The effect of prior bisphosphonate therapy on the subsequent BMD and bone turnover response to strontium ranelate.

Strontium ranelate is an effective treatment for osteoporosis in treatment-naive women. In the United Kingdom, bisphosphonates are often used first line. Prior bisphosphonate use may blunt the bone mineral density (BMD) response to strontium ranelate by reducing strontium uptake into the bone. Sixty bisphosphonate-naive women and 60 women discontinuing bisphosphonates were recruited. All women commenced strontium ranelate and calcium/vitamin D. BMD and bone turnover markers were recorded for 12 months. After 12 months, the bisphosphonate-naive group's BMD increased by 5.6% (p < .001) at the spine, 3.4% (p < .001) at the total hip, and 4.0% (p < .001) at the heel. By comparison, the prior bisphosphonate group had a 2.1% (p = .002) increase at the spine but no change at the hip or heel. At all time points, BMD was significantly greater in the bisphosphonate-naive group. In the prior bisphosphonate group, there was no significant change in BMD during the first 6 months at the spine, but between months 6 and 12 there was a parallel gain in BMD (0.027 versus 0.020 g/cm(2), p = .40). The baseline difference in bone markers was no longer significant by 3 months for bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and 6 months for procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX). More women in the prior bisphosphonate group suffered a vertebral fracture (2 versus 8 women, p = .047). After bisphosphonates, bone turnover remains suppressed for up to 6 months, with blunting of the BMD response to strontium ranelate during this time. After 6 months, BMD increases in the spine but not at the hip or heel.

The effect of prior bisphosphonate exposure on the treatment response to teriparatide in clinical practice.

Our objective was to determine the effect of prior bisphosphonate exposure on the treatment response to teriparatide. All patients started on teriparatide in our hospital are entered into a database. All patients who had at least 12 months' treatment were identified. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether or not they had prior bisphosphonate exposure, and the response to teriparatide was compared using procollagen of type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and bone mineral density (BMD). Fifty-two patients had been treated for at least 12 months, 38 with prior bisphosphonate exposure and 14 without. The mean duration of bisphosphonate treatment was 67 months, discontinued a mean of 1 month previously. P1NP increased significantly at 3 and 6 months in both groups. However, those without previous bisphosphonate treatment had a higher baseline P1NP (49 vs. 30 microg/L, P<0.01), and this remained higher at 3 months (109 vs. 71 microg/L, P=0.10) and 6 months (183 vs. 126 microg/L, P=0.06), although the difference was not significant. In the prior bisphosphonate and bisphosphonate naive groups, respectively, the change in spinal BMD was 9.0% and 7.8% (P=0.54) at 12 months and 9.8% and 6.1% (P=0.30) at 18 months. The respective change in hip BMD was 1.0% and -0.3% (P=0.36) at 12 months and 2.8% and 1.3% (P=0.44) at 18 months. There was a trend toward a smaller but still significant increase in P1NP in response to teriparatide in bisphosphonate-treated patients. Although this suggests a blunting of the anabolic effects, in our clinic population this did not result in a reduction in BMD gain.

HIV infection--a risk factor for osteoporosis.

Osteopenia and osteoporosis have recently been described as complications of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients. The advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy in conjunction with improved standard antiviral and antibiotic regimens has dramatically changed the clinical course of HIV infection, resulting in prolonged survival. The pathogenesis and role of each individual medication are poorly understood. Avascular necrosis has also been described in AIDS patients receiving or not receiving antiretroviral therapy. This article is a clinically focused review of the literature on osteopenia, osteoporosis, and mineral metabolism related to HIV infection. In patients with HIV infection, the risks of osteopenia and osteoporosis are not very clear. The suggested risk factors for the development of osteopenia are use of protease inhibitors, longer duration of HIV infection, high viral load, high lactate levels, low bicarbonate levels, raised alkaline phosphatase level, and lower body weight before antiretroviral therapy. There have also been a few case reports of pathologic fractures in AIDS patients with antiretroviral therapy-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis. The underlying mechanism triggering bone loss in HIV-infected patients is unknown. The proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 have been found to be constitutionally produced in increased amounts in HIV-positive individuals, and they may have a role in osteoclast activation and resorption. Serum markers of bone formation are decreased and resorption is increased in patients with advanced clinical disease. Hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, and abnormalities of the parathyroid hormone axis have been described in HIV infection. Histomorphometric analyses have shown altered bone remodeling in HIV-infected patients when compared with controls. Patients with known risk factors for osteoporosis-advancing age, low body weight, and prolonged duration of HIV infection-and those receiving protease inhibitor treatment should be considered for dual x-ray absorptiometry imaging. If bone mineral density is osteopenic or osteoporotic, then the patient should also be screened for other known medical causes of osteoporosis and consider treatment with a bisphosphonate or, if hypogonadal, testosterone replacement under close monitoring.