Nutrition and maternal health: a mapping of Australian dietetic services.

BACKGROUND: Strong associations between diet and maternal and child outcomes emphasise the importance of evidence-based care for women across preconception, antenatal and postnatal periods. A 2008 survey of Australian maternal health dietetic services documented critically low resourcing with considerable variation in staffing levels and models of care. This study repeated the survey to examine resourcing in Australian maternal health services. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was emailed to publicly-funded Australian maternal health dietetic services in May 2018. Quantitative and qualitative variables collected across preconception to postnatal services (including diabetes) included; births per year (BPY), number of beds, staffing (full time equivalents; FTE), referral processes, and models of care. Results were collated in > 5000; 3500 and 5000; and < 3500 BPY. RESULTS: Forty-three eligible surveys were received from seven states/territories. Dietetic staffing levels ranged from 0 to 4.0 FTE (> 5000 BPY), 0-2.8 FTE (3500-5000 BPY), and 0-2.0 FTE (< 3500 BPY). The offering of preconception, antenatal and postnatal services varied significantly between hospitals (format, staffing, referral processes, delivery models). Few sites reported service effectiveness monitoring and only one delivered gestational diabetes mellitus care according to nutrition practice guidelines. Low staffing levels and extensive service gaps, including lack of processes to deliver and evaluate services, were evident with major concerns expressed about the lack of capacity to provide evidence-based care. CONCLUSIONS: Ten years after the initial survey and recommendations there remains an identified role for dietitians to advocate for better staffing and for development, implementation, and evaluation of service models to influence maternal nutrition.

Implementation of gestational weight gain guidelines - what's more effective for ensuring weight recording in pregnancy?

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women who gain weight in accordance with guidelines have the lowest risk of pregnancy and birth-related complications. However, evidence-practice gaps often exist. To address pregnancy weight management barriers, a stepped implementation science approach was used, comprising targeted in-services, provision of scales for clinic rooms, and changes to routine weight recording in a hospital electronic medical record. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative influence of evidence-based interventions on staff's compliance to recording of antenatal weights. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of weight recording over three 15-month cohorts across April 2014-December 2017. Variables calculated from data included: proportion of women with weight recorded at booking and proportion of women who had a weight recorded at each visit. Generalised estimating equation modelling was used to examine differences in weight recording compliance rates between cohorts, pre-pregnancy body mass index categories, model of care and clinicians. RESULTS: There were approximately 13,000 pregnancies in each cohort. The proportion of women who had a weight recorded at each visit per cohort differed significantly between cohorts from 4.2% (baseline), 18.9% (scales and in-services) to 61.8% (medical record prompts), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements were achieved through systematic barrier analysis and subsequent mapping and implementation of appropriate and effective interventions. Improvements were observed across the entire service, in all models of care with all professional groups demonstrating increased recording of weights.

Re-evaluating the nutritional awareness, knowledge and eating behaviours of women attending a tertiary maternity hospital following iterative service redesign.

AIM: Since the opening of the new Mater Mothers' Hospital in 2008, innovative initiatives were developed, implemented and evaluated to meet women's nutritional needs. This study evaluated changes in women's nutritional awareness, knowledge and behaviours and compared these data with our baseline survey. METHODS: During 2014-2017, 421 postnatal women were surveyed across nine survey periods. Results were compared with those from our 2008 survey (n = 102). Surveys assessed nutrition knowledge, attitudes, behaviour, education preferences, and dietetic service awareness and were distributed on meal trays. RESULTS: A greater proportion of women accessed the nutrition services in 2014-2017 compared with 2008 (19.7% vs 9.9%) and rated the resources favourably (≥3.5 out of 5). A similar proportion rated the importance of eating well postnatally (83.1% vs 92.1%) and returning to their pre-pregnancy weight (62.4% vs 68.3%) as important/very important. In both periods, women had poor diet quality, despite identifying healthy eating as a high priority. A reduction in median gestational weight gain (GWG) approached significance, 13.0 kg (2014-2017) versus 14.0 kg (2008), P = 0.055. There was a significant association between GWG and cohort with an increase in the proportion of women gaining within their correct guidelines (by 15.4%), a reduction of excessive gain (by 24.7%, P < 0.001) over time. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based service changes made since 2008 have effected positive change in women's GWG, service preferences, and access. However, women still require awareness-raising and behaviour change programs to improve diet quality and GWG to ensure optimal pregnancy outcomes.

Service-wide management of healthy gestational weight gain following an implementation science approach.

The aim of health guidelines is to ensure consistency in the delivery of care to minimise health-related complications. However, even when good evidence is available, professionals do not necessarily implement it. Following a 2011 survey (Time 1) of staff in a tertiary maternity hospital, a number of service changes were implemented to facilitate best practice delivery of care to pregnant women regarding gestational weight gain (GWG). A (second) staff survey was then undertaken to re-assess staff knowledge, attitudes and behaviours around the management of GWG in our hospital. This cross-sectional, prospective online survey was distributed to staff in antenatal clinic. The survey assessed staff awareness of pregnancy-related weight complications, knowledge and application of specific guidelines, and a guideline adherence score was calculated. Sixty-nine staff (44.8% response rate) completed the 2014 (Time 2) survey. Just over half (51.9%) stated they were familiar with clinical guidelines regarding weight management in pregnancy. Guideline adherence ranged from 3.7 ± 1.9 to 11.3 ± 1.0 /15 across different professional groups; significant improvements with adherence by dietitians were noted over time. Despite minimal change over time in the overall adherence score, compliance with individual elements of the guideline recommendations comprising the adherence score differed. Improvements in staff practices and attitudes are apparent since the first survey. However, further improvements in guideline awareness and guideline elements are still required to improve the delivery of best practice antenatal GWG care.