Occupational exposure to air pollutants emitted from in situ burning of offshore oil spills: a large-scale field study.

BACKGROUND: In-situ burning (ISB) could be an effective cleanup method during spills. This study aims to study occupational exposure to pollutants emitted from offshore, large-scale ISB-experiments among personnel on vessels involved in ISB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six experimental ISBs after release of 4.2-6 m3 crude or refined oils were performed. Air measurements on three vessels were taken of particulate matter (PM) of different size fractions, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and volatile organic compounds (VOC). RESULTS: One vessel was located upwind (about 80-140 m) from the burning oil while two work boats were positioned 200-400 m downwind. One of the work boats moved back and forth transverse to the smoke plume while the other followed the edge of the smoke plume downwind. During the burn period (28-63 min) the range of mean concentrations of PM2.5 particles in the closest work boat downwind from the burn (0.068-0.616 mg/m3) was considerably higher than in the upwind vessel (0.0198-0.029 mg/m3) and in the work boat moving downwind at the edge of the visible smoke (0.007-0.078 mg/m3). The particles were mainly in the PM<1 fraction. In the work boat closest to the burn the mean concentration of particulate PAH and VOC was 0.046-0.070 ng/m3 and < limit of detection -17.1 ppm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The mean PM2.5 levels in the closest vessel varied between 4 and 41 times higher than the 24-hour Norwegian Air Quality Criteria for the general population, indicating that the particulate exposure may impose a health risk for personnel up to 400 m downwind from an ISB. Exposure to VOC and PAH among crew on board vessels both upwind and downwind from the burning was low during these conditions. However, it is recommended that crew on vessels close to and downwind of smoke plumes from oil fires should use half-masks with P3 filters.

Chemical and toxicological characterisation of residues from offshore in-situ burning of spilled fuel oils.

Burn residues collected after large scale experimental in situ burns performed in the North Sea were characterised with emphasis on chemistry and acute toxicity. Low-energy water accommodated fractions (WAFs) of three marine fuels (Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (ULSFO), bunker oil (IFO180), and marine gas oil (MGO) and their field-generated residues from in situ burning (ISB). were prepared to evaluate the potential impact of ISB residue to the environment. The toxicity effects on primary consumers were assessed by testing on early life stage (nauplii) of the marine copepod Calanus finmarchicus. Toxicity studies showed that ISB decreased the acute toxicity of the WAFs compared to the initial oils. WAF of MGO had highest toxicity, and ISB residue of MGO seems to be more toxic than WAFs of fresh ULSFO and IFO180. Additive toxicity expressed as toxic unit (TU) based on the chemical composition also indicated that the toxicity of WAFs from ISB residues were lower than for the initial oils. The 2-3 ring PAHs seem to contribute most to the TU. Overall, the three offshore burns reduced the total mass of PAHs in the water accommodated fractions by >90 % compared to the released unburned oils and caused a reduction of the acute toxicity to copepod nauplii.

Offshore field experiments with in-situ burning of oil: Emissions and burn efficiency.

In situ burning (ISB) is an oil spill response technique including ignition and burning to remove oil on the water surface. The technique rapidly and effectively removes large portions of the oil. However, the combustion process causes a large smoke plume and leaves a viscous residue in the water. During six large-scale experimental burns in the North Sea in 2018 and 2019, the smoke plume, released oil and contained residues were analysed. The objectives were to document the content of particles and gases in the smoke plume, properties of both the released oils and residues, and the effectiveness of the burns. Oseberg crude oil, Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (ULSFO), Intermediate Fuel Oil (IFO180) and Marine Gas Oil (MGO) were released into a fire-boom and ignited. Particles and gases in the smoke plume were monitored using drones with several sensors. Soot particle monitoring indicated that more than 90% of the particles produced during the burns were <1 µm. Soot fallout was mainly limited to visible smoke, and the particle concentration was highest directly under the smoke plume and declined with distance from the burn. Gas monitoring in the smoke indicated low concentrations of SO2 and NOX (<2 ppm), and the concentrations of CO2 and CO were within air quality standards. Black Carbon produced relative to the amount of oil burned was 10-18%. The burn efficiency varied and were estimated to 80-91% for Oseberg, >90% for MGO, and <60% for both ULSFO and IFO180. The present paper addresses the results of the smoke plume monitoring, properties of the ISB residues and the burn efficiency.

Relative bioavailability and toxicity of fuel oils leaking from World War II shipwrecks.

The Norwegian Authorities have classified 30 WWII shipwrecks to have a considerable potential for pollution to the environment, based on the location and condition of the wreck and the types and amount of fuel. Oil thus far has been removed from eight of these shipwrecks. The water accommodated fractions of oils from two British wrecks and two German wrecks have been studied with special emphasis on chemistry and biological effects (algae growth (Skeletonema costatum) and copepod mortality (Calanus finmarchicus)). Chemical analyses were also performed on three additional German wreck oils. The results from these studies show that the coal based oils from German WWII shipwrecks have higher toxicity to marine organisms than the mineral oils from the British shipwrecks. The potential for higher impact on the marine environment of coal based oils has resulted in an altering of the priority list for oil recovery from WWII wrecks by the authorities.