Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities in Addressing Medicaid Beneficiaries' Non-Medical Risks to Health: A Qualitative Analysis.

CONTEXT: North Carolina's Healthy Opportunities Pilots (HOP) is a Medicaid 1115 Waiver program that seeks to address nonmedical risks to health for Medicaid beneficiaries through multisector collaboration. Among other stakeholders, HOP involves collaboration between human services organizations that deliver interventions, network leads, which establish and oversee the human services organizations within a region of the state. OBJECTIVE: To understand how employees at human services organizations and network leads prepared to deliver HOP services. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews. Interviews were conducted between April and June 2022. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded thematically, and analyzed using a conceptual model derived from the consolidated framework for implementation research. SETTING: Organizations within North Carolina counties participating in HOP. PARTICIPANTS: Employees of human services and network lead organizations across all 3 HOP regions of North Carolina. RESULTS: The researchers interviewed 37 participants. Overall, organizations experienced benefits from HOP participation, including capacity-building resources, flexibility in allocating resources, and creating community-wide enthusiasm for addressing nonmedical risks to health. There were also key challenges. These included the time needed to build capacity, adjustments to the work processes and regulations inherent to multisector collaboration, geographic variation in availability of services to offer, and the difficulty of addressing different needs. Finally, participants recognized substantial opportunities that HOP presented, including membership in a more extensive network, exposure to a learning community, and a more sustainable funding source. CONCLUSIONS: The perspectives of individuals preparing to deliver HOP services offer important lessons for those developing and implementing large-scale programs that can address nonmedical threats to health.

North Carolina Medicaid System Perspectives on Substance Use Disorder Treatment Policy Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe perspectives from stakeholders involved in the Medicaid system in North Carolina regarding substance use disorder (SUD) treatment policy changes during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews in early 2022 with state agency representatives, Medicaid managed care organizations, and Medicaid providers (n = 22) as well as 3 focus groups of Medicaid beneficiaries with SUD (n = 14). Interviews and focus groups focused on 4 topics: policies, meeting needs during COVID, demand for SUD services, and staffing. RESULTS: Overall, policy changes, such as telehealth and take-home methadone, were considered beneficial, with participants displaying substantial support for both policies. Shifting demand for services, staffing shortages, and technology barriers presented significant challenges. Innovative benefits and services were used to adapt to these challenges, including the provision of digital devices and data plans to improve access to telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: Perspectives from Medicaid stakeholders, including state organizations to beneficiaries, support the continuation of SUD policy changes that occurred. Staffing shortages remain a substantial barrier. Based on the participants' positive responses to the SUD policy changes made during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, such as take-home methadone and telehealth initiation of buprenorphine, these changes should be continued. Additional steps are needed to ensure payment parity for telehealth services.

The Economics of Treatment for Depression.

The global prevalence of depression has risen over the past three decades across all socioeconomic groups and geographic regions, with a particularly rapid increase in prevalence among adolescents (aged 12-17 years) in the United States. Depression imposes large health, economic, and societal costs, including reduced life span and quality of life, medical costs, and reduced educational attainment and workplace productivity. A wide range of treatment modalities for depression are available, but socioeconomic disparities in treatment access are driven by treatment costs, lack of culturally tailored options, stigma, and provider shortages, among other barriers. This review highlights the need for comparative research to better understand treatments' relative efficacy, cost-effectiveness, scalability, and potential heterogeneity in efficacy across socioeconomic groups and country and cultural contexts. To address the growing burden of depression, mental health policy could consider reducing restrictions on the supply of providers, implementing digital interventions, reducing stigma, and promoting healthy lifestyles. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health, Volume 45 is April 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Permanent Supportive Housing Receipt and Health Care Use Among Adults With Disabilities.

This study assessed whether permanent supportive housing (PSH) participation is associated with health service use among a population of adults with disabilities, including people transitioning into PSH from community and institutional settings. Our primary data sources were 2014 to 2018 secondary data from a PSH program in North Carolina linked to Medicaid claims. We used propensity score weighting to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated of PSH participation. All models were stratified by whether individuals were in institutional or community settings prior to PSH. In weighted analyses, among individuals who were institutionalized prior to PSH, PSH participation was associated with greater hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits and fewer primary care visits during the follow-up period, compared with similar individuals who largely remained institutionalized. Individuals who entered PSH from community settings did not have significantly different health service use from similar comparison group members during the 12-month follow-up period.

