ARID1A deficiency promotes progression and potentiates therapeutic antitumour immunity in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Exploring predictive biomarkers and therapeutic strategies of ICBs has become an urgent need in clinical practice. Increasing evidence has shown that ARID1A deficiency might play a critical role in sculpting tumor environments in various tumors and might be used as pan-cancer biomarkers for immunotherapy outcomes. The current study aims to explored the immune-modulating role of ARID1A deficiency in Hepatitis B virus (HBV) related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) and its potential immunotherapeutic implications. METHODS: In the current study, we performed a comprehensive analysis using bioinformatics approaches and pre-clinical experiments to evaluate the ARID1A regulatory role on the biological behavior, and immune landscape of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC). A total of 425 HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients from TCGA-LIHC, AMC and CHCC-HBV cohort were enrolled in bioinformatics analysis. Immunohistochemical staining of HBV-HCC specimens and ARID1A deficiency cellular models were used to validate the results of the analysis. RESULTS: Our results have shown that ARID1A deficiency promoted tumor proliferation and metastasis. More importantly, ARID1A deficiency in HBV-HCC was associated with the higher TMB, elevated immune activity, and up-regulated expression of immune checkpoint proteins, especially TIM-3 in HBV-HCC. Further, the expression of Galectin-9, which is the ligand of TIM-3, was elevated in the ARID1A knockout HBV positive cell line. CONCLUSION: To conclude, we have shown that the ARID1A deficiency was correlated with more active immune signatures and higher expression of immune checkpoints in HBV-HCC. Additionally, the present study provides insights to explore the possibility of the predictive role of ARID1A in HBV-HCC patients responsive to immunotherapy.

CHST7 Methylation Status Related to the Proliferation and Differentiation of Pituitary Adenomas.

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are the second most common primary brain tumor and may develop from any of the cell lineages responsible for producing the different pituitary hormones. DNA methylation is one of the essential epigenetic mechanisms in cancers, including PAs. In this study, we measured the expression profile and promoter methylation status of carbohydrate sulfotransferase 7 (CHST7) in patients with PA; then, we investigated the effect of the CHST7 methylation status on the proliferation and differentiation of PAs. The volcano map and Metascape results showed that the levels of CHST7 were related to the lineages' differentiation and the cell adhesion of PAs, and patients with low CHST7 had greater chances of having an SF-1 lineage (p = 0.002) and optic chiasm compression (p = 0.007). Reactome pathway analysis revealed that most of the DEGs involved in the regulation of TP53 regulated the transcription of cell cycle genes (HSA-6791312 and HSA6804116) in patients with high CHST7. Correlation analysis showed that CHST7 was significantly correlated with the eIF2/ATF4 pathway and mitochondrion-related genes. The AUC of ROC showed that CHST7 (0.288; 95% CI: 0.187-0.388) was superior to SF-1 (0.555; 95% CI: 0.440-0.671) and inferior to FSHB (0.804; 95% CI: 0.704-0.903) in forecasting the SF-1 lineage (p < 0.001). The SF-1 lineage showed a higher methylation frequency for CHST7 than the Pit-1 and TBX19 lineages (p = 0.009). Furthermore, as the key molecule of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, inhibin ßE (INHBE) was positively correlated with the levels of CHST7 (r = 0.685, p < 0.001). In summary, CHST7 is a novel pituitary gland specific protein in SF-1 lineage adenomas with a potential role in gonadotroph cell proliferation and lineage differentiation in PAs.

Genomic Alterations Identification and Resistance Mechanisms Exploration of NSCLC With Central Nervous System Metastases Using Liquid Biopsy of Cerebrospinal Fluid: A Real-World Study.

Background: Genomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be used to detect actionable mutations and guide clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Examining the performance of CSF samples in real-world settings can confirm the potential of CSF genotyping for guiding therapy in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: We included 1,396 samples from 970 NSCLC patients with CNS metastases in real-world settings. All samples underwent targeted next-generation sequencing of 1,021 cancer-relevant genes. In total, 100 CSF samples from 77 patients who had previously received targeted treatment were retrospectively analyzed to explore the mechanisms of TKI-resistance. Results: For NSCLC patients with CNS metastases, CSF samples were slightly more often used for genomic sequencing in treated patients with only distant CNS metastases compared to other patients (10.96% vs. 0.81-9.61%). Alteration rates in CSF samples were significantly higher than those in plasma, especially for copy number variants (CNV). The MSAFs of CSF samples were significantly higher than those of plasma and tumor tissues (all p <0.001). Remarkably, detection rates of all actionable mutations and EGFR in CSF were higher than those in plasma samples of treated patients (all p <0.0001). For concordance between paired CSF and plasma samples that were simultaneously tested, the MSAF of the CSF was significantly higher than that of matched plasma cfDNA (p <0.001). From multiple comparisons, it can be seen that CSF better detects alterations compared to plasma, especially CNV and structural variant (SV) alterations. CSF cfDNA in identifying mutations can confer the reason for the limited efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for 56 patients (78.87%, 56/71). Conclusions: This real-world large cohort study confirmed that CSF had higher sensitivity than plasma in identifying actionable mutations and showed high potential in exploring underlying resistance mechanisms. CSF can be used in genomics profiling to facilitate the broad exploration of potential resistance mechanisms for NSCLC patients with CNS metastases.

