D3 Receptor-Targeted Cariprazine: Insights from Lab to Bedside.

Until the late 1800s, drug development was a chance finding based on observations and repeated trials and errors. Today, drug development must go through many iterations and tests to ensure it is safe, potent, and effective. This process is a long and costly endeavor, with many pitfalls and hurdles. The aim of the present review article is to explore what is needed for a molecule to move from the researcher bench to the patients' bedside, presented from an industry perspective through the development program of cariprazine. Cariprazine is a relatively novel antipsychotic medication, approved for the treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar mania, bipolar depression, and major depression as an add-on. It is a D3-preferring D3-D2 partial agonist with the highest binding to the D3 receptors compared to all other antipsychotics. Based on the example of cariprazine, there are several key factors that are needed for a molecule to move from the researcher bench to the patients' bedside, such as targeting an unmet medical need, having a novel mechanism of action, and a smart implementation of development plans.

Cariprazine Orodispersible Tablet: A New Formulation for Cariprazine.

INTRODUCTION: Cariprazine is an atypical dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic available in the form of capsules. Although capsules are one of the most desirable routes of administration, there are certain situations (e. g., in an acute psychiatric setting, or when swallowing difficulties, or liquid shortages are present) when they cannot be administered. Therefore, alternative solutions like orodispersible tablets are needed. This study aimed to investigate the bioequivalence of a newly developed orodispersible tablet to the commercially available hard gelatine capsule of cariprazine 1.5 mg. METHODS: This was a phase I, open-label, randomized, single-dose bioequivalence study. It had a 2-period, 2-sequence, cross-over design, where each subject received one test and one reference product in a randomized sequence, separated by a wash-out period of 55 days. Blood sampling was performed over 72 h after dosing. Cariprazine concentrations were analyzed by a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. Standard bioequivalence statistics was applied to PK parameters calculated by non-compartmental analysis. Safety measures were analyzed descriptively. RESULT: Pharmacokinetic data of 43 healthy volunteers and safety data of 54 subjects was analyzed. Cariprazine AUC0-72h and Cmax geometric mean ratios were 117.76% and 100.88%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals were within the pre-defined bioequivalence acceptance limits of 80.00% - 125.00%. Safety data was in line with the Summary of Product Characteristics of Cariprazine. DISCUSSION: The result of this clinical trial proved the bioequivalence of the new orodispersible tablet formulation when compared to hard gelatine capsules, enabling an alternative option for treatment of those suffering from schizophrenia.

Comparing the latent state-trait structure of the PANSS in cariprazine-medicated and placebo-controlled patients with acute schizophrenia.

After over a hundred years of research, the question whether the symptoms of schizophrenia are rather trait-like (being a relatively stable quality of individuals) or state-like (being substance to change) is still unanswered. To assess the trait and the state component in patients with acute schizophrenia, one group receiving antipsychotic treatment, the other not. Data from four phase II/III, 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of similar design that included patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were pooled. In every trial, one treatment group received a third-generation antipsychotic, cariprazine, and the other group placebo. To assess symptoms of schizophrenia, the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) was applied. Further analyses were conducted using the five subscales as proposed by Wallwork and colleagues. A latent state-trait (LST) model was developed to estimate the trait and state components of the total variance of the observed scores. All symptom dimensions behaved more in a trait-like manner. The proportions of all sources of variability changed over the course of the observational period, with a bent around weeks 3 and 4. Visually inspected, no major differences were found between the two treatment groups regarding the LST structure of symptom dimensions. This high proportion of inter-individual stability may represent an inherent part of symptomatology that behaves independently from treatment status.

Single trajectory treatment response for predominant negative symptoms: Post-hoc analysis of a clinical trial with cariprazine and risperidone.

