Genetic Status Affects Disease-Specific Mortality But Not the Incidence of Local Recurrence in Patients with Uveal Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Increased disease-specific mortality has been observed among patients with local recurrence (LR) from uveal melanoma (UM), but the underlying mechanism is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if copy number alterations of chromosomes 3 and/or 8q, at the time of diagnosis, increase the incidence of LR and if disease-specific mortality among patients with LR depends on the chromosome status of the primary tumor. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 239 consecutive patients with primary UM (choroidal or ciliary body) treated with Ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) brachytherapy from January 2009 to December 2019 at a single national referral center. METHODS: Cox regression modeling and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the effect of the status of chromosomes 3 and 8q on the incidence of LR and disease-specific mortality after the event of LR. Multistate models were used to illustrate the probabilities over time of patients being alive and disease-free, alive with LR, dead from UM metastases, or dead from other causes split on the status of chromosomes 3 and 8q. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of LR and disease-specific mortality. RESULTS: Local recurrence was observed in 42 patients (16%). Overall incidence of LR was not affected by aberrations of chromosomes 3 and/or 8q (P = 0.87). Although LR occurred earlier in patients with aberrations of chromosomes 3 and/or 8q compared with patients with a normal copy number of chromosomes 3 and 8q, the median time from primary diagnosis to LR was 1.6 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.0-2.0) and 3.2 years (IQR, 2.1-5.0), respectively. Cox regression found LR to be an independent risk factor for disease-specific mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-5.0) among all patients, but multistate models demonstrated a low risk of disease-specific death among patients with normal chromosomes 3 and 8q status, even after an LR. CONCLUSIONS: Copy number alterations of chromosome 3 and/or 8q in the primary UM did not increase the overall incidence of LR. However, the development of an LR enhanced the risk of disease-specific mortality among patients with copy number alterations of chromosomes 3 and/or 8q. Even after an LR, disease-specific mortality remained low among patients with normal copy numbers of chromosomes 3 and 8q. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

In uveal melanoma Gα-protein GNA11 mutations convey a shorter disease-specific survival and are more strongly associated with loss of BAP1 and chromosomal alterations than Gα-protein GNAQ mutations.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Mutations in the Gα-genes GNAQ and GNA11 are found in 85-90% of uveal melanomas (UM). Aim of the study is to understand whether the mutations in both genes differentially affect tumor characteristics and outcome and if so, to identify potential mechanisms. METHODS: We analyzed the association between GNAQ and GNA11 mutations with disease-specific survival, gene expression profiles, and cytogenetic alterations in 219 UMs. We used tandem-affinity-purification, mass spectrometry and immunoprecipitation to identify protein interaction partners of the two G-proteins and analyzed their impact on DNA-methylation. RESULTS: GNA11 mutation was associated with: i) an increased frequency of loss of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) expression (p = 0.0005), ii) monosomy of chromosome 3 (p < 0.001), iii) amplification of chr8q (p = 0.038), iv) the combination of the latter two (p = 0.0002), and inversely with v) chr6p gain (p = 0.003). Our analysis also showed a shorter disease-specific survival of GNA11-mutated cases as compared to those carrying a GNAQ mutation (HR = 1.97 [95%CI 1.12-3.46], p = 0.02). GNAQ and GNA11 encoded G-proteins have different protein interaction partners. Specifically, the Tet Methylcytosine Dioxygenase 2 (TET2), a protein that is involved in DNA demethylation, physically interacts with the GNAQ protein but not with GNA11, as confirmed by immunoprecipitation analyses. High-risk UM cases show a clearly different DNA-methylation pattern, suggesting that a different regulation of DNA methylation by the two G-proteins might convey a different risk of progression. CONCLUSIONS: GNA11 mutated uveal melanoma has worse prognosis and is associated with high risk cytogenetic, mutational and molecular tumor characteristics that might be determined at least in part by differential DNA-methylation.