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Icotinib in Patients With Clinically Diagnosed Advanced Lung Cancer With EGFR-Sensitizing Variants Assessed by Circulating Tumor DNA Testing: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The inability to obtain a pathological diagnosis in a certain proportion of patients with clinically diagnosed advanced lung cancer impedes precision treatment in clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcome of first-line icotinib in patients with clinically diagnosed advanced lung cancer with unknown pathological status and positive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-sensitizing variants assessed by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Design, Setting, and Participants: The Efficiency of Icotinib in Plasma ctDNA EGFR Mutation-Positive Patients Diagnosed With Lung Cancer (CHALLENGE) trial is a prospective, multicentered, open-label, single-arm phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial conducted between July 1, 2017, and July 31, 2019. Patients with systemic treatment-naive, clinically diagnosed advanced peripheral lung cancer, unknown pathological status, and positive pretreatment plasma EGFR-sensitizing variants were eligible. A total of 391 potentially eligible Chinese patients from 19 centers in China were screened for ctDNA EGFR variants by 3 independent detection platforms (Super amplification refractory mutation system [SuperARMS] polymerase chain reaction, droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing), and those with EGFR variants tested by any platform were included. Analyses were conducted from September 9 to December 31, 2021. Interventions: Enrolled patients were treated with oral icotinib tablets (125 mg 3 times daily) until disease progression, death, or treatment discontinuation due to various reasons, such as toxic effects and withdrawing consent. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and the concordance among the 3 detection platforms. Results: Of 116 included patients, 76 (65.5%) were female, and the median (range) age was 64 (37-85) years. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 36.3 (30.2-40.7) months. The ORR was 52.6% (95% CI, 43.1%-61.9%). The median PFS and OS were 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.3-12.2) and 23.2 months (95% CI, 17.7-28.0), respectively, and the DCR was 84.5% (95% CI, 76.6%-90.5%). The concordance rate among the 3 detection platforms was 80.1% (313 of 391), and the clinical outcomes in patients identified as positive by any platform were comparable. Conclusions and Relevance: This prospective phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial suggests that for patients with clinically diagnosed advanced lung cancer with unknown pathological status, ctDNA-based EGFR genotyping could help decision-making in particular clinical situations, while still warranting future larger-scaled real-world exploration. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03346811.

Intracranial efficacy of alectinib in ALK-positive NSCLC patients with CNS metastases-a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Although alectinib had demonstrated promising intracranial efficacy in several clinical trials, data were limited on its CNS activity in real-world settings. METHODS: In this retrospective study, ALK-positive NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM) or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from six hospitals in China were divided into three cohorts based on the treatment history before the administration of alectinib. ALK-TKI-naive patients were enrolled in cohort 1, cohort 2 included patients who experienced intracranial progression with or without extracranial progression after treatment with crizotinib, and cohort 3 included patients who developed progression only in CNS following treatment with other second-generation ALK-TKIs. The definition and evaluation of intracranial and extracranial lesions were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were eligible and included in our study (cohort 1: 20, cohort 2: 32, cohort 3: 13). For the overall population and patients with uncontrolled CNS metastases, similar intracranial response in CNS target lesions was observed: cohort 1: 81.8% and 80%; cohort 2: 76.5% and 86.7%; cohort 3: 42.8% and 33.3%. For patients in these three cohorts, 75% (6/8), 78.6% (11/14), and 83.3% (5/6) were reported to have significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms respectively. The number of patients who were in need of mannitol or corticosteroids decreased remarkably after the treatment of alectinib (p < 0.001), and there was also a steep fall-over in the number of patients with ECOG ≥2 points before and after the administration of alectinib (p = 0.003). All patients (8/8) diagnosed with LM ± BM experienced substantial alleviation in CNS-related symptoms. In cohort 1 and cohort 2, no significant difference in CNS-time to progression was found between patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic BM when treated with alectinib alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study substantiated the potent CNS activity of alectinib in real-world settings. Patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic BM could benefit from alectinib comparatively, which indicated that alectinib alone might defer the timing of local treatment. However, our results should be treated cautiously owing to limited sample size.

