Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of rabeprazole in children 1 to 11 years old with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole after a single oral dose and once-daily administration for 5 consecutive days was characterized in children 1 to 11 years old with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The initial 8 patients received rabeprazole sodium (hereafter referred to as rabeprazole) 0.14 mg/kg (part 1); the next 20 patients were randomized to receive 0.5 or 1 mg/kg (part 2) to target concentrations in plasma expected to be safe and effective. Pharmacokinetic parameters of rabeprazole and the thioether metabolite were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Subjective evaluations of GERD severity, rabeprazole short-term effectiveness, palatability, and safety were also characterized. RESULTS: Rabeprazole concentrations increased in a dose-dependent manner. Little or no accumulation was observed after repeated administration. The results suggest that formation of the thioether is an important metabolic pathway in young patients, which is consistent with adults. Plasma area under the concentration-time curve values of rabeprazole and the metabolite were poorly correlated with individual age and body weight. Furthermore, oral rabeprazole clearance values (not adjusted for weight) were similar to historical adult data. However, weight-adjusted values were higher for the pediatric patients, and approximately 2 to 3 times the milligram per kilogram dose of rabeprazole in these children was necessary to achieve comparable concentrations in adults. Subjective evaluations demonstrated an improvement of GERD symptoms in most patients after rabeprazole treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Palatability of the formulation was reported to be good or excellent. Rabeprazole was well tolerated, with no notable differences in safety among the dose groups.

An interaction study between the new antiepileptic and CNS drug carisbamate (RWJ-333369) and lamotrigine and valproic acid.

PURPOSE: To characterize possible pharmacokinetic interactions between the new antiepileptic drug carisbamate (RWJ-333369) and valproic acid (VPA) or lamotrigine (LTG) following multiple dosing in healthy subjects. METHODS: Two open-label, sequential-design studies were conducted in 24 healthy adults. In Study 1, subjects received carisbamate alone (5 days 250 mg q12h; 5 days 500 mg q12h), then VPA alone (7 days 300 mg q12h; 7 days 500 mg q12h), and then a combination of VPA (500 mg q12h) and carisbamate (5 days 250 mg q12h; 5 days 500 mg q12h). In Study 2, subjects received carisbamate alone as in Study 1, then LTG alone (14 days 25 mg q12h; 14 days 50 mg q12h), and then combination of LTG (50 mg q12h) and carisbamate (3 days 250 mg q12h; 14 days 500 mg q12h). RESULTS: Coadministration of VPA or LTG had minimal effect on carisbamate mean C(max) and AUC(ss) values. Mean VPA-C(max) and AUC(ss) values were approximately 15% lower when given concomitantly with carisbamate. However, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the C(max) and AUC(ss) ratio with/without carisbamate were within the 80-125% equivalence range, C(max) 82-89%; AUC(ss) 81-88%. Mean LTG C(max) and AUC(ss) values were approximately 20% lower when given concomitantly with carisbamate. The 90% CIs with and without carisbamate for LTG C(max) and AUC(ss) were 79-86% and 75-81%, respectively. This modest change is not considered clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: There were no clinically significant interactions between carisbamate and VPA or LTG. Concomitant administration of carisbamate with VPA or LTG was generally safe and well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics of the new antiepileptic and CNS drug RWJ-333369 following single and multiple dosing to humans.

PURPOSE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of the new antiepileptic and CNS drug RWJ-333369 following single and multiple oral doses to healthy subjects, including the effect of food on bioavailability. METHOD: Two studies were conducted. The first study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential, ascending-dose crossover design. Subjects were divided into four dose groups (100, 250, 500, and 750 mg) of 10 to 11 subjects each. RWJ-333369 or placebo was administered for two 7-day periods, separated by a 14-day washout. In the second study RWJ-333369 (750 mg) was administered to 12 healthy subjects under fasted and fed conditions. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed for RWJ-333369 by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Safety was assessed throughout the studies. RESULTS: Mean (range) pharmacokinetic parameters in the above studies were: oral clearance (CL/F) 3.4-4.2 L/h, half-life (t(1/2)) 10.6-12.8 h, and renal clearance (CLr) 0.042-0.094 L/h, indicating that RWJ-333369 is eliminated primarily by metabolism. These parameters were not significantly different (p > 0.05) for the four dose groups and for single and multiple dosing. C(max) and AUC increased proportionally with dose and decreased with food by 11% and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following single and repetitive (q12h) doses of 100-750 mg, RWJ-333369 had linear pharmacokinetics; food did not alter pharmacokinetics to a clinically relevant extent. RWJ-333369 is extensively metabolized and has a low CL/F that equals < 5% of the liver blood flow. Thus, orally administered RWJ-333369 has no hepatic first-pass effect. The 12-h half-life will enable bid dosing with an immediate-release oral formulation.