Patients presenting with metastases: stage IV uveal melanoma, an international study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse ocular and systemic findings of patients presenting with systemic metastasis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: It is an international, multicentre, internet-enabled, registry-based retrospective data analysis. Patients were diagnosed between 2001 and 2011. Data included: primary tumour dimensions, extrascleral extension, ciliary body involvement, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-tumour, node, metastasis staging, characteristics of metastases. RESULTS: Of 3610 patients with uveal melanoma, 69 (1.9%; 95% CI 1.5 to 2.4) presented with clinical metastasis (stage IV). These melanomas originated in the iris, ciliary body and choroid in 4%, 16% and 80% of eyes, respectively. Using eighth edition AJCC, 8 (11%), 20 (29%), 24 (35%), and 17 (25%) belonged to AJCC T-categories T1-T4. Risk of synchronous metastases increased from 0.7% (T1) to 1.5% (T2), 2.6% (T3) and 7.9% (T4). Regional lymph node metastases (N1a) were detected in 9 (13%) patients of whom 6 (67%) had extrascleral extension. Stage of systemic metastases (known for 40 (59%) stage IV patients) revealed 14 (35%), 25 (63%) and 1 (2%) had small (M1a), medium-sized (M1b) and large-sized (M1c) metastases, respectively. Location of metastases in stage IV patients were liver (91%), lung (16%), bone (9%), brain (6%), subcutaneous tissue (4%) and others (5%). Multiple sites of metastases were noted in 24%. Compared with the 98.1% of patients who did not present with metastases, those with synchronous metastases had larger intraocular tumours, more frequent extrascleral extension, ciliary body involvement and thus a higher AJCC T-category. CONCLUSIONS: Though higher AJCC T-stage was associated with risk for metastases at diagnosis, even small T1 tumours were stage IV at initial presentation. The liver was the most common site of metastases; however, frequent multiorgan involvement supports initial whole-body staging.

Prognostic Factors Five Years After Enucleation for Uveal Melanoma.

Purpose: A subgroup of uveal melanoma (UM) gives rise to metastases at a late stage. Our objective was to identify patient and tumor characteristics that are associated with UM-related death in patients who survived 5 years following enucleation. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 583 primary UM cases, enucleated at the Leiden University Medical Center between 1983 and 2013. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed in the total cohort and separately in those surviving more than 5 years (n = 297). Results: In the total cohort, the median age was 62.6 years, and the median tumor diameter was 12.0 mm. Monosomy 3 was detected in 53% of cases and gain of 8q in 47%. In the cohort surviving 5 years, the median age was 59.5 years, and the median tumor diameter was 11.0 mm. Monosomy 3 and gain of 8q were detected in 33% and 31% of cases, respectively. In the total cohort, male gender (P = 0.03), tumor diameter (P < 0.001), mitotic count (P < 0.001), extravascular matrix loops (P = 0.03), extraocular growth (P < 0.001), and gain of 8q (P < 0.001) were independently associated with UM-related death. In patients surviving 5 years after enucleation, univariable analysis revealed that age (P = 0.03), tumor diameter (P < 0.001), monosomy 3 (P = 0.04), and 8q gain (P = 0.003) were associated with subsequent UM-related death. Using a multivariable analysis, only male gender (P = 0.03) and gain of 8q (P = 0.01) remained significant. Conclusions: Predictors of UM-related death change over time. Among UM patients who survived the initial 5 years following enucleation, male gender and chromosome 8q status were the remaining factors related to UM-related death later on.

Multicenter External Validation of the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online: An OOG Collaborative Study.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is fatal in ~50% of patients as a result of disseminated disease. This study aims to externally validate the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online V3 (LUMPO3) to determine its reliability in predicting survival after treatment for choroidal melanoma when utilizing external data from other ocular oncology centers. Anonymized data of 1836 UM patients from seven international ocular oncology centers were analyzed with LUMPO3 to predict the 10-year survival for each patient in each external dataset. The analysts were masked to the patient outcomes. Model predictions were sent to an independent statistician to evaluate LUMPO3's performance using discrimination and calibration methods. LUMPO3's ability to discriminate between UM patients who died of metastatic UM and those who were still alive was fair-to-good, with C-statistics ranging from 0.64 to 0.85 at year 1. The pooled estimate for all external centers was 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.75). Agreement between observed and predicted survival probabilities was generally good given differences in case mix and survival rates between different centers. Despite the differences between the international cohorts of patients with primary UM, LUMPO3 is a valuable tool for predicting all-cause mortality in this disease when using data from external centers.

Aqueous Humor Biomarkers Identify Three Prognostic Groups in Uveal Melanoma.

