Long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic indicators for focal impulse and rotor modulation guided ablation: A single-center observational study.

BACKGROUND: Electrophysiologists have developed a computational mapping approach to localize sources that may perpetuate persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM)-guided ablation of these sources have produced variable results. The current study further assesses single-procedure success rates of FIRM-guided ablation for preventing AF or atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and analyzes different baseline characteristics as prognostic indicators for individuals experiencing these undesired outcomes. METHODS: Seventy-one consecutive patients (mean age 64.58 ± 9.05 years and 36.6% female) with drug-refractory persistent AF with and without prior history of pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) underwent FIRM-guided ablation. Patients without prior history of PVAI underwent FIRM-guided ablation in addition to de novo PVAI. Patients with prior history of PVAI had the pulmonary veins reassessed at the time of FIRM-guided ablation for reconnection as well as re-isolation, when necessary. These patients were then prospectively followed for AF and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. RESULTS: FIRM analysis revealed rotors in the right atrium in 66.2% (1.77 ± 1.53 mean rotors per patient) and in the left atrium in 85.9% (2.65 ± 1.52 mean rotors per patient) of patients analyzed in the current study. After a single FIRM-guided ablation procedure, AF and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was demonstrated in 21.1% (15/71) and 33.8% (24/71) of patients, respectively. The entire cohort of patients were followed for a mean duration of 23.20 ± 8.38 months with the mean time to AF recurrence found to be 12.35 ± 10.44 months. Furthermore, valvular heart disease (i.e. moderate mitral or tricuspid regurgitation) was found to be a statistically significant independent predictor for AF recurrence following FIRM-guided ablation (p = .033). CONCLUSIONS: FIRM-guided ablation in combination with PVAI is a suitable and effective approach for symptomatic individuals with drug-refractory persistent AF with and without prior history of PVAI. Randomized controlled studies are warranted.

Impella to unload the left ventricle in patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Impella is frequently used to unload the left ventricle in patients with cardiogenic shock on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). There is limited data regarding the use of this strategy. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the said strategy. METHODS: A systematic search for studies comparing Impella plus VA-ECMO (ECVAD) vs VA-ECMO alone was performed using Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were then used to perform a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Three studies involving 448 patients were included in the final analysis. In total, 117 (26%) patients were female, mean age was 57 years. VA-ECMO was placed in 355 out of 448 (79%) patients, while ECVAD was placed in 93 out of 448 (21%). Death occurred in 49 out of 93 (52.6%) patients on ECVAD and 226 out of 355 (63.6%) on ECMO, relative risk (RR): 0.76, confidence interval (CI), 95% (0.62-0.94) P = .01. Hemolysis was present in 46 (49.4%) patients in the ECVAD vs 67 (18%) in the ECMO group, RR: 2.64, CI, 95% (1.97-3.55) P < .01. Bleeding was present in 42 (45.2.%) patients in the ECVAD group and 135 (38%) in the ECMO group, RR: 1.25, CI, 95% (0.95-1.63) P = .11. CVVHD was used on 31 (33.3%) patients in the ECVAD group while 89 (25%) in the ECMO group, RR 1.35, CI, 95% (0.95-1.91) P = .10. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the use of Impella as an unloading strategy in patients with VA-ECMO decreased mortality, increased rate of hemolysis, neutral bleeding risk, and similar rates of acute kidney injury requiring CVVHD.

The utility of pulmonary function testing in the preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The role of pulmonary function testing (PFT) as a predictor of clinically relevant endpoints in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of PFT in the preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing TAVR. METHODS: An evaluation of PFT (i.e., FEV1), arterial blood gases (i.e., PO2), the diagnosis of chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) by the Global Initiative for COPD (GOLD), and the diagnosis of chronic lung disease (CLD) by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) was performed to determine whether a relationship exists among these parameters and clinically relevant outcomes, including all-cause 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 513 patients underwent TAVR between March 2013 and December 2016. Per STS criteria, 269/513 (52%) had CLD with a mean FEV1 of 55.4 ± 12%. Per GOLD criteria, 158/513 (30%) of patients had COPD with a mean FEV1/forced vital capacity of 61.8 ± 8.2%. The severity of CLD was affected by changes in ejection fraction, albumin, creatinine, and B-type natriuretic peptide levels (p = .009, p < .001, p < .001, and p < .001, respectively), whereas the severity of COPD was not affected by these same variables, (p = .302, .079, .137, and .102, respectively). An increased A-a gradient (p = .035), increased PCO2 (p = .016), and decreased PO2 (p = <.001) demonstrated increased risk of 30-day mortality. Neither classification (COPD or CLD), nor PFT changes, showed association with 30-day and 1-year mortality (p = NS). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that isolated abnormalities in spirometry are a poor indicator of clinically relevant outcomes in TAVR. When classified correctly, COPD does not predict clinically relevant postoperative outcomes.

