Susceptibility to reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 virus relative to existing antibody concentrations and T cell response.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the reinfection rate of vaccinated or convalescent immunized SARS-CoV-2 in 952 expatriate workers with SARS-CoV-2 serological antibody (Ab) patterns and surrogate T cell memory at recruitment and follow-up. METHODS: Trimeric spike, nucleocapsid, and neutralizing Abs were measured, along with a T cell stimulation assay, targeting SARS-CoV-2 memory in clusters of differentiation (CD) 4+ and CD8+ T cells. The subjects were then followed up for reinfection for up to 6 months. RESULTS: The seroprevalence positivity at enrollment was greater than 99%. The T cell reactivity in this population was 38.2%. Of the 149 (15.9%) participants that were reinfected during the follow-up period (74.3%) had nonreactive T cells at enrollment. Those who had greater than 100 binding Ab units/ml increase from the median concentration of antispike immunoglobulin G Abs had a 6% reduction in the risk of infection. Those who were below the median concentration had a 78% greater risk of infection. CONCLUSION: Significant immune protection from reinfection was observed in those who retained T cell activation memory. Additional protection was observed when the antispike was greater than the median value.

Evaluation of post-vaccination immunoglobulin G antibodies and T-cell immune response after inoculation with different types and doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: A retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: The induction and speed of production of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) immune biomarkers may vary by type and number of inoculated vaccine doses. This study aimed to explore variations in SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike (anti-S), anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N), and neutralizing immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, and T-cell response by type and number of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses received. Methods: In a naturally exposed and SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated population, we quantified the anti-S, anti-N, and neutralizing IgG antibody concentration and assessed T-cell response. Data on socio-demographics, medical history, and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination were collected. Furthermore, nasal swabs were collected to test for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Confounder-adjusted association between having equal or more than a median concentration of the three IgG antibodies and T-cell response by number and type of the inoculated vaccines was quantified. Results: We surveyed 952 male participants with a mean age of 35.5 years ± 8.4 standard deviations. Of them, 52.6% were overweight/obese, and 11.7% had at least one chronic comorbidity. Of the participants, 1.4, 0.9, 20.2, 75.2, and 2.2% were never vaccinated, primed with only one dose, primed with two doses, boosted with only one dose, and boosted with two doses, respectively. All were polymerase chain reaction-negative to SARS-CoV-2. BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) was the most commonly used vaccine (92.1%), followed by rAd26-S + rAd5-S (Sputnik V Gam-COVID-Vac) (1.5%) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) (0.3%). Seropositivity to anti-S, anti-N, and neutralizing IgG antibodies was detected in 99.7, 99.9, and 99.3% of the study participants, respectively. The T-cell response was detected in 38.2% of 925 study participants. Every additional vaccine dose was significantly associated with increased odds of having ≥median concentration of anti-S [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.76], anti-N (aOR, 1.35; 95% CI: 1.03-1.75), neutralizing IgG antibodies (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI: 1.00-1.66), and a T-cell response (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI: 1.12-1.95). Compared with boosting with only one dose, boosting with two doses was significantly associated with increased odds of having ≥median concentration of anti-S (aOR, 13.8; 95% CI: 1.78-106.5), neutralizing IgG antibodies (aOR, 13.2; 95% CI: 1.71-101.9), and T-cell response (aOR, 7.22; 95% CI: 1.99-26.5) although not with anti-N (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI: 0.16-1.08). Compared with priming and subsequently boosting with BBIBP-CorV, all participants who were primed with BBIBP-CorV and subsequently boosted with BNT162b2 had ≥median concentration of anti-S and neutralizing IgG antibodies and 14.6-time increased odds of having a T-cell response (aOR, 14.63; 95% CI: 1.78-120.5). Compared with priming with two doses, boosting with the third dose was not associated, whereas boosting with two doses was significantly associated with having ≥median concentration of anti-S (aOR, 14.20; 95% CI: 1.85-109.4), neutralizing IgG (aOR, 13.6; 95% CI: 1.77-104.3), and T-cell response (aOR, 7.62; 95% CI: 2.09-27.8). Conclusion: Achieving and maintaining a high blood concentration of protective immune biomarkers that predict vaccine effectiveness is very critical to limit transmission and contain outbreaks. In this study, boosting with only one dose or with only BBIBP-CorV after priming with BBIBP-CorV was insufficient, whereas boosting with two doses, particularly boosting with the mRNA-based vaccine, was shown to be associated with having a high concentration of anti-S, anti-N, and neutralizing IgG antibodies and producing an efficient T-cell response.