Pharmacokinetic interaction study between the new antiepileptic and CNS drug RWJ-333369 and carbamazepine in healthy adults.

PURPOSE: To characterize the possible pharmacokinetic interaction between the new antiepileptic and CNS drug RWJ-333369 and carbamazepine (CBZ) following multiple dosing in healthy subjects. METHODS: In an 8-week, open-label, sequential design study, 24 healthy adults received multiple-dose RWJ-333369 alone (5 days 250 mg q12h; 5 days 500 mg q12h), then after a 4-day washout, multiple-dose CBZ alone (3 days 100 mg q12h; 3 days 200 mg q12h; 22 days 300 mg q12h), and then combination of CBZ (300 mg q12h), and RWJ-333369 (5 days 250 mg q12h; 5 days 500 mg q12h). RESULTS: At steady-state following multiple dosing, RWJ-333369 peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time-curve within the dosing interval (AUCss) increased in proportion to dose. The C(max) and AUCss of CBZ were similar when given alone or concomitantly with RWJ-333369. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of CBZ C(max) and AUCss with/without RWJ-333369 were: 94-104% and 95-104%, respectively (well within the equivalence range of 80-125%). When RWJ-333369 was administered with CBZ, its mean (SD) oral clearance increased from 3.2 L/h to 4.9 L/h and consequently its mean half-life was shortened from 10.4 (1.9) h to 7.4 (1.2) h, and mean AUCss and C(max) were reduced by 37% and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no effect of multiple-dose RWJ-333369 on CBZ pharmacokinetics. CBZ induced RWJ-333369 clearance, resulting in shortened half-life and decreased exposure (AUCss) and C(max). Concomitant administration of RWJ-333369 with CBZ was generally safe and tolerated.

A comparative study of the effect of carbamazepine and valproic acid on the pharmacokinetics and metabolic profile of topiramate at steady state in patients with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To compare the influence of enzyme-inducing comedication and valproic acid (VPA) on topiramate (TPM) pharmacokinetics and metabolism at steady state. METHODS: Three groups were assessed: (a) patients receiving TPM mostly alone (control group, n =13); (b) patients receiving TPM with carbamazepine (CBZ; n = 13); and (c) patients receiving TPM with VPA (n = 12). TPM and its metabolites were assayed in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in TPM oral (CL/F) and renal (CL(r)) clearance between the VPA group and the control group. Mean TPM CL/F and CL(r) were higher in the CBZ group than in controls (2.1 vs. 1.2 L/h and 1.1 vs. 0.6L/h, respectively; p < 0.05). In all groups, the urinary recovery of unchanged TPM was extensive and accounted for 42-52% of the dose (p > 0.05). Urinary recovery of 2,3-O-des-isopropylidene-TPM (2,3-diol-TPM) accounted for 3.5% of the dose in controls, 2.2% in the VPA group (p > 0.05), and 13% in the CBZ group (p < 0.05). The recovery of 10-hydroxy-TPM (10-OH-TPM) was twofold higher in the CBZ group than in controls, but it accounted for only <2% of the dose. The plasma concentrations of TPM metabolites were severalfold lower than those of the parent drug. CONCLUSIONS: Renal excretion remains a major route of TPM elimination, even in the presence of enzyme induction. The twofold increase in TPM-CL/F in patients taking CBZ can be ascribed, at least in part, to stimulation of the oxidative pathways leading to formation of 2,3-diol-TPM and 10-OH-TPM. VPA was not found to have any clinically significant influence on TPM pharmacokinetic and metabolic profiles.

Pharmacokinetic and metabolic investigation of topiramate disposition in healthy subjects in the absence and in the presence of enzyme induction by carbamazepine.

PURPOSE: To characterize the metabolic profile of topiramate (TPM) in humans and to assess the influence of enzyme induction by carbamazepine (CBZ) on the pharmacokinetics and metabolic profile of TPM. METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects received a single oral dose of TPM (200 mg) on two randomized occasions. On one occasion, TPM was administered alone, and on the other, it was given on day 18 of a 24-day treatment with CBZ (maintenance dosage, 600 mg/day). Blood and urine samples were collected for > or = 72 h after dosing. TPM and its metabolites were assayed in plasma and urine by a specific liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) method. RESULTS: Mean TPM oral clearance (CL/F) increased from 1.2 L/h (control) to 2.2 L/h after CBZ treatment. Mean TPM half-life decreased from 29 h to 19 h. TPM was excreted extensively in urine both under noninduced (56%) and CBZ-induced conditions (40%). 2,3-O-Des-isopropylidene-TPM (2,3-diol-TPM) was identified as the most prominent urinary metabolite, with a recovery accounting for 3.2% and 7.9% of the TPM dose under noninduced and induced conditions, respectively. Corresponding recovery values for 10-hydroxy-TPM (10-OH-TPM) were 1.2% and 1.8%, respectively. The control AUC(metabolite)/AUC(drug) ratio for 2,3-diol-TPM and 10-OH-TPM were 1.5% and 0.6%, and they increased by threefold and twofold, respectively, after CBZ treatment. CONCLUSIONS: TPM remains appreciably excreted unchanged in urine (41%) under CBZ-induced conditions, even though TPM CL/F increased by twofold. Although 2,3-diol-TPM and 10-OH-TPM were measured in unconjugated form, the significant increases in their AUC and urinary excretion are consistent with the twofold increase in TPM clearance.