Comparing Medicaid Expenditures for Standard and Enhanced Therapeutic Foster Care.

Therapeutic foster care (TFC) is a service for children with high behavioral health needs that has shown promise to prevent entry into more restrictive and expensive care settings. The purpose of this study was to compare Medicaid expenditures associated with TFC with Medicaid expenditures associated with an enhanced higher-rate service called Intensive Alternative Family Treatment (IAFT). We conducted a secondary analysis of Medicaid claims in North Carolina among children entering care in 2018-2019. Using propensity score analysis with difference-in-difference estimation, we compared monthly Medicaid expenditures before and after initiating TFC and IAFT (N = 5472 person-months). Youth entering IAFT had higher expenditures prior to treatment than those entering TFC. Both standard TFC and IAFT were associated with a downward trend in expenditures following treatment initiation. Both TFC and IAFT reverse a trend of increasing Medicaid costs prior to care among children with high behavioral health needs.

Enhanced Primary Care for People With Serious Mental Illness: A Propensity Weighted Cohort Study.

Objective: People with serious mental illness (SMI) have high rates of cardiometabolic illness, receive low quality care, and experience poor outcomes. Nevertheless, studies of existing integrated care models have not consistently shown improvements in cardiometabolic health for people with SMI. This study assessed the effect of a novel model of enhanced primary care for people with SMI on cardiometabolic outcomes. Enhanced primary care is a model of integrated care wherein comprehensive primary care delivery is adapted to the needs of people with SMI in coordination with behavioral care.Methods: We conducted a propensity-weighted cohort study comparing 234 patients with SMI receiving enhanced primary care to 4,934 patients with SMI receiving usual primary care using electronic health data from a large academic medical system covering the years 2014-2018. The propensity-weighted models controlled for baseline differences in outcome measures and patient characteristics between groups.Results: Compared to usual primary care, enhanced primary care increased hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) screening by 18 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 10 to 25), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) screening by 16 percentage points (CI, 8.8 to 24), and blood pressure screening by 7.8 percentage points (CI, 5.8 to 9.9). Enhanced primary care reduced HbA1c by 0.27 percentage points (CI, -0.47 to -0.060) and systolic blood pressure by 3.9 mm Hg (CI, -5.2 to -2.5) compared to usual primary care. We did not find evidence that enhanced primary care consistently affected glucose screening, LDL values, or diastolic blood pressure.Conclusions: Enhanced primary care can achieve clinically meaningful improvements in cardiometabolic health compared to usual primary care.

A Survey of Behavioral Health Care Providers on Use and Barriers to Use of Measurement-Based Care.

OBJECTIVE: Despite robust evidence for efficacy of measurement-based care (MBC) in behavioral health care, studies suggest that adoption of MBC is limited in practice. A survey from Blue Cross-Blue Shield of North Carolina was sent to behavioral health care providers (BHCPs) about their use of MBC, beliefs about MBC, and perceived barriers to its adoption. METHODS: The authors distributed the survey by using professional networks and snowball sampling. Provider and clinical practice characteristics were collected. Numerical indices of barriers to MBC use were created. Ordered logistic regression models were used to identify associations among practice and provider characteristics, barriers to MBC use, and level of MBC use. RESULTS: Of the 922 eligible BHCPs who completed the survey, 426 (46%) reported using MBC with at least half of their patients. Providers were more likely to report MBC use if they were part of a large group practice, had MBC training, had more weekly care hours, or practiced in nonmetropolitan settings. Physicians, self-reported generalists, more experienced providers, and those who did not accept insurance were less likely to report MBC use. Low perceived clinical utility was the barrier most strongly associated with less frequent use of MBC. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence exists for efficacy of MBC in behavioral health care, less than half of BHCPs reported using MBC with at least half of their patients, and low perceived clinical utility of MBC was strongly associated with lower MBC use. Implementation strategies that attempt to change negative attitudes toward MBC may effectively target this barrier to use.

A mixed methods study of provider factors in buprenorphine treatment retention.

