Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ophthalmology ; 111(9): 1683-92, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15350323

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report on 3-year postoperative safety and efficacy outcomes with the Myopic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL). DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-six eyes of 294 patients with between 3.0 and 20.0 diopters (D) of myopia participating in the United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the ICL for myopia. INTERVENTION: Implantation of the ICL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (VA), refraction, best spectacle-corrected VA (BSCVA), adverse events, operative and postoperative complications, lens opacity analysis, subjective satisfaction, and patient symptoms. RESULTS: At 3 years, 59.3% had 20/20 or better VA, and 94.7% had 20/40 or better uncorrected VA if BSCVA was 20/20 and patients were targeted for emmetropia; 67.5% of patients were within 0.5 D and 88.2% were within 1.0 D of predicted refraction. The mean improvement in BSCVA ranged between 0.5 and 0.6 lines. At 3 years postoperatively, 3 eyes (0.8%) decreased by >or=2 lines of BSCVA, in contrast to 40 eyes (10.8%) that improved by a similar amount. Contrast sensitivity improved postoperatively. Cumulative 3-year corneal endothelial cell loss was under 10%. Early largely asymptomatic, presumably surgically induced anterior subcapsular opacities (trace or greater) were seen in 14 eyes (2.7%), with only 2 being clinically significant. Five eyes (0.9%) of 3 patients developed nuclear opacities of grade >2 at 2 to 3 years postoperatively. Three (0.6%) ICL removals with cataract extraction and IOL implantation have been performed. Only 0.6% reported dissatisfaction; 97.1% of patients reported they would choose ICL implantation again. Incidences of patient symptoms, glare, halos, double vision, night vision problems, and night driving difficulties decreased or remained unchanged after ICL surgery. CONCLUSION: Three-year results from this standardized, multicenter clinical investigation support the safety, efficacy, and predictability of ICL surgery to treat moderate to high myopic refractive errors.


Subject(s)
Anterior Chamber/surgery , Contact Lenses , Myopia/surgery , Prosthesis Implantation , Adult , Cell Count , Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Endothelium, Corneal/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myopia/physiopathology , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Safety , Treatment Outcome , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Visual Acuity/physiology
2.
Ophthalmology ; 110(2): 255-66, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12578765

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of the Implantable Contact Lens (ICL) to treat moderate to high myopia. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-three eyes of 291 patients with between 3 and 20.0 diopters (D) of myopia participating in the U. S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the ICL for myopia. INTERVENTION: Implantation of the ICL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refraction, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), adverse events, operative and postoperative complications, lens opacity analysis (Lens Opacity Classification System III), subjective satisfaction, and symptoms. RESULTS: Twelve months postoperatively, 60.1% of patients had a visual acuity of 20/20 or better, and 92.5% had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Patients averaged a 10.31-line improvement in UCVA, 61.6% of patients were within 0.5 D, and 84.7% were within 1.0 D of predicted refraction. Only one case (0.2%) lost > 2 lines of BSCVA. Gains of 2 or more lines of BSCVA occurred in 55 cases (11.8%) at 6 months and 41 cases (9.6%) at 1 year after ICL surgery. Early and largely asymptomatic, presumably surgically induced anterior subcapsular (AS) opacities were seen in 11 cases (2.1%); an additional early AS opacity (0.2%) was seen because of inadvertent anterior chamber irrigation of preservative-containing solution at surgery. Two (0.4%) late (> or = 1 year postoperatively) AS opacities were observed. Two (0.4%) ICL removals with cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation have been performed. Patient satisfaction (very/extremely satisfied) was reported by 92.4% of subjects on the subjective questionnaire; only four patients (1.0%) reported dissatisfaction. Slightly more patients reported an improvement at 1 year over baseline values for the following subjective symptoms: quality of vision, glare, double vision, and night driving difficulties. Only a 3% difference between pre-ICL and post-ICL surgery was reported for haloes. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the safety, efficacy, and predictability of ICL implantation to treat moderate to high myopia.


Subject(s)
Anterior Chamber/surgery , Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic , Myopia/surgery , Prosthesis Implantation , Adult , Biocompatible Materials , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Refraction, Ocular , Safety , Treatment Outcome , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Visual Acuity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...