Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
J Clin Neurosci ; 121: 67-74, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38364728

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) remains a controversial intervention for intracranial hypertension among patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). METHODS: We identified aSAH patients who underwent DC following microsurgical aneurysm repair from a prospectively maintained registry and compared their outcomes with a propensity-matched cohort who did not. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of undergoing decompressive surgery and post-operative outcome. Outcomes of interest were inpatient mortality, unfavourable outcome, NIS-Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcome Measure and modified Rankin Score (mRS). RESULTS: A total of 246 patients with aSAH underwent clipping of the culprit aneurysm between 01/09/2011 and 20/07/2020. Of these, 46 underwent DC and were included in the final analysis. Unsurprisingly, DC patients had a greater chance of unfavourable outcome (p < 0.001) and higher median mRS (p < 0.001) at final follow-up. Despite this, almost two-thirds (64.1 %) of DC patients had a favourable outcome at this time-point. When compared with a propensity-matched cohort who did not, patients treated with DC fared worse at all endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the presence of intracerebral haemorrhage and increased pre-operative mid-line shift were predictive of undergoing DC, and WFNS grade ≥ 4 and a delayed ischaemic neurological deficit requiring endovascular angioplasty were associated with an unfavourable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that DC can be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality. Further research is required to determine the superiority, or otherwise, of DC compared with structured medical management of intracranial hypertension in this context, and to identify predictors of requiring decompressive surgery and patient outcome.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Ruptured , Decompressive Craniectomy , Intracranial Aneurysm , Intracranial Hypertension , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Decompressive Craniectomy/adverse effects , South Australia , Australia , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/surgery , Intracranial Hypertension/surgery , Aneurysm, Ruptured/surgery , Registries , Intracranial Aneurysm/complications , Intracranial Aneurysm/surgery
2.
Br J Neurosurg ; : 1-4, 2023 Nov 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37981758

ABSTRACT

Spinal arteriovenous fistulas represent a heterogenous group of pathologies and are divided into four categories. Type IV fistulas are further stratified into three groups (IVa, IVb and IVc) according to the number and dimensions of the fistulous vessels. Approximately 10% of these fistulas are associated with aneurysms. However, we are not aware of a previously reported case of an aneurysm associated with a Type IVa fistula with an anterior spinal artery (ASA) feeder at the cervico-medullary junction. We therefore describe our experience with a patient presenting with a ruptured aneurysm associated with a fistula in this location.

3.
Res Sq ; 2023 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38196639

ABSTRACT

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) have a serious adverse impact on people living with HIV. Previously, using a 39-site dual-randomized type 2 hybrid trial design, findings from the Substance Abuse Treatment to HIV Care Project supported the Implementation and Sustainment Facilitation (ISF) strategy to improve implementation and effectiveness of a motivational interviewing brief intervention (MIBI) for SUD within HIV service settings across the United States (US). Building on this trial, this cluster-randomized type 3 hybrid trial aimed to test the incremental effectiveness of a pay-for-performance (P4P), a form of the "alter incentive/allowance structures" strategy. Methods: Twenty-six HIV service organizations, their staff participants (N=87), and their client participants (N=341) were cluster-randomized to one of two implementation conditions. The control condition included staff-focused training, feedback, and consultation (TFC) and team-focused implementation and sustainment (ISF). The experimental condition included TFC+ISF as well as P4P (TFC+ISF+P4P). P4P used financial incentives to reward MIBI implementation (US$10 per MIBI delivered) and MIBI implementation at or above a pre-defined level of quality (US$10 per demonstration). In addition to these outcomes, past 4-week changes/reductions in client participant's days of primary substance use and anxiety symptoms were examined. Results: The addition of P4P had a large and significant effect on the number of MIBIs implemented (d=1.30, p<.05) and reduction in anxiety (d=-1.54), but there was no impact on days of substance use. P4P had large effects on MIBI quality (d=1.24) and MIBI implementation effectiveness (d=1.28), but these were not significant (p<.10). Conclusions: P4P is a form of the "alter incentive/allowance structures" strategy Its function is to reward the implementation of a clinical innovation. Rewarding implementation is consistent with the theory of implementation effectiveness, which suggests implementation climate (i.e., the extent to which implementation is expected, supported, and rewarded) is a key antecedent of implementation effectiveness (i.e., the consistency and quality of implementation). We found that P4P had a significant, positive impact on MIBI implementation in HIV service settings, but client-level outcomes were mixed. Future research should examine the cost-effectiveness of this strategy, as well as to examine the effectiveness of P4P to improve the implementation of other evidence-based innovations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04687917. Registered 12/18/2020.