Plasma and whole blood pharmacokinetics of topiramate: the role of carbonic anhydrase.

Topiramate (TPM) is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug with various mechanisms of action including an inhibitory effect on some isozymes of carbonic anhydrase (CA). Binding to CA-I and CA-II, which are highly concentrated in erythrocytes, may affect drug pharmacokinetics. Consequently, the objectives of this study were: (a) to comparatively assess TPM pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, based on plasma and whole blood data, by simultaneously measuring TPM concentrations in plasma and whole blood following different therapeutic doses; (b) to rigorously establish the affinity of TPM for CA-I and CA-II in order to gain insight into how binding to these isozymes in erythrocytes influences TPM pharmacokinetics. TPM (100, 200 and 400 mg, single dose) was given in a randomized three-way crossover design to 27 healthy subjects and the drug concentrations in plasma and whole blood were simultaneously measured for 168 h after dosing. The pharmacokinetics of TPM in plasma was linear, but TPM clearance from whole blood increased with increasing dose. At low therapeutic concentrations, the blood-to-plasma ratio for TPM decreased from 8 to 2 as its concentration increased, indicating a substantial and saturable binding of TPM to erythrocytes. The kinetics (dissociation binding constant -Kd and maximum binding rate -Bmax) of the binding of TPM to erythrocytes was determined from the measured concentrations of TPM in whole blood and plasma. This analysis indicated the existence of two binding sites with Kd values of 0.54 and 140 microM, and Bmax values of 22 and 124 micromol/L of erythrocyte volume, respectively. These Bmax values are similar to literature values for the molar concentration of human CA-II (14-25 micromol/L) and CA-I (115-125 micromol/L). TPM inhibition constant (Ki) values for the inhibition of purified human CA obtained using assays based on CO2 hydration or 4-nitrophenylacetate hydrolysis were 0.62 and 0.49 microM for CA-II, and 91 and 93 microM for CA-I. The results of these studies indicate that virtually all of the binding of TPM to erythrocytes is attributable to CA-I and CA-II. Because CA-I and CA-II are highly concentrated in erythrocytes, a large portion of TPM in whole blood is bound and serves as a depot. This contributes to the lower oral clearance (CL/F), apparent volume of distribution (Vss/F) and longer half-life (t(1/2)) that TPM has in blood compared to the CL/F, Vss/F and t(1/2), estimated from plasma data. The difference between TPM blood and plasma pharmacokinetics was more profound at low doses (< or = 100 mg/day).

Pharmacokinetic interactions of topiramate.

Topiramate is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been approved worldwide (in more than 80 countries) for the treatment of various kinds of epilepsy. It is currently being evaluated for its effect in various neurological and psychiatric disorders. The pharmacokinetics of topiramate are characterised by linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range 100-800 mg, low oral clearance (22-36 mL/min), which, in monotherapy, is predominantly through renal excretion (renal clearance 10-20 mL/min), and a long half-life (19-25 hours), which is reduced when coadministered with inducing AEDs such as phenytoin, phenobarbital and carbamazepine. The absolute bioavailability, or oral availability, of topiramate is 81-95% and is not affected by food. Although topiramate is not extensively metabolised when administered in monotherapy (fraction metabolised approximately 20%), its metabolism is induced during polytherapy with carbamazepine and phenytoin, and, consequently, its fraction metabolised increases. During concomitant treatment with topiramate and carbamazepine or phenytoin, the (oral) clearance of topiramate increases 2-fold and its half-life becomes shorter by approximately 50%, which may require topiramate dosage adjustment when phenytoin or carbamazepine therapy is added or discontinued. From a pharmacokinetic standpoint, topiramate is a unique example of a drug that, because of its major renal elimination component, is not subject to drug interaction due to enzyme inhibition, but nevertheless is susceptible to clinically relevant drug interactions due to induction of its metabolism. Unlike old AEDs such as phenytoin and carbamazepine, topiramate is a mild inducer and, currently, the only interaction observed as a result of induction by topiramate is that with ethinylestradiol. Topiramate only increases the oral clearance of ethinylestradiol in an oral contraceptive at high dosages (>200 mg/day). Because of this dose-dependency, possible interactions between topiramate and oral contraceptives should be assessed according to the topiramate dosage utilised. This paper provides a critical review of the pharmacokinetic interactions of topiramate with old and new AEDs, an oral contraceptive, and the CNS-active drugs lithium, haloperidol, amitriptyline, risperidone, sumatriptan, propranolol and dihydroergotamine. At a daily dosage of 200 mg, topiramate exhibited no or little (with lithium, propranolol and the amitriptyline metabolite nortriptyline) pharmacokinetic interactions with these drugs. The results of many of these drug interaction studies with topiramate have not been published before, and are presented and discussed for the first time in this article.