Obesity Paradox in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Background and Purpose- Although obesity is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke, studies have shown evidence of an obesity paradox-a protective effect of obesity in patients who already have these disease states. Data on the obesity paradox in intracerebral hemorrhage is limited. Methods- Clinical data for adult intracerebral hemorrhage patients were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample between 2007 and 2014. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association of body habitus with in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay, tracheostomy or gastrostomy placement, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Results- There were 99 212 patients who were eligible. Patients with both obesity (OR=0.69; 95% CI=0.62-0.76; P<0.001) and morbid obesity (OR=0.85; 95% CI=0.74-0.97; P=0.02) were associated with decreased odds of in-hospital mortality. Morbid obesity was significantly associated with increased odds of a tracheostomy or gastrostomy placement (OR=1.42; 1.20-1.69; P<0.001) and decreased odds of a routine discharge disposition (OR=0.84; 0.74-0.97; P=0.014). Conclusions- Obesity and morbid obesity appear to protect against mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage.

Thromboembolic Outcomes of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Limited data is available assessing the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulation (AC) strategies for prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In this systematic review, we conducted a literature search to examine the possible association between different AC strategies and prevention of these adverse outcomes. METHODS: Scientific databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus) were searched using relevant medical subject headings and keywords to retrieve studies published through September of 2019. Studies assessing the outcomes of interest in patients with HCM and AF receiving AC, no AC as well as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were selected. RESULTS: This review identified 14 observational studies evaluating thromboembolic events by AC strategies in 8,479 participants with concomitant HCM and AF. The use of AC was associated with a lower pooled incidence rate of total thromboembolic events at 9.5% (112 events in 1,175 patients) compared to 22.1% with no AC (108 events in 489 patients). In addition, the use of DOACs was associated with a lower pooled incidence rate of thromboembolic events at 4.7% (169 events in 3,576 patients) compared to 8.7% with VKAs (281 events in 3,239 patients). Furthermore, the use of DOACs compared to VKAs was associated with a lower pooled incidence rate of major bleeding and all-cause mortality at 3.8% (136 events in 3,576 patients) versus 6.8% (220 events in 3,239 patients) and 4.1% (124 events in 3,008 patients) versus 16.1% (384 events in 2,380 patients), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AC of patients with concomitant HCM and AF was associated with a lower incidence of thromboembolic events when compared to antiplatelet therapy or no treatment. Treatment with DOACs was also associated with a lower incidence of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality when compared to VKAs.

Long-term quality of life in octogenarians and nonagenarians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation following WATCHMAN™ device implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of WATCHMAN™ on quality of life (QoL) in octogenarians and nonagenarians. BACKGROUND: QoL after WATCHMAN™ device in the elderly remains unknown. METHODS: This is a prospective and retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent WATCHMAN™ implantation in a tertiary cardiovascular center from April 1, 2015 to September 27, 2017. The primary outcome was a prospective assessment of QoL via the SF-12v2 Health Survey (SF-12v2) in those aged ≥80 and ≥90 years. Secondary outcomes include major bleeding, stroke, vascular complications, pericardial effusion, device related thrombus (DRT), prolonged length of stay (LOS), acute kidney injury (AKI), and recurrent hospitalizations. RESULTS: This cohort of 151 patients included 48/151 (32%) females with a mean age of 80 ± 7.7 years. Mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc was 4.38 ± 1.36 and mean HAS-BLED was 3.27 ± 1.17. Octogenarians 65/81(80%) and nonagenarians 16/81(20%) comprised 81/151(54%) of patients (mean age 86 ± 4.3 years) from which 36/65 (55%) octogenarians and 10/16 (63%) nonagenarians completed SF-12v2 evaluation at 22 ± 10 and 30 ± 10-months. Octogenarians demonstrated enhanced physical component scores (PCS), and nonagenarians equal PCS versus the age-adjusted norm (45.43 ± 9.84 versus 38.68 ± 11.04, P = 0.0003, and 41.26 ± 12.36 versus 38.68 ± 11.04, P = 0.6463, respectively). The mental component scores (MCS) of octogenarians and nonagenarians remained comparable (51.80 ± 9.56 and 48.97 ± 9.92 versus 50.06 ± 10.94, respectively, P = 0.4659). No stroke, vascular complications, pericardial effusions, or readmissions related to WATCHMAN™ occurred. No difference among patients <80, ≥80, and ≥90 years was found in major bleeding events, DRT, prolonged LOS, or AKI (P = 0.0569, 0.116, 0.498, and 0.795, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians and nonagenarians experience favorable long-term QoL after WATCHMAN™, with acceptable bleeding risk and low incidence of procedure-related complications.

