Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
1.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 29(2): e2423212, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865514

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare accuracy of arch expansion using two different thermoplastic materials in Invisalign aligners: EX30® (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol, or PETG) and SmartTrack® (polyurethane). METHODS: The study sample comprised 65 adult patients consecutively treated with Invisalign from two private practices: group 1 - treated with EX30® (358 teeth) and group 2 - treated with SmartTrack® (888 teeth). Six hundred and twenty-three measurements were assessed in three digital models throughout treatment: model 1 - initial, model 2 - predicted tooth position, and model 3 - achieved position. Sixteen reference points per arch were marked and, after best alignment, 2 points per tooth were copied from one digital model to another. Linear values of both arches were measured for canines, premolars, and first molars: on lingual gingival margins and cusp tips of every tooth. Comparisons were performed by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Both termoplastic materials presented significant differences between predicted and achieved values for all measurements, except for the lower molar cusp tip in the SmartTrack® group. There is no statistical difference in the accuracy of transverse expansion between these two materials. Overall accuracy for EX30® aligners in maxilla and mandible were found to be 37 and 38%, respectively; and Smarttrack® presented an overall accuracy of 56.62% in the maxilla and 68.72% in the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: It is not possible to affirm one material expands better than the other. Further controlled clinical studies should be conducted comparing SmartTrack® and EX30® under similar conditions.


Subject(s)
Orthodontic Appliance Design , Polyethylene Terephthalates , Polyurethanes , Tooth Movement Techniques , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Female , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentation , Male , Polyurethanes/therapeutic use , Polyethylene Glycols , Dental Arch , Orthodontic Appliances, Removable , Young Adult
2.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 29(2): e2423237, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775600

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to assess the predictability of Invisalign® aligners regarding rotational, mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip movements. METHODS: Two materials were included in the analysis - EX30, used until 2013; and SmartTrack, in current use. The study comprised 56 adult patients treated with Invisalign Comprehensive. Data sample were assessed on three sets of digital models; model 1 - initial, model 2 - predicted, and model 3 - achieved. Sixty reference points were marked in each dental arch, and two reference planes assisted the superimposition. The degree of rotation, mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip was obtained via trigonometric calculations, through a previously published validated method. The accuracy of outcomes was compared according to the types of tooth movement and teeth groups,and the influence of predetermined variables on movement accuracy was also investigated. RESULTS: Rotation and mesio-distal tip did not present any significant difference when comparing EX30 and SmartTrack groups. Only buccal-lingual tip presented a significant difference, incisor and canine groups treated with EX30 aligners presented an increase in accuracy (p= 0.007 and p = 0.007, respectively). For each additional degree planned for rotation movements, there was an increase of 0.35° in the discrepancy, and an increase of 0.40° and 0.41° for mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip, respectively. EX30 and SmartTrack discrepancies were compared by multilevel linear regression. CONCLUSION: EX30 aligners reached higher accuracy for buccal-lingual tip in anterior teeth. However, for rotation and mesio-distal tip, SmartTrack and EX30 are similarly accurate. The total amount of planned movement has a significant impact on accuracy rates, with a decrease in accuracy for every additional degree.


Subject(s)
Tooth Movement Techniques , Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Rotation , Female , Male , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Incisor , Models, Dental , Orthodontic Appliances, Removable , Dental Arch
3.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 27(4): 615-625, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456750

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this prospective study was to assess possible changes in the position and shape of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) articular disc in patients treated with two protocols of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and face mask (FM) therapy. METHODS: A sample of 88 patients with Class III or Class III subdivision malocclusions, aged between 6 and 13 years, were consecutively selected and divided into three groups (G): G1-34 patients were treated with RME, followed by FM therapy; G2-34 patients were treated using RME according to modified alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (ALT-RAMEC) protocol, followed by FM therapy. These treated groups were randomly (1:1 allocation ratio) distributed according to the two treatment protocols. G3 - Control Group - 20 untreated patients were followed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) TMJs were obtained before (T1) and after (T2) a treatment period or follow-up. McNemar test, Fisher's exact test and intra- and inter-observer concordance (K) were performed (p ≤ .05). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline cephalometric variables at T1 between the groups. There were statistically significant differences between the groups (p < .001) in relation to the disc shape in T1, since G1 (8 TMJs -11.76%) presented higher occurrences of altered forms in comparison with G2 (no changes). No significant differences were observed in disc position CM and OM (G1 - p > .999; G2 - p = .063; G3 - p = .500) and shape (G1 - p > 0.999; G2 - p = .250; G3 - not calculable), between T1 × T2, in any of the groups studied. CONCLUSION: The two treatment protocols did not have adverse effects on the position and shape of the TMJ disc, in a short-term evaluation.


