[Evolution of followed renal oncocytomas]. / Évolution des oncocytomes rénaux surveillés.

INTRODUCTION: Oncocytomas are primitive kidney tumours, considered benign but their evolution is not fully established. The local progression is generally admitted but few data explain what makes a oncocytoma to grow more or less quickly. The objective of our study is to analyse the evolution of followed renal oncocytomas after histologic confirmation and to identify factors that can influence their growth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study in two centers (North Hospital and Hospital of the Conception of Marseille). All patients with renal oncocytoma diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy from September 2010 to April 2016 and followed for more than one year were included. Epidemiological, histological, and morphological data were collected at diagnosis, during follow-up and in case of strategy change (intervention). Statistical analysis of factors influencing oncocytomes growth was based on the Pearson correlation test. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included. The median age for diagnosis was 65 years [39-85]. The sex ratio H/F was 6/5. The median follow-up was 34 months [12-180]. The average diagnosis size was 29 mm [12-90]. Thirteen patients (25%) were treated secondarily, including 70% by conservative treatment. The average growth was 0.25 (±0.23) cm/yr. The patients treated were younger and had a higher growth rate than the untreated (0.48±0.23cm/yr versus 0.18±0.18cm/yr, P<0,001). According to Pearson's analysis, there was a positive linear relationship (R=0.27, P=0.047) between velocity and initial size and a negative linear relationship (ρ=-0.44, P<0.001) between velocity and age at diagnosis. So tumor growth was faster if the patients were young and the tumor voluminous at diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Rapid growth often leads to a cessation of surveillance in favour of an intervention strategy. For young patients, conservative treatment (partiel nephrectomy or ablative treatment) in the medium term is likely to be preferred, but for elderly patients or with important comorbidities follow-up is an alternative to an invasive attitude. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Is a routine second transurethral resection of the bladder still necessary after hexaminolévulinate photodynamic diagnosis-assisted TURBT?] / La résection transurétrale de vessie de réévaluation est-elle toujours nécessaire en cas de primo-résection sous luminofluorescence par hexaminolévulinate ?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the impact of blue light cystoscopy with hexaminolevulinate on residual tumor rates at second-look transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among all patients undergoing TURB in our center between 2012 and 2017, 52 patients had a second-look after a first complete TURB with a delay<3months. We compare patients with standard white light cystoscopy/TURB then second-look blue light cystoscopy/re-TURB (group A, n=30) and patients with blue light cystoscopy/TURB at the initial procedure then white light cystoscopy/re-TURB (group B, n=22). The residual tumor rates at second-look, restaging and changing in therapeutic strategy, as well as recurrence free survival and progression rate were compared. RESULTS: Residual tumor at the time of second-look cystoscopy was detected in 42.3% of cases in our cohort, with a significant difference between the two groups (63.3% in group A versus 0% in group B, <0.001). In group A, 16.7% (5/30) of patients had upstaging and/or upgrading at second-look cystoscopy, resulting in a change in therapeutic strategy in most cases (4/5) while none upstaging was observed in group B. In multivariate analysis, the use of luminofluorescence at the first TURB was the only independent predictive factor of residual tumor (P=0.0031). CONCLUSION: The quality of the initial TURB, when performed by using blue light cystoscopy, had a significant impact on the rate of residual tumor at the second-look resection and could modify therapeutic strategy of NMIBC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.