ABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the utility of brain 18F-DOPA PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of brain lesions with inconclusive MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve patients were studied, with a total of 16 lesions, without definitive diagnosis after brain MRI. A double acquisition PET/CT brain scan was acquired at 20 and 90min. Visual and semiquantitative assessment was performed with SUVmax calculation of the lesions and calculation of the T/S Ratio (tumor/contralateral striatum) and T/N Ratio (contralateral healthy tumor/parenchyma) for each time. RESULTS: Based on the visual assessment scale and using T/S ratio ≥1 and T/N ratio ≥1.3 to determine malignancy, the values of sensitivity (S), specificity (E) and positive predictive value (PPV) were: visual assessment (S 100%, E 33.3%, VPP 71.4%), T/S Ratio (S 90%, E 100%, VPP 100%) and T/N Ratio (S 100%, E 16.6%, VPP 66.6 %). No lesion showed an increase in SUVmax in late acquisition. 18F-DOPA PET/CT modified treatment in 75% of the patients. CONCLUSION: 18F-DOPA PET/CT is a useful tool in the study of brain lesions with inconclusive MRI. Late imaging (dual-point) has no added value in the final diagnosis. FDOPA has an impact on patient management modifying therapeutic behavior.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Dihydroxyphenylalanine/analogs & derivatives , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the utility of brain 18F-DOPA PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of brain lesions with inconclusive MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve patients were studied, with a total of 16 lesions, without definitive diagnosis after brain MRI. A double acquisition PET/CT brain scan was acquired at 20 and 90 minutes. Visual and semiquantitative assessment was performed with SUVmax calculation of the lesions and calculation of the T/S ratio (tumor/contralateral striatum) and T/N ratio (tumor/contralateral healthy parenchyma) for each time. RESULTS: Based on the visual assessment scale and using T/S ratio ≥ 1 and T/N ratio ≥ 1.3 to determine malignancy, the values of sensitivity (S), specificity (E) and positive predictive value (PPV) were: visual assessment (S 100%, E 33.3%, VPP 71.4%), T/S ratio (S 90%, E 100%, VPP 100%) and T/N ratio (S 100%, E 16.6%, VPP 66.6%). No lesion showed an increase in SUVmax in late acquisition. 18F-DOPA PET/CT modified treatment in 75% of the patients. CONCLUSION: 18F-DOPA PET/CT is a useful tool in the study of brain lesions with inconclusive MRI. Late imaging (dual-point) has no added value in the final diagnosis. F-DOPA has an impact on patient management modifying therapeutic behavior.
