Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Eur Spine J ; 30(2): 410-415, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32248506

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess skull bone thickness from birth to skeletal maturity at different sites to provide a reference for the correct selection of pin type and pin placement according to age. METHODS: 270 children and adolescents (age: 0-17 years) with a normal CT scan obtained at Emergency Department for other medical reasons were included. Skull thickness was measured on the axial plane CT scans at eight different sites of the vault: midline anterior (A) and posterior (P), right and left lateral (L), antero-lateral (AL), postero-lateral (PL). RESULTS: From birth to skeletal maturity, L thickness was increased significantly less (+ 58%) compared with AL (+ 205%), P (+ 233%), PL (+ 247%), and A (+ 269%) thickness (P < 0.01). At the end of growth, the thickest and thinnest points of the vault (absolute value) were found at the P and L measurement sites, respectively (P < 0.01). Children aged < 4 years exhibited the highest variability in AL and PL skull bone thickness, with thickness < 3 mm observed in 85% (64/75 patients) and 92% (69/75 patients) of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: We recommend that the tip of the pin should not exceed 2-3 mm in children aged < 4, and 4 mm in children aged 4-6 years, to decrease the risk of inner table perforation. After the age of 7 years and 13 years, standard-sized pin tips (5 and 6 mm, respectively) may be safely used. Children aged < 4 years show significant variability in skull thickness, and therefore a CT scan may be required for this particular age group.


Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Skull , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
Eur Spine J ; 29(7): 1784, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32405795

ABSTRACT

Unfortunately, the author group has been incorrectly listed by the first name instead of the family name in the original publication. The complete correct author group should read as follows.

3.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim ; 57(2): 103-8, 2010 Feb.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20337002
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...