Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Intern Emerg Med ; 17(2): 359-367, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34133005

ABSTRACT

The relationship between COVID-19 severity and viral load is unknown. Our objective was to assess the association between viral load and disease severity in COVID-19. In this single center observational study of adults with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2, the first positive in-hospital nasopharyngeal swab was used to calculate the log10 copies/ml [log10 copy number (CN)] of SARS-CoV-2. Four categories based on level of care and modified sequential organ failure assessment score (mSOFA) at time of swab were determined. Median log10CN was compared between different levels of care and mSOFA quartiles. Median log10CN was compared in patients who did and did not receive influenza vaccine, and the correlation between log10CN and D-dimer was examined. We found that of 396 patients, 54.3% were male, and 25% had no major comorbidity. Hospital mortality was 15.7%. Median mSOFA was 2 (IQR 0-3). Median log10CN was 5.5 (IQR 3.3-8.0). Median log10CN was highest in non-intubated ICU patients [6.4 (IQR 4.4-8.1)] and lowest in intubated ICU patients [3.6 (IQR 2.6-6.9)] (p value < 0.01). In adjusted analyses, this difference remained significant [mean difference 1.16 (95% CI 0.18-2.14)]. There was no significant difference in log10CN between other groups in the remaining pairwise comparisons. There was no association between median log10CN and mSOFA in either unadjusted or adjusted analyses or between median log10CN in patients with and without influenza immunization. There was no correlation between log10CN and D-dimer. We conclude, in our cohort, we did not find a clear association between viral load and disease severity in COVID-19 patients. Though viral load was higher in non-intubated ICU patients than in intubated ICU patients there were no other significant differences in viral load by disease severity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Viral Load
2.
Intern Emerg Med ; 15(4): 701-709, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052366

ABSTRACT

This study aims to describe infectious complications in both out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and to compare differences in antimicrobial treatment and outcomes between the two groups. This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with OHCA or IHCA who had sustained ROSC between December 2007 to March 2015 were included. Blood, urine, sputum, and other fluid cultures, as well as radiologic imaging, were obtained at the discretion of the treating clinical teams. 275 IHCA and 318 OHCA patients were included in the analysis. We found evidence of infection in 181 IHCA and 168 OHCA patients. Significant differences were found between the IHCA and OHCA group in terms of initial rhythm, duration of arrest (10 min vs. 20, p = < 0.001), targeted temperature management (30% vs. 73%, p = < 0.001), and post-arrest infection rates (66% vs 53%, p = 0.001). 95% of IHCA and 82% of OHCA patients received antimicrobial treatment in the post-cardiac arrest period. The source of infection in both groups was largely respiratory, followed by urinary. Gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods were the most common organisms identified among subjects with culture-proven bacteremia. Infections in the post-arrest period were common in both OHCA and IHCA. We found significantly more infections in IHCA compared to OHCA patients. The most common infection category was respiratory and the most common organism isolated from sputum cultures was Staphylococcus aureus coagulase-positive. The incidence of culture-positive bacteremia was similar in both OHCA and IHCA cohorts but overall lower than previously reported.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Heart Arrest/complications , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Boston , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Female , Heart Arrest/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/complications , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Crit Care ; 43: 61-64, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28850930

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Alcohol-use disorders (AUDs) have been associated with increased sepsis-related mortality. As patients with AUDs are often thiamine deficient, we investigated practice patterns relating to thiamine administration in patients with AUDs presenting with septic shock and explored the association between receipt of thiamine and mortality. MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with septic shock between 2008 and 2014 at a single tertiary care center. We identified patients with an AUD diagnosis, orders for microbial cultures and use of antibiotics, vasopressor dependency, and lactate levels≥4mmol/L. We excluded those who received thiamine later than 48h of sepsis onset. RESULTS: We included 53 patients. Thirty-four (64%) patients received thiamine. Five patients (15%) received their first thiamine dose in the emergency department. The median time to thiamine administration was 9 (quartiles: 4, 18) hours. The first thiamine dose was most often given parenterally (68%) and for 100mg (88%). In those receiving thiamine, 15/34 (44%) died, compared to 15/19 (79%) of those not receiving thiamine, p=0.02. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of patients with AUDs admitted for septic shock do not receive thiamine. Thiamine administration in this patient population was associated with decreased mortality.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/mortality , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Shock, Septic/mortality , Thiamine/administration & dosage , Vitamin B Complex/administration & dosage , Aged , Alcoholism/drug therapy , Alcoholism/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Septic/drug therapy , Shock, Septic/physiopathology , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment Outcome
4.
Intern Emerg Med ; 7(6): 539-45, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23054404

ABSTRACT

Noninvasive ventilation, both continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, has been used increasingly for acute respiratory failure over the past several years. Noninvasive ventilation has been proven to be beneficial for some causes of acute respiratory failure, most clearly for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, while its use in other forms of acute respiratory failure remains more controversial. In this article, the evidence for the use of noninvasive ventilation in various kinds of acute respiratory failure will be examined. Particular attention will be paid to the clinical situations commonly encountered by emergency medicine and general internal medicine clinicians. The potential dangers of noninvasive ventilation as well as some guidelines for clinical decision making when treating patients with this mode of ventilator support will also be discussed.


Subject(s)
Noninvasive Ventilation , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Acute Disease , Asthma/complications , Humans , Obesity/complications , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Pulmonary Edema/etiology , Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...