Purpose: To investigate whether we can identify different patterns of inflammation in the aqueous humor of a uveal melanoma (UM)-containing eye, and whether these are related to prognosis. Methods: Ninety samples of aqueous humor from UM-containing eyes were analyzed using a high-throughput multiplex immunoassay that enables simultaneous analysis of 92 predefined protein biomarkers. Cytokine expression was compared to clinical and histopathological characteristics. Cluster analysis was performed, after which the clusters were compared with clinical and histopathological tumor characteristics. Results: Cluster analysis revealed three distinct clusters, with one cluster showing hardly any inflammatory cytokines, one showing intermediate levels, and one showing a high expression of inflammation-related biomarkers. Significant differences between the clusters were seen with regard to patient age (P = 0.008), tumor prominence (P = 0.001), ciliary body involvement (P < 0.001), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (P < 0.001), monosomy of chromosome 3 (P = 0.03), and gain of chromosome 8q (P = 0.04), with the cluster with a highest cytokine expression having the worst prognostic markers. Especially apoptosis-related cytokines were differentially expressed. Conclusions: Analysis of cytokines in the aqueous humor shows distinct differences between aqueous humor samples and allocates these samples into three different prognostic tumor clusters. Especially large tumors with ciliary body involvement and monosomy 3 were associated with many cytokines, especially apoptosis-related cytokines. The presence of these cytokines in the aqueous humor may play a role in the lack of effective antitumor immune responses.

Differential Expression of DNA Repair Genes in Prognostically-Favorable versus Unfavorable Uveal Melanoma.

Expression of DNA repair genes was studied in uveal melanoma (UM) in order to identify genes that may play a role in metastases formation. We searched for genes that are differentially expressed between tumors with a favorable and unfavorable prognosis. Gene-expression profiling was performed on 64 primary UM from the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands. The expression of 121 genes encoding proteins involved in DNA repair pathways was analyzed: a total of 44 genes differed between disomy 3 and monosomy 3 tumors. Results were validated in a cohort from Genoa and Paris and the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. Expression of the PRKDC, WDR48, XPC, and BAP1 genes was significantly associated with clinical outcome after validation. PRKDC was highly expressed in metastasizing UM (p < 0.001), whereas WDR48, XPC, and BAP1 were lowly expressed (p < 0.001, p = 0.006, p = 0.003, respectively). Low expression of WDR48 and XPC was related to a large tumor diameter (p = 0.01 and p = 0.004, respectively), and a mixed/epithelioid cell type (p = 0.007 and p = 0.03, respectively). We conclude that the expression of WDR48, XPC, and BAP1 is significantly lower in UM with an unfavorable prognosis, while these tumors have a significantly higher expression of PRKDC. Pharmacological inhibition of DNA-PKcs resulted in decreased survival of UM cells. PRKDC may be involved in proliferation, invasion and metastasis of UM cells. Unraveling the role of DNA repair genes may enhance our understanding of UM biology and result in the identification of new therapeutic targets.

Genetic prognostication in uveal melanoma.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare tumour with a high propensity to metastasize. Although no effective treatment for metastases yet exists, prognostication in UM is relevant for patient counselling, planning of follow-up and stratification in clinical trials. Besides conventional clinicopathologic characteristics, genetic tumour features with prognostic significance have been identified. Non-random chromosome aberrations such as monosomy 3 and gain of chromosome 8q are strongly correlated with metastatic risk, while gain of chromosome 6p indicates a low risk. Recently, mutations in genes such as BAP1, SF3B1 and EIF1AX have been shown to be related to patient outcome. Genetics of UM is a rapidly advancing field, which not only contributes to the understanding of the pathogenesis of this cancer, but also results in further refinement of prognostication. Concomitantly, advances have been made in the use of genetic tests. New methods for genetic typing of UM have been developed. Despite the considerable progress made recently, many questions remain, such as those relating to the reliability of prognostic genetic tests, and the use of biopsied or previously irradiated tumour tissue for prognostication by genetic testing. In this article, we review genetic prognostic indicators in UM, also comparing available genetic tests, addressing the clinical application of genetic prognostication and discussing future perspectives for improving genetic prognostication in UM.

Targeting of the MAPK and AKT pathways in conjunctival melanoma shows potential synergy.