Nationally Representative Readmission Factors Associated with Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are tied to financial penalties and thus significantly influence health-care policy. Many current studies on readmissions lack national representation by not tracking readmissions across hospitals. The recently released Nationwide Readmission Database is one of the most comprehensive national sources of readmission data available, making it an invaluable resource to understand this critically important health policy issue. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database for 2013 and 2014 was queried for adult patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (441.4) undergoing endovascular (39.71) or open (38.44) repair. Outcomes examined were overall/initial admission mortality and overall/30-day readmissions. Multivariate logistic regression for these outcomes was also performed on multiple readmission factors. RESULTS: Fifty-three thousand four hundred seventeen patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (47,431 endovascular aortic repair [EVAR] versus 5,986 open surgical repair [OSR]). Significant differences were found for EVAR versus OSR on overall readmissions, initial admission cost, readmission costs, length of stay, days to readmission, and overall/initial admission mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that length of stay > 30, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1, discharge disposition, and female sex were all significant predictors of 30-day readmission. Repair type was significantly associated with 30-day readmissions; however, it was not a significant factor for overall readmissions. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in costs, prognosis, and readmission rates for EVAR versus OSR. Given that these differences are being used to create "acceptable" readmission rates, disbursement quotas among hospitals, and subsequent penalties for providers outside the expected rates, it is only prudent to obtain the most accurate information to guide those policies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management/epidemiological, level IV.

Importance of a Risk Stratification Strategy to Identify High-risk Patients Presenting With Cocaine-associated Acute Coronary Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines recommend treating patients with cocaine-associated chest pain, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction similarly to patients with traditional acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Risk stratifying these patients could potentially reduce unnecessary procedures and improve resource utilization. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 258 patients presenting with cocaine-associated ACS who underwent cardiac catheterization in a community teaching hospital between 2006 and 2015. The primary outcome was the prevalence of acute obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting compared with that of patients with normal coronary or nonobstructive disease. RESULTS: Of the studied population, 36% had obstructive CAD requiring intervention and 64% were found to have normal coronaries or nonobstructive disease. Significant risk factors for obstructive CAD were older age, history of CAD, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, and troponin elevation. A logistic model was developed based on these variables, applied to the studied population, and was found to have 93% sensitivity in predicting the likelihood of obstructive CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac catheterization in patients presenting with cocaine-associated ACS may be overutilized. A predictive model based on clinical risk factors may help individualize patient care and reduce unnecessary invasive diagnostic interventions.

The Impact of Epidemiological Factors and Treatment Interventions on Survival in Patients With Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas.

OBJECTIVES: Primary pancreatic signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare histologic variant of pancreatic carcinoma. A population-based analysis of pancreatic SRCC was performed to determine the predictive effects of epidemiological factors and treatment interventions on overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was searched for pancreatic SRCC cases diagnosed between January 1, 1973 and December 31, 2013. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test, χ(2) analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The mean age among 497 patients was 66.6 years (SD, 11.9). Most patients were white (82.7%) and male (54.5%). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 17%, 9%, and 4%, respectively, while the corresponding 1-, 2-, and 5-year rates for DSS were 18%, 10%, and 5%, respectively. On univariable analysis; age, site, grade, stage, and treatment were predictive of OS and DSS (P<0.05). On multivariable analysis; radiation improved OS and DSS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.592 and 0.589, respectively), pancreatectomy improved OS and DSS (aHR, 0.360 and 0.355, respectively), and combination therapy improved OS and DSS (aHR, 0.295 and 0.286, respectively). Age, site, and stage were also independent predictors of OS and DSS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated treatment to be an independent predictor of OS and DSS in localized/regional disease, in distant disease, and in patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2013. CONCLUSIONS: Age, site, stage, and treatment independently predict OS and DSS in pancreatic SRCC.