Clinical outcome, long-term survival and tolerability of sequential therapy of first-line crizotinib followed by alectinib in advanced ALK+NSCLC: A multicenter retrospective analysis in China.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the clinical outcome, long-term survival and tolerability of sequential therapy of first-line crizotinib followed by alectinib in a real-world setting for Chinese patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC. METHODS: The medical records of patients who received sequential therapy with first-line crizotinib followed by alectinib (no intermittent systemic therapy was allowed between the two ALK-TKIs) were collected from six centers in China. Combined time treatment to failure (C-TTF) was defined as the period from the start of crizotinib to the complete discontinuation of alectinib due to any cause. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were included in our study. Fifty-two patients were switched to alectinib due to disease progression, seven as a result of toxicity, and two due to patient preference. At the time of data cutoff, alectinib treatment was discontinued in 31 patients on account of disease progression while severe adverse events resulted in cessation of alectinib in another two patients. Rebiopsy was conducted in 21 patients following disease progression on alectinib in whom ALK secondary mutation was found in 13 patients. Patients with ALK secondary mutation demonstrated better PFS during treatment with subsequent ALK-TKIs compared with those without (10.4 vs. 3.1 m, p = 0.0018, HR = 0.08). With a median follow-up of 34.3 months, C-TTF was 39.2 months and estimated 5-year OS was 68.6% in the overall population. CONCLUSION: Sequential therapy with first-line crizotinib followed by alectinib demonstrated long-term benefits. Different efficacy in subsequent ALK-TKI between patients with or without ALK secondary mutation further emphasized the importance of rebiopsy to guide targeted therapy more precisely.

The Feasibility of Using Biomarkers Derived from Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing as Predictive Classifiers in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of biomarkers based on dynamic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to classify small cell lung cancer (SCLC) into different subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumor and longitudinal plasma ctDNA samples were analyzed by next-generation sequencing of 1,021 genes. PyClone was used to infer the molecular tumor burden index (mTBI). Pre-treatment tumor tissues [T1] and serial plasma samples were collected (pre-treatment [B1], after two [B2], six [B3] cycles of chemotherapy and at progression [B4]). RESULTS: Overall concordance between T1 and B1 sequencing (n=30) was 66.5%, and 89.5% in the gene of RB1. A classification method was designed according to the changes of RB1 mutation, named as subtype Ⅰ (both positive at B1 and B2), subtype Ⅱ (positive at B1 but negative at B2), and subtype Ⅲ (both negative at B1 and B2). The median progressive-free survival for subtype Ⅰ patients (4.5 months [95%CI: 2.6-5.8]) was inferior to subtype Ⅱ (not reached, p<0.0001) and subtype Ⅲ (10.8 months [95%CI: 6.0-14.4], p=0.002). The median overall survival for subtype Ⅰ patients (16.3 months [95%CI: 5.3-22.9]) was inferior to subtype Ⅱ (not reached, p=0.01) and subtype Ⅲ (not reached, p=0.02). Patients with a mTBI dropped to zero at B2 had longer median overall survival (not reached vs. 19.5 months, p=0.01). The changes of mTBI from B4 to B1 were sensitive to predict new metastases, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85.7%. CONCLUSION: Monitoring ctDNA based RB1 mutation and mTBI provided a feasible tool to predict the prognosis of SCLC.

Alectinib as first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in the real-world setting: preliminary analysis in a Chinese cohort.