Subject(s)
Extraoral Traction Appliances , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Palatal Expansion Technique , Temporomandibular Joint Disc , Humans , Palatal Expansion Technique/instrumentation , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/pathology , Male , Female , Adolescent , Child , Prospective Studies , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Cephalometry , Treatment Outcome , Follow-Up Studies
4.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 29(2): e2423212, 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-1557692

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare accuracy of arch expansion using two different thermoplastic materials in Invisalign aligners: EX30® (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol, or PETG) and SmartTrack® (polyurethane). Methods: The study sample comprised 65 adult patients consecutively treated with Invisalign from two private practices: group 1 - treated with EX30® (358 teeth) and group 2 - treated with SmartTrack® (888 teeth). Six hundred and twenty-three measurements were assessed in three digital models throughout treatment: model 1 - initial, model 2 - predicted tooth position, and model 3 - achieved position. Sixteen reference points per arch were marked and, after best alignment, 2 points per tooth were copied from one digital model to another. Linear values of both arches were measured for canines, premolars, and first molars: on lingual gingival margins and cusp tips of every tooth. Comparisons were performed by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney test. Results: Both termoplastic materials presented significant differences between predicted and achieved values for all measurements, except for the lower molar cusp tip in the SmartTrack® group. There is no statistical difference in the accuracy of transverse expansion between these two materials. Overall accuracy for EX30® aligners in maxilla and mandible were found to be 37 and 38%, respectively; and Smarttrack® presented an overall accuracy of 56.62% in the maxilla and 68.72% in the mandible. Conclusions: It is not possible to affirm one material expands better than the other. Further controlled clinical studies should be conducted comparing SmartTrack® and EX30® under similar conditions.


RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo retrospectivo foi comparar a acurácia na expansão da arcada utilizando alinhadores Invisalign com dois tipos de material termoplástico: EX30® (Polietileno Tereftalato Glicol, ou PETG) e SmartTrack® (poliuretano). Método: A amostra desse estudo incluiu 65 pacientes adultos tratados consecutivamente em dois consultórios particulares: grupo 1 - tratado com EX30® (358 dentes), e grupo 2 - tratado com SmartTrack® (888 dentes). Foram avaliadas 623 medidas em três pares de modelos digitais, ao longo do tratamento: modelo 1 - inicial, modelo 2 - posição dentária planejada, modelo 3 - posição alcançada. Foram marcados 16 pontos de referência por arcada e, após o bestfit, 2 pontos por arcada foram copiados de um modelo digital para o outro. Medidas lineares de ambas as arcadas foram aferidas para caninos, pré-molares e primeiros molares, localizadas na margem gengival lingual e ponta de cúspide de todos os dentes. Foram realizadas comparações usando os testes Wilcoxon e Mann-Whitney. Resultados: Ambos os materiais termoplásticos apresentaram diferenças significativas entre os valores planejados e alcançados em todas as medidas, exceto na ponta de cúspide dos primeiros molares inferiores do grupo SmartTrack®. Não houve diferença estatística entre esses dois materiais quanto à acurácia da expansão transversa. Em termos gerais, a acurácia dos alinhadores EX30® na maxila e mandíbula foi de 37% e 38%, respectivamente. O grupo SmartTrack® apresentou acurácia de 56,62% e 68,72% na maxila e mandíbula, respectivamente. Conclusões: Não foi possível afirmar que um material expande melhor que o outro. Estudos clínicos controlados futuros devem ser conduzidos comparando SmartTrack® e EX30® sob condições similares.

5.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 29(2): e2423237, 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-1557693

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: This retrospective study aimed to assess the predictability of Invisalign® aligners regarding rotational, mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip movements. Methods: Two materials were included in the analysis - EX30, used until 2013; and SmartTrack, in current use. The study comprised 56 adult patients treated with Invisalign Comprehensive. Data sample were assessed on three sets of digital models; model 1 - initial, model 2 - predicted, and model 3 - achieved. Sixty reference points were marked in each dental arch, and two reference planes assisted the superimposition. The degree of rotation, mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip was obtained via trigonometric calculations, through a previously published validated method. The accuracy of outcomes was compared according to the types of tooth movement and teeth groups,and the influence of predetermined variables on movement accuracy was also investigated. Results: Rotation and mesio-distal tip did not present any significant difference when comparing EX30 and SmartTrack groups. Only buccal-lingual tip presented a significant difference, incisor and canine groups treated with EX30 aligners presented an increase in accuracy (p= 0.007 and p = 0.007, respectively). For each additional degree planned for rotation movements, there was an increase of 0.35° in the discrepancy, and an increase of 0.40° and 0.41° for mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip, respectively. EX30 and SmartTrack discrepancies were compared by multilevel linear regression. Conclusion: EX30 aligners reached higher accuracy for buccal-lingual tip in anterior teeth. However, for rotation and mesio-distal tip, SmartTrack and EX30 are similarly accurate. The total amount of planned movement has a significant impact on accuracy rates, with a decrease in accuracy for every additional degree.