Ultrafiltration versus intravenous loop diuretics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Background Intravenous loop diuretics are the first-line therapy for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) but many patients are discharged with unresolved congestion resulting in higher re-hospitalization and mortality rates. Ultrafiltration (UF) is a promising intervention for ADHF. However, studies comparing UF to diuretics have been inconsistent in their clinical outcomes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed. Trials were included if they met the following criteria: (1) randomization with a control group, (2) comparison of UF with a loop diuretic, and (3) a diagnosis of ADHF. Results When compared to diuretics, UF was associated with a reduced risk of clinical worsening (odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.86, P-value 0.007), increased likelihood for clinical decongestion (OR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.09-4.91, P-value 0.03) with greater weight (0.97 Kg, 95% CI: 0.52-1.42, P-value <0.0001) and volume reduction (1.11 L, 95% CI: 0.68-1.54, P-value <0.0001). The overall risk of re-hospitalization (OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.62-1.38, P-value 0.70), return to emergency department (OR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.44-1.08, P-value 0.10) and mortality (OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.60-1.62, P-value 0.97) were not significantly improved by UF treatment. Conclusions UF is associated with significant improvements in clinical decongestion but not in rates of re-hospitalization or mortality.

Perioperative Outcomes and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation in Octogenarians: A Retrospective Study and Review of the Benefits of Rhythm Control.

OBJECTIVES: Catheter ablation for rhythm control has emerged as a successful therapeutic option for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), though it has not been well studied in octogenarians. This study evaluates its safety in octogenarians in a community hospital and reviews the benefits of rhythm control. METHODS: Among 1,592 patients undergoing AF ablation, 84 octogenarian were identified. The primary outcome was normal sinus rhythm (NSR) on electrocardiogram at discharge. Secondary outcomes were periprocedural complications and markers and risks of reablation compared to younger cohorts. RESULTS: An NSR on discharge occurred in 83 patients. Three patients required pacing for symptomatic sinus bradycardia, complete heart block, and symptomatic junctional bradycardia, respectively. Reablation for recurrent AF occurred in 23 octogenarians. Using the octogenarians as reference, the relative risk (RR) of 1 reablation was not significantly different among the age groups 70-79, 60-69, and <60 years. The RR of 2 reablations was greater in the octogenarian group (RR 0.26 [95% CI 0.09-0.71, p = 0.008], 0.42 [95% CI 0.17-1.04, p = 0.06], and 0.27 [95% CI 0.1-0.75, p = 0.01], respectively). Coronary artery disease (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.68, p = 0.026) and percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.63, p = 0.021) were markers for reablation. CONCLUSION: AF catheter ablation achieved an NSR with minimal periprocedural complications. The benefits of rhythm control should be considered in treatment.

Comparing industry compensation of cardiothoracic surgeons and interventional cardiologists.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare payment trends between cardiothoracic surgeons and interventional cardiologists using the Open Payments website made available for the public by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were extracted from the second release of the Open Payments database, which includes payments made between August 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014. Total payments to individual physicians were aggregated based on specialty, region of the country, and payment type. The Gini index was calculated for each specialty to measure income disparity. A Gini index of 1 indicates all the payments went to one individual, whereas a Gini index of 0 indicates all individuals received equal payments. RESULTS: During the study period of interest, data were made available for 3587 (80%) cardiothoracic surgeons compared with 2957 (99%) interventional cardiologists. Mean total payments to cardiothoracic surgeons were $7770 (standard deviation, $52,608) compared with a mean of $15,221 (standard deviation, $98,828) for interventional cardiologists. The median total payments to cardiothoracic surgeons was $1050 (interquartile range, $233-$3612) compared with $1851 (interquartile range, $607-$5462) for interventional cardiologists. The overall Gini index was 0.932, whereas the Gini index was 0.862 for interventional cardiologists and 0.860 for cardiothoracic surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons received payments from drug and device manufacturers. The mean total payments to interventional cardiologists were higher than any other specialty. However, like cardiothoracic surgery, they were among the most equitably distributed compared with other specialties.

