Risk-reducing mastectomy decisions among women with mutations in high- and moderate- penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes.

BACKGROUND: Women harboring mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes are at increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer and are faced with decisions about risk management, including whether to undergo high-risk screening or risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). National guidelines recommend BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers consider RRM, but that carriers of moderate penetrance mutations (e.g., ATM or CHEK2) should be managed based on family history. We aimed to investigate determinants of decision for RRM, and hypothesized that mutation status, age, family history, partner status, and breast cancer would impact RRM decision making. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study assessing RRM decisions for 279 women. RESULTS: Women with BRCA and moderate penetrance gene mutations, a personal history of breast cancer, or a first degree relative with a history of breast cancer were more likely to undergo RRM. Breast cancer status and age showed an interaction effect such that women with breast cancer were less likely to undergo RRM with increasing age. CONCLUSION: Although national guidelines do not recommend RRM for moderate penetrance carriers, the rates of RRM for this population approached those for BRCA mutation carriers. Further insights are needed to better support RRM decision-making in this population.

"This could be me": exploring the impact of genetic risk for Huntington's disease young caregivers.

Huntington's disease (HD) is a predominantly adult-onset, genetic, neurodegenerative condition. Children of affected individuals have a 50% risk of inheriting HD and often assume caregiving roles for their parent. Studies specifically focused on HD young caregivers have proposed that the genetic risk component of HD "exacerbates" the caregiving experience and identified common responsibilities, burdens, and support needs, but none have explored the relationship between the caregiving role and perception of genetic risk. In an attempt to understand this relationship, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the interaction between a young caregiver's perception of genetic risk, the caregiving experience, and thoughts about and plans for predictive testing. Thirteen individuals between 15 and 25 years who provided care for a parent with HD were recruited from two HD youth groups and local support groups. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Two themes emerged: (1) caregiving and thoughts about risk and (2) caregiving and perceived opinions towards genetic testing. Our findings suggest that the genetic risk colors the caregiving experience by evoking feelings about the future and a potential diagnosis of HD, in addition to impacting plans for predictive testing. Genetic counselors can use these findings to inform their understanding of caregiver experiences, which can aid them when helping patients explore their motivations for testing during a genetic counseling session. Future studies should explore the extent to which health care providers acknowledge the work of young caregivers in the home and provide support to these individuals.

Developing a conceptual, reproducible, rubric-based approach to consent and result disclosure for genetic testing by clinicians with minimal genetics background.

PURPOSE: In response to genetic testing being widely ordered by nongenetics clinicians, the Consent and Disclosure Recommendations (CADRe) Workgroup of the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen; clinicalgenome.org ) developed guidance to facilitate communication about genetic testing and efficiently improve the patient experience. Considering ethical, legal, and social implications, and medical factors, CADRe developed and pilot tested two rubrics addressing consent for genetic testing and results disclosure. The CADRe rubrics allow for adjusting the communication approach based on circumstances specific to patients and ordering clinicians. METHODS: We present results of a formative survey of 66 genetics clinicians to assess the consent rubric for nine genes (MLH1, CDH1, TP53, GJB2, OTC; DMD, HTT, and CYP2C9/VKORC1). We also conducted interviews and focus groups with family and patient stakeholders (N = 18), nongenetics specialists (N = 27), and genetics clinicians (N = 32) on both rubrics. RESULTS: Formative evaluation of the CADRe rubrics suggests key factors on which to make decisions about consent and disclosure discussions for a "typical" patient. CONCLUSION: We propose that the CADRe rubrics include the primary issues necessary to guide communication recommendations, and are ready for pilot testing by nongenetics clinicians. Consultation with genetics clinicians can be targeted toward more complex or intensive consent and disclosure counseling.