Examining the heterogeneity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia contributes to the identification of available treatment targets. Generally, prior evidence classified three to four symptom treatment response trajectory groups over the course of positive symptoms, yet, no evidence exists regarding the heterogeneity of medium-term response to predominant negative symptoms. The current post-hoc analysis aims to identify the heterogeneity in negative symptom treatment response trajectories among patients with predominant negative symptoms who received either cariprazine or risperidone for 26 weeks. Treatment response was analyzed based on the: the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Factor Score for Negative Symptoms (PANSS-FSNS), and the Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGIS) and Improvement (CGII) scales. To identify subgroups of patients with a similar course of treatment response, group-based trajectory modelling was utilized. Results demonstrated that in comparison with competing models, a single trajectory best described the treatment response of patients with predominant negative symptoms. The results indicate that patients with predominant negative symptoms with over ten years of schizophrenia respond rapidly to adequate treatment and follow a course of steady improvement.

The efficacy and safety of cariprazine in the early and late stage of schizophrenia: a post hoc analysis of three randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the post hoc analysis was to better understand the efficacy and safety of cariprazine in patients with schizophrenia for less than 5 years (early stage) and for more than 15 years (late stage). METHODS: Data from three phase II/III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with similar design in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were pooled and patients with early and late stage of schizophrenia were determined. A mixed-effects model for repeated measures approach was applied and least square (LS) mean changes from baseline to week 6 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and factor scores were reported. Descriptive statistics were used for safety analyses including treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuation rates. RESULTS: Overall, 460 patients were identified as being in the early and 414 in the late stage of schizophrenia. The pooled analysis evaluating mean change from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS total score indicated statistically significant difference between cariprazine and placebo in favor of cariprazine in both the early (LS mean difference [LSMD] -7.5 P < .001) and late stage (LSMD -6.7, P < .01) subpopulation. Early stage patients experienced similar amount of TEAEs (CAR 67.3%, PBO 54.1%) as patients in the late stage (CAR 69.6%, PBO 65.6%). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, cariprazine, a potent D3-D2 partial agonist has been found to be safe and effective in the treatment of early and late stage schizophrenia.

Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Cognitive Dysfunction in the Schizophrenia-Bipolar Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Cognitive impairment is a core feature of disorders on the schizophrenia-bipolar spectrum, i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been proposed to be a biomarker of cognitive impairment in these disorders as it plays a critical role in neuroplasticity and proposed to mediate some of the psychotropic effects of medication. However, despite numerous studies investigating the association between circulating BDNF and these disorders, no solid conclusions have been drawn regarding its involvement in cognitive impairment. Objectives: The current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine blood BDNF levels and cognitive dysfunction in patients on the schizophrenia-bipolar spectrum as well as to evaluate whether circulating BDNF measurements can act as a biomarker for cognitive dysfunction. Methods: Studies were identified by searching Embase and Medline databases for English language articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 January and 2021 June according to the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 815 articles were identified of which 32 met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review - reporting on comparisons between blood BDNF levels and cognitive functions of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder patients versus healthy controls (no studies involving schizoaffective patients were specifically obtained for the time being). Twenty-four of these studies (19 with schizophrenia and 5 with bipolar disorder patients) were eligible to be included in the meta-analysis. Results: Our findings indicated that circulating BDNF levels were significantly reduced in patients experiencing an acute episode of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder compared to healthy controls. Cognitive function was also found to be significantly worse in patients, however, correlations between BDNF levels and cognitive impairment were not always detected. Interventions, especially pharmacotherapy seemed to improve certain aspects of cognition and increase circulating BDNF levels. Conclusion: Circulating BDNF alone does not seem to be a valid biomarker of cognitive dysfunction in patients with disorders on the schizophrenia-bipolar spectrum, owing to several confounding factors. Changes of the circulating levels of BDNF should be evaluated in a wider context of other stress-, immune-, and inflammatory-related factors.

Real-Life Clinical Experience With Cariprazine: A Systematic Review of Case Studies.

