ABSTRACT
Cortical potentials evoked by mid-inspiratory occlusion arise from numerous receptors, many of which are probably within the upper airway. Their precise nature is not known. The aim of the current study was to improve knowledge of this by studying the effects of topical upper airway anaesthesia on respiratory-related evoked potentials. Respiratory-related evoked potentials were described through the averaging of electroencephalogram (EEG) epochs following mid-inspiratory occlusions (C3-CZ; C4-CZ). A total of 21 healthy volunteers (13 male, aged 22-52 yrs) were studied during mouth breathing, before and after topical upper airway anaesthesia (lidocaine). Moreover, 15 subjects were studied during nose breathing with and without anaesthesia. Six subjects were studied whilst inhaling L-menthol. Typical potentials were present in all the subjects, their components featuring normal amplitudes and latencies. The route of breathing and upper airway anaesthesia did not modify the EEG responses to inspiratory occlusions, qualitatively or quantitatively, during mouth or nose breathing. L-menthol had no effect. Upper airway receptors sensitive to topical anaesthesia are unlikely to contribute significantly to mid-inspiratory occlusion-evoked potentials. On the contrary, deeper receptors, such as joint and muscle receptors, could contribute dominantly to these potentials.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local/methods , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Anesthesia, Local/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Respiration , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Respiratory muscles play an important role in the origin of respiratory sensations. Data dissecting the role of the diaphragm and other inspiratory muscles are scarce. This study aimed to determine the impact of diaphragm dysfunction following inspiratory resistive loading on respiratory-related evoked potentials considered as a neurophysiological substrate of certain types of respiratory sensations. Altogether, nine subjects aged 25-50 yrs (six females) participated in the study. Transdiaphragmatic pressure output of cervical magnetic stimulation (with subdivision in oesophageal and gastric component), and respiratory-related evoked potentials (C3 and C4 derivations in the international 10-20 system) following mid-inspiratory occlusions were studied before and after an inspiratory-resistive loading challenge. Predominant diaphragm dysfunction was observed in seven subjects (average 28% reduction in transdiaphragmatic pressure, from 27.25-19.91 cmH2O, with increased oesophageal-to-gastric pressure ratio). The latencies and amplitudes of all the components of the respiratory-related evoked potentials were unchanged. The study concluded that predominant diaphragm fatigue does not affect respiratory-related evoked potentials.