BACKGROUND: Low retention is a persistent challenge in the delivery of buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). The goal of this study was to identify provider factors that could drive differences in treatment retention while accounting for the contribution of patient characteristics to retention. METHODS: We developed a novel a mixed-methods approach to explore provider factors that could drive retention while accounting for patient characteristics. We used Medicaid claims data from North Carolina in the United States to identify patient characteristics associated with higher retention. We then identified providers who achieved high and low retention rates. We matched high- and low-retention providers on their patients' characteristics. This matching created high- and low-retention provider groups whose patients had similar characteristics. We then interviewed providers while blinded to which belonged in the high- and low-retention groups on aspects of their practice that could affect retention rates, such as treatment criteria, treatment cost, and services offered. RESULTS: Less than half of patients achieved 180-day treatment retention with large differences by race and ethnicity. We did not find evidence that providers who achieved higher retention consistently did so by providing more comprehensive services or selecting for more stable patients. Rather, our findings suggest use of "high-threshold" clinical approaches, such as requiring participation in psychosocial services or strictly limiting dosages, explain differences in retention rates between providers whose patients have similar characteristics. All low-retention providers interviewed used a high-threshold practice compared to half of high-retention providers interviewed. Requiring patients to participate in psychosocial services, which were often paid out-of-pocket, appeared to be especially important in limiting retention. CONCLUSION: Providers who adopt low-threshold approaches to treatment may achiever higher retention rates than those who adopt high-threshold approaches. Addressing cost barriers and systemic racism are likely also necessary for improving buprenorphine treatment retention.

Permanent Supportive Housing Tenure Among a Heterogeneous Population of Adults with Disabilities.

People with disabilities can face substantial barriers to living stably in community settings. Evidence shows that permanent supportive housing (PSH), which combines subsidized housing with individualized support services, can improve housing stability among subpopulations of people with disabilities, including those with behavioral health conditions. PSH has also been shown to improve some health outcomes among people with severe mental illness or substance use disorder, but effects varied by participants' program tenure. This study assessed retention in a PSH program serving a broad population of adults with disabilities and identified factors associated with program tenure. Administrative data from 2093 individuals who began participating in a North Carolina PSH program between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. Participants' unadjusted probability of remaining in a PSH placement at specific time points was estimated, with censoring due to death or the end of the study period (July 2020). Using Cox regression, program tenure was modeled as a function of participant and PSH placement location characteristics. Participants had a 71% probability of remaining in PSH after 2 years. Older age, female gender, and non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity were associated with lower hazard of PSH departure. Having a severe mental illness diagnosis was associated with greater departure hazard. Level of socioeconomic deprivation and rurality of the PSH placement ZIP code were not associated with departure hazard. PSH programs may be able to successfully retain a heterogeneous population of adults with disabilities, although tenure may vary by participant demographic and clinical characteristics.

Are North Carolina clinicians delivering opioid use disorder treatment to Medicaid beneficiaries?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Medicaid is a public health insurance program in the United States that serves low-income individuals. Medicaid beneficiaries have elevated risk of opioid use disorder (OUD), yet face barriers to receiving medications for OUD (MOUD). To inform efforts to increase MOUD receipt among Medicaid beneficiaries, this study: (1) estimated Medicaid participation prevalence among clinicians authorized to prescribe buprenorphine and (2) estimated the association between clinician characteristics and OUD care delivery to Medicaid beneficiaries. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study of North Carolina, USA licensed physicians, physician assistants and nurse practitioners. Licensure data from 2018 were merged with 2019 US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) data to identify clinicians who received the DEA waiver required to prescribe buprenorphine (n = 1714). Medicaid claims data were used to characterize clinician engagement in OUD care delivery. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were indicators of any Medicaid professional claims and any Medicaid prescription claims for buprenorphine and/or naltrexone. Predictors included clinician characteristics (e.g. gender and race) and characteristics of clinicians' practice location (e.g. area opioid overdose death rate). FINDINGS: Most waivered clinicians delivered services to Medicaid beneficiaries, ranging from 67.0% of behavioral health clinicians to 82.9% of specialist physicians. Among waivered clinicians with Medicaid professional claims, prevalence of prescribing buprenorphine to Medicaid beneficiaries ranged from 30.3% among specialist physicians to 51.6% among behavioral health clinicians. The probability of prescribing MOUD to Medicaid beneficiaries was higher among waivered clinicians identifying as male compared with female (8.5 percentage points, P = 0.004) or black compared with white (9.9 percentage points, P = 0.007), older clinicians (0.5 percentage point increase per year, P < 0.001) and clinicians in counties with a higher opioid overdose death rate (5.0 percentage point increase per additional death per 10 000 residents, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Among clinicians in North Carolina, USA who are authorized to prescribe buprenorphine, 67-83% (depending on type of specialist) deliver services to Medicaid beneficiaries, but only 30-52% of those prescribe medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) to Medicaid beneficiaries. Engagement in OUD care delivery to Medicaid beneficiaries varies by clinician demographic and area characteristics.