PURPOSE: Conjunctival melanoma (CM) is a rare but lethal form of cancer. Similar to cutaneous melanoma, CM frequently carries activating mutations in BRAF and NRAS. We studied whether CM as well as conjunctival benign and premalignant melanocytic lesions express targets in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and AKT pathways, and whether specific inhibitors can suppress CM growth in vitro. METHODS: 131 conjunctival lesions obtained from 129 patients were collected. The presence of BRAF V600E mutation and expression of phosphorylated (p)-ERK and p-AKT were assessed by immunohistochemistry. We studied cell proliferation, phosphorylation, cell cycling and apoptosis in three CM cell lines using two BRAF inhibitors (Vemurafenib and Dabrafenib), a MEK inhibitor (MEK162) and an AKT inhibitor (MK2206). RESULTS: The BRAF V600E mutation was present in 19% of nevi and 26% of melanomas, but not in primary acquired melanosis (PAM). Nuclear and cytoplasmic p-ERK and p-AKT were expressed in all conjunctival lesions. Both BRAF inhibitors suppressed growth of both BRAF mutant CM cell lines, but only one induced cell death. MEK162 and MK2206 inhibited proliferation of CM cells in a dose-dependent manner, and the combination of these two drugs led to synergistic growth inhibition and cell death in all CM cell lines. CONCLUSION: ERK and AKT are constitutively activated in conjunctival nevi, PAM and melanoma. While BRAF inhibitors prohibited cell growth, they were not always cytotoxic. Combining MEK and AKT inhibitors led to more growth inhibition and cell death in CM cells. The combination may benefit patients suffering from metastatic conjunctival melanoma.

PRAME as a Potential Target for Immunotherapy in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

Importance: Uveal melanoma (UM) is an intraocular primary malignant neoplasm that often gives rise to metastatic disease for which there are no effective therapies. A substantial proportion of UMs express the cancer-testis antigen PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma), which can potentially be targeted by adoptive T-cell therapy. Objective: To determine whether there may be a rationale for PRAME-directed T-cell therapy for metastatic UM. Design, Setting, and Participants: An experimental study using a retrospective cohort of 64 patients with UM (median follow-up, 62 months) was conducted from January 8, 2015, to November 20, 2016, at the Leiden University Medical Center. Clinical, histopathologic, and genetic parameters were compared between 64 PRAME-positive and PRAME-negative UMs. HLA class I restricted, PRAME-specific T cells were stimulated with UM cell lines to measure their antigen-specific reactivity against these cell lines, which were analyzed for PRAME expression by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Uveal melanoma metastases from 16 unrelated patients were assessed for PRAME expression by messenger RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and for HLA class I expression by immunofluorescence staining. Main Outcomes and Measures: Interferon γ production for antigen-specific reactivity and detection of PRAME and HLA class I expression in primary and metastatic UM. Results: Of the 64 patients in the study (31 women and 33 men; mean [SD] age at the time of enucleation, 60.6 [15.6] years), PRAME expression was negative in 35 primary UMs and positive in 29 primary UMs. Positive PRAME expression was associated with a high largest basal diameter (15.0 vs 12.0 mm; P = .005), ciliary body involvement (59% vs 26%; P = .008), and amplification of chromosome 8q (66% vs 23%; P = .002). PRAME-specific T cells reacted against 4 of 7 UM cell lines, demonstrating that T-cell reactivity correlated with PRAME expression. Metastatic UM samples were positive for PRAME messenger RNA in 11 of 16 patients and for HLA class I in 10 of 16 patients, with 8 of 16 patients demonstrating coexpression of both PRAME and HLA class I. Conclusions and Relevance: PRAME is expressed in many primary and metastatic UMs, and about half of the metastatic UMs coexpress PRAME and HLA class I. The finding that PRAME-specific T cells in this study reacted against PRAME-positive UM cell lines suggests a potential role for PRAME-directed immunotherapy for selected patients with metastatic UM.

Uveal Melanoma: Identifying Immunological and Chemotherapeutic Targets to Treat Metastases.

