Age differences in the association of comorbid burden with adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Older age and comorbid burden are both associated with adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2, but it is not known whether the association between comorbid burden and adverse outcomes differs in older and younger adults. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relationship between comorbid burden and adverse outcomes in adults with SARS-CoV-2 of different ages (18-64, 65-79 and ≥ 80 years). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational longitudinal cohort study of 170,528 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System between 2/28/20 and 12/31/2020 who were followed through 01/31/2021. MEASUREMENTS: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); Incidence of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and death within 30 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. RESULTS: The cumulative 30-day incidence of death was 0.8% in cohort members < 65 years, 7.1% in those aged 65-79 years and 20.6% in those aged ≥80 years. The respective 30-day incidences of hospitalization were 8.2, 21.7 and 29.5%, of ICU admission were 2.7, 8.6, and 11% and of mechanical ventilation were 1, 3.9 and 3.2%. Median CCI (interquartile range) ranged from 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) in the youngest, to 4 (2.0, 7.0) in the oldest age group. The adjusted association of CCI with all outcomes was attenuated at older ages such that the threshold level of CCI above which the risk for each outcome exceeded the reference group (1st quartile) was lower in younger than in older cohort members (p < 0.001 for all age group interactions). LIMITATIONS: The CCI is calculated based on diagnostic codes, which may not provide an accurate assessment of comorbid burden. CONCLUSIONS: Age differences in the distribution and prognostic significance of overall comorbid burden could inform clinical management, vaccination prioritization and population health during the pandemic and argue for more work to understand the role of age and comorbidity in shaping the care of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2.

A Health Services Research Agenda for Bariatric Surgery Within the Veterans Health Administration.

In 2016, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) held a Weight Management State of the Art conference to identify evidence gaps and develop a research agenda for population-based weight management for veterans. Included were behavioral, pharmacologic, and bariatric surgery workgroups. This article summarizes the bariatric surgery workgroup (BSWG) findings and recommendations for future research. The BSWG agreed that there is evidence from randomized trials and large observational studies suggesting that bariatric surgery is superior to medical therapy for short- and intermediate-term remission of type 2 diabetes, long-term weight loss, and long-term survival. Priority evidence gaps include long-term comorbidity remission, mental health, substance abuse, and health care costs. Evidence of the role of endoscopic weight loss options is also lacking. The BSWG also noted the limited evidence regarding optimal timing for bariatric surgery referral, barriers to bariatric surgery itself, and management of high-risk bariatric surgery patients. Clinical trials of pre- and post-surgery interventions may help to optimize patient outcomes. A registry of overweight and obese veterans and a workforce assessment to determine the VHA's capacity to increase bariatric surgery access were recommended. These will help inform policy modifications and focus the research agenda to improve the ability of the VHA to deliver population-based weight management.

Specialty care and education associated with greater disease-specific knowledge but not satisfaction with care for chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about differences among hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients managed by generalists vs. specialists with respect to patient-centred outcomes, such as disease-specific knowledge, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and satisfaction with care. AIM: To examine selected patient-centred outcomes of HCV-related care provided in primary care, specialty care or both. METHODS: A total of 629 chronic HCV patients completed a survey including an HCV knowledge assessment and validated instruments for satisfaction and HRQoL. Multivariable linear regression was used to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Adjusted total HCV knowledge score was lower among patients who did not attend specialty care (P < 0.01). Primary care and specialty patients did not differ in adjusted general HRQoL or satisfaction. Sixty percent of specialty patients underwent formal HCV education, which was associated with 5% higher knowledge score (P = 0.01). General HRQoL and patient satisfaction did not differ between primary care and specialty groups. Disease-specific knowledge and care satisfaction were independent of mental illness, substance abuse, socio-economic variables, history of antiviral treatment, formal HCV education and duration of time between last visit and survey completion. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care patients with chronic HCV have lower adjusted disease-specific knowledge than specialty patients, but no difference in general HRQoL or patient satisfaction.

Cost-effectiveness of growth factors during hepatitis C anti-viral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Although the current standard of care for controlling anaemia and neutropenia during anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C is to use dose reduction of ribavirin and pegylated interferon, respectively, erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor are now being advocated as alternatives to dose reduction. AIM: To determine the cost-effectiveness of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as an alternative to anti-viral dose reduction during antihepatitis C therapy. METHODS: Decision analysis was used to assess cost-effectiveness by estimating the cost of using a growth factor per quality-adjusted life-year gained. RESULTS: Under baseline assumptions, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year of using growth factors ranged from 16,247 US dollars for genotype 1 with neutropenia to 145,468 US dollars for genotype 2/3 patients with anaemia. These findings are sensitive to the relationship between dose reduction and sustained virological response. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon our findings and the varying strength of the evidence for a relationship between dose reduction and sustained virological response: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may be cost-effective for genotype 1 patients; erythropoietin is probably not cost-effective for genotype 2/3 patients; no conclusion can be reached regarding the cost-effectiveness of erythropoietin for genotype 1 patients or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for genotype 2/3 patients. Randomized trials are needed to firmly establish the relationship between dose reduction and sustained virological response.

