The within-session change in low back pain intensity following spinal manipulative therapy is related to differences in diffusion of water in the intervertebral discs of the upper lumbar spine and L5-S1.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-group, prospective, repeated-measures design with responder analysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in the changes in diffusion of water within the lumbar intervertebral discs between participants with low back pain who reported a within-session reduction in pain intensity following a single treatment of spinal manipulative therapy and those who did not. BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of research that describes the physiologic events associated with analgesia following intervention for low back pain. Postintervention increases in the diffusion of water within various soft tissues of the spine may be one of many potential mechanisms linked to pain reduction. METHODS: Nineteen adults between 20 and 45 years of age participated in this study. All participants reported low back pain of at least 2 on an 11-point (0-10) verbally administered numeric pain rating scale at the time of enrollment. Participants underwent T2- and diffusion-weighted lumbar magnetic resonance imaging scans immediately before and after receiving a single treatment of spinal manipulative therapy. Individuals who reported a decrease in current pain intensity of more than 2 following treatment were classified as "within-session responders," and the remainder were classified as "not-within-session responders." The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), representing the diffusion of water in the nucleus pulposus, was calculated from ADC maps derived from the midsagittal diffusion-weighted images. RESULTS: Two-way, repeated-measures analyses of variance indicated significant group-by-time interactions. Participants in the within-session-responder group (n = 12) had a postintervention increase in ADC at L1-2 (P = .001), L2-3 (P = .002), and L5-S1 (P = .01) compared to those in the not-within-session-responder group (n = 7). Large effect sizes in ADC between responder groups were observed at L1-2 (d = 1.74), L2-3 (d = 1.83), and L5-S1 (d = 1.49). No significant group-by-time interactions were observed at the L3-4 and L4-5 levels. CONCLUSION: Changes in the diffusion of water within the lumbar intervertebral discs at the L1-2, L2-3, and L5-S1 levels appear to be related to differences in within-session pain reports following a single treatment of spinal manipulative therapy.

Concurrent validity of walking speed values calculated via the GAITRite electronic walkway and 3 meter walk test in the chronic stroke population.

The purpose of this study was to provide novel information regarding the concurrent validity (primary aim) and reliability (secondary aim) of walking speed (WS) calculated via the GAITRite electronic walkway system and 3 meter walk test (3MWT) in the chronic stroke population. The 3MWT is a feasible option for clinicians working in environments where space is limited. Psychometric properties of the test have not been established. Participants with chronic stroke were stratified into three groups: (1) household ambulators (HA) (self-selected WS < 0.4 m/s, 12 participants, 31 observations); (2) limited community ambulators (LCA) (self-selected WS 0.4-0.8 m/s, 24 participants, 60 observations); and (3) community ambulators (CA) (self-selected WS > 0.8 m/s, 26 participants, 71 observations). Three consecutive trials of GAITRite and 3MWT were performed at participant's self-selected WS. Average WS measurements differed significantly (p < 0.05) between GAITRite and 3MWT for all three groups. HA group: GAITRite 0.25 (0.11) m/s, 3MWT 0.27 (0.11) m/s; LCA group: GAITRite 0.56 (0.11) m/s, 3MWT 0.52 (0.10) m/s; CA group: GAITRite 1.03 (0.16) m/s, 3MWT 0.89 (0.15) m/s. Both WS measures had excellent within-session reliability (ICC's ranging from 0.85 to 0.97, SEM95 from 0.04 to 0.12 m/s and MDC95 from 0.05 to 0.16 m/s). Reliability was highest for HA on both measures. Although both the 3MWT and the GAITRite are reliable measures of WS for individuals with chronic stroke, the two measures do not demonstrate concurrent validity.

The immediate reduction in low back pain intensity following lumbar joint mobilization and prone press-ups is associated with increased diffusion of water in the L5-S1 intervertebral disc.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-group, prospective, repeated-measures design. OBJECTIVES: To determine differences in the changes of diffusion of water in the L5-S1 intervertebral disc between subjects with nonspecific low back pain (LBP) who reported an immediate reduction in pain intensity of 2 or greater on an 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale after a 10-minute session of lumbar joint mobilization, followed by prone press-up exercises, compared to those who did not report an immediate reduction in pain intensity of 2 or greater on the pain scale. BACKGROUND: Combining lumbar joint mobilization and prone press-up exercises is a common intervention for patients with LBP; however, there is conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness and efficacy of this approach. Increased knowledge of the physiologic effects of the combined use of these treatments, and the relationship to pain reports, can lead to refinement of their clinical application. METHODS: Twenty adults, aged 22 to 54, participated in this study. All subjects reported LBP of at least 2 on an 11-point (0-10) verbally administered numeric rating scale at the time of enrollment in the study and were classified as being candidates for the combination of joint mobilization and prone press-ups. Subjects underwent T2- and diffusion-weighted lumbar magnetic resonance imaging scans before and immediately after receiving a 10-minute session of lumbar pressures in a posterior-to-anterior direction and prone press-up exercises. Subjects who reported a decrease in current pain intensity of 2 or greater immediately following treatment were classified as immediate responders, while the remainder were classified as not-immediate responders. The apparent diffusion coefficient, representing the diffusion of water in the nucleus pulposis, was calculated from the midsagittal diffusion-weighted images. RESULTS: Following treatment, immediate responders (n = 10) had a mean increase in the apparent diffusion coefficient in the middle portion of the L5-S1 intervertebral disc of 4.2% compared to a mean decrease of 1.6% for the not-immediate responders (P<.005). CONCLUSION: In a group of subjects with LBP, who were classified as being candidates for extension-based treatment, the report of an immediate reduction in pain intensity of 2/10 of greater after a treatment of posterior-to-anterior-directed pressures, followed by prone press-up exercises, was associated with an increase in diffusion of water in the nuclear region of the L5-S1 intervertebral disc. Subjects who did not report a pain reduction of at least 2/10 did not have a change in diffusion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40(5):256-264, Epub 12 March 2010. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3284.

The change in the diffusion of water in normal and degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs following joint mobilization compared to prone lying.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, repeated measures obtained under treatment and control conditions. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to provide preliminary evidence regarding the immediate change in the diffusion of water in the nuclear region of normal and degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs (IVDs) following a single session of lumbar joint mobilization, and to compare these findings to the immediate change in the diffusion of water following a 10-minute session of prone lying. BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness and efficacy of lumbar joint mobilization. Increased knowledge of the physiologic effects of lumbar joint mobilization can lead to refinement of its clinical application. METHODS AND MEASURES: A total of 24 people (15 males and 9 females), ranging in age from 22 to 58 years, participated in this study. All subjects had a history of activity-limiting low back pain. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images (DW-MRIs) were obtained immediately before and after a 10-minute session of lumbar joint mobilization. At least 1 month later, a second session was performed in which DW-MRIs were obtained immediately before and after a 10-minute session of prone lying. RESULTS: Following lumbar joint mobilization, a significant increase (P = .002) in the mean values for diffusion of water was observed within degenerative IVDs at L5-S1 (22.2% increase; effect size, 0.97). Degenerative IVDs at L1-2 to L4-5 and normal IVDs at L1-2 to L5-S1 did not demonstrate a change in diffusion following joint mobilization. Prone lying was not associated with a change in diffusion for normal or degenerative IVDs. CONCLUSIONS: The stimulus provided by lumbar joint mobilization may influence the diffusion of water in degenerative IVDs at L5-S1; however, these are preliminary findings and the relationship of these findings to pain and function needs further investigation.