Uveal melanoma is an intraocular malignancy that, depending on its size and genetic make-up, may lead to metastases in up to 50% of cases. Currently, no therapy has been proven to improve survival. However, new therapies exploiting immune responses against metastases are being developed. The primary tumor is well characterized: tumors at high risk of developing metastases often contain macrophages and lymphocytes. However, these lymphocytes are often regulatory T cells that may suppress immune response. Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown marked efficacy in multiple cancers (eg, cutaneous melanoma) but do not yet improve survival in uveal melanoma patients. More knowledge needs to be acquired regarding the function of T cells in uveal melanoma. Other therapeutic options are related to the biochemical pathways. Targeting the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway with small molecule MEK inhibitors abrogates the growth of UM cells harboring GNAQ/GNA11 Q209 mutations, suggesting that these aberrant G-protein oncogenes mediate, at least in part, their effect through this hallmark proliferation pathway. Other pathways are also implicated, such as those involving c-Jun and YAP. Further studies may show how interference in the different pathways may affect survival.

Uveal Melanoma Treatment and Prognostication.

Approximately 90% of uveal melanoma develop in the choroid, with the remainder arising in the ciliary body or the iris. The treatment of uveal melanoma is aimed at conserving the eye and useful vision, and, if possible, preventing metastatic disease. Enucleation is now reserved for tumors that are large and/or involve the optic disc, having largely been replaced by various forms of radiotherapy (plaque brachy-therapy, proton beam or stereotactic radiotherapy) and laser therapy. Whereas iridectomy and iridocyclectomy are widely performed, transscleral exoresection of choroidal tumors is performed only in a few centers because it requires special skills and hypotensive anesthesia. Transretinal endoresection using vitrectomy equipment is easier but controversial because of concerns about tumor seeding. Long-term postoperative surveillance is necessary to identify and treat local tumor recurrence and any other complications, such as radiation-induced morbidity, and to provide counseling to the patient. Factors predicting metastasis include older age, large tumor size, ciliary body involvement, extraocular spread, epithelioid cytomorphology, chromosome 3 loss and chromosome 8q gain, class 2 gene expression profile, loss of BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1), and the presence of inflammation. Prognostication is enhanced by multi-variable analysis combining clinical, histologic, and genetic factors, also taking the patient's age and sex into account. As there is a lack of options for treating metastases, much research is focused on identifying potential therapeutic targets.

Genetic evolution of uveal melanoma guides the development of an inflammatory microenvironment.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by a number of genetic aberrations that follow a certain chronology and are tightly linked to tumor recurrence and survival. Loss of chromosome 3, bi-allelic loss of BAP1 expression, and gain in chromosome 8q have been associated with metastasis formation and death, while loss of chromosome 3 has been associated with the influx of macrophages and T cells. We used a set of genetically-classified UM to study immune infiltration in the context of their genetic evolution. We show in two independent cohorts that lack of BAP1 expression is associated with an increased density of CD3+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. The presence of extra copies of chromosome 8q in disomy 3 tumors with a normal BAP1 expression is associated with an increased influx of macrophages (but not T cells). Therefore, we propose that the genetic evolution of UM is associated with changes in the inflammatory phenotype. Early changes resulting in gain of chromosome 8q may activate macrophage infiltration, while sequential loss of BAP1 expression seems to drive T cell infiltration in UM.

The Prognostic Value of AJCC Staging in Uveal Melanoma Is Enhanced by Adding Chromosome 3 and 8q Status.

Purpose: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system has been validated for use as a prognostic parameter in uveal melanoma (UM). We studied whether adding information regarding chromosome 3 and 8q status further enhances the prognostic value of this staging system. Methods: We retrospectively studied a cohort of 522 patients who had been treated for UM in two different centers between 1999 and 2015. The mean follow-up time was 47.7 months. Cumulative incidence curves were generated and regression analyses were performed for different combinations of AJCC staging and chromosome status. Death due to UM metastases was the primary endpoint. Results: In AJCC stage I cases, only patients with monosomy 3 as well as chromosome 8q gain died due to UM metastases (P < 0.001). Among patients with stage II and III tumors, those with monosomy 3 plus gain of chromosome 8q had the worst prognosis, whereas the clinical outcome of those with only one of these aberrations was intermediate (P < 0.001). Patients without monosomy 3 and 8q gain showed favorable prognosis, independent of their tumor's AJCC stage. In cases with monosomy 3, 8q gain, or both, adding AJCC stage improved the predictive value. Multivariable regression analyses demonstrated that AJCC staging and chromosome 3 and 8q status contain independent information about survival status. Conclusions: Combining information on AJCC staging and chromosome 3 and 8q status allows a more accurate prognostication in UM. We conclude that the prognostic value of the AJCC staging system can be improved by adding information regarding chromosome 3 and 8q status.

