Resección hepática por metástasis de cáncer colorrectal: una visión multidisciplinar / Liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary approach

Objetivo: valorar los resultados cualitativos a corto y medio plazo de un programa de reciente implantación de evaluación hepática multidisciplinar de casos complejos de metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal.Pacientes y métodos: cuarenta evaluaciones clínicas consecutivas de pacientes con metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal valorados para resección hepática mayor, realizadas por un comité multidisciplinar de especialistas. Las exploraciones complementarias practicadas fueron TAC trifásica y ecografía intraoperatoria, junto a RMN y/o PET en casos de dudas. La resección hepática se podía realizar como gesto único o bien en dos tiempos y combinada a otras técnicas.Resultados: la mortalidad postoperatoria a los 30 días fue del 4%. Presentaron complicaciones el 28%, siendo la complicación más frecuente la infección de la herida quirúrgica (20%). Se transfundieron el 16,6% de los pacientes, con una necesidad transfusional media de 1000 cc. Dos casos precisaron reintervención (8%), en un caso precoz por absceso intraabdominal, y en otro caso tardía, por estenosis de la vía biliar principal. El porcentajede recaídas global es del 36%, siendo más frecuente la extrahepática (26%). La supervivencia actuarial al año de seguimiento es del 90 y del 82% a los dos años. Se hallaban libres de enfermedad a los dos años el 64% de los pacientes. Conclusiones: los programas de resección hepática de metástasis de cáncer colorrectal pueden ser implantados por equipos multidisciplinares de reciente creación, si bien existe la necesidad de auditarse y situarse dentro de los parámetros de calidad

Aim: to analyze qualitative short-time results of a new program for multidisciplinary liver evaluation in complex cases of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. Patients and methods: 40 clinical consecutive evaluations with liver metastasis assessed for major liver resection by a multidisplinary specialist committee. Complementary explorations performed included CT and ultrasounds, and MRI or PET for doubtful cases. Liver resection was made in a single operation or two-stage hepatectomy, or combined with other techniques. Results: postoperative mortality at 30 days was 4%. Complications occurred in 28%, with surgical wound infection being most frequent (20%); 16.6% of resections were transfused, with a mean volume of 1000 ml. Two patients needed reoperation –one for an intraperitoneal abscess and one for bile-duct stenosis. Percentage of global relapse was 36%, with 26% of relapses out of the liver. Actuarial survival at one year follow-up was 90%, and 82% at two years; 64% of patients remain free of disease two years after the operation. Conclusions: programs for liver resection for colorectal cancer metastasis may be implemented by multidisciplinary teams of recent setup. There is a need to evaluate own results and then compare them with a standard of quality previously reported

[Advantages of computerized management in a gastrointestinal endoscopy unit]. / Ventajas de la gestión informatizada en una unidad de endoscopia digestiva.

Computerized management of the activity of a gastrointestinal endoscopy unit in a hospital requires technological resources that include an intrahospital network, a computerized endoscopy program, a computerized appointments program and electronic medical records. The endoscopy unit should define the portfolio of services it provides and establish the time required to perform each procedure, probably using distinct criteria for outpatient and inpatient requests. Computerized management should establish forms designed to receive, accept and schedule requests, and should transfer all the contents of the request to the endoscopy program. The endoscopy program makes and stores reports and images. Integration among the programs allows these contents to be transferred to the electronic medical record. Measures to guarantee the confidentiality and safety of the medical information in each center should be implemented in accordance with its policy on access to medical information.

Ventajas de la gestión informatizada en una unidad de endoscopia digestiva / Advantages of computerized management in a gastrointestinal endoscopy unit

Gestionar de forma informática la actividad de una unidad de endoscopia digestiva en un hospital requiere una dotación tecnológica que incluya una red intrahospitalaria, un programa informático de endoscopia, un programa gestor de peticiones y una historia clínica electrónica. La unidad de endoscopia debe definir el catálogo de prestaciones que realiza, establecer la estructura de su agenda de trabajo y probablemente dotar con criterios diferentes las peticiones de pacientes ambulatorios de las de los pacientes hospitalizados. Una solicitud de endoscopia debe ser vista mediante formas electrónicas predefinidas de recibir las solicitudes, aceptada y programada, lo que se traduce en la transmisión de todos los contenidos al programa de endoscopia. El programa de endoscopia realiza y almacena informes e imágenes. La integración entre los programas permite transmitir estos contenidos a la historia clínica electrónica. Deben existir medidas que garanticen la confidencialidad y la seguridad de la información médica que parametriza cada centro hospitalario según su política de accesos a la información médica

Computerized management of the activity of a gastrointestinal endoscopy unit in a hospital requires technological resources that include an intrahospital network, a compute- rized endoscopy program, a computerized appointments program and electronic medical records. The endoscopy unit should define the portfolio of services it provides and establish the time required to perform each procedure, probably using distinct criteria for outpatient and inpatient requests. Computerized management should establish forms designed to receive, accept and schedule requests, and should transfer all the contents of the request to the endoscopy program. The endoscopy program makes and stores reports and images. Integration among the programs allows these contents to be transferred to the electronic medical record. Measures to guarantee the confidentiality and safety of the medical information in each center should be implemented in accordance with its policy on access to medical information

Liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary approach.

AIM: To analyze qualitative short-time results of a new program for multidisciplinary liver evaluation in complex cases of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 40 clinical consecutive evaluations with liver metastasis assessed for major liver resection by a multidisciplinary specialist committee. Complementary explorations performed included CT and ultrasounds, and MRI or PET for doubtful cases. Liver resection was made in a single operation or two-stage hepatectomy, or combined with other techniques. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality at 30 days was 4%. Complications occurred in 28%, with surgical wound infection being most frequent (20%); 16.6% of resections were transfused, with a mean volume of 1000 ml. Two patients needed reoperation -one for an intraperitoneal abscess and one for bile-duct stenosis. Percentage of global relapse was 36%, with 26% of relapses out of the liver. Actuarial survival at one year follow-up was 90%, and 82% at two years; 64% of patients remain free of disease two years after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Programs for liver resection for colorectal cancer metastasis may be implemented by multidisciplinary teams of recent setup. There is a need to evaluate own results and then compare them with a standard of quality previously reported.