Bile acid ratio in diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

We sought to determine if the bile acid ratio of cholic acid to chenodeoxycholic acid (CA:CDCA) is an important component for diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). We assessed the addition of bile acid CA:CDCA ratio information in diagnosing ICP in a database of patients evaluated for ICP by serum bile acids and hepatic transaminases. Patients were considered to test positive for ICP if there was elevation in total bile acid, CA:CDCA ratio, or transaminase. Of 231 specimens evaluated for ICP with bile acid and transaminases, 17.1% had elevated total bile acids, 29.4% had elevated transaminase, and 8.2% had an elevated bile acid ratio. Most specimens with elevated bile acid ratio also had elevated total bile acid; 35.5% of specimens tested positive by total bile acid and/or transaminases, increasing minimally to 35.9% with bile acid ratio information. Similar results were found using lower total bile acid and bile acid ratio thresholds. The bile acid CA:CDCA ratio contributed little to the diagnosis of ICP. The use of total bile acid and hepatic transaminases without bile acid ratios decreased positive tests by less than 2%.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: detection with urinary bile acid assays.

AIMS: To determine sensitivity and specificity of urine bile acid sulfate (UBAS) and non-sulfated urine bile acid (UBA) assays for detection of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). METHODS: Urine was collected prospectively from healthy and pruritic patients evaluated for ICP. Results were expressed as a ratio to urinary creatinine. RESULTS: Of 20 patients evaluated for ICP, 14 had confirmed ICP by serum testing and six had pruritus only. UBAS results were higher with ICP (P<0.001) and increased with gestational age in healthy controls. Adjusted for gestational age, the multiples of the median (MoM) were still higher (2.64+/-1.11, 1.05+/-0.54, P<0.001). The sensitivity was 100% and specificity 83% at 1.5 MoM in pruritic patients. UBA results were higher with ICP (23.0+/-9.8, 12.8+/-7.4, P<0.001), with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 50% at 10.2 micromol/g cretinine. CONCLUSION: Urinary bile acids can detect or exclude ICP with serum abnormalities. Urine bile acid sulfates have higher specificity than non-sulfated urine bile acids at equivalent sensitivities, but co-detection of progestin sulfates is suspected.

Pharmacogenetics in cancer chemotherapy: balancing toxicity and response.

The goal of chemotherapy is the elimination of tumor cells from the host. This is achieved by the use of therapeutic agents that are often more harmful to normal tissues than to the targeted tumor. Many chemotherapeutic agents are designed to damage cell replication machinery either directly at the level of DNA or indirectly, by inhibiting enzymes involved with DNA repair and synthesis. Novel therapeutic agents that exert their effects at signal transduction pathways have advanced chemotherapy; however, a role for the classic chemotherapeutic agents remains. These classic agents are associated with tumor cell resistance, toxicity, and occasionally secondary neoplasia. Current practices for the dosing of therapeutic agents rely on height and body surface measurements or drug monitoring and Bayesian adaptive control. Pharmacogenetics is emerging as an alternate approach to managing chemotherapy that may prevent undertreatment while avoiding overtreatment and associated toxicities. By determining the polymorphic genetic makeup of the host and, in some instances, the altered genetic expression of the tumor, chemotherapy can be tailored for interindividual response and toxicity avoidance. Chemotherapy is particularly applicable to the pharmacogenetic approach to tailored therapy for a number of reasons. The margin of safety is low with chemotherapeutic agents. Some drugs require biotransformation for activation. Drug activation correlates with toxicity. The pathways of drug clearance or inactivation exhibit polymorphic differences. Interindividual, race-specific, and age-related responses to chemotherapeutic agents are common. Last, drug resistance can be inherent to the tumor as a result of the suppression of apoptosis. Variations in response and toxicity to a specific drug can be caused by alterations in drug-metabolizing enzymes or receptor expression. These effects can be classed as pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic differences. Some of the genes known to display polymorphic differences include FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinase, FCG3RA IgG FC receptor, thymidylate synthase, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, thiopurine S-methyltransferase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase, glutathione S-transferase, uridine diphosphate glyuronosyl transferases, N-acetyl transferases, cytochrome P450, and the DNA repair enzymes XPD and XRCC1. To be successful a pharmacogenetic approach to individualized chemotherapy must selectively take advantage of a determination of direct enzyme activity, gene expression, and genotype.

Single-strand conformational polymorphism and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in screening for variegate porphyria: identification of two new mutations.

Single-strand conformational polymorphism and denaturing gel electrophoresis were used to screen for mutations in the protoporphyrinogen oxidase gene (PPOX) of three patients with clinically and biochemically proven variegate porphyria in order to select genomic regions for specific DNA sequence analysis. Two previously undescribed mutations were identified: PPOX1423-1426-delATCT and PPOX2272insG. Denaturing gel electrophoresis was able to discern the point mutation in exon 5 (PPOX2272insG) of the PPOX gene. Once an index individual has been identified, single-strand conformational polymorphism and denaturing gel electrophoresis techniques are useful to identify family members who may be unaffected carriers. Such identification can help potential cases to avoid medications and other triggers that could precipitate acute porphyric attacks.