RESUMO Objetivo: Esse estudo retrospectivo teve como objetivo aferir a previsibilidade dos alinhadores Invisalign em relação aos movimentos de rotação e inclinações mesiodistal e vestibulolingual. Material e Métodos: Foram incluídos dois materiais nessa análise: EX30®, utilizado até 2013; e SmartTrack®, atualmente em uso. Esse estudo avaliou 56 pacientes tratados com Invisalign Comprehensive. Os dados foram avaliados em três pares de modelos digitais; modelo 1 - inicial, modelo 2 - planejado, e modelo 3 - alcançado. Foram marcados 60 pontos de referência em cada arcada, sendo a sobreposição realizada com auxílio de planos de referência. O grau de rotação e inclinações mesiodistal e vestibulolingual foi obtido por cálculos de trigonometria, usando um método validado publicado anteriormente. Os resultados foram comparados de acordo com os tipos de movimento dentário e grupos de dentes, também foi investigada a influência de variáveis predeterminadas na confiabilidade dos movimentos. Resultados: Os movimentos de rotação e inclinação mesiodistal não apresentaram diferença estatística, quando comparados os grupos EX30® e SmartTrack®. Somente a inclinação vestibulolingual apresentou diferença estatisticamente significativa, sendo que os grupos de incisivos e caninos tratados com alinhadores EX30® apresentaram um aumento na previsibilidade(p= 0,007 e p= 0,007, respectivamente). Para cada grau adicional planejado para movimento de rotação, ocorreu um aumento de 0,35° na discrepância, e aumentos de 0,40° e 0,41° para as inclinações mesiodistal e vestibulolingual, respectivamente. As discrepâncias entre EX30® e SmartTrack® foram comparadas por regressão linear multinível. Conclusão: Os alinhadores EX30® alcançaram maior previsibilidade para a inclinação vestibulolingual em dentes anteriores. No entanto, para rotação e inclinação mesiodistal, SmartTrack® e EX30® apresentaram previsibilidade similar. A quantidade total de movimento planejado apresenta influência significativa nas taxas de previsibilidade, com diminuição na acurácia para cada grau adicional.

6.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 26(2): 185-196, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35946345

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the position and shape of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) articular disc among the sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in Angle Class III, Class III subdivision malocclusion and normal occlusion. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in disc position and shape in different (1) malocclusions and (2) skeletal patterns. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study evaluated 105 patients divided into 3 groups: Class III (33, 9.39 ± 1.96 years), Class III subdivision (45, 9.51 ± 1.59 years) and a normal occlusion (27, 10.24 ± 0.87 years) was included as healthy control. Severity of the maxilla-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancy and vertical facial pattern were determined using 2D cephalometry, and the position and shape of the articular discs were evaluated in magnetic resonance images. Statistical parametric and non-parametric tests and Kappa analysis for intra-observer and inter-observer assessment were used (p ≤ .05). RESULTS: Significant between-group differences were found in articular disc position. In the normal occlusion group, all the articular discs were well positioned. In Class III and Class III subdivision, the discs were displaced in 30.3% and 12.2% of the TMJs, respectively. Sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns did not affect the findings significantly. The Class III subdivision malocclusion group is probably different from the other groups, showing 97.7% of biconcave discs in both TMJs. CONCLUSION: The longitudinal follow-up of this sample becomes relevant as the two groups with malocclusion in the pre-peak phase of pubertal growth showed differences in the prevalence of displacement and form of the articular disc, with no association with their vertical facial characteristics.


Subject(s)
Joint Dislocations , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Malocclusion , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion/epidemiology , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Temporomandibular Joint , Joint Dislocations/pathology , Mandibular Condyle/pathology
7.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 26(1): 27-36, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35347846