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been a major advance in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which have been substantiated in clinical trials. However, real-world data on first-line alectinib in a Chinese patient population are limited. Methods: We enrolled patients diagnosed with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC treated with first-line alectinib at 8 centers in China, including cases with symptomatic or active CNS metastases. Continuation of alectinib was permitted after local or gradual progression at the treating clinician's discretion. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the period from the start of alectinib to discontinuation for any cause including disease progression, death, adverse events and patient's preference. We defined longer EML4-ALK variants as containing EML4 fusions to at least exon 13 and shorter variants had EML4 fusions up to exon 6. Results: Of the 110 patients included, 26.4% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) ≥2 points. The objective response rate (ORR) was 88.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-94.3%] and median tumor shrinkage rate was 60% (range, 0-100%) in patients with target lesions. For patients with measurable central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the CNS-ORR was 92.9% (95% CI: 66.1-99.8%), additionally, 80% (8/10) of patients experienced significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms following alectinib treatment. With a median follow-up of 18.3 months, the estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and 2-year treatment failure-free rate were 81.1% (95% CI: 71.5-87.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI: 70.6-88.0%) respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 6.4% and only 2 patients (1.8%) permanently discontinued alectinib due to adverse events. Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with metastases in ≥3 distant organs and a tumor reduction rate ≤50% demonstrated more unfavorable mPFS than their counterparts. Furthermore, patients carrying longer variants showed superior mPFS to those with shorter variants (not reached vs. 24.2 months, hazard ratio =0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.68, P=0.004). Conclusions: Alectinib showed substantial efficacy and an excellent safety profile in a real-world setting of Chinese patients. Clinical outcomes and long-term survival still require longer follow-up. Tumors with shorter EML4 fusion variants, more extensive metastases and less reduction in tumor lesions may require more aggressive strategies.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs)/circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) and their subtypes in small cell lung cancer: Predictors for response and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to define the clinical significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs)/circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) and their subtypes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. METHODS: CTCs/CTECs and their subtypes were determined using SE-iFISH technology in 33 SCLC patients before initial treatment (B1), after two cycles of chemotherapy (B2), at the completion of chemotherapy (B3), and disease progression (B4). The correlations with clinical characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: CTCs and CTECs were detected in 96.6% and 65.5% of patients, respectively. Patients had higher levels of CTCs compared with CTECs in circulation (p < 0.05). Extensive-stage SCLC patients tended to have higher CTEC counts (p = 0.035), and the detection of CTC-white blood cell (CTC-WBC) clusters was associated with a worse response to treatment (p = 0.030). Patients with CTC-WBC clusters at B1 (17.3 vs. 22.6 months, p = 0.041) and B2 (19.9 vs. 25.2 months, p = 0.018) had significantly shorter OS than those with no detection. Additionally, their presence was revealed as independent predictors for a worse OS in multivariable analyses (B1: HR 9.3, 95% CI: 1.4-48, p = 0.0079; B2: HR 4.4, 95% CI: 1.1-18, p = 0.041). A high CTC level at B4 was an adverse prognostic factor for SCLC patients (PFS: 8.7 vs. 22.5 months, p = 0.0026; OS: 19 months vs. not reached, p = 0.0086). CTC clusters and CTECs also showed prognostic values. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CTC-WBC clusters at baseline and after two-cycle chemotherapy and the total CTC counts at the completion of chemotherapy are strong predictors for the prognostic survival of SCLC patients receiving first-line treatment.

Icotinib as Adjuvant Treatment for Stage II-IIIA Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with EGFR Mutation (ICWIP Study): Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial.

The efficacy and possible role of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treating early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer have yet to be established. Therefore, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of icotinib in completely resected EGFR-mutant stage II-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent standard chemotherapy. This is a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase III trial. A total of 124 patients aged 18-75 years who qualified the inclusion criteria were recruited. These patients were randomised (1:1) to receive either icotinib (125 mg 3 times per day) or placebo (the same dosage and frequency) for 36 months, followed by a further 36 months of observational window. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS), while the secondary endpoints are overall survival, 3-year and 5-year DFS, safety and tolerability of the medication, and health-related quality-of-life. Analyses will be conducted in a full analysis set and a per-protocol set as well. To our knowledge, the present study is the first randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial designed to explore efficacy and safety of icotonib in this population. The results obtained in the near future may provide potential guidance in clinical practice. Trial Registration: This trial was registered on www.ClinicalTrail.gov as NCT02125240.

[The Methylation of p16 Gene Promoter in Carcinogenesis and Development of Breast Cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the protein expression of the p16 gene and the methylation of its promoter in breast cancer, and to analyze the correlation between the p16 DNA methylation and the clinicopathological features. METHODS: Immuno-histochemistry technique (SP method) and methylation-specific-PCR (MSP) were used to detect p16 protein expression and the methylation of the p16 promoter in 47 breast cancer samples as well as in 20 hyperplasia samples of mammary glands. Results The p16 protein expression in breast cancer samples significantly lower when compared with those of hyperplasia samples (48. 9% vs. 70. 0%) and p16 methylation was more frequent in breast-tumor tissues when compared with those of hyperplasia samples (38. 3% vs. 20. 0%), but the statistical significance wasn't found (P> 0. 05). Down-regulation of p16 protein was negatively correlation with p16 gene hypermethylation (r= -0. 33, P =0. 02). Meanwhile, p16 methylation in breast cancer tissues correlated with histological type, lymph node metastasis, but not correlated with the age, tumor diameter, TNM stage, expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) gene status. CONCLUSION: The downregulation of p16 protein induced by promoter methylation of p16 gene may not contribute to early cancinogenesis, but may contribute to progression of breast cancer.