4.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 90(S1): S206-S214, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35703773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given substance use disorders (SUDs) among people with HIV are highly prevalent, integrating SUD services within HIV service settings is needed to help end the HIV epidemic. In this study, we assessed the setting-intervention fit (SIF) of 9 evidence-based SUD interventions: acamprosate, disulfiram, oral naltrexone, injectable naltrexone, oral buprenorphine, injectable buprenorphine, contingency management, motivational interviewing, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). SETTING: Clinical and nonclinical HIV service organizations (HSOs) in the United States. METHODS: In May 2020, a stakeholder-engaged real-time Delphi was completed with 202 HSOs. HSO respondents rated the extent to which each SUD intervention was fundable, implementable, retainable, sustainable, scalable, and timely for their HSO, and these 6 items were summed into an SIF score (possible range of 0-18). RESULTS: Motivational interviewing had the highest average SIF score (11.42), with SIF scores above the midpoint (9.5) for clinical (11.51) and nonclinical HSOs (11.36). For nonclinical HSOs, none of the other interventions were above the midpoint. For clinical HSOs, the average SIF scores were above the midpoint for CBT (10.97) and oral buprenorphine (9.51). Multivariate regression analyses, which controlled for characteristics of the HSO respondent, revealed geographic region of the United States and whether the HSO currently offered any substance use services as 2 of the best predictors of SIF scores. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the need to improve the SIF for the other evidence-based SUD interventions, motivational interviewing, CBT, and oral buprenorphine are currently the evidence-based SUD interventions with greatest perceived fit for integration within HSOs in the United States.


Subject(s)
Buprenorphine , HIV Infections , Substance-Related Disorders , Delphi Technique , Evidence-Based Medicine , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Naltrexone , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , United States/epidemiology
5.
AIDS Behav ; 26(4): 1183-1196, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34586532

ABSTRACT

Although HIV and substance use disorders (SUDs) constitute a health syndemic, no research to date has examined the perceived negative impacts of different SUDs for people with HIV (PWH). In May 2019, 643 stakeholders in the U.S., representing clients of AIDS service organizations (ASOs), ASO staff, and HIV/AIDS Planning Council members, participated in an innovative Stakeholder-Engaged Real-Time Delphi (SE-RTD) survey focused on the prevalence and individual-level negative impact of five SUDs for PWH. The SE-RTD method has advantages over conventional survey methods by efficiently sharing information, thereby reducing the likelihood that between-group differences are simply due to lack of information, knowledge, and/or understanding. The population-level negative impacts were calculated by weighting each SUD's individual-level negative impact on indicators of the HIV Care Continuum and other important areas of life by the perceived prevalence of each SUD. Overall, we found these SUDs to have the greatest population-level negative impact scores (possible range 0-24): alcohol use disorder (population-level negative impact = 6.9; perceived prevalence = 41.9%), methamphetamine use disorder (population-level negative impact = 6.5; perceived prevalence = 3.2%), and opioid use disorder (population-level negative impact = 6.4; perceived prevalence = 34.6%). Beyond further demonstration of the need to better integrate SUD services within HIV settings, our findings may help inform how finite funding is allocated for addressing the HIV-SUD syndemic within the U.S. Based on our findings, such future efforts should prioritize the integration of evidence-based treatments that help address use disorders for alcohol, methamphetamine, and opioids.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism , HIV Infections , Methamphetamine , Opioid-Related Disorders , Substance-Related Disorders , Alcoholism/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Prevalence , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , United States/epidemiology
7.
Neurosurgery ; 88(5): 891-899, 2021 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33503659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is mounting evidence that the search strategies upon which systematic reviews (SRs) are based frequently contain errors are incompletely reported or insensitive. OBJECTIVE: To appraise the quality of search strategies in the 10 leading specialty neurosurgical journals and identify factors associated with superior searches. METHODS: This research-on-research study systematically surveyed SRs published in the 10 leading neurosurgical journals between 01/10/2017 and 31/10/2019. All SRs were eligible for assessment using a predefined coding manual that was adapted from the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA), a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR), and Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The PubMed interface was used to search the MEDLINE database, which was supplemented by individual journal searches. Descriptive statistics were utilized to identify factors associated with improved search strategies. RESULTS: A total of 633 articles were included and contained a median of 19.00 (2.00-1654.00) studies. Less than half (45.97%) of included search strategies were considered to be reproducible. Aggregated reporting score was positively associated with in-text reference to reporting guideline adherence (τb = 0.156, P < .01). The number of articles retrieved by a search (τb = 0.11, P < .01) was also associated with the reporting of a reproducible search strategy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the search strategies used in neurosurgical SRs require improvement. In addition to increasing awareness of reporting standards, we propose that this be achieved by the incorporation of PRISMA and other guidelines into article submission and peer-review processes. This may lead to the conduct of more informative SRs, which may result in improved clinician decision-making and patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Neurosurgical Procedures , Periodicals as Topic/standards , Systematic Reviews as Topic/standards , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic
8.
Global Spine J ; 11(4): 525-532, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32875892