Primary Care Physicians', Psychiatrists', and Oncologists' Coordination While Prescribing Medications for Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Coordination of medication prescribing is important in the care of patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) given the involvement of multiple providers and multiple medications used to manage MCC. The objective of this study was to identify physician and practice factors associated with physicians' coordination of prescribing for complex patients with MCC. METHODS: Our cross-sectional study used a 33-item anonymous, online survey to assess physicians' coordination practices while prescribing for patients with MCC. We sampled primary care physicians (PCPs), psychiatrists, and oncologists across the United States. Coordination of medication prescribing was measured on a 7-point Likert-type scale. χ2, Fisher exact test, and binomial logistic regression, adjusted for factors and covariates, were used to determine differences in coordination of prescribing. Average marginal effects were calculated for factors. RESULTS: A total of 50 PCPs, 50 psychiatrists, and 50 oncologists participated. Most psychiatrists (56%) and oncologists (52%) reported frequently coordinating prescribing with other physicians, whereas less than half of the PCPs (42%) reported frequently coordinating prescribing. Female physicians were 25% points more likely to report coordinating prescribing than male physicians (P = 0.0186), and physicians not using electronic medical records were 30% points more likely to report coordinating prescribing than physicians using electronic medical records (P = 0.0230). Four additional factors were associated with lower likelihood of coordinating prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Physician and practice factors may influence differences in coordination of medication prescribing, despite physician specialty. These factors can provide a foundation for developing interventions to improve coordination of prescribing practices for MCC.

The Role of Primary Care in the Initiation of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in Statewide Public and Private Insurance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if individuals newly diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) who saw a primary care provider (PCP) before or on the date of diagnosis had higher rates of medication treatment for OUD (MOUD). METHODS: Observational study using logistic regression with claims data from Medicaid and a large private insurer in North Carolina from January 2014 to July 2017. KEY RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2017, the prevalence of diagnosed OUD increased by 47% among Medicaid enrollees and by 76% among the privately insured. Over the same time period, the percent of people with an OUD who received MOUD fell among both groups, while PCP involvement in treatment increased. Of Medicaid enrollees receiving buprenorphine, the percent receiving buprenorphine from a PCP increased from 32% in 2014 to 39% in 2017. Approximately 82% of people newly diagnosed with OUD had a PCP visit in the 12 months before diagnosis in Medicaid and private insurance. Those with a prior PCP visit were not more likely to receive MOUD. Seeing a PCP at diagnosis was associated with a higher probability of receiving MOUD than seeing an emergency provider but a lower probability than seeing a behavioral health specialist or other provider type. CONCLUSIONS: People newly diagnosed with OUD had high rates of contact with PCPs before diagnosis, supporting the importance of PCPs in diagnosing OUD and connecting people to MOUD. Policies and programs to increase access to MOUD and improve PCPs' ability to connect people to evidence-based treatment are needed.