Distribution of GNAQ and GNA11 Mutation Signatures in Uveal Melanoma Points to a Light Dependent Mutation Mechanism.

Uveal melanomas (UM) originate from melanocytes in the interior wall of the eye, namely from the iris, ciliary body and the choroid with marked differences in light exposure (from dark anterior to illuminated posterior). In contrast to UV radiation, focused or converging visible light readily reaches the retina and can damage DNA which possibly contributes to UM development. In this report choroidal, ciliochoroidal and iridociliary melanomas were analyzed for GNAQ and GNA11 mutations which were subsequently correlated to the location of tumor origin. Hotspot mutations in GNAQ and GNA11 can be divided in A>T and in A>C mutation signatures. The GNAQ A626C mutation (Q209P) was almost exclusively observed in choroidal melanomas from the illuminated posterior side. On the other hand, ciliochoroidal UM from the dark anterior side with mostly A>T mutations were clearly associated with light-colored eyes. Combined these data suggest a light and a pigment dependent etiology in UM development.

Radiation Treatment Affects Chromosome Testing in Uveal Melanoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiation treatment induces chromosomal aberrations in uveal melanoma (UM) and to evaluate which tumor features determine success of karyotyping and FISH. METHODS: Material from 327 UM-containing enucleated eyes was submitted for karyotyping, while FISH for chromosome 3 was performed in 248 samples. Thirty-six UMs had previously undergone irradiation. Karyotypes were analyzed, and the success rate of karyotyping/FISH was evaluated and compared with clinicopathologic tumor characteristics and prior irradiation. RESULTS: Aberrations were observed in all chromosomes, with chromosomes 1, 3, 6, 8, 13, 15, 16, and Y being altered in at least 15% of the tumors. Aberrations were more common and more complex in previously irradiated tumors (significant for chromosomes 5 [P = 0.004] and 13 [P = 0.04]). Karyotyping and FISH failed significantly more often in irradiated tumors (both P < 0.001). In nonirradiated cases, successful karyotyping was related to a large tumor prominence (P = 0.004) and a high mitotic count (P = 0.007). The success of FISH in these tumors was not associated with any of the studied parameters. In irradiated tumors, karyotyping succeeded more frequently in cases with a high mitotic count (P = 0.03), whereas FISH was more often successful in tumors with a high mitotic count (P = 0.001), a large diameter (P = 0.009) and large prominence (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Karyotyping and FISH are more often successful in UMs with features characteristic of high tumor aggressiveness, whereas prior irradiation leads to multiple chromosome aberrations and to unsuccessful tests. It will be interesting to determine whether other techniques can provide reliable information on the chromosome status of previously irradiated UMs.

Skewed expression of the genes encoding epigenetic modifiers in high-risk uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE: Monosomy 3 (M3) or the presence of a specific RNA expression profile, known as class 2, is strongly associated with death from uveal melanoma (UM). Given the important role of epigenetic processes in cancer development and progression, we compared the transcriptional profiles of a selection of epigenetic regulators between primary UM with a good and a bad prognosis. METHODS: Transcriptional levels of 59 epigenetic regulator genes were measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in 20 UM, 12 with monosomy of chromosome 3 (M3) and 8 with disomy of chromosome 3 (D3). Validation was performed in an independent cohort. Expression levels were compared to clinicopathological characteristics, including class type. Bisulfite sequencing was used to evaluate the role of DNA methylation in gene silencing. RESULTS: In the first set of tumors, general downregulation of transcription of the genes encoding epigenetic regulatory enzymes was seen in association with M3. The 10 genes with the highest differential expression between M3 and D3 were selected and were analyzed in a second set of tumors. In the validation set, significantly lower levels of KAT2B (P = 0.008), HDAC11 (P = 0.009), KMT1C (P = 0.05), KDM4B (P = 0.003), KDM6B (P = 0.04), and BMI-1 (P = 0.001) transcripts were found in tumors with M3/class 2. Methylation of C-phosphate-G (CpG) residues was not observed on the putative regulatory regions of KAT2B, KDM4B, or KDM6B. CONCLUSIONS: Expression levels of a number of histone-modifying genes and polycomb family members are significantly lower in uveal melanoma with monosomy 3/class 2, supporting a general dysregulation of epigenetic modifiers in UM with a bad prognosis.