Background: The hierarchy of evidence coming from evidence-based medicine favors meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials over observational studies and clinical cases. Nonetheless, in the field of psychiatry, where conditions are much more complex, additional evidence coming from real-world clinical practice is necessary to complement data from these gold standards. Thus, in this systematic review, the aim is to summarize the evidence coming from clinical case reports regarding cariprazine, a third-generation antipsychotic drug that has been approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder with manic, depressive or mixed features in adults. Methods: A systematic review was performed using Embase and Pubmed databases searching for English-language cases published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 January and 2021 September with the following search terms: (cariprazin* OR "rgh-188" OR rgh188 OR vraylar OR reagila) AND ("case report*" OR "case report"/de OR "case stud*" OR "case study"/de OR "case seri*"). Results: After the removal of duplicates, 49 articles were retrieved via the search, from which 22 were suitable for this review. These 22 articles encompassed 38 cases from which 71% described patients with schizophrenia, 16% patients with psychotic disorders, 5% patients with mood disorder and 8% described patients with other disorders such as Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome, borderline personality disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder with paranoid schizophrenia. The median age of patients was 31, and half of them were female. The majority of patients (76%) started cariprazine with 1.5 mg/day, and the most common maintenance dose was 4.5 mg/day (34%) and 3.0 mg/day (29%). Conclusion: Cariprazine was found to be safe and effective in a wide range of psychiatric conditions with different symptom profiles from acute psychotic symptoms through addiction to negative and cognitive symptoms. The results are in-line with the established evidence from clinical trials, however, they also show how cariprazine can be successfully utilized for treating certain symptoms irrespective of the indication.

The burden of caring for someone with schizophrenia: A cross country report from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Russia.

INTRODUCTION: People with schizophrenia often need long-term support in their everyday life. Thus, caregivers are vital factors to support their recovery and long-term functioning. In turn, however, the caregiver role is highly burdensome and may lead to severe distress and burnout, imposing further hardness on patients and their family. The aim of this paper was to map the caregivers' situation and their possible needs in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Russia. METHODS: 225 caregivers of schizophrenic patients completed a questionnaire in Bulgaria (n=50), the Czech Republic (n=50), Hungary (n=50) and Russia (n=75) about their sociodemographic status, financial, emotional and subjective challenges that arise from the caregiver duty. RESULTS: Caregivers are mainly married (56%), women (72%) entering their 50's, working full time (48%). The average time they spend taking care of someone with schizophrenia is 26 hours weekly. This duty often limits their indepen - dence (59%), recreational activities (56%), financial security (47%) and social life (47%). Thirty-nine percentage reported health-related issues, while sadness and anxiety were also commonly experienced. Caregivers felt left alone with their struggles (56%), longing for both disease-related information and self-help support. As a result, 21% felt fully or mostly dissatisfied with their life. CONCLUSION: Taking care of someone with schizophrenia represents a high burden, affecting one's social and economic status, as well as mental and physical health. Caregivers often feel alone with their struggles and would welcome tailored support to help them cope with the multidimensional burden they carry.

The effectiveness and safety of cariprazine in schizophrenia patients with negative symptoms and insufficient effectiveness of previous antipsychotic therapy: an observational study.

The aim of the study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of cariprazine in routine psychiatric settings on schizophrenia patients with negative symptoms who have been treated with antipsychotics previously but without sufficient success. This was an open-label, flexible-dose, 16-week, observational study in Latvia. The primary outcome measure was an array of anamnesis-based clinical questions on schizophrenia symptoms rated on a seven-point scale. Other outcome measurements were the clinical global impression improvement (CGI-I) and severity (CGI-S) scales. Safety parameters included spontaneous reports of adverse events and specific assessments of extrapyramidal side-effects. A mixed model for repeated measures was fit to the data to evaluate the mean change from baseline for all visits. A total of 116 patients enrolled in the study (completion: 83%). Change from baseline to termination in symptom control was statistically significant (-7.3; P < 0.001), with the most improvement in negative symptoms (-6.3; P < 0.001). Over 70% of patients improved minimally or much based on the CGI-I scores at the final visit, and the CGI-S scores indicated an overall improvement in severity from moderately to mildly ill. 40% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Over 70% of doctors were satisfied with the effectiveness and tolerability of cariprazine. Cariprazine significantly improved negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients.