Argon plasma coagulation for rectal bleeding after prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To better define the efficacy and safety of argon plasma coagulation (APC), specifically for brachytherapy-related proctitis, we reviewed the clinical course of 7 patients treated for persistent rectal bleeding. Approximately 2-10% of prostate cancer patients treated with 125I or 103Pd brachytherapy will develop radiation proctitis. The optimum treatment for patients with persistent bleeding is unclear from the paucity of available data. Prior reports lack specific dosimetric information, and patients with widely divergent forms of radiation were grouped together in the analyses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seven patients were treated with APC at the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and the University of Washington from 1997 to 1999 for persistent rectal bleeding due to prostate brachytherapy-related proctitis. Four patients received supplemental external beam radiation, delivered by a four-field technique. A single gastroenterologist at the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System treated 6 of the 7 patients. If the degree of proctitis was limited, all sites of active bleeding were coagulated in symptomatic patients. An argon plasma coagulator electrosurgical system was used to administer treatments every 4-8 weeks as needed. The argon gas flow was set at 1.6 L/min, with an electrical power setting of 40-45 W. RESULTS: The rectal V100 (the total rectal volume, including the lumen, receiving the prescription dose or greater) for the 7 patients ranged from 0.13 to 4.61 cc. Rectal bleeding was first noticed 3-18 months after implantation. APC (range 1-3 sessions) was performed 9-22 months after implantation. Five patients had complete resolution of their bleeding, usually within days of completing APC. Two patients had only partial relief from bleeding, but declined additional APC therapy. No patient developed clinically evident progressive rectal wall abnormalities after APC, (post-APC follow-up range 4-13 months). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients benefited from APC, and no cases of clinically evident progressive tissue destruction were noted. Although APC appears to be efficacious and safe in the setting of the rectal doses described here, caution is in order when contemplating APC for brachytherapy patients.

The use of trimodality therapy for the treatment of operable esophageal carcinoma in the veteran population: patient survival and outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve the cure rates associated with surgical therapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is being used with increasing frequency before resection (trimodality therapy). A variety of clinical trials have reviewed this approach, but only one study to the authors' knowledge has shown a survival benefit for trimodality therapy. The extent to which trimodality therapy has gained acceptance in general practice is not clear. The objective of the current study was to determine the extent to which both surgery and trimodality therapy are used for the management of esophageal carcinoma within a large, national health care system and to determine the outcome of patients treated with these treatment approaches. METHODS: The current study was a retrospective cohort study. The study population was comprised of all veterans who underwent either surgery alone or trimodality therapy for operable esophageal carcinoma between the fiscal years of 1993 and 1997. Data were obtained from the Veterans Administration Patient Treatment File, Outpatient Clinic File, and the Beneficiary Identification Record Locator System. The main outcome measures were perioperative mortality and patient survival. RESULTS: During the study period, 695 patients underwent either surgery alone or trimodality therapy for esophageal carcinoma. Five hundred thirty-four (77%) patients were treated with surgery only. One hundred sixty-one (23%) patients underwent surgery after induction chemoradiotherapy (trimodality therapy). Patients selected for trimodality therapy were younger (mean age, 60.8 years vs. 65.6 years), had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to have a midesophageal tumor. The median survival for all patients was 15.2 months. The type of treatment had no apparent effect on survival. Favorable prognostic factors included younger age, a distal esophageal tumor, and the absence of metastases. The overall perioperative mortality was 13.7 %. The use of trimodality therapy did not increase perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Trimodality therapy is commonly used within the VA system. The nonrandomized nature of this study does not allow comparison of trimodality therapy to surgery alone, but the overall survival was limited for all patients. The predictors of survival are related to the biology of the disease, and they include patient age, tumor location, and stage at diagnosis.

Assessment of vital status in Department of Veterans Affairs national databases. comparison with state death certificates.

PURPOSE: To determine the extent to which Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) database vital status information agrees with Washington state death certificates. METHODS: Using each data source, vital status was determined for 19,481 Washington state resident veterans hospitalized in Washington VA hospitals from 1994 to 1997, and for 33,602 Washington state resident veterans who were seen as outpatients during 1997. RESULTS: The agreement between VA and Washington state records was excellent for hospitalized veterans (kappa = 0.91, p < 0.0001). Three thousand one hundred-eight individuals (86.2% of all deaths) appeared in both files. Of those deaths missing in the VA files, 71% had no service-connected disability, VA pension, or other compensation. Among outpatients, agreement between the death files was very good (kappa = 0.82, p < 0.001). Three hundred seventy-two individuals (69.8% of all deaths) appeared in both files. Of those deaths missing in the VA files, 63% had no service-connected disability or VA pension or other compensation. CONCLUSIONS: The VA death files are a valid source of vital status information for veterans hospitalized in recent years. For veterans having exclusively outpatient visits, however, the VA files miss a substantial proportion of deaths. For these patients, alternative means of vital status ascertainment are warranted.