Predictors of mortality in adult patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection have been increasing. Patients with MRSA bloodstream infection have a poor prognosis and high mortality rate. Identification of potential risk factors associated with MRSA bloodstream infection-related mortality may help improve patient outcomes. METHODS: Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify articles describing predictors of mortality in patients with MRSA bloodstream infections. Two investigators independently assessed articles for inclusion and data extraction. RESULTS: Twenty observational studies were included in the analysis. Factors associated with higher mortality were development of severe sepsis or septic shock [odds ratio (OR): 4.56, 95% CI: 3.37-6.18], congestive heart failure (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.27-2.50), liver cirrhosis (OR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.27-2.65), malignancy (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.33-1.98), infective endocarditis (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.35-3.11), nosocomial infection (OR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.41-5.55), intensive care unit admission (OR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.49-6.36) and inappropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.16-4.36); removal of the eradicable foci was a protective factor (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.40-0.63) The average APACHE II score at the time of diagnosis of MRSA bloodstream infection was considerably higher in patients who did not survive than in those who survived [weighted mean difference (WMD): 5.81, 95% CI: 3.03-8.59]. DISCUSSION: Patient condition, appropriate timing of antimicrobial treatment, surgical intervention and disease severity according to the APACHE II score are the most important risk factors for death in patients with MRSA bloodstream infections.

Predictors of mortality in patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection: a meta-analysis and a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Cases of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection have been increasing. Patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection have a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate. Identification of potential risk factors associated with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection-related mortality may help improve patient outcomes. METHODS: Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify articles describing predictors of mortality in patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. The quality of articles was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score (NOS). Review Manager was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-seven observational studies were included in the analysis. Factors associated with higher mortality were septic shock [odds ratio (OR): 4.41, 95% CI: 3.17-6.15], congestive heart failure (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.71-4.13), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.87-3.15), chronic kidney disease (CKD; OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.43-2.22), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.16-1.72), mechanical ventilation (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.25-2.18), and inappropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.52). The average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at the time of diagnosis of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection was considerably higher in patients who did not survive than in those who survived (weighted mean difference: 5.86, 95% CI: 2.46-9.26). DISCUSSION: Patient condition, timing appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and disease severity according to the APACHE II score are the most important risk factors for death in patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Our finding may help predict patients' outcomes and improve management for them. REGISTRATION NUMBER: 20210417EuEGX/INPLASY2020100037.

Early clinical management of acute CNS infections: a prospective cohort study.

Aim: To explore early management and clinical predictors of patients with suspected CNS infections. Methods: In a prospective cohort study of 125 adult patients with suspected CNS infections, clinical features and early management time points were compared between groups with and without confirmed CNS infections. Results: The door-to-lumbar puncture time was associated with the initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, the confirmed diagnosis and the time to change empirical treatment. Multivariate analysis indicated that the initial Glasgow Coma Scale score was an independent risk factor for prognosis. Conclusion: Lumbar puncture plays a crucial role in early management of CNS infections. Patients with CNS infection who have disturbances of consciousness should receive particular attention.