Topiramate and lamotrigine pharmacokinetics during repetitive monotherapy and combination therapy in epilepsy patients.

PURPOSE: To determine at steady state (in the same group of patients): (a) the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lamotrigine (LTG) with LTG monotherapy, (b) the PK of LTG concomitantly administered with topiramate (TPM) at three escalating TPM doses (100, 200, and 400 mg/day), (c) the PK of TPM at three escalating TPM doses while receiving fixed-dose LTG therapy, and (d) the PK of TPM with TPM monotherapy. METHODS: This was an open-label, sequential, single-group, dose-escalating PK study in which 13 patients with epilepsy not optimally controlled with LTG received stable-dose LTG monotherapy for 2 weeks, followed by stable-dose LTG therapy combined with escalating doses of TPM for

Analysis of topiramate and its metabolites in plasma and urine of healthy subjects and patients with epilepsy by use of a novel liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay.

A novel liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method was developed and validated for quantification of topiramate (TPM) and its metabolites 10-hydroxy topiramate (10-OH-TPM), 9-hydroxy topiramate (9-OH-TPM), and 4,5-O-desisopropylidene topiramate (4,5-diol-TPM) in plasma and urine. The method uses 0.5 mL of plasma or 1 mL of urine that is extracted with diethyl ether and analyzed by LC-MS. Positive ion mode detection enables tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) identification of the aforementioned four compounds. Calibration curves of TPM, 4,5-diol-TPM, 9-OH-TPM, and 10-OH-TPM in plasma and urine were prepared and validated over the concentration range of 0.625 to 40 microg/mL using TPM-d(12) as an internal standard. Calibration curves were linear over this concentration range for TPM and its metabolites. Accuracy and precision ranged in urine from 83% to 114% and 4% to 13% (%CV), respectively, and in plasma from 82% to 108% and 6% to 13%, respectively. The applicability of the assay was evaluated by analyzing plasma samples from a healthy subject who received a single oral dose of TPM (200 mg) and urine samples from 11 patients with epilepsy treated with TPM (daily dose between 100 to 600 mg) alone or with other antiepileptic drugs. Only TPM was detected and quantified in the plasma samples, and its concentration ranged between 0.7 and 4.3 microg/mL. The concentrations of TPM and 10-OH TPM were quantifiable in all urine samples and ranged from 20 to 300 microg/mL for TPM and from 1 to 50 microg/mL for 10-OH-TPM. The metabolites 4,5-diol-TPM and 9-OH-TPM were also detected in all urine samples, but their concentrations were quantifiable only in 4 patients. An unidentified peak in the chromatograms obtained from patients' urine was attributed to 2,3-O-desisopropylidene topiramate (2,3-diol-TPM). Due to a lack of reference material of 2,3-diol TPM and the similar MS/MS spectrum with 4,5-diol-TPM, the calibration curves of 4,5-diol-TPM were used for the quantification of its isomer 2,3-diol-TPM. Based on these determinations, the apparent 2,3-diol-TPM-to-TPM concentration ratio in patients' urine ranged from 0.05 to 0.51 and the 10-OH-TPM-to-TPM ratio ranged from 0.02 to 0.17. In conclusion, a novel LC-MS method for the assay of TPM and four of its metabolites in plasma and urine was developed. Its utilization for analysis of urine samples from patients with epilepsy showed that the method was suitable for analysis of TPM and its metabolites in clinical samples. Two quantitatively significant TPM metabolites (10-OH-TPM and 2,3-diol-TPM) and two quantitatively minor metabolites (9-OH-TPM and 4,5-diol-TPM) were detected and quantified in urine samples from patients with epilepsy.

Effect of topiramate or carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol in healthy obese and nonobese female subjects.

PURPOSE: To study the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive (OC) containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol during OC monotherapy, concomitant OC