Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 83(7): 471-7, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17538797

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To test the ability of the cytogenetic emergency network (CEN) of laboratories, currently under development across Canada, to provide rapid biological dosimetry using the dicentric assay for triage assessment, that could be implemented in the event of a large-scale radiation/nuclear emergency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A workshop was held in May 2004 in Toronto, Canada, to introduce the concept of CEN and recruit clinical cytogenetic laboratories at hospitals across the country. Slides were prepared for dicentric assay analysis following in vitro irradiation of blood to a range of gamma-ray doses. A minimum of 50 metaphases per slide were analyzed by 41 people at 22 different laboratories to estimate the exposure level. RESULTS: Dose estimates were calculated based on a dose response curve generated at Health Canada. There were a total of 104 dose estimates and 96 (92.3%) of them fell within the expected range using triage scoring criteria. Half of the laboratories analyzed 50 metaphases in

Subject(s)
Cytogenetics/organization & administration , Radioactive Hazard Release , Radiometry/methods , Canada , Chromosome Aberrations , Disaster Planning , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Emergencies , Gamma Rays , Humans , Metaphase/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries
3.
Prenat Diagn ; 26(9): 810-3, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16821252

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To present a series of prenatally detected cases of recurrent pericentric inversions with euchromatic breakpoints and to review the literature to determine whether parental karyotyping is required for genetic counselling. METHODS: Cases of recurrent pericentric inversions with euchromatic breakpoints were collected from Canadian Cytogenetic Laboratories. Cases included inversions for chromosome 1(p13q21), chromosome 2(p11.2q13), chromosome 5(p13q13) and chromosome 10(p11.2q21.2). RESULTS: The incidence of de novo inv(2)(p11.2q13) was low, with one case among 91 inversions. There were no cases of de novo inv(10) (p11.2q21.2) among 17 reported and one case of de novo inv(5)(p13q13) among 21 reported. CONCLUSION: Our study, and data from the literature, suggests that most cases of inv(2)(p11.2q13) have been stably inherited, that de novo cases of inv(2) are rare and that both inherited and de novo forms are without phenotypic or developmental consequences. We suggest that parental karyotyping for cases of inv(2) is not useful in counselling as it may generate unnecessary parental anxiety over a chromosomal finding that is likely innocuous.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Chromosome Inversion/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2/genetics , Fathers , Genetic Counseling , Mothers , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 10 , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5 , Female , Humans , Karyotyping , Pregnancy , Risk
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...