Dosing Cariprazine Within and Beyond Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.

Although the optimal dosing of an antipsychotic medication is known to be essential in the long-term management of schizophrenia, in case of novel drugs such as cariprazine, determining the right dosing strategy is not that simple. Without decades of experience with a particular compound, evidence regarding dosing and titration comes primarily from double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials that are not necessarily mirroring the real-life experiences of doctors. Via summarizing data from both clinical data (n = 3275) and real-world evidence (observational study n = 116, case studies n = 29), this perspective paper aims to shed a light on the appropriate dosing strategies of cariprazine from treatment initiation through switching strategies to concomitant medications.

Survival and early complications of preterm infants with birthweight less than 500 grams during a 10-year period in Hungary.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data available on the survival and early complications of preterm infants with less than 500 g birthweight. To estimate the outcomes for these infants, it is important for caregivers to be aware of perinatal factors that may affect survival. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the mortality and certain early complications of preterm infants born with less than 500 g in Hungary between 2006 and 2015. METHODS: We reviewed data of 486 infants from the database of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office and in parallel of 407 infants from the "NICU database." The study period was divided into two epochs: 2006-2010 and 2011-2015. RESULTS: The survival was 27.1% in the first epoch and 39.1% in the second epoch, and the incidence of early complications was slightly higher in the second epoch. In the surviving group (first and second epoch combined), gestational age (25.1 vs 23.7 weeks), birthweight (458 vs 447 g) antenatal steroid treatment (66.3% vs 52.3%), surfactant therapy (95.1% vs 84.3%), median Apgar scores (6 vs 3 and 8 vs 5 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively) and proportion of caesarean delivery (89.3% versus 68.5%) were higher than in the non-surviving group (first and second epoch combined). The proportion of multiple births was lower in the surviving group (15.7% vs 33.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of infants with less than 500 g improved between 2006-2010 and 2011-2015 in Hungary. The slightly higher occurrence of early complications might be associated with improving survival.

Morbidity and mortality trends in very-very low birth weight premature infants in light of recent changes in obstetric care.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we describe trends in morbidity and mortality of preterm infants with less than 500mg birth weight in the changing landscape of obstetric and neonatal care. STUDY DESIGN: During a ten year study period between 2006 and 2016 we assessed outcome data for all neonates with less than 500mg birth weight born at our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. We divided study subjects into two groups based on whether their birth date fell in the first half (2006-2010; n=39) versus the second half (2011-2015; n=27) of the study period comparing clinical outcomes in the two groups. We also assessed several clinical parameters for association with postnatal survival by comparing relative frequencies for each clinical parameter among surviving infants versus mortality cases. RESULTS: Survival rate for preterm neonates with less than 500mg birth weight born between 2006 and 2010 was 30.8%. This survival rate rose to 70.4% in the second half of the study period between 2011 and 2015 (p<0.05). Among surviving babies premature birth was found to be predominantly associated with maternal hypertension or intrauterine growth restriction while in those who died premature birth due to premature rupture of membranes and spontaneous preterm labor were significantly more common. All surviving infants with less than 500mg birth weight were born via cesarean section whereas among those who died cesarean section had been performed in only 80% and vaginal delivery in 20% representing a significant difference between the groups (p<0.05). The majority (90.3%) of surviving infants with less than 500mg birth weight had received surfactant therapy while the proportion of neonates receiving surfactant therapy among mortality cases was significantly lower (65.2%; p<0.05). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that among premature neonates with less than 500mg birth weight preterm delivery due to premature rupture of membranes and intrauterine infections represents the worse mortality risk. Steroid prophylaxis and measures to prevent and treat intrauterine infections with appropriate use of antibiotics can markedly improve survival in these cases. In premature neonates with less than 500mg birth weight survival is more favorable after cesarean section compared to vaginal delivery.