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of treatment with a Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander (Stage I), followed by fixed appliances (Stage II) and follow-up for an average of 4 years after Stage II, on dentoskeletal facial structures. METHODS: This study involved 50 adolescents with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion associated with mandibular retrognathism: Treated Group (TG-25) and Control Group (CG-25). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken: T1, immediately before Stage I (TG) or at the beginning of the follow-up period (CG); T2, at the end of Stage I (TG) or the follow-up period (CG); T3, at the end of Stage II (TG); and T4, on average, 4 years after Stage II (TG). Enlow's counterpart analysis and some cephalometric measurements were evaluated. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The ramus alignment variables (P < 0.001), SNB (0.040), ANB (<0.001), 1.PP (P = 0.015), 1.MP (P < 0.001), ms/RLp (P < 0.001), mi/RLp (P < 0.001) and S-LS (P = 0.005) showed differences between TG and CG from T1 to T2. Longitudinally, there were differences in ramus alignment, P = 0.003, T1 > T2 < T3 = T4; SNB, P = 0.016, T1 < T2 = T3 = T4; ANB, P < 0.001, T1 > T2 = T3 = T4; 1.MP, P < 0.001, T1 < T2 = T3 = T4; ms/RLp, P = 0.002, T1 = T2 < T3 = T4; mi/RLp, P < 0.001, T1 < T2 = T3 = T4; S-LS, P < 0.001, T1 > T2 = T3 = T4 and S-LI, P = 0.003, T1 = T2 = T3 > T4. CONCLUSION: The nasomaxillary complex (MCF/PM alignment) tended to a retrusive effect to compensate the degree of mandibular retrusion. The protrusive effect of the lower facial third was evident after the Herbst stage and did not remain stable in the follow-up. The dentoalveolar compensation and improvement in facial profile remained stable.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II , Orthodontic Appliances, Functional , Adolescent , Humans , Cephalometry , Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Orthodontic Appliances, Functional/standards , Longitudinal Studies
8.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 26(2): 239-247, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36073609

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The intrusion of posterior teeth had been considered challenging up to the development of orthodontic mini implants. In periodontally compromised teeth, the challenge is even greater, because of the root resorption risk due to periodontal ligament over-compression. Still, the precise strategy to determine the force reduction level remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine, by a finite element analysis (FEA), the force reduction needed to avoid root resorption and maintain the efficiency of orthodontic mechanics of periodontally compromised teeth similar to the sound one. METHODS: An anatomical model was constructed representing a premolar inserted into a maxillary bone. Based on the initial model (R0), three bone height loss conditions were simulated (R2 = 2 mm, R4 = 4 mm, and R6 = 6 mm). Two intrusive movements were simulated: pure intrusion (bilateral mini implant) and uncontrolled-tipping intrusion (buccal mini implant). The hydrostatic stress at the periodontal ligament was used to evaluate the risk of root resorption due to over-compression. RESULTS: For bilateral mini implant intrusion, the force had to be decreased by 16%, 32% and 48% for R2, R4 and R6, respectively. For buccal mini implant intrusion, the required reductions were higher (20%, 36% and 56%). A linear relationship between the intrusive force reduction and the alveolar bone height loss was observed in both intrusion mechanics. CONCLUSIONS: According to the FE results, 8% or 9.3% of force reduction for each millimetre of bone height loss is suggested for intrusion with bilateral or buccal mini implant, respectively. The buccal mini implant anchorage must be associated with a supplemental strategy to avoid buccal crown tipping.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures , Root Resorption , Humans , Finite Element Analysis , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/methods , Periodontal Ligament , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Maxilla
10.
Clin Oral Investig ; 26(1): 463-469, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34258675

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) position of the cervical vertebrae of growing subjects with unilateral posterior crossbite (UPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 1455 patients were screened, and ultimately 58 scans (26 patients with UPC and 32 controls with normal occlusion) were included after imposing inclusion/exclusion criteria. Roll, yaw, and deviation of the geometric center of C1, C2, and C3 vertebrae were measured and compared between groups. A correlation between these parameters and different variables on mandibular positioning was also carried out. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between groups for the deviation of pogonium (Pog), mandibular plane roll, and C3 roll, and patients with UPC showed higher cant or deviation. A significant correlation was reported for the roll of C2 and C3 with the deviation of Pog, a roll of the occlusal plane, and roll of the mandibular plane (p < 0.05). The greater the deviation of the Pog to one side, the greater the roll of the vertebrae with this same side up. The same tendency was observed between the roll of the occlusal plane or the mandibular plane with the roll of these cervical vertebrae. CONCLUSIONS: There is a positive correlation between transverse occlusal changes and positional deviations of the cervical vertebrae, especially C2 and C3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study results do not allow us to infer the clinical/functional consequences of these deviations, as well as if malocclusion's treatment would result in an improvement of intervertebral relationships.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion , Mandible , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Malocclusion/diagnostic imaging
11.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 26(3): e2119148, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34231830

