ABSTRACT
Duration of fever and virus persistence after baloxavir administration were investigated in 81 outpatients, 16 with A(H1N1)pdm09 and 65 with A(H3N2) in the Japanese 2018-2019 influenza season. Only eight cases of A(H3N2) viruses were detected post-dose. PA/I38T-substituted viruses were detected in four (6.2%) of 65 A(H3N2) patients, at days 3 and 4, constituting 50% (4/8) of A(H3N2) detected post-dose. The median duration of fever was 26.0 h for A(H1N1)pdm09 and 20.3 h for A(H3N2). The median duration of fever for patients with PA/I38T-substituted viruses was 22.0 h, without significant difference to that of the patients in whom the mutated virus was not detected. Emergence of PA/I38T-substituted viruses after treatment with baloxavir was confirmed, but no significant prolongation of fever was observed in the four patients with PA/I38T-substituted virus emergence.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Dibenzothiepins/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Morpholines/therapeutic use , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Triazines/therapeutic use , Adult , Drug Resistance, Viral/drug effects , Fever , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/drug effects , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/drug effects , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
Comparison of the viral persistence of pandemic H1N1 (H1N1pdm) and seasonal H1N1 with or without H275Y mutation after oseltamivir therapy has not been adequately done. Virus was isolated before and on days 4-6 from the start of oseltamivir treatment for 158 cases of seasonal (2007-2008 and 2008-2009 seasons) or pandemic (2009-2010 season) H1N1 influenza. Sequence analysis was done for each season and NA inhibition assay (IC(50)) was done in the 2009-2010 season. H275Y mutation before therapy was 0% in the 2007-2008 and 2009-2010 seasons, but 100% in the 2008-2009 season. Fever and other symptoms were noticeably prolonged after oseltamivir therapy for children with H275Y mutated seasonal H1N1 (2008-2009 season), but not in patients with seasonal H1N1 without mutation (2007-2008) or H1N1pdm (2009-2010). The viral persistence rate was significantly higher for patients 15 years or younger than for those 16 years and older with H275Y mutated seasonal H1N1 (46.2% and 10.5%, respectively) or with H1N1pdm (43.3% and 11.5%, respectively). The H275Y mutation emerged after oseltamivir treatment in 2.4% (2/82) of all patients with H1N1pdm. In two children, the H275Y mutation emerged after therapy and the IC(50) increased more than 200 fold; however, the prolongation of fever was not so prominent. In conclusion, oseltamivir was effective for fever and other clinical symptoms; however, the virus persisted longer than expected after treatment in H1N1pdm influenza-infected children in the 2009-2010 season, similar to seasonal H1N1 with H275Y mutation in the 2008-2009 season.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Viral/drug effects , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/drug effects , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Mutation , Oseltamivir/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Adolescent , Adult , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Child , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , Female , Fever/drug therapy , Fever/virology , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza, Human/physiopathology , Influenza, Human/virology , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Japan , Male , Oseltamivir/pharmacology , Seasons , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Treatment Outcome , Virus Shedding , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of oseltamivir therapy started within 48h of the onset for influenza A(H1N1) virus with H274Y neuraminidase (NA) mutation. METHODS: Virus was isolated before and four to six days after starting oseltamivir treatment from 73 outpatients with influenza A(H1N1) virus in the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 seasons. NA inhibition assays (IC(50)) and sequence analyses were done using influenza viruses isolated from these patients. Body temperature was evaluated before and on the second, third, and fourth days after starting treatment. RESULTS: H274Y mutation was not shown in the 2007-2008 season (44 patients) and shown in all 29 patients in the 2008-2009 season by NA sequence analyses. The mean IC(50) before oseltamivir treatment was significantly higher in 2008-2009 (319.3+/-185.4 nM) than in 2007-2008 (1.5+/-0.8 nM; p<.001). Patients < or =15 years with oseltamivir-resistant virus infection had a higher ratio of patients persisted virus after oseltamivir treatment than patients >15 years (50% and 11.8%, respectively, p=0.038), and a significant higher body temperature during oseltamivir treatment, compared to patients < or =15 years treated for oseltamivir-sensitive virus infection. CONCLUSION: The clinical effectiveness of oseltamivir for the A(H1N1) virus was reduced in the 2008-2009 season compared with the previous season, especially in children, probably due to the H274Y mutation. Oseltamivir seems to be not recommended for children and patients with high-risk underlying diseases infected with H274Y mutated A(H1N1) virus.
