Meta-analysis and systematic review of population-based epidemiological studies in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is positively associated with obesity, mostly in young women. The global increase in obesity may influence the burden of IIH. Using the PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases, a meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiological studies of IIH were performed up to June 2017. Temporal changes in IIH incidence were measured, and incidence rates of IIH were correlated with country-specific World Health Organization obesity rates. Prevalence data and shunting rates of IIH were recorded. The quality of epidemiological studies was assessed using the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) criteria. In 15 identified studies, there were 889 patients (87% women), mean age 29.8 years. The incidence of IIH ranged from 0.03 to 2.36 per 100 000 per year. The pooled incidence of IIH was 1.20 per 100 000 per year although there was very high heterogeneity (I2 98%). The incidence rates of IIH were correlated with country-specific prevalence of obesity (Spearman's correlation 0.82, P < 0.01). The prevalence of IIH was rarely recorded. A shunting procedure was reported in 8% of patients. STROND criteria were variably reported, median of 26.5 of 43 (range 16-35). IIH is a public health concern as increased obesity prevalence is associated with increased incidence of IIH. A better quality of epidemiological studies is required to improve understanding of IIH and inform health policy for IIH management.

Educational interventions in neurology: a comprehensive systematic review.

A fear of neurology and neural sciences (neurophobia) may have clinical consequences. There is therefore a need to formulate an evidence-based approach to neurology education. A comprehensive systematic review of educational interventions in neurology was performed. BEI, Cochrane Library, Dialog Datastar, EBSCO Biomedical, EBSCO Psychology & Behavioral Sciences, EMBASE, ERIC, First Search, MDConsult, Medline, Proquest Medical Library and Web of Knowledge databases were searched for all published studies assessing interventions in neurology education among undergraduate students, junior medical doctors and residents up to and including July 2012. Two independent literature searches were performed for relevant studies, which were then classified for level of evidence using the Centre of Evidence-based Medicine criteria and four levels of Kirkpatrick educational outcomes. One systematic review, 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nine non-randomized cohort/follow-up studies, 33 case series or historically controlled studies and three mechanism-based reasoning studies were identified. Educational interventions showed favourable evaluation or assessment outcomes in 15 of 16 (94%) RCTs. Very few studies measured subsequent clinical behaviour (two studies) and patient outcomes (one study). There is very little high quality evidence of demonstrably effective neurology education. However, RCTs are emerging, albeit without meeting comprehensive educational criteria. An improving evidence base in the quality of neurology education will be important to reduce neurophobia.