Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol ; 25(1): 77-81, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36345995

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the need, feasibility and acceptability of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) implementing a systematic, routine, unmet social needs identification and referral pathway, as a means of promoting health equity and addressing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). METHOD: Quality Improvement methodologies were used to adapt and pilot an unmet social needs identification and referral pathway for use with parents/carers of children with communication disabilities referred to an urban Australian speech-language pathology service. SLPs were surveyed about the acceptability and feasibility of this practice. RESULT: The majority of parents/carers, 289 of 293 (99%), agreed to participate in the study, with 31 of the 289 (11%) reporting concerns about unmet social needs. The most common unmet need related to household bills (n = 17, 28%), followed by childcare (n = 12, 20%), employment (n = 10, 16%), food (n = 8, 13%), housing (n = 7, 11%), and parent/carer education (n = 7, 11%). The majority of these families, 26 of 31 (84%), requested referral to, or information about, local community services/resources. SLPs reported high levels of acceptability (93%) and feasibility (98%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the need, feasibility and acceptability of SLPs implementing an unmet social needs identification and referral pathway, and the potential to scale this initiative across other speech-language pathology services and allied health contexts. This paper focusses on SDG 1, SDG 2, SDG 3, SDG 4, SDG 8, SDG 10, SDG 11, SDG 16, and also addresses SDG 17.


Subject(s)
Speech-Language Pathology , Sustainable Development , Humans , Child , Australia , Parents
2.
Surg Endosc ; 27(2): 443-53, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22806520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to provide our experience in the management of infected and drained pancreatic necrosis using the retroperitoneal approach. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study in a tertiary care university hospital. Thirty-two patients with confirmed infected pancreatic necrosis were studied. Superficial necrosectomy was performed with lavage and aspiration of debris. This was achieved though a retroperitoneal approach of the pancreatic area and under the direct vision of a flexible endoscope. The follow-up procedure using retroperitoneal endoscopy did not require taking the patient to the operating room. The main outcome measures were infection control, morbidity, and mortality related to technique, reintervention, and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: No significant morbidity or mortality related to the technique was observed in all of the patients with infected pancreatic necrosis treated with this retroperitoneal approach compared with published data using other approaches. Reinterventions were not required and patients are currently asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal access of the pancreatic area is a good approach for drainage and debridement of infected pancreatic necrosis. Translumbar retroperitoneal endoscopy allows exploration under direct visual guidance avoiding open transabdominal reintervention and the risk of contamination of the abdominal cavity. This technique does not increase morbidity and mortality, can be performed at the patients' bedside as many times as necessary, and has advantages over other retroperitoneal approaches.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/surgery , Laparoscopy , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreas/surgery , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Diseases/pathology , Pancreatic Diseases/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Bacterial Infections/complications , Equipment Design , Humans , Laparoscopes , Middle Aged , Necrosis/surgery , Pancreatic Diseases/complications , Pancreatic Diseases/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
3.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 63(6): 808-13, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16650543

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the ASGE recommends that high-risk endoscopic procedures can safely be performed on patients taking aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in standard doses, there is a paucity of data on EUS-FNA per se in this setting. OBJECTIVE: We studied the safety and cellular yield of EUS-FNA and/or Trucut biopsy (TCB) in patients taking aspirin, NSAIDS, or prophylactic low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). DESIGN: Prospective control study. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA and/or TCB were recruited over an 18-month period. The usage of aspirin, NSAIDS, or LMWH were recorded and patients who were not taking these medications served as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The bleeding events (endosonographic findings of extraluminal bleeding, intraluminal bleeding requiring hemostatic procedures, hematemesis, or melena) and cellular yield were compared between patients and controls. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients (8 had repeat procedures) underwent EUS-FNA and/or TCB on 241 lesions. Bleeding events occurred in none (0 of 26), 33.3% (2 of 6), and 3.7% (7 of 190) of the patients in the aspirin/NSAIDS, LMWH, and control groups, respectively (p = 0.023). The mean numbers of FNA passes, applications of suction, bloody specimens, and cellular yield were not significantly different between patients who were or were not receiving medications. No significant difference in bleeding events was noted between the FNA and TCB groups. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA or TCB is safe in patients taking aspirin or NSAIDS. Consideration should be given to stopping LMWH before the procedure. The cellular yield and blood contamination of the specimen from FNA are similar to those in controls.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/methods , Biopsy, Needle , Endosonography , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/adverse effects , Biopsy, Needle/adverse effects , Contraindications , Hemorrhage/etiology , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Humans , Prospective Studies
4.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 63(3): 403-8, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16500387