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the present study were to develop a method for longitudinally measuring tooth rotation, inclination and angulation on digital models, and to test the method validity and reliability. METHODS: The initial and final planned models of 14 patients treated with Invisalign® (386 teeth) were exported from ClinCheck®. The rotation, inclination and angulation values were assessed for the incisors, canines, premolars and molars, in both models, using trigonometry. An application was developed in Python 2.7 to automate the measurements. The ∆planned (variation in the position between the initial and final planned models) was obtained for each tooth and each type of movement. To test the validity, the degree of agreement between the ∆planned and the values available in the Invisalign® Table of Movements was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. For intra and inter-rater reliabilities, the ∆planned was obtained again. RESULTS: Excellent ICCs (> 0.9) and limits of agreement with narrow and clinically acceptable discrepancies were obtained for the rotation of all teeth (except maxillary canines, which had broader limits: -3.47 - 5.43) and for the inclination of premolars and molars. The inclination of anterior teeth and angulation of all teeth had ICCs and limits that were not indicative of great agreement. The reliability was high for the three movements (discrepancy <2°). CONCLUSIONS: The method developed is reliable and suitable for longitudinally measuring inclination (posterior teeth) and rotation (except maxillary canines). It has limited value for the other movements measurements.


Subject(s)
Cuspid , Tooth Movement Techniques , Bicuspid , Humans , Incisor , Reproducibility of Results
12.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 26(3): e2119148, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-1286208

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: The objectives of the present study were to develop a method for longitudinally measuring tooth rotation, inclination and angulation on digital models, and to test the method validity and reliability. Methods: The initial and final planned models of 14 patients treated with Invisalign® (386 teeth) were exported from ClinCheck®. The rotation, inclination and angulation values were assessed for the incisors, canines, premolars and molars, in both models, using trigonometry. An application was developed in Python 2.7 to automate the measurements. The ∆planned (variation in the position between the initial and final planned models) was obtained for each tooth and each type of movement. To test the validity, the degree of agreement between the ∆planned and the values available in the Invisalign® Table of Movements was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. For intra and inter-rater reliabilities, the ∆planned was obtained again. Results: Excellent ICCs (> 0.9) and limits of agreement with narrow and clinically acceptable discrepancies were obtained for the rotation of all teeth (except maxillary canines, which had broader limits: -3.47 - 5.43) and for the inclination of premolars and molars. The inclination of anterior teeth and angulation of all teeth had ICCs and limits that were not indicative of great agreement. The reliability was high for the three movements (discrepancy <2°). Conclusions: The method developed is reliable and suitable for longitudinally measuring inclination (posterior teeth) and rotation (except maxillary canines). It has limited value for the other movements measurements.


RESUMO Objetivo: Os objetivos do presente estudo foram desenvolver um método para medir longitudinalmente a rotação, inclinação e angulação dentárias em modelos digitais, e testar sua validade e reprodutibilidade. Material e Métodos: Os modelos inicial e final planejado de 14 pacientes tratados com Invisalign® (386 dentes) foram exportados do ClinCheck®. Os valores de rotação, inclinação e angulação foram calculados para incisivos, caninos, pré-molares e molares, em ambos os modelos, por meio de trigonometria. Um aplicativo desenvolvido em Python 2.7 foi utilizado para automatização das medidas. O ∆planejado (variação na posição entre os modelos inicial e final planejado) foi obtido para os movimentos descritos, nos diferentes grupos de dentes. A validade do método foi verificada pelo grau de concordância entre o ∆planejado e os valores disponíveis na Tabela de Movimentos do Invisalign®, utilizando-se o Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse (ICC) e a análise de Bland-Altman. O ∆planejado foi novamente calculado para análise da reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminadores. Resultados: Excelentes ICCs (> 0,9) e limites de concordância com discrepâncias reduzidas e clinicamente aceitáveis foram obtidos para a rotação de todos os dentes (exceto os caninos superiores, que expressaram limites mais amplos: -3,47 - 5,43) e para a inclinação de pré-molares e molares. A inclinação dos dentes anteriores e a angulação de todos os dentes apresentaram ICCs e limites não representativos de boa concordância. A reprodutibilidade foi alta para os três movimentos (discrepância < 2°). Conclusões: O método desenvolvido é reprodutível e se mostrou adequado para mensuração longitudinal da inclinação de dentes posteriores e rotação de todos os dentes, exceto caninos superiores. Apresenta valor limitado para as demais mensurações.