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: This was an ambispective clinical quality registry study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate utility of 11-variable modified Frailty Index (mFI) in predicting postoperative outcomes among patients ≥80 years undergoing spinal surgery. METHODS: Consecutive patients ≥80 years who underwent spinal surgery between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2018, were included. Primary outcome measure was rate of major complication. Secondary outcome measures were (1) overall complication rate, (2) surgical site infection, and (3) 6-month mortality. RESULTS: A total of 121 operations were performed. Demographic metrics were (1) age (mean ± SD) = 83.1 ± 2.8 years and (2) mFI (mean ± SD) = 2.1 ± 1.4 variables. As mFI increased from 0 to ≥4 variables, risk of major complication increased from 18.2% to 40.0% (P = .014); overall complication increased from 45.5% to 70.0% (P = .032); surgical site infection increased from 0.0% to 25.0% (P = .007). There were no significant changes in risk of 6-month mortality across mFIs (P = .115). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher mFI score of ≥3 variables was associated with a significantly higher risk of (1) major complication (P = .025); (2) overall complication (P = .015); (3) surgical site infection (P = .007); and (4) mortality (P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: mFI scores of ≥3/11 variables were associated with a higher risk of postoperative morbidity in patients aged ≥80 years undergoing spinal surgery. The mFI-associated risk stratification provides a valuable adjunct in surgical decision making for this rapidly growing subpopulation of patients.

10.
Neurospine ; 17(1): 174-183, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32252167

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of anterior plating on postoperative dysphagia (POD) among adult patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylosis and determine the potential role of demographic and clinical characteristics in the development of POD. METHODS: Consecutive adults undergoing an elective, single-level, ACDF were randomly assigned to receive a stand-alone CoRoent Cage or a CoRoent Cage with a Helix, or HelixMini plate. Patients with a history of cervical spine surgery were excluded. M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and Bazaz questionnaires were completed at regular intervals for 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were recruited over a 2-year period, with 8 allocated to receive a stand-alone cage, 5 to receive a cage and Helix Mini plate, and 12 to receive a cage and Helix plate. The POD rate was 68% at 48 hours, before falling to 16% at 6 and 12 months. A longer retraction time was observed in the Helix plate group compared to the stand-alone cage group (7.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-15.63; p = 0.046), although there was no difference in the incidence or severity of dysphagia between cohorts at any timepoint. With the exception of body mass index, there was no difference in patients with and without dysphagia, and each of the interventions was equally efficacious with respect to clinical and radiological endpoints. CONCLUSION: Dysphagia is a common consequence of ACDF and, while the placement of a large plate results in longer retraction time, it was not associated with higher rates of dysphagia. Further research is required to identify both patient-specific and surgical contributors to this complication.

11.
World Neurosurg ; 138: e267-e274, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32105880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to 1) describe the use K-wireless pedicle screw insertion among adults (age ≥18 years) undergoing a minimally invasive fusion and 2) perform a systematic review (SR) of all studies that describe a navigated, K-wireless technique with 3-dimensional fluoroscopy. METHODS: Patients undergoing a minimally invasive fusion requiring pedicle screw fixation for any indication were prospectively enrolled in the observational component of this study. An assessment of pedicle breach was performed independently and in duplicate based on a modification of the Belmont grading scale. Articles for the SR were identified from a structured search of Medline from inception to May 8, 2019, without restriction of language. RESULTS: A total of 82 pedicle screws were placed in 20 patients who underwent surgery between January and June 2014. There was no significant difference in mean operative time between the cases included in this study and a matched cohort of 20 patients undergoing surgery with 2-dimensional fluoroscopy and K-wire-assisted pedicle screw placement (95 ± 13 vs. 87 ± 20 minutes, respectively; P > 0.05). There were 2 major pedicle breaches (Belmont grade 3) in a single patient, yielding a major breach rate of 2.44%. A total of 6 papers that described the placement of 700 pedicle screws in 160 patients between May 2011 and March 2017 were included in the SR. The overall breach rate was 7.00% (n = 37). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous pedicle screws can be placed accurately and safely using 3-dimensional navigation without the use of K-wires and may confer benefits to patients and clinicians by reducing K-wire-associated complications and radiation exposure.


Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Neuronavigation/methods , Pedicle Screws , Spinal Fusion/methods , Aged , Bone Wires , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Observational Studies as Topic , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation
12.
Asian Spine J ; 14(3): 388-398, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31906611

ABSTRACT

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the surgical, radiological, and functional outcomes of posterior-only versus combined anterior-posterior approaches in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. The ideal approach (anterior-only, posterior-only, or combined anterior-posterior) for the surgical management of thoracolumbar burst fracture remains controversial, with each approach having its advantages and disadvantages. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed (registration no., CRD42018115120). The authors reviewed comparative studies evaluating posterior-only approach compared with combined anterior-posterior approaches with respect to clinical, surgical, radiographic, and functional outcome measures. Five retrospective cohort studies were included. Postoperative neurological deterioration was not reported in either group. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative length of stay were increased among patients in the combined anterior-posterior group in one study and equivalent between groups in another study. No significant difference was observed between the two approaches with regards to long-term postoperative Cobb angle (mean difference, -0.2; 95% confidence interval, -5.2 to 4.8; p =0.936). Moreover, no significant difference in functional patient outcomes was observed in the 36item Short-Form Health Survey, Visual Analog Scale, and return-to-work rates between the two groups. The available evidence does not indicate improved clinical, radiologic (including kyphotic deformity), and functional outcomes in the combined anterior-posterior and posterior-only approaches in the management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. Further studies are required to ascertain if a subset of patients will benefit from a combined anterior-posterior approach.

14.
Neurosurgery ; 85(1): 1-10, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30649511

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Systematic review (SR) abstracts are frequently relied upon to guide clinical decision-making. However, there is mounting evidence that the quality of abstract reporting in the medical literature is suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: To appraise SR abstract reporting quality in neurosurgical journals and identify factors associated with improved reporting. METHODS: This study systematically surveyed SR abstracts published in 8 leading neurosurgical journals between 8 April 2007 and 21 August 2017. Abstracts were identified through a search of the MEDLINE database and their reporting quality was determined in duplicate using a tool derived from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Abstracts (PRISMA-A) statement. All SR abstracts that provided comparison between treatment strategies were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive statistics were utilized to identify factors associated with improved reporting. RESULTS: A total of 257 abstracts were included in the analysis, with a mean of 22.8 (±25.3) included studies. The overall quality of reporting in included abstracts was suboptimal, with a mean score of 53.05% (±11.18). Reporting scores were higher among abstracts published after the release of the PRISMA-A guidelines (M = 56.52; 21.74-73.91) compared with those published beforehand (M = 47.83; 8.70-69.57; U = 4346.00, z = -4.61, P < .001). Similarly, both word count (r = 0.338, P < .001) and journal impact factor (r = 0.199, P = .001) were associated with an improved reporting score. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the overall reporting quality of abstracts in leading neurosurgical journals requires improvement. Strengths include the large number abstracts assessed, and its weaknesses include the fact that only neurosurgery-specific journals were surveyed. We recommend that attention be turned toward strengthening abstract submission and peer-review processes.


Subject(s)
Abstracting and Indexing , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Humans , Abstracting and Indexing/standards , Neurosurgical Procedures , Periodicals as Topic/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Heart Lung Circ ; 28(4): 583-590, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29653839

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anti-myosin antibodies (AMAs) are often formed in response to myocardial infarction (MI) and have been implicated in maladaptive cardiac remodelling. We aimed to: (1) compare AMA formation in patients with Non-ST-Elevation MI (NSTEMI) and ST-Elevation MI (STEMI); (2) evaluate factors predicting autoantibody formation; and, (3) explore their functional significance. METHODS: Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) AMA titres were determined in serum samples collected at admission, 3 and 6 months post MI. The relationship between demographic and clinical data, and antibody formation, was investigated to determine factors predicting antibody formation and functional significance. RESULTS: Forty-three (43) patients were consecutively recruited; 74.4% were positive for IgM at admission, compared with 23.3% for IgG. Mean IgG levels increased by 1.24% (±0.28) at 3 months, and 13.55% (±0.13) at 6 months post MI. Mean antibody levels were significantly higher in the NSTEMI cohort at both follow-up time points for IgG (p<0.001, p<0.0001), but not IgM (p=0.910, p=0.066). A moderately positive correlation between infarct size and increase in mean IgM concentration was observed at 3 months (r(98)=0.455; p=0.015). Anti-myosin antibody formation was not associated with an unfavourable outcome at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-myosin antibodies are formed in a significant proportion of patients following MI, particularly among those with NSTEMI. While IgM levels fall after infarction, IgG levels increase and persist beyond 6 months of follow-up. This raises the possibility that they may contribute to long-term myocardial damage and dysfunction. Future research should focus on the specific epitopes that are targeted by these antibodies, and their functional significance. This may result in the emergence of novel therapies to attenuate cardiac dysfunction in MI patients.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Autoimmunity , Myocardial Infarction/immunology , Myosins/immunology , Biomarkers/blood , Electrocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/blood , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
17.
J Cardiol Cases ; 16(6): 183-185, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30279830

