Providers' Reports of Environmental Conditions and Resources at Births in the United States.

Environmental conditions and resources that may influence provider's behaviors have been investigated in birth environments focusing on location rather than conditions and available resources. Using a descriptive, cross sectional design, we surveyed a random sample of certified nurse-midwives (CNMs), obstetricians, family practice physicians, and certified professional midwives (CPMs) to describe conditions, resources, and workforce present during U.S. births. In all, 1,243 midwives and physicians reported most environmental resources were present at almost 100% of births they attended. Conditions varied: room noise acceptability restriction of phone calls/texts from any source and lighting kept to a minimum. Trainees were present at most births regardless of setting and provider type. The impact of room noise, phone calls/texting, and lighting on outcomes should be determined. The roles and impact of personnel, including trainees, should be described. The extent to which clusters of resources are associated with outcomes might provide new directions for interventions that improve care.

Variables That Influence US Midwife and Physician Management of the Third Stage of Labor.

INTRODUCTION: Midwives and physicians incorporate their knowledge, experiences, and other variables in making clinical decisions. Variations in the management of the third stage of labor may be a result of variables that influence providers' decision making. The purpose of this study was to describe variables that influence US midwives' and physicians' management of the third stage of labor. METHODS: A randomly selected national sample of certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives, certified professional midwives, obstetricians, and family physicians was surveyed about the extent to which maternal characteristics, maternal history, and current birth characteristics influence their third-stage management. The extent of influence was defined in terms of always to never altering management. Descriptive summaries, group comparisons, and partial correlations were used to determine differences in influences between midwives and physicians. One free-text question was analyzed using qualitative methods. RESULTS: A total of 1243 clinicians responded. There was considerable variability in the response patterns in that the same variable was reported to always alter management during the third stage of labor for some participants yet did not influence the management practices of others at all. Differences between responses from midwives and physicians were explored as a possible explanation for some of the variability. In response to the free-text inquiry about variables that most influenced changes in participants' usual management of the third stage, the participants most often included active bleeding, current recommendations or guidelines, and maternal or family preferences. DISCUSSION: This study identifies variables reported as influencing clinical decision making during the third stage of labor. Therefore, these variables are important to consider when evaluating interventions and outcomes related to management of the third stage of labor and any attempts to design new interventions. The findings are descriptive of practice; they are not intended to guide changes in practice.

US Physician and Midwife Adherence to Active Management of the Third Stage of Labor International Recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage has increased in the United States despite the international promotion of active management of the third stage of labor. Adherence to the international recommendations in the United States is unclear. It is also not known how the components of active management are related to other practices that may be used during the third stage of labor. The purpose of this study was to determine routine practice patterns for managing the third stage of labor in the United States. METHODS: A randomized national survey was conducted of certified nurse-midwives/certified midwives, certified professional midwives, obstetricians, and family physicians who self-reported third-stage practices. Descriptive analyses and partial correlations were used to determine differences in practice patterns between midwives and physicians. A 2-step clustering algorithm was used to identify clusters of third-stage practices. RESULTS: A total of 1243 clinicians responded. Uterine massage after placenta expulsion was reportedly used at almost every birth by all provider types. Median use of cord traction and oxytocin administration by all provider types was 80% and 90% of births, respectively. Cluster analysis of these and other interventions used during the third stage of labor revealed 4 distinct clusters of practices ranging from primarily a hands-off at one extreme to high-intervention approaches at the other extreme. The other 2 clusters were defined by practices that fell between those extremes. DISCUSSION: Determination of how, and under what conditions, clinicians decide when to use particular techniques to manage the third stage of labor and how these techniques influence the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, is necessary. The clusters of practice combinations that emerged in this study suggest that there are extreme variations in clinician practices during management of the third stage of labor.

Junior research track faculty in U.S. schools of nursing: Resources and expectations.

BACKGROUND: Concerns about U.S. nursing research workforce preparation and success in the research arena require information about support mechanisms and readiness because the first research position is key to researcher retention and success. PURPOSE: The purpose was to describe the state of junior nursing research faculty recruitment terms, nursing programs' support during the first 2 years of employment, and administrators' views about strengths and weaknesses of the junior nursing research faculty pool and adequacy of the support provided. METHODS: Survey administrators in all U.S. nursing programs offering research doctorates (n = 125; response rate: 52%). DISCUSSION: Resource availability varied widely across institutions. Most respondents reported resources were adequate regardless of the actual level provided. Administrators' teaching and research expectations of these faculty also varied widely. Administrators identified readiness to perform as an issue of concern. CONCLUSION: As consumers of nursing research program graduates and as administrators responsible for the nursing research enterprise, deans need to take collective as well as individual actions.