Subject(s)
Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques , Cuspid , Bicuspid , Reproducibility of Results , Incisor
13.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 10562, 2019 07 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31332205

ABSTRACT

This study describes the effect of the software binning and data averaging during micro CT volume acquisition, on the assessment of root resorption volumes. The mesial roots (n = 9), after orthodontic tooth movement during 14 days, were scanned, using a micro CT system (9 µm/pixel). All roots were reconstructed and the volumes of the resorption lacunae evaluated. The height and width of the pixels vary according to the parameters (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9) used during the scan. In the root #1 the mean volumes of resorption were similar in A4 and A7; in the root #2 there was no similarity in the mean volumes of resorption in any of the parameters; in root #3 only A4 presented mean volume different from zero (3.05 × 10°). In the root #5, the A1 and A7 presented similar mean volumes and in the A6 and A9 presented near mean volumes. In the root #9 the A1, A4, and A7 presented similar mean volumes and A6 and A9 also had similar mean volumes. Significant difference was detected in the volume of resorption among the roots #2, #5 and #9 (p = 0.04). When analyzing delicate structures such as the roots of rats' molars, the variation of such parameters will significantly influence the results.

14.
Braz Dent J ; 30(4): 410-416, 2019 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31340233

ABSTRACT

The present study aimed to analyze the effect of LED phototherapy on the presence of hyalinization and root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) in rats and to measure the amount of tooth movement. Eighty rats were allocated into two groups: LED and control (CON), where the LED rats were irradiated with infrared LED (850 nm, 30 mW) for 5 min during the first five days of OTM and where controls were not irradiated. Both groups were subdivided into four subgroups (n=10) according to the date of euthanasia (4, 7, 14 and 21 days). Five out of ten LED21 and five of ten CON21 rats were submitted to micro-computed tomography (µCT); µCT scans were taken on days 0, 7, 14 and 21. For histological study, maxillae were processed to light microscopy using Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) and Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) histochemistry. The amount of tooth movement did not differ between LED and CON. Hyalinization was observed at the pressure areas in both groups, and it did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. Root resorption was also observed in both groups after 7 days and it did not represent any differences between the two groups. LED phototherapy was not able to increase the amount of OTM. Similar characteristics of hyalinization and root resorption were observed in both groups.


Subject(s)
Root Resorption , Tooth Movement Techniques , Animals , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase , X-Ray Microtomography
15.
Braz. dent. j ; Braz. dent. j;30(4): 410-416, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1011567

ABSTRACT

Abstract The present study aimed to analyze the effect of LED phototherapy on the presence of hyalinization and root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) in rats and to measure the amount of tooth movement. Eighty rats were allocated into two groups: LED and control (CON), where the LED rats were irradiated with infrared LED (850 nm, 30 mW) for 5 min during the first five days of OTM and where controls were not irradiated. Both groups were subdivided into four subgroups (n=10) according to the date of euthanasia (4, 7, 14 and 21 days). Five out of ten LED21 and five of ten CON21 rats were submitted to micro-computed tomography (μCT); μCT scans were taken on days 0, 7, 14 and 21. For histological study, maxillae were processed to light microscopy using Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) and Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) histochemistry. The amount of tooth movement did not differ between LED and CON. Hyalinization was observed at the pressure areas in both groups, and it did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. Root resorption was also observed in both groups after 7 days and it did not represent any differences between the two groups. LED phototherapy was not able to increase the amount of OTM. Similar characteristics of hyalinization and root resorption were observed in both groups.


Resumo O presente estudo tem como objetivo analisar o efeito da fototerapia LED na presença da hialinização e reabsorção radicular durante o movimento dentário ortodôntico (MDO) em ratos, e a mensuração da quantidade de movimento dentário. Oitenta ratos foram alocados em dois grupos: LED e Controle (CON), os ratos foram irradiados com um LED infravermelho (850nm, 30mW) por 5 minutos durante os cinco primeiros dias da MDO; e o grupo controle não foi irradiado. Ambos os grupos foram subdivididos em 4 subgrupos (n=10) de acordo com a data da eutanásia (4, 7, 14 e 21 dias). Cinco dos dez ratos LED21 e cinco dos dez ratos CON21foram submetidos a microtomografia computadorizada (μCT); As μCT foram realizadas nos dias 0, 7, 14 e 21. Para o estudo histológico, as maxilas foram processadas para microscopia de luz, usando hematoxilina-eosina (HE) e Fosfatase ácido Tartrate-Resistente (TRAP) para histoquímica. A quantidade de movimento dentário não diferiu entre o LED e o CON. A hialinização foi observada nas áreas de pressão em ambos os grupos e não mostrou diferença estatisticamente significante. Reabsorção radicular também foi observada em ambos os grupos depois de 7 dias e não houve diferença entre os grupos. A fototerapia LED não aumentou a quantidade de MDO. Características similares de hialinização e reabsorção radicular foram observadas em ambos os grupos


