Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Urologe A ; 56(7): 917-924, 2017 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28405705

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk for patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa) and pre-existing CV disease. This risk seems to be different for the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists leuprolide and goserelin and GnRH antagonists, whereas the slightly more expensive GnRH antagonist shows a beneficial risk profile. The present study assesses the cost effectiveness of degarelix compared to leuprolide for PCa patients with increased CV risk. METHODS: This analysis is based on a pooled analysis of six phase III, randomized, controlled trials comparing the GnRH agonists leuprolide and goserelin with the GnRH antagonist degarelix. For the combined endpoint of CV events or death a superiority of degarelix was determined with a Number-Needed-to-Treat of 12. From the perspective of German statutory health insurance, this evaluation estimates and compares the additional drug costs of degarelix treatment to the cost of one (avoided) CV event. The CV event costs were estimated via emergency treatment and transportation, inpatient treatment, and rehabilitation. The difference of these two cost pools divided by 12 yields the average saving per patient and year. RESULTS: For every 12 PCa patients with CV history that are treated with GnRH antagonists to prevent one CV event, there will be additional drug costs in comparison with leuprolide treatment of € 3111 per year. Costs of € 8447 per year are prevented. Therefore, each patient with a history of CV who is treated with degarelix instead of a leuprolide generates savings of € 445 per patient and year. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to leuprolide, degarelix is cost effective for patients with increased CV risk.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors , Leuprolide/economics , Leuprolide/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Leuprolide/adverse effects , Male , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Oligopeptides/adverse effects , Oligopeptides/economics , Oligopeptides/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors
3.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11496621

ABSTRACT

Over the past two decades, many genetically engineered drugs have been developed and approved for the treatment of patients. Typically, these drugs are characterized by a high and specific activity in the presence of optimal safety. They include hormones, enzymes, growth and coagulation factors, antibodies as well as vaccines. All these proteins are generated using recombinant DNA technology. An expression vector with the gene encoding for the protein of interest is introduced into an appropriate microorganism or cell line. The biochemical machinery of the host cell then translates the genetic information into the corresponding protein. Large scale production of the recombinant drugs uses biotechnological processes. The genetically modified organisms are grown in bioreactors from which the desired protein is finally isolated and purified. This review focuses on the production and clinical application of recombinant erythropoietin in the areas of nephrology, hemato-oncology and elective surgery.


Subject(s)
Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Genetic Engineering , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Biotechnology/methods , Biotechnology/trends , DNA, Recombinant/genetics , Genetic Engineering/methods , Genetic Engineering/trends , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...