Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dent Educ ; 79(10): 1140-52, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26427774

ABSTRACT

Social media consist of powerful tools that impact not only communication but relationships among people, thus posing an inherent challenge to the traditional standards of who we are as dental educators and what we can expect of each other. This article examines how the world of social media has changed dental education. Its goal is to outline the complex issues that social media use presents for academic dental institutions and to examine these issues from personal, professional, and legal perspectives. After providing an update on social media, the article considers the advantages and risks associated with the use of social media at the interpersonal, professional, and institutional levels. Policies and legal issues of which academic dental institutions need to be aware from a compliance perspective are examined, along with considerations and resources needed to develop effective social media policies. The challenge facing dental educators is how to capitalize on the benefits that social media offer, while minimizing risks and complying with the various forms of legal constraint.


Subject(s)
Schools, Dental , Social Media , Access to Information , Civil Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Crowdsourcing , Curriculum , Education, Dental , Evidence-Based Dentistry/education , Faculty, Dental , Feedback , Humans , Intellectual Property , Interpersonal Relations , Interprofessional Relations , Marketing of Health Services , Organizational Policy , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Participation , Policy Making , Professional Role , Risk Assessment , Schools, Dental/organization & administration , Social Media/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Networking , Students, Dental , United States
2.
J Dent Educ ; 79(10): 1153-66, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26427775

ABSTRACT

The goal of this article is to describe the broad curricular constructs surrounding teaching and learning about social media in dental education. This analysis takes into account timing, development, and assessment of the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors needed to effectively use social media tools as a contemporary dentist. Three developmental stages in a student's path to becoming a competent professional are described: from undergraduate to dental student, from the classroom and preclinical simulation laboratory to the clinical setting, and from dental student to licensed practitioner. Considerations for developing the dental curriculum and suggestions for effective instruction at each stage are offered. In all three stages in the future dentist's evolution, faculty members need to educate students about appropriate professional uses of social media. Faculty members should provide instruction on the beneficial aspects of this communication medium and help students recognize the potential pitfalls associated with its use. The authors provide guidelines for customizing instruction to complement each stage of development, recognizing that careful timing is not only important for optimal learning but can prevent inappropriate use of social media as students are introduced to novel situations.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Dental , Schools, Dental , Social Media , Attitude , Clinical Competence , Communication , Computer Security , Confidentiality , Conflict of Interest , Defamation , Dentist-Patient Relations/ethics , Educational Measurement , Ethics, Dental/education , Faculty, Dental , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Peer Review , Practice Management, Dental , Private Practice , Problem-Based Learning , Professional Role , Social Media/ethics , Social Media/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Responsibility , Students, Dental , Teaching/methods , Trust
3.
J Dent Educ ; 78(3): 454-64, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24609347

ABSTRACT

Dental schools must prepare future dentists to deliver culturally sensitive care to diverse patient populations, but there is little agreement on how best to teach these skills to students. This article examines this question by exploring the historical and theoretical foundations of this area of education in dentistry, analyzes what is needed for students to learn to provide culturally sensitive care in a dental setting, and identifies the discipline-specific skills students must master to develop this competence. The problems associated with single-discipline, lecture-based approaches to teaching culturally sensitive care are outlined, and the advantages of an interdisciplinary, patient-centered, skills-based approach to teaching culturally sensitive care are described. The authors advocate for an approach to teaching culturally sensitive care that builds upon learning in the behavioral sciences, ethics, and public health. Component skills and perspectives offered by each of these curriculum areas are identified, and their contributions to the teaching of culturally sensitive care are described. Finally, the need to consider the timing of this instruction in the dental curriculum is examined, along with instructional advantages associated with an approach that is shared by faculty across the curriculum.


Subject(s)
Cultural Competency/education , Dental Care , Education, Dental , Students, Dental , Teaching/methods , Behavior Control , Behavioral Sciences/education , Clinical Competence , Communication , Community Dentistry/education , Cultural Diversity , Culture , Curriculum , Dentist-Patient Relations , Ethics, Dental/education , Faculty, Dental , Humans , Learning , Patient-Centered Care , Public Health Dentistry/education , Social Responsibility , Time Factors
6.
J Am Coll Dent ; 80(4): 49-58, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24761582

ABSTRACT

A hypothetical case of alleged sexual misconduct in a practice with high employee turnover and stress is analyzed by three experts. This case commentary examines the ethical role expectations of an office manager who is not directly involved but becomes aware of the activities. The commentators bring the perspectives of a dental hygienist, academic administrator, and attorney; a teacher of behavioral sciences in a dental school; and a general dentist with many years of practice experience.


Subject(s)
Dental Staff/ethics , Ethics, Professional , Professional Misconduct/ethics , Sexual Behavior , Dental Offices/ethics , Dentists/ethics , Hostility , Humans , Interprofessional Relations/ethics , Office Management/ethics , Power, Psychological , Professional Competence , Sexual Harassment/ethics , Social Responsibility , Workplace
7.
J Am Coll Dent ; 77(3): 26-34, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21314050

ABSTRACT

This article examines advantages associated with nonpharmacological behavioral management techniques and suggests that there are benefits to their use (such as achieving a more lasting solution to the problem of dental anxiety) that are not realized with medication-based interventions. Analyses that use Kantian and existential viewpoints for exploring the use of medication versus behavioral interventions for managing life problems yield parallel conclusions: there are advantages gained by using behavioral interventions that are not always associated with medication-based interventions. These analyses, taken together with an understanding of the psychology of dental anxiety management, suggest that using nonpharmacological techniques for the management of dental anxiety can maximize adherence to the ethical principles of beneficence and patient autonomy. The authors discuss the barriers that make nonpharmacological interventions for anxiety management difficult for dentists to routinely use, and suggest that additional training in these methods and increased collaboration with mental health professionals are needed for dentists.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy , Beneficence , Dental Anxiety/prevention & control , Dental Care/psychology , Dentist-Patient Relations/ethics , Personal Autonomy , Adaptation, Psychological , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Health , Behavior Control , Clinical Competence , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Communication , Contraindications , Dental Anxiety/psychology , Existentialism , Humans , Mind-Body Therapies , Pain/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Psychoanalytic Theory , Referral and Consultation , Self Efficacy , Time Factors
8.
J Fam Psychol ; 18(3): 453-8, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15382970

ABSTRACT

Are attachments to security objects and mothers related? Do children securely and insecurely attached to mothers use security blankets differently? Following the Strange Situation procedure (M. D. S. Ainsworth, M. C. Blehar, E. Waters, & S. Wall, 1978), 67 toddlers were left alone in a novel playroom with a stranger and their blanket. Although being blanket attached was unrelated to their security of attachment to mothers, avoidantly and securely attached children adjusted differently depending on their blanket attachments. Blanket-attached children also classified as avoidantly attached to mothers remained longer than did blanket-nonattached maternally avoidant, blanket-attached maternally secure, and blanket- blanketnonattached maternally secure children. Blanket-attached, maternally avoidant children may nonattached have relied on blankets as support to allay distress during separation. Availability of security blankets produces different adaptations to maternal separations among avoidantly and securely attached children.


Subject(s)
Mother-Child Relations , Object Attachment , Adaptation, Psychological , Anxiety, Separation/psychology , Avoidance Learning , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Personality Assessment , Social Environment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...