ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Complaints about side-effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may be overlooked in clinical practice. We assessed the value and risks of an active intervention policy for reported complaints in a randomized controlled pragmatic trial. METHODS: This randomized controlled pragmatic trial included 111 adults treated for epilepsy in seven general hospitals. They were considered well-managed by their treating physician, but reported moderate to severe complaints on a questionnaire (SIDAED, assessing SIDe effects in AED treatment). The intervention was adjustment of AED treatment (53 patients), either reduction of dose or switch of AED, versus continuation of treatment unchanged (58 control patients) during 7 months. Primary outcomes were quality of life (Qolie-10) and complaints score. Secondary outcome measures were the occurrence of seizures or adverse events. RESULTS: After 7 months, the relative risk (RR) for improvement in quality of life was 1.80 (1.04-3.12) for the intervention group compared to control and the RR of decrease in complaints was 1.34 (0.88-2.05). In 58% of patients randomized to adjustment, the medication had indeed been changed. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, despite a possible risk of seizure recurrence, adjustment of drug treatment in well-managed patients with epilepsy, who report considerable complaints, improves the quality of life.
Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Adult , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Seizures/drug therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Side-effects of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) may be overlooked in patients with epilepsy in everyday clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and severity of subjective complaints in patients who were considered to be well-controlled and to assess whether these complaints are related to medication, personality traits, or other determinants. METHODS: We included patients with epilepsy who were considered to be well-controlled in a cross-sectional study in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Their medication had not been changed for six months and an apparent reason to change the medication was lacking at the time of enrolment. Subjective complaints were assessed with a 46-item questionnaire. Using multivariable linear regression modeling, we assessed whether patient characteristics, epilepsy characteristics, medication, quality of life (Qolie-10), and personality traits (SCL-90) explained the presence and severity of complaints. RESULTS: Of 173 included patients, 67% reported moderate to severe subjective complaints on the questionnaire. Cognitive complaints were reported most frequently. Multivariate modeling showed that 61% of the variance in reported complaints could be explained by included determinants. The prevalence and severity of complaints was associated with AED polytherapy and higher scores on psycho neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were considered to be well-controlled proved to report an unexpectedly high number of subjective complaints. Both medication and aspects of personality contributed to the level of complaints. Our study illustrates that subjective side-effects are easily overlooked in everyday clinical practice, possibly because in practice a generally phrased question is used to detect side-effects.
Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Cognition/drug effects , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Epilepsy/psychology , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The linear naevus sebaceus syndrome (LNSS) is a phakomatosis, characterized in general by a triad consisting of naevus sebaceus of Jadassohn, seizures, and mental retardation. In addition, a broad spectrum of neurological, ophthalmological, skeletal, urogenital and cardiovascular symptoms may be encountered. According to our literature review, seizures and mental retardation were reported in 67 and 61% of cases, respectively. Because ophthalmological abnormalities (59%) and involvement of other organ systems (61%) occur frequently, we advise avoidance of adhering to the classical triad for recognizing or describing LNSS. Gross structural abnormality of the cerebrum or cranium was frequently observed (72%), consisting mainly of enlargement of one lateral ventricle, hemimegalencephaly and hemimegacranium. We report a case of a male patient with the clinical features of LNSS, but without cerebral developmental abnormalities at autopsy examination.