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is problematic and requires meeting a burden of proof through clinical, biochemical, radiologic, and histological features. Endoscopic ultrasound yields detailed images of the extrahepatic biliary tree, but its value in contributing to the diagnosis of this condition is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the potential for transduodenal EUS to detect common bile duct wall thickening in PSC. DESIGN: A prospective, controlled study with retrospective, blinded data analysis. SETTING: Single tertiary referral center for inflammatory bowel disease and EUS. PATIENTS: Four groups of patients were assessed with radial endosonography: PSC (n = 9); inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with abnormal liver blood tests (n = 21); choledocholithiasis (n = 15); and normal controls (n = 50). Measurements were made of the common bile duct diameter and wall thickness. INTERVENTIONS: Transduodenal radial EUS of the biliary tree. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Common bile duct diameter and wall thickness. RESULTS: The mean diameter (SD) of the common bile duct for the PSC, IBD, choledocholithiasis, and normal control groups measured 8.9 mm (2.8), 5.4 mm (1.7), 7.2 mm (2.2), and 5.0 mm (1.9), respectively (PSC and choledocholithiasis groups compared to the IBD group, P < .05 for a single test of hypothesis, but correction for the multiple testing of data removed this significance; normal control group P < .005). Mean ductal wall thickness (SD) was 2.5 mm (0.8) for the PSC group, 0.7 mm (0.4) for the IBD group, 0.8 mm (0.4) for the choledocholithiasis group, and 0.8 mm (0.4) for the normal control group, respectively (PSC group compared to the other 3 groups, P < .005). LIMITATIONS: Assessment of intrahepatic PSC is problematic. CONCLUSION: Thickening (>1.5 mm) of the common bile duct wall is seen in patients with PSC but not in those with apparently uncomplicated IBD or choledocholithiasis. The results of this study suggest that standard endosonography contributes to the imaging and potentially to the diagnosis of PSC.


Subject(s)
Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic/diagnostic imaging , Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic/pathology , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/diagnostic imaging , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/pathology , Duodenoscopy , Endosonography , Adult , Aged , Choledocholithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Choledocholithiasis/pathology , Female , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/pathology , Liver Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
6.
JOP ; 6(2): 189-93, 2005 Mar 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15767737

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Lymph node involvement in pancreatic cancer is a predictor of poor patient long-term survival. The detection of multiple metastatic peri-pancreatic nodes by EUS-FNA may dissuade the surgeon from undertaking a curative pancreatic resection. CASE REPORT: We report an interesting case of a man with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, who presented with the diagnostic problem of a pancreatic solid-cystic lesion and multiple malignant-looking peri-pancreatic lymphadenopathy on EUS. EUS-FNA yielded chronic lymphocytic leukaemia involvement in the peri-pancreatic lymph nodes and a markedly elevated CEA in the cystic fluid. The absence of adenocarcinoma involvement of the lymph nodes prompted surgery on the pancreatic lesion with a curative intent. Pancreatic mucinous cystadenocarcinoma was diagnosed and a sub-total pancreatectomy was performed with clear resection margins. All 30 resected peri-pancreatic lymph nodes showed chronic lymphocytic leukemia involvement only. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that abnormal lymphadenopathy adjacent to a primary pancreatic lesion may not necessarily be due to the latter. Systemic lymphoproliferative disease, as in this case, can masquerade as metastatic adenocarcinoma lymph nodes on EUS. EUS-FNA is useful in diagnosing lymphoproliferative disease.


Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Cystadenocarcinoma/secondary , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Cystadenocarcinoma/complications , Cystadenocarcinoma/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Endosonography , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/complications , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/diagnosis , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Male , Pancreas/diagnostic imaging , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreas/surgery , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery
7.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 59(1): 28-32, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14722543

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa is a rare genetically determined disorder of the stratified squamous epithelium. Patients with the most severe forms develop scarring of the esophagus after ingestion of food. This results in dysphagia, which severely compromises the ability to eat. Maintenance of adequate nutritional intake is a central aim, but the most appropriate method is unknown. METHODS: The results of endoscopic through-the-scope balloon dilation under propofol anesthesia in 53 patients with epidermolysis bullosa and esophageal strictures are reported. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of patients had a single stricture (range 1 to 6 strictures), most often in the proximal esophagus (median 20 cm from incisors). A total of 182 dilations were performed (median two per patient) over a median follow-up period of 3.5 years. For all but 3 patients, there was an improvement in the dysphagia score. There was a mean increase in weight after the procedure of 2.9 kg: 95% CI[2.0, 3.8]; p<0.001, over a median 29 days. There was no significant post-procedure morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic balloon dilation is a safe and effective treatment for the esophageal strictures of epidermolysis bullosa. In the majority of patients, dilation relieves dysphagia and improves nutritional status.


Subject(s)
Catheterization/methods , Epidermolysis Bullosa/complications , Esophageal Stenosis/therapy , Esophagoscopy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Esophageal Stenosis/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...