Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Antiviral Res ; 61(1): 1-18, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14670589

ABSTRACT

Some anticancer drugs, but not all, inhibit replication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and thus, exhibit a therapeutic potential. Such drugs, unlike the traditional HIV enzyme inhibitors, could suppress HIV strains that are resistant to inhibitors of viral enzymes, decrease proviral burden in vivo, or reduce reservoirs of infection via killing infected cells. Thus, they may be an effective adjunct therapy or perhaps result in a cure. The incidence of HIV infection and AIDS mortalities continue to increase worldwide, including the United States and parts of Africa, with a parallel increase in a number of other manifestations, including AIDS defining malignancies. The basis for continual spread of HIV presumably in large part stems from the viral resistance to previously successful drugs and the lack of curative antiretroviral drugs. To reverse these trends, other approaches for AIDS therapy must be developed. One possibility is the development of potent anticancer drugs, that exhibit anti-HIV activities. At least four chemically and pharmacologically distinct classes of anticancer drugs, i.e. certain cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs), topoisomerase 1 enzyme (top 1) inhibitors, non-nucleoside antimetabolites, and estrogen receptor ligands are promising candidates. These drugs, at high doses are used for cancer therapy; at lower concentrations they exhibit anti-HIV activities in cultured cells. While the antiretroviral and the anticancer activities of the cdk inhibitor flavopiridol appear to be mutually exclusive and unrelated in cells and animal model(s) of HIV disease, the top 1 inhibitor 9-nitrocamptothecin, as well as the cdk-inhibitor roscovitine inhibit replication of HIV via selective sensitization of HIV-infected cells to apoptosis. In contrast, the inhibitory effects of these compounds are different from other cancer therapeutics that, at toxic concentrations, activate HIV either in cultured cells (such as certain ingenol and butyrate derivatives) and/or in patients (such as the widely used cyclophosmamide and cisplatin). This quality may lead to the eradication of proviral reservoirs, which is not accomplished by the currently available antiretroviral drugs. In this review, relevant available clinical and in vitro data that either support or discourage using certain anticancer drugs for treatment of HIV disease, and the rationales for developing novel antiretroviral drugs that may target infected cells rather than viral proteins are discussed.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV/drug effects , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Antimetabolites/pharmacology , Apoptosis , Camptothecin/pharmacology , Cyclin-Dependent Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Flavonoids/pharmacology , HIV/physiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Piperidines/pharmacology , Purines/pharmacology , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Roscovitine , Topoisomerase I Inhibitors , Virus Replication/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...