweight and obese individuals ultimately develop CAD. The objective of this study was to identify human genes associated with CAD in a subgroup of overweight and obese individuals using population-based association methods. Logistic regression analyses were used to test the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 34 candidate genes and the CAD phenotype with age, gender, and BMI as covariates. Two SNPs in the Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) gene [rs1042031 and rs1800479], one in the Cholesterol Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) gene [rs5880], and one in the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor (LDLR) gene [rs2569538] met the 0.01 significance level for association with CAD. Based on these findings, we conclude that variants within the CETP and Apo B genes conferred susceptibility to CAD in overweight individuals and that a variant with the LDLR gene conferred susceptibility in an obese group.


Subject(s)
Apolipoproteins B/genetics , Cardiovascular Diseases/genetics , Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins/genetics , Obesity/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptors, LDL/genetics , Body Mass Index , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Overweight/genetics , Phenotype , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , West Virginia
4.
Pharm Pract (Granada) ; 10(3): 119-24, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24155827

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the direct financial impact for patients resulting from Medication Therapy Management (MTM) interventions made by community pharmacists. Secondary objectives include evaluating the patient and physician acceptance rates of the community pharmacists' recommended MTM interventions. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at 20 Price Chopper and Hen House grocery store chain pharmacies in the Kansas City metro area from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. Study patients were Medicare Part D beneficiaries eligible for MTM services. The primary outcome was the change in patient out-of-pocket prescription medication expense as a result of MTM services. RESULTS: Of 128 patients included in this study, 68% experienced no out-of-pocket financial impact on their medication expenses as a result of MTM services. A total of 27% of the patients realized a cost-savings (USD440.50 per year, (SD=289.69)) while another 5% of patients saw a cost increase in out-of-pocket expense (USD255.66 per year, (SD=324.48)). The net financial impact for all 128 patients who participated in MTM services was an average savings of USD102.83 per patient per year (SD=269.18, p<0.0001). Pharmacists attempted a total of 732 recommendations; 391 (53%) were accepted by both the patient and their prescriber. A total of 341 (47%) recommendations were not accepted because of patient refusal (290, 85%) or prescriber refusal (51, 15%). CONCLUSIONS: Patient participation in MTM services reduces patient out-of-pocket medication expense. However, this savings is driven by only 32% of subjects who are experiencing a financial impact on out-of-pocket medication expense. Additionally, the majority of the pharmacists' recommended interventions (53%) were accepted by patients and prescribers.

5.
Chemotherapy ; 49(4): 184-8, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12886053

ABSTRACT

The in vitro susceptibility of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin against several gram-positive and gram-negative clinical isolates was tested by E test. We found that the MIC(50) and MIC(90) values against all members of the Enterobacteriaceae family except Serratia were <0.5 mg/l for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin (MIC range 0.006-32 mg/l) based on the in vitro susceptibility data. The susceptibility rates for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were more than 85% for Escherichia coli, citrobacter, enterobacter cloacae, enterobacter aerogenes and Klebsiella pneumoniae, although Serratia and Acinetobacter exhibited more or less similar susceptibility rates (about 80%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated significant resistance to fluoroquinolones (MIC(90) >32 mg/l) and decreased bactericidal rates (<65%) to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Respiratory pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were highly susceptible (100%) to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. The ineffectiveness of fluoroquinolones for treating coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus was demonstrated by poor in vitro susceptibility rates with levofloxacin (52%) and moxifloxacin (57%). Coagulase-negative staphylococci demonstrated significantly decreased bactericidal rates to levofloxacin (21%), while the in vitro susceptibility to moxifloxacin was higher (66%) than that to levofloxacin. We propose that the beneficial effect of inclusion of any of these three fluoroquinolones in treating Enterococcus infections is marginal, as demonstrated by significantly reduced susceptibility rates (<32%). These data demonstrate the utility of fluoroquinoles to treat several gram-negative bacterial infections (with the exception of Acinetobacter and P. aeruginosa), as well as S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Aza Compounds , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Fluoroquinolones , Levofloxacin , Ofloxacin/pharmacology , Quinolines , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Moxifloxacin
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...