Subject(s)
Animals , Rats , Root Resorption , Tooth Movement Techniques , Rats, Wistar , X-Ray Microtomography , Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase
16.
Clin Oral Investig ; 22(1): 369-376, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28488057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine the effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on the first molar roots of cleft lip and palate subjects along different root development stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty participants with unilateral cleft lip and palate were divided into three groups (n = 10), according to the type of expander used: Hyrax, iMini and Fan-type. A cone beam CT scan was performed before (T1) and 3 months after stabilization of the appliance (T2). Measurements of root lengths of the first permanent maxillary molars were taken to evaluate root development and external apical root resorption (EARR). RESULTS: Roots presenting open apexes before treatment exhibited a statistically significant increase in root length after treatment (P < .001). Conversely, there were no significant changes in the root length of roots that had closed apexes at the beginning of treatment (P > .05). Furthermore, there were no differences among groups, or correlation between cleft side and gender was found vis-à-vis to changes in the root length (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic forces of RME were neither able to interrupt the root development process nor to cause EARR in cleft subjects. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As the RME is the most common orthodontic procedure in patients with cleft lip and palate, understanding its impact on dental structures is of fundamental importance.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip/therapy , Cleft Palate/therapy , Molar/diagnostic imaging , Palatal Expansion Technique , Tooth Root/anatomy & histology , Tooth Root/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Child , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Female , Humans , Male , Maxilla , Molar/anatomy & histology , Molar/growth & development , Prospective Studies , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Reproducibility of Results , Tooth Root/growth & development
17.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 19(1): 46-54, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24713559

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the dentoskeletal changes observed in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrognathism. Treatment was performed with the Herbst orthopedic appliance during 13 months (phase I) and pre-adjusted orthodontic fixed appliance (phase II). METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 17 adolescents were taken in phase I onset (T1) and completion (T2); in the first thirteen months of phase II (T3) and in phase II completion (T4). Differences among the cephalometric variables were statistically analyzed (Bonferroni variance and multiple comparisons). RESULTS: From T1 to T4, 42% of overall maxillary growth was observed between T1 and T2 (P<0.01), 40.3% between T2 and T3 (P<0.05) and 17.7% between T3 and T4 (n.s.). As for overall mandibular movement, 48.2% was observed between T1 and T2 (P<0.001) and 51.8% between T2 and T4 (P<0.01) of which 15.1% was observed between T2 and T3 (n.s.) and 36.7% between T3 and T4 (P<0.01). Class II molar relationship and overjet were properly corrected. The occlusal plane which rotated clockwise between T1 and T2, returned to its initial position between T2 and T3, remaining stable until T4. The mandibular plane inclination did not change at any time during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular growth was significantly greater in comparison to maxillary, allowing sagittal maxillomandibular adjustment. The dentoalveolar changes (upper molar) that overcorrected the malocclusion in phase I, partially recurred in phase II, but did not hinder correction of the malocclusion. Facial type was preserved.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Orthodontic Appliances, Functional , Retrognathia/therapy , Adolescent , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mandible/growth & development , Mandible/pathology , Mandibular Advancement/instrumentation , Maxilla/growth & development , Maxilla/pathology , Molar/pathology , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Palatal Expansion Technique/instrumentation , Rotation , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome
18.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 19(1): 46-54, Jan-Feb/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-709646

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the dentoskeletal changes observed in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrognathism. Treatment was performed with the Herbst orthopedic appliance during 13 months (phase I) and pre-adjusted orthodontic fixed appliance (phase II). METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 17 adolescents were taken in phase I onset (T1) and completion (T2); in the first thirteen months of phase II (T3) and in phase II completion (T4). Differences among the cephalometric variables were statistically analyzed (Bonferroni variance and multiple comparisons). RESULTS: From T1 to T4, 42% of overall maxillary growth was observed between T1 and T2 (P < 0.01), 40.3% between T2 and T3 (P < 0.05) and 17.7% between T3 and T4 (n.s.). As for overall mandibular movement, 48.2% was observed between T1 and T2 (P < 0.001) and 51.8% between T2 and T4 (P < 0.01) of which 15.1% was observed between T2 and T3 (n.s.) and 36.7% between T3 and T4 (P < 0.01). Class II molar relationship and overjet were properly corrected. The occlusal plane which rotated clockwise between T1 and T2, returned to its initial position between T2 and T3 remaining stable until T4. The mandibular plane inclination did not change at any time during treatment. CONCLUSION: Mandibular growth was significantly greater in comparison to maxillary, allowing sagittal maxillomandibular adjustment. The dentoalveolar changes (upper molar) that overcorrected the malocclusion in phase I, partially recurred in phase II, but did not hinder correction of the malocclusion. Facial type was preserved. .