Nudging primary care providers to expand the opioid use disorder workforce.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the responsiveness of primary care providers to pro-social and financial incentives to participate in a learning collaborative for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). STUDY SETTING: We conducted a statewide experiment in North Carolina from January 2019 to November 2019 to expand access to support for providers learning to treat opioid use disorder using different types of messaging and incentives. STUDY DESIGN: We randomly assigned 15,835 primary care providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) in North Carolina (NC) to receive one of four letters recruiting providers to participate in an online learning collaborative for providers learning to treat opioid use disorder. The four versions of the recruitment letters contained either pro-social messaging, mention of financial reimbursement for time spent in the learning collaborative, both, or neither. DATA COLLECTION: We created a primary data source, tracking provider responses to the recruitment letters and emails. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We found a 47.5% greater (p < 0.05) response rate using pro-social recruitment messaging that provided a greater description of the local conditions in each provider's region compared to the control group; this effect increased with higher overdose opioid death rates. Mention of financial reimbursement only modestly increased provider response rates. Some heterogeneity was observed by provider type, with NPs having the largest response to pro-social messaging. CONCLUSIONS: Prosocial nudges had strong effects on efforts to enhance the behavioral health workforce in NC through participation in an ECHO for medication-assisted treatment (MAT) learning collaborative. The prosocial approach can and should be employed by states and professional societies in their efforts to create training programs for medication for OUD (MOUD), in order to expand access to lifesaving treatments for opioid use disorder.

Duration of medical home participation and quality of care for patients with chronic conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the length of participation in a patient-centered medical home (PCMH), an evidence-based practice, leads to higher quality care for Medicaid enrollees with multiple co-morbid chronic conditions and major depressive disorder (MDD). DATA SOURCES: This analysis uses a unique data source that links North Carolina Medicaid claims and enrollment data with other administrative data including electronic records of state-funded mental health services, a state psychiatric hospital utilization database, and electronic records from a five-county behavioral health carve-out program. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study uses generalized estimating equations (GEEs) on person-year-level observations to examine the association between the duration of PCMH participation and measures of guideline-concordant care, including the receipt of minimally adequate care for MDD, defined as 6 months of antidepressant use or eight psychotherapy visits each year. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Adults with two or more chronic conditions reflected in administrative data, including MDD. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We found a 1.7 percentage point increase in the likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care at 4 months of PCMH participation, as compared to newly enrolled individuals with a single month of participation (p < 0.05). This effect increased with each additional month of PCMH participation; 12 months of participation was associated with a 19.1 percentage point increase in the likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care over a single month of participation (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The PCMH model is associated with higher quality of care for patients with multiple chronic conditions and MDD over time, and these benefits increase the longer a patient is enrolled. Providers and policy makers should consider the positive effect of increased contact with PCMHs when designing and evaluating initiatives to improve care for this population.

Improving Physical Health Among People With Serious Mental Illness: The Role of the Specialty Mental Health Sector.

People with serious mental illness die 10-20 years earlier, compared with the overall population, and the excess mortality is driven by undertreated physical health conditions. In the United States, there is growing interest in models integrating physical health care delivery, management, or coordination into specialty mental health programs, sometimes called "reverse integration." In November 2019, the Johns Hopkins ALACRITY Center for Health and Longevity in Mental Illness convened a forum of 25 experts to discuss the current state of the evidence on integrated care models based in the specialty mental health system and to identify priorities for future research, policy, and practice. This article summarizes the group's conclusions. Key research priorities include identifying the active ingredients in multicomponent integrated care models and developing and validating integration performance metrics. Key policy and practice recommendations include developing new financing mechanisms and implementing strategies to build workforce and data capacity. Forum participants also highlighted an overarching need to address socioeconomic risks contributing to excess mortality among adults with serious mental illness.

Couple communication and contraception use in urban Senegal.

OBJECTIVES: Couple communication about family planning has been shown to increase uptake of contraception. However, couple communication is often measured based solely on one partner's report of communication. This research investigates the influence of couple-reported communication about family planning on current and future use of contraception using couple-level data. METHODS: We used baseline data from the Measurement, Learning, and Evaluation (MLE) project collected through household surveys in 2011 from a cross-sectional representative sample of women and men in urban Senegal to conduct secondary data analysis. We used multivariable logit models to estimate the average marginal effects of couple communication about family planning on current contraception use and future intention to use contraception. RESULTS: Couple communication about family planning reported by both partners was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of current use of contraception and with future intention to use contraception among non-contracepting couples. Couples where one partner reported discussing family planning had a 25% point greater likelihood of current contraception use than couples where neither partner reported discussing, while couples where both partners reported discussing family planning had a 56% point greater likelihood of current contraception use, representing more than twice the effect size. Among couples not using contraception, couples where one partner reported discussing family planning had a 15% point greater likelihood of future intention to use contraception than couples where neither partner reported discussing, while couples where both partners reported discussing family planning had a 38% point greater likelihood of future intention to use contraception. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the importance of the inclusion of both partners in family planning programs to increase communication about contraception and highlight the need for future research using couple-level data, measures, and analysis.

