Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) advocacy-Past, present and future!

Patient advocates, referring to those individuals that have been diagnosed with the disease for which they advocate, are essential stake holders in healthcare. For those facing the stages of being diagnosed with Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC), the "call to advocate" is an immediate response to being diagnosed with a rare and aggressive disease that progresses rapidly, often in a matter of weeks or months. There is a great stigma and bias in the medical community that has inhibited the education and study of IBC. A lack of understanding of the disease, how it presents and how to treat it leaves many IBC patients facing misdiagnosis. Communication is a cornerstone of healthcare; this goes beyond the patient-provider dynamic. Education of IBC must be a grassroots initiative. There should be no barrier to care in the diagnosis, treatment, study and survivorship of inflammatory Breast Cancer. It is not just an oncologist's lesson to learn, but that of all providers in healthcare. In this chapter you will hear how 4 women who were diagnosed with IBC faced the difficult tasks of navigating through the healthcare system on their own and came out on the other side using their experience to help others. In conclusion, in defining the evolving roles of Patient Advocacy in IBC over the past 25 years, we examine what has been done, along with its challenges, and what work still remains from the perspectives of different patient advocates.

Genomic Landscape of Advanced Solid Tumors in Circulating Tumor DNA and Correlation With Tissue Sequencing: A Single Institution's Experience.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising noninvasive biomarker for baseline characterization and longitudinal monitoring of a tumor throughout disease management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of ctDNA across a wide spectrum of tumor types. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 1,763 patients with advanced cancers who had next-generation sequencing of ctDNA or tumor tissue completed by a designated commercial assay at Northwestern University. RESULTS: ctDNA identified at least one gene alteration in 90% of patients. The number of detected alterations (NDA) and mutant allele frequency (MAF) of the most frequently mutated genes varied significantly across tumor types, with the highest MAF observed in gastric, colorectal, and breast cancers and the highest NDA observed in colorectal, lung squamous, and ovarian/endometrial cancers. TP53 was the most mutated gene in all tumor types. PIK3CA, ERBB2, BRCA1, and FGFR1 alterations were associated with breast cancer, and ESR1 mutations were exclusively detected in this tumor type. Colorectal cancer was characterized by alterations in KRAS and APC mutations, whereas KRAS, EGFR, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutations were common in lung adenocarcinoma. Concordance between blood and tissue sequencing was notably observed for truncal gene alterations (eg, APC and KRAS), whereas low concordance was often observed in genes associated with treatment resistance mechanisms (eg, RB1 and NF1). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) varied significantly across tumor types, and patients with high MAF or NDA had a significantly higher TMB score with one of the investigated platforms. CONCLUSION: The study provided new insights into the ctDNA mutational landscape across solid tumors, suggesting new hypotheses-generating data and caveats for future histotype-agnostic workflows integrated with tissue-based biomarkers such as TMB.