OBJETIVO: avaliar as alterações dentoesqueléticas observadas no tratamento da má oclusão de Classe II com retrognatismo mandibular, realizado com aparelho ortopédico de Herbst durante 13 meses (Fase I) e aparelho ortodôntico fixo pré-ajustado (Fase II). MÉTODOS: foram obtidas telerradiografias laterais de 17 adolescentes, ao início (T1), final da Fase I (T2), primeiros 13 meses da Fase II (T3) e término da Fase II (T4). As diferenças entre as variáveis cefalométricas foram analisadas estatisticamente (variância e comparações múltiplas de Bonferroni). RESULTADOS: de T1 a T4, do total da projeção da maxila, 42% foram observados de T1 a T2 (p < 0,01); 40,3% de T2 a T3 (p < 0,05); e 17,7% de T3 a T4 (n.s.). Do total da projeção da mandíbula, foi notado 48,2% de T1 a T2 (p < 0,001) e 51,8% de T2 a T4 (p < 0,01), sendo 15,1% (n.s.) de T2 a T3, e 36,7% de T3 a T4 (p < 0,01). A relação molar e a sobressaliência foram corrigidas idealmente. Em T4, todos apresentavam características de oclusão normal. O plano oclusal que de T1 a T2 rotacionou no sentido horário, de T2 a T3 retornou aos valores iniciais, mantendo-se estável até T4. A inclinação do plano mandibular, responsável pela caracterização do tipo facial, não alterou em nenhum tempo. CONCLUSÃO: a mandíbula cresceu significativamente mais que a maxila, favorecendo o ajuste sagital maxilomandibular. As mudanças dentárias (molares superiores), que sobrecorrigiram a má oclusão na Fase I, recidivaram parcialmente na Fase II, sem comprometer a correção da má oclusão. O tipo facial foi preservado. .


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Orthodontic Appliances, Functional , Retrognathia/therapy , Cephalometry/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Mandible/growth & development , Mandible/pathology , Mandibular Advancement/instrumentation , Maxilla/growth & development , Maxilla/pathology , Molar/pathology , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Palatal Expansion Technique/instrumentation , Rotation , Treatment Outcome , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentation
19.
Angle Orthod ; 84(1): 171-6, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23834269

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of two adhesion boosters on shear bond strength and on the bond failure location of indirectly bonded brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty bovine incisors were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20), and their buccal faces were etched using 37% phosphoric acid. In group 1 (control), brackets were indirectly bonded using only Sondhi adhesive. In groups 2 and 3, the adhesion boosters Enhance Adhesion Booster and Assure Universal Bonding Resin, respectively, were applied before bonding with Sondhi. Maximum bond strength was measured with a universal testing machine, and the location of bond failure was evaluated using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). One-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey test (P < .05) was used to compare the shear bond strength among groups, and the differences in ARI scores were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test (P < .05). The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to determine whether there was any correlation between bond strength and ARI scores. RESULTS: The mean shear bond strength in group 3 was significantly higher (P < .01) than in the other groups. Evaluation of the locations of bond failure revealed differences (P < .05) among the three groups. There was a moderate correlation between bond strength and ARI scores within group 3 (r  =  0.5860, P < .01). CONCLUSION: In vitro shear bond strength was acceptable in all groups. The use of the Assure adhesion booster significantly increased both the shear bond strength of indirectly bonded brackets and the amount of adhesive that remained on the enamel after bracket debonding.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Cements/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Animals , Cattle , Compomers/chemistry , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Materials Testing , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Random Allocation , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Temperature , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
20.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 18(6): 100-5, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24351156

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Moyers analysis is widely used for analyzing mixed dentition, however, the accuracy of its theoretical probability tables has been recently questioned. Taking into consideration the fact the mixed dentition analysis is of paramount importance to precisely determine the space needed for alignment of canines and premolars, this research aimed at objectively assessing in the literature such an important step for orthodontic diagnosis. METHODS: A computerized search involving articles published on PubMed and Lilacs between 1990 and September, 2011 was conducted in accordance with the method described in the Cochrane 5.1.0 handbook. RESULTS: The research resulted in a sample composed of 629 articles. The inclusion criteria were: Articles using the Moyers analysis with a sample greater or equal to 40 patients. Conversely, the exclusion criteria were: Dental casts of patients with syndromes or oral cleft, researches conducted with a literature review, only, or clinical case reports and researches conducted before 1990. For this systematic review, 19 articles were selected. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the literature available, we can conclude that Moyers mixed dentition analysis must be carefully used, since the majority of the articles analyzed showed that the probability of 75% was not as accurate as expected, leading to the need of adapting the probability levels depending on the study population.


Subject(s)
Bicuspid/anatomy & histology , Cuspid/anatomy & histology , Dental Arch/anatomy & histology , Dentition, Mixed , Tooth Crown/anatomy & histology , Forecasting , Humans , Probability , Tooth, Unerupted/anatomy & histology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL