Association between Pre-Kidney Transplant Elevated Parathyroid Hormone and Post-Transplant Graft Loss.

BACKGROUND: Prior to kidney transplantation (KT) most patients have an elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH). However, the impact of PTH on post-KT mortality and graft loss is unclear. We quantified the association between PTH levels measured at transplant and adverse post-KT outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal cohort of 1,136 KT recipients from a single tertiary care center between 12/2008 and 2/2020. Pre-KT PTH levels were abstracted retrospectively. Adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between pre-KT PTH levels and mortality and death-censored graft loss (DCGL). RESULTS: Of 1,136 recipients, pre-KT PTH levels were ≤300pg/mL in 62.3% and >600pg/mL in 12.5%. Compared to those with a pre-KT PTH≤300pg/mL, patients with a pre-KT PTH>600pg/mL were more likely to be Black (51.4% vs. 34.6%) and have a longer dialysis vintage (4.8y vs. 1.7y) (p<0.001). Those with a pre-KT PTH>600pg/mL had a higher 10-year cumulative incidence of DCGL than those with PTH≤300pg/mL (31.7% vs. 15.4%, p<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, pre-KT PTH>600pg/mL was associated with a 1.76-fold increased risk of DCGL (95% CI: 1.16-2.65). The magnitude of this association differed by race (pinteraction=0.011) and by treatment (pinteraction=0.018). Among non-Black patients, a PTH>600pg/mL was associated with a 3.21-fold increased risk of DCGL compared to those with PTH≤300pg/mL (95%CI: 1.77-5.81). Among untreated patients, those with PTH>600pg/mL had a 2.54-fold increase in DCGL (95%CI: 1.44-4.47). There was no association between pre-KT PTH and mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: PTH >600pg/mL prior to KT increased the risk of DCGL by 76%, demonstrating the importance of treating PTH prior to KT to prevent graft loss in a contemporary era with the introduction and widespread availability of medical therapy.

Feasibility of robotic multivisceral resections in colorectal cancer patients: a NSQIP-based study.

Multivisceral robotic surgery may be an alternative to sequential procedures in select patients with colorectal cancer who are diagnosed with synchronous lesions or in those who require additional procedures at the time of resection. The aim of this study was to assess utilization of the robot for multivisceral resections and compare the surgical outcomes of this approach to laparoscopic resections. Adult colorectal surgery patients who underwent a colectomy or proctectomy and a concurrent abdominal surgery procedure in the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database (2016-2021) were included. The primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative overall and serious morbidity. Factors associated with morbidity were assessed using a multivariable logistic regression. Of the 3875 patients who underwent simultaneous multivisceral resections, 397 (10.3%) underwent a robotic approach and 962 (24.8%) a laparoscopic approach. Gynecological procedures (38%) comprised the largest proportion of concurrent procedures followed by hepatic resections (18%). On unadjusted analysis, rates of overall morbidity (25.4% vs. 30.0%) and serious morbidity (12.1% vs 12.0%) did not differ between the robotic and laparoscopic approach groups, respectively. The rate of conversion to open was lower for the robotic compared to laparoscopic approach (9.3% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.001), and length of stay was shorter (4 vs. 5, p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in overall (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.16, p = 0.34) or serious morbidity (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.75-1.65, p = 0.59) between the two approaches even after concurrent procedure risk stratification. Robotic multivisceral resections can be performed with acceptable overall and serious morbidity in select patients with colorectal cancer. Rates of conversion and length of stay may be decreased with a robotic approach, and future research is needed to determine the optimal operative approach in this patient population.

Procedure-specific risks of robotic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.

An estimated 25% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, the most common site being the liver. Although prior studies have reported that a simultaneous approach to resections in these patients can lead to increased rates of complications, emerging literature shows that minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches can mitigate this additional morbidity. This is the first study utilizing a large national database to investigate colorectal and hepatic procedure-specific risks in robotic simultaneous resections for CRC and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP targeted colectomy, proctectomy, and hepatectomy files, 1,721 patients were identified who underwent simultaneous resections of CRC and CRLM from 2016 to 2021. Of these patients, 345 (20%) underwent resections by an MIS approach, defined as either laparoscopic (n = 266, 78%) or robotic (n = 79, 23%). Patients who underwent robotic resections had lower rates of ileus compared to those who had open surgeries. The robotic group had similar rates of 30-day anastomotic leak, bile leak, hepatic failure, and post-operative invasive hepatic procedures compared to both the open and laparoscopic groups. The rate of conversion to open (8% vs. 22%, p = 0.004) and median LOS (5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.022) was significantly lower for robotic compared to laparoscopic group. This study, which is the largest national cohort of simultaneous CRC and CRLM resections, supports the safety and potential benefits of a robotic approach in these patients.

Procedure-Specific Risks of Robotic Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases.

An estimated 25% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, the most common site being the liver. Controversy exists regarding the safety of a simultaneous versus staged approach to resections in these patients, but reports have shown that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches can mitigate morbidity. This is the first study utilizing a large national database to investigate colorectal and hepatic procedure-specific risks in robotic simultaneous resections for CRC and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP targeted colectomy, proctectomy, and hepatectomy files, 1,550 patients were identified who underwent simultaneous resections of CRC and CRLM from 2016-2020. Of these patients, 311 (20%) underwent resections by an MIS approach, defined as an either laparoscopic (n = 241, 78%) or robotic (n = 70, 23%). Patients who underwent robotic resections had lower rates of ileus compared to those who had an open surgery. The robotic group had similar rates of 30-day anastomotic leak, bile leak, hepatic failure, and post operative invasive hepatic procedures compared to both the open and laparoscopic groups. The rate of conversion to open was significantly lower for robotic compared to laparoscopic group (9% vs. 22%, p = 0.012). This report is the largest study to date of robotic simultaneous CRC and CRLM resections reported in the literature and supports the safety and potential benefits of this approach.

Young-onset colorectal cancer: A review.

Despite the general decrease in overall incidence of colorectal cancer since the early 1990s, the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients less than 50 years old has nearly doubled. A systematic review was performed using the PubMed database (2011-2020) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011-2021) to identify studies (published in English) evaluating epidemiologic, clinical, hereditary, and molecular features; as well as evaluation, management, and prognosis of young-onset colorectal cancer patients. Our search yielded a total of 3401 articles, after applying our inclusion criteria. We fully reviewed 94 full-length studies. This systematic review demonstrates the increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer and highlights the importance of being hypervigilant for the differential diagnosis colorectal cancer when evaluating a young adult who presents with gastrointestinal symptoms.