ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Valorar la rentabilidad diagnóstica del signo del pedículo vascular detectado mediante Doppler color/potencia para el diagnóstico del pólipo endometrial. Método: Se realiza una revisión sistemática y metanálisis. Para ello, se llevó a cabo una búsqueda electrónica de los siguientes términos: "endometrial polyp", "Doppler", "ultrasound" (MeSH) y "pedicle sign". Se incluyeron: estudios prospectivos o de cohortes retrospectivos; investigaciones de mujeres con enfermedad orgánica endometrial y pacientes con pólipos endometriales; estudios que tuvieran como objetivo la evaluación de la prueba diagnóstica la ecografía mediante Doppler color/potencia para el diagnóstico de pólipo endometrial, y trabajos que usaran el diagnóstico anatomopatológico como prueba de referencia. El período comprendió de enero de 2003 a mayo de 2015. Todos los análisis se realizaron mediante el módulo MIDAS y METANDI de la versión STATA 12.0 para Windows (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, EE.UU.). Un valor de p < 0.05 fue considerado estadísticamente significativo. Resultados: Se identificaron un total de 629 artículos, de los que se excluyeron 623, por lo que fueron incluidos en el metanálisis final 6 artículos. Dichos estudios incluían 1237 mujeres y 362 pólipos endometriales (prevalencia del 29.3%). La sensibilidad, la especificidad, la razón de verosimilitud (LR, likelihood ratio), tanto positiva como negativa (LR-) para el signo del pedículo fueron 77% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 53% a 91%), 95% (IC 95%: 87% a 98%), 16.0 (IC 95%: 7.1 a 35.9) y 0.24 (IC 95%: 0.11 a 0.54), respectivamente. Se detectó una heterogeneidad importante en los estudios. Conclusión: El signo del pedículo ofrece un rendimiento aceptable para el diagnóstico de los pólipos endometriales.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of vascular pedicle sign detected by color Doppler/power ultrasound for the diagnosis of endometrial polyp. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. An electronic search (Pubmed) was conducted using the following terms: "endometrial polyp", "Doppler", "ultrasound" (MeSH), and "pedicle sign". Criteria for inclusion were as follows: prospective or retrospective cohort studies; studies of women with endometrial organic pathology and women with endometrial polyps; studies to evaluate the diagnostic test using color Doppler ultrasound/power for the diagnosis of endometrial polyp, and studies using pathological diagnosis as the gold standard. The period covered was January 2003 to May 2015. All analyses were performed using the MIDAS and METANDI module STATA version 12.0 for Windows (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 629 papers were identified, of which 623 were excluded, including 6 studies in the meta-analysis. These studies included 1237 women and 362 endometrial polyps (29.3% prevalence). The sensitivity, specificity, LR and LR- for the sign of the pedicle were 77% (95% CI, 53%-91%), 95% (95% CI, 87%-98%), 16.0 (95% CI, 7.1-35.9) and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.54), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was detected in studies. Conclusion: The sign of the pedicle provides acceptable performance for diagnosis of endometrial polyp.
Subject(s)
Ultrasonics , Uterine Hemorrhage , Echocardiography, Doppler , Diagnosis , NeoplasmsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We aimed at performing a systematic review to determine the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy) for detecting tubal occlusion. METHODS: A systematic review in Medline database search from January 1989 to October 2015 to identify relevant studies evaluating 3D-HyCoSy. Eligibility criteria were studies assessing the role of 3D-HyCoSy for diagnosing tubal occlusion in infertile women. Index test was 3D-HyCoSy. Reference standard was laparoscopy with dye test or X-ray hysterosalpingography. Quality was assessed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for the method were estimated. RESULTS: A total number of 88 papers were identified. After exclusions, nine studies were ultimately included. Pooled estimated sensitivity was 98% (95% CI 91-100) with a moderate heterogeneity (I2: 64.8%, 95% CI 39.6-89.9; and Cochran Q 22.7, p < 0.001). Pooled estimated specificity was 90% (95% CI 83-95) with significant heterogeneity (I2: 80.3%, 95% CI 68.1-92.5; and Cochran Q 40.6, p < 0.001). Positive likelihood ratio was 10.3 (95% CI 5.6-18.7) and negative likelihood ratio was 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.21). CONCLUSION: 3D-HyCoSy is an accurate test for diagnosing tubal occlusion in women with infertility.
Subject(s)
Fallopian Tube Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Fallopian Tube Patency Tests/methods , Fallopian Tubes/diagnostic imaging , Infertility, Female/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Hysterosalpingography , Laparoscopy , MEDLINE , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing diagnostic performance of intraoperative gross evaluation (IGE) and intraoperative frozen section (IFS) for the assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS: An extensive search was performed in several databases from January 1989 to May 2015. Eligibility criteria were studies using intraoperative gross evaluation or intraoperative frozen section to determine deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer using the final histopathology report with reference standard. Quality was assessed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. RESULTS: Forty-seven articles were identified. Of these, 35 studies were selected and included in the meta-analysis. A total of 6387 women were evaluated intraoperatively with any of the 2 methods mentioned. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for IGE were 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63%-77%) and 91% (95% CI, 89%-93%), respectively. Heterogeneity was found high for sensitivity (I2: 83.6%; Cochran Q: 79.4; P < 0.001) and moderate for specificity (I, 51.4%; Cochran Q, 29.8; P =0.01). Pooled sensitivity and specificity for IFS were 85% (95% CI, 81%-88%) and 97% (95% CI, 96%-98%), respectively. Heterogeneity was found moderate for sensitivity (I, 56.4%; Cochran Q, 45.9; P < 0.001) and high for specificity (I, 83.2%; Cochran Q, 118.9; P < 0.001). Both sensitivity (P = 0.0008) and specificity (P = 0.0021) were significantly higher for IFS compared to IGE. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative frozen section has better diagnostic performance than intraoperative gross evaluation for the intraoperative diagnosis of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer.