ABSTRACT

The transradial approach has become the gold-standard for coronary angiography. It is better tolerated by patients, associated with less bleeding, earlier post-procedure mobilization, and reduced mortality in patients with myocardial infarction. Given the hand's dual arterial supply and extensive collateral circulation, the risk of serious functional injury after radial catheterization is essentially reduced to zero. However, even a small amount of bleeding in the volar compartment can lead to compartment syndrome (CS) and permanent neurovascular injury. The purpose of this paper is to describe our experience with an unusual case of late-onset acute CS following transradial coronary angiography, and to summarize the available literature on this topic. .

18.
J Cardiol ; 69(1): 38-45, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27641966

ABSTRACT

Recent improvements in medical and surgical coronary revascularization techniques have significantly improved outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, large infarctions are often followed by a poorly understood process of pathological ventricular remodelling, which fails to return the heart to its premorbid state. Although it remains incompletely understood, there is increasing interest in the role of the immune system in this process. One hypothesis is that released cardiac proteins become the focus of an immune response that results in the formation of functionally significant autoantibodies. This review summarizes the current literature, both human and animal, relating to the formation and clinical relevance of anti-troponin antibodies (ATAs) in patients with MI.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Myocardial Infarction/immunology , Troponin/immunology , Ventricular Remodeling/immunology , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/blood
19.
Int J Cardiol ; 209: 226-33, 2016 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26897075

ABSTRACT

Recent improvements in the medical and surgical management of myocardial infarction mean that many patients are now surviving with greater impairment of cardiac function. Despite appropriate management, some of these patients subsequently develop pathological ventricular remodelling, which compounds their contractile dysfunction and can lead to congestive cardiac failure (CCF). The pathophysiological mechanism underpinning this process remains incompletely understood. One hypothesis suggests that a post-infarction autoimmune response, directed against constituents of cardiac myocytes, including cardiac myosin, may make an important contribution. Our review summarises the current literature related to the formation and clinical relevance of anti-myosin antibodies (AMAs) in patients with myocardial infarction. This discussion is supplemented with reference to a number of important animal studies, which provide evidence of the potential mechanisms underlying AMA formation and autoantibody mediated cardiac dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Cardiac Myosins/blood , Myocardial Infarction/blood , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Animals , Autoimmunity/physiology , Humans , Myocardium/pathology
20.
Injury ; 45(9): 1296-300, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24560872

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Older age and blood transfusion have both been independently associated with higher mortality post trauma and the combination is expected to be associated with catastrophic outcomes. Among patients who received a massive transfusion post trauma, we aimed to investigate mortality at hospital discharge of patients ≥65 years old and explore variables associated with poor outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of registry data on all major trauma patients presenting to a level I trauma centre between 2006 and 2011 was conducted. Mortality at hospital discharge among patients ≥65 years old was compared to the younger cohort. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to determine independent risk-factors for mortality among older patients. RESULTS: There were 51 (16.4%) patients of age ≥65 years who received a massive transfusion. There were 20 (39.2%) deaths, a proportion significantly higher than 55 (21.1%) deaths among younger patients (p<0.01). Pre-hospital GCS, the presence of acute traumatic coagulopathy and higher systolic blood pressure on presentation were independently associated with higher mortality. Age and volume of red cells transfused were not significantly associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Survival to hospital discharge was demonstrated in elderly patients receiving massive transfusions post trauma, even in the presence of multiple risk factors for mortality. Restrictive resuscitation or transfusion on the basis of age alone cannot be supported. Early aggressive resuscitation of elderly trauma patients along specific guidelines directed at the geriatric population is justified and may further improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion , Guideline Adherence , Multiple Trauma/therapy , Resuscitation , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Australia/epidemiology , Blood Component Transfusion/methods , Blood Component Transfusion/mortality , Female , Fibrinogen/metabolism , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Plasma , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Registries , Resuscitation/methods , Resuscitation/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...