An exploration of how midwives and physicians manage the third stage of labor in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Care of the woman during the third stage of labor is a critical component of good patient outcomes. The type and extent of activities used in the United States, including those suggested for active management of the third stage of labor, are unknown. This study obtained preliminary data for the development of a national study of interventions used by US birth attendants during the third stage of labor, work that will ultimately lead to a study examining links between activities and outcomes. The specific aims were to identify provider-reported assessments and interventions used during the third stage of labor and to examine which management steps or interventions providers believe should always be used during the third stage of labor. METHODS: Four provider-specific focus groups (certified nurse-midwives, certified professional midwives, obstetricians, and family practice physicians) were held using a nominal group technique. Two researchers analyzed audio-recorded transcriptions independently. RESULTS: More than 100 assessments, 110 interventions, and 65 "always used" activities were identified. There was variation within and across groups. Midwife groups were more likely to specify maternal preference activities, and physician groups were more likely to specify drug-related actions. DISCUSSION: Surveys of third-stage labor practices must include large numbers of actions to represent what may be the state of US practices. Survey design may need to include a multiple-forms approach to avoid participant burden. Designs should include the exploration of differences by provider type as well as within provider variation.

Defining and describing capacity issues in U.S. Doctor of Nursing Practice programs.

Recent calls to expand the number of U.S. Doctors of Nursing Practice (DNPs) raises questions about programs' capacities, content and requirements, and their ability to expand. This paper aims to describe (1) key aspects of DNP program capacities that may provide direction for DNP program expansion plans, the timing of such expansion and program QI efforts; and (2) the impact of the DNP on faculty resources for research doctoral programs. A survey of all U.S. DNP programs (n = 130; response rate 72%) was conducted in 2011 based on previously tested items. Reviews of Web sites of nonresponding schools provided some data from all programs. Ratios of students to faculty active in advanced practice (AP) and in QI (QI) were high (AP 11.0:1, SD 10.1; QI 20.2:1, SD 17.0 respectively). There was wide variation in scholarly requirements (0-4: 50% of program had none) and program committee composition (1-5; mode=2). Almost all responding schools that offered PhD and DNP programs reported assigning research-active or potentially research-active faculty in both programs. The ability to expand programs while maintaining quality may be compromised by capacity issues. Addressing demand issues through the alignment of program requirements with societal and employment requirements may provide directions for addressing current DNP capacity issues.

Operating room team members' views of workload, case difficulty, and nonroutine events.

Interventions such as mandatory "time-outs" have contributed to intraoperative safety but improvements are still necessary. We present data provided by 3 professions always present in the intraoperative setting that suggest next steps in the quest for improvements. We describe the differences and similarities in operating room (OR) nurses', anesthesia providers', and surgeons' beliefs about team function, case difficulty, nonroutine event (NRE), and error causation using a qualitative design at 3 Veterans' Administration hospitals. Intraoperative errors are costly in lives, suffering, and dollars. A quality improvement tenet states that workers are a rich information source regarding the context within which quality can be improved. Identifying and describing OR providers' beliefs are necessary steps in devising novel approaches to quality improvement. Intraoperative NRE and error prevention opportunities exist within and outside of the OR. There may be "cascade" and "perfect storm conditions" before and during operative procedures that increase the likelihood of NREs. Confirmation of these phenomena could improve prediction and prevention of NREs. Exploration of differences in team definition and team performance ratings by provider type may also identify avenues for improvement.

Leadership in doctoral nursing research programs.

The expansion of U.S. doctoral nursing research programs and transitions based on demographic distribution of the nursing academic workforce raises questions about the preparation for leadership transition planning. The purpose of this study was to describe the program leaders, job conditions, and status of transition efforts. A survey of U.S. nursing research doctoral programs (N = 105) was conducted in 2008. The response rate was 84.8%. A Web search of nonresponding schools provided some data from all programs. Most research doctoral program leaders hold additional responsibilities (mean = 4.2). The mean budgeted leadership time was 32.9% (SD = 21.4). Among programs in which the director's age was at least 60 years, 59% had no succession plan. Continuing improvement of the quality of doctoral nursing research programs could be compromised by leadership transition issues. To produce research-competitive graduates, continued support and attention to leadership of these programs is essential.

Defining and describing capacity issues in US doctoral nursing research programs.

The expansion of US doctoral research programs raises questions about mentorship capacity, program quality, and decisions about future expansion. To describe capacity issues and, when possible, compare findings to those of an earlier study, a survey of US nursing research doctoral programs (n = 105) was conducted in 2008. The response rate was 84.8%. The Web sites of non-responding schools were reviewed providing some data from all programs. The mean ratio of students per current externally funded grant was 6.9 (SD 7.5) to 1. The mean ratio of student to ever-funded faculty was 8.3 (SD 8.3) to 1. The mean number of research activities required (out of 5 possible) was 1.8 (SD 1.4), and the most common was a research practica (77%), followed by attendance at a research meeting external to the school (37%), and submitting an article for publication (32%). The quality of many programs may be compromised by capacity issues. Attention to existing programs' requirements and capacities and determination of the roles of these variables in producing research competitive graduates is needed.