ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For the minimally invasive excision of small-sized pulmonary nodules, bronchoscopic markings are increasingly being performed owing to advancements in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Hybrid operating room equipment is utilized for bronchoscopic VATS markings. We aimed to compare the marking accuracy between bronchoscopic VATS and other marking techniques such as computed tomography-guided percutaneous marking and conventional X-ray fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopic marking. METHODS: Patients with small-sized pulmonary nodules scheduled to undergo VATS were enrolled in the study. A mixture of 50 to 100 µL of diluted indocyanine green and iopamidol was injected adjacent to the pulmonary nodules as a VATS marker. Patients receiving each of the three image-guided techniques were categorized into group A (computed tomography-guided percutaneous injection), group B (X-ray fluoroscopy-guided virtual bronchoscopy-assisted bronchoscope injection), and group C (cone-beam computed tomography and augmented fluoroscopy-guided virtual bronchoscope-assisted bronchoscopic injection in the hybrid operating room). VATS marking accuracy and procedural complications were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: In total, 61 patients with 73 pulmonary nodules were eligible for analysis. VATS marking was successful for 15/16 nodules in group A, 28/30 nodules in group B, and 25/27 nodules in group C. Marking accuracy was 5.75±4.59, 15.00±14.02, and 6.05±6.11 (mm), respectively. Multiple markings were successful in 0/1 (0%), 5/6 (83.3%), and 5/5 (100.0%) nodules in groups A, B, and C, respectively. A small pneumothorax occurred in 3/15 (20.0%) patients in group A. CONCLUSIONS: The cone-beam computed tomography and augmented fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopic approach performed in a hybrid operating room is accurate and equivalent to the computed tomography-guided percutaneous approach, and it enables the VATS marking of multiple pulmonary nodules without causing a secondary pneumothorax.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of a method we developed to predict the ablation area at the time of CT guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation for liver tumors on a CT workstation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten tumors (mean diameter 15.5 mm, range, 9.0-21.5 mm) in seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for which CT guided RF ablation was performed were subjects of this study. After advancing the electrode, plain CT was obtained. Then a simulated ball to predict the ablated area was created on the workstation. After confirming that the tumor was sufficiently within the ball, ablation was performed. The distance of the edge of the actual ablated area from that of the predicted ablated area was measured at six points in three cross-sectional directions on CT images after ablation. RESULTS: The procedures were successfully performed without complications. No local recurrence occurred. Mean absolute value of the distance of the gap between the actual and predicted ablated areas was 3.06 ± 2.18 mm (range: 0 to 9 mm). At 29 (55.8%) points, the actual ablated area was smaller than the predicted ablated area; it was larger in 17 (32.7%), and was the same in 6 (11.5%) points. CONCLUSION: Our method produces an acceptable simulation during RF ablation under CT guidance.