Value of Oral Proton Pump Inhibitors in Acute, Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are the standard medical treatment in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVGIB). Optimal route of PPI delivery has been questioned. AIM: The aim was to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis for the endpoints of risk of rebleeding, length of stay (LOS), surgery (ROS), mortality, and total units of blood transfused (UBT) among trials evaluating acid suppressive medications in ANVGIB. METHODS: A total of 39 studies using IV PPI drip, IV scheduled PPI, oral PPI, H2-receptor antagonists, and placebo were identified. Network meta-analysis was used for indirect comparisons and Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for calculation of probability superiority. RESULTS: No difference was observed between IV PPI drip and scheduled IV PPI for mortality (relative risk=1.11; 95% credibility interval, 0.56-2.21), LOS (0.04, -0.49 to 0.44), ROS (1.27, 0.64-2.35) and risk of rebleeding within 72 hours, 1 week, and 1 month [(0.98, 0.48-1.95), (0.59, 0.13-2.03), (0.82, 0.28-2.16)]. Oral PPIs were as effective as IV scheduled PPIs and IV PPI drip for LOS (0.22, -0.61 to 0.79 and 0.16, -0.56 to 0.80) and UBT (-0.25, -1.23 to 0.65 and -0.06, -0.71 to 0.65) and superior to IV PPI drip for ROS (0.30, 0.10 to 0.78). CONCLUSION: Scheduled IV PPIs were as effective as IV PPI drip for most outcomes. Oral PPIs were comparable to scheduled IV for LOS and UBT and superior to IV PPI drip for ROS. Conclusions should be tempered by low frequency endpoints such as ROS, but question the need for IV PPI drip in ANVGIB.

Non-critical care telemetry and in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Telemetry is increasingly used to monitor hospitalized patients with lower intensities of care, but its effect on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes in non-critical care patients is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: Telemetry utilization in non-critical care patients does not affect IHCA outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in non-critical care beds that experienced a cardiac arrest in a university-affiliated teaching hospital during calendar years 2011 and 2012 was performed. Data were collected as part of AHA Get With the Guidelines protocol. The independent variable and exposure studied were whether patients were on telemetry or not. Telemetry was monitored from a central location. The primary endpoint was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and the secondary end point was survival to discharge. RESULTS: Of 123 IHCA patients, the mean age was 75±15 and 74 (61%) were male. 80 (65%) patients were on telemetry. Baseline demographics were similar except for age; patients on telemetry were younger with mean age of 70.3 vs. 76.8 in the non-telemetry group (p=0.024). 72 patients (60%) achieved ROSC and 46 (37%) achieved survival to discharge. By univariate analysis, there was no difference between patients that had been on telemetry vs. no telemetry in ROSC (OR=1.13, p=0.76) or survival to discharge (OR=1.18, p=0.67). Similar findings were obtained with multivariate analysis for ROSC (0.91, p=0.85) and survival to discharge (OR=0.92, p=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: The use of cardiac telemetry in non-critical care beds, when monitored remotely in a central location, is not associated with improved IHCA outcomes.

A meta-analysis on the prophylactic use of macrolide antibiotics for the prevention of disease exacerbations in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Macrolides are of unique interest in preventing COPD exacerbations because they possess a variety of antibacterial, antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. Recent research has generated renewed interest in prophylactic macrolides to reduce the risk of COPD exacerbations. Little is known about how well these recent findings fit within the context of previous research on this subject. The purpose of this article is to evaluate, via exploratory meta-analysis, whether the overall consensus favors prophylactic macrolides for prevention of COPD exacerbations. METHODS: EMBASE, Cochrane and Medline databases were searched for all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Six RCTs were identified. The primary endpoint was incidence of COPD exacerbations. Secondary endpoints including mortality, hospitalization rates, adverse events and likelihood of having at least one COPD exacerbation were also examined. RESULTS: There was a 37% relative risk reduction (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.87, p value = 0.005) in COPD exacerbations among patients taking macrolides compared to placebo. Furthermore, there was a 21% reduced risk of hospitalization (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90, p-value = 0.01) and 68% reduced risk of having at least one COPD exacerbation (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.54, p-value = 0.001) among patients taking macrolides versus placebo. There was also a trend toward decreased mortality and increased adverse events among patients taking macrolides but these were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic macrolides are an effective approach for reducing incident COPD exacerbations. There were several limitations to this study including a lack of consistent adverse event reporting and some degree of clinical and statistical heterogeneity between studies.

Do physicians/researchers trade stock based on privileged information? A closer look at trading patterns surrounding the annual ASCO conference.

The goal of this paper was to assess whether, given the opportunity, physicians/researchers would try to profit (by trading stocks) from information that only they were made privy to. The Annual ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) Conference, the largest annual oncology conference, provided the perfect venue to fully explore this question. Up until 2008, ASCO abstracts were released exclusively to ASCO members (i.e., physicians, oncologists) two weeks prior to the conference, and many speculated about unusual trading patterns during these two weeks. In 2008, in response to concerns about such illicit activities, ASCO changed this policy (by distributing these abstracts instead to the general public). We decided to take a closer look at these trading patterns to determine the true impact of ASCO's 2008 decision and whether the differences prior to and following 2008 reveal something about the likelihood of physicians/researchers to profit from "privileged information."