Effect of Enhanced Primary Care for People with Serious Mental Illness on Service Use and Screening.

BACKGROUND: Strategies are needed to better address the physical health needs of people with serious mental illness (SMI). Enhanced primary care for people with SMI has the potential to improve care of people with SMI, but evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a novel enhanced primary care model for people with SMI on service use and screening. DESIGN: Using North Carolina Medicaid claims data, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis comparing healthcare use and screening receipt of people with SMI newly receiving enhanced primary care to people with SMI newly receiving usual primary care. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate average differences in outcomes between the treatment and comparison groups adjusting for observed baseline characteristics. PARTICIPANTS: People with SMI newly receiving primary care in North Carolina. INTERVENTIONS: Enhanced primary care that includes features tailored for individuals with SMI. MAIN MEASURES: Outcome measures included outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient stays and days, and recommended screenings 18 months after the initial primary care visit. KEY RESULTS: Compared to usual primary care, enhanced primary care was associated with an increase of 1.2 primary care visits (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31 to 2.1) in the 18 months after the initial visit and decreases of 0.33 non-psychiatric inpatient stays (CI: - 0.49 to - 0.16) and 3.0 non-psychiatric inpatient days (CI: - 5.3 to - 0.60). Enhanced primary care had no significant effect on psychiatric service and ED use. Enhanced primary care increased the probability of glucose and HIV screening, decreased the probability of lipid screening, and had no effect on hemoglobin A1c and colorectal cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced primary care for people with SMI can increase receipt of some preventive screening and decrease use of non-psychiatric inpatient care compared to usual primary care.

Are There Performance Advantages Favoring Federally Qualified Health Centers in Medical Home Care for Persons with Severe Mental Illness?

To identify whether medical homes in FQHCs have advantages over other group and individual medical practices in caring for people with severe mental illness. Models estimated the effect of the type of medical home on monthly service utilization, medication adherence, and total Medicaid spending over a 4-year period for adults aged 18 or older with a major depressive disorder (N = 65,755), bipolar disorder (N = 19,925), or schizophrenia (N = 8501) enrolled in North Carolina's Medicaid program. Inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) were used to adjust for nonrandom assignment of patients to practices. Generalized estimating equations for repeated measures were used with gamma distributions and log links for the continuous measures of medication adherence and spending, and binomial distributions with logit links for binary measures of any outpatient or any emergency department visits. Adults with major depression or bipolar disorders in FQHC medical homes had a lower probability of outpatient service use than their counterparts in individual and group practices. The probability of emergency department use, medication adherence, and total Medicaid spending were relatively similar across the three settings. This study suggests that no one type of medical practice setting-whether FQHC, other group, or individual-consistently outperforms the others in providing medical home services to people with severe mental illness.

Are Certain Health Centers Better Patient-Centered Medical Homes for People with Severe Mental Illness?

Patient-centered medical homes based at federally-qualified health centers (FQHCs) can benefit patients with complex health needs, such as severe mental illness (SMI). However, little is known about FQHC characteristics associated with changes in health care expenditures and utilization for individuals with SMI. Using North Carolina Medicaid claims and FQHC data from the Uniform Data System, multivariate regression identified FQHC characteristics associated with total expenditures, medication adherence and emergency department utilization among adults with SMI, controlling for time-invariant differences by health center. Few of the FQHC-level factors affected the outcomes-not even offering on-site behavioral health services. Although the FQHCs in the analysis sample exhibited considerable variation in the provision of specialty behavioral services and in staffing configurations, it may be the case that the examination of average effects across a heterogeneous group of adults with SMI mask benefits of FQHCs to certain subgroups. These findings support the conclusion that there is no "one-size-fits-all" model that works best for this diverse patient population. Study results are relevant for practices embarking on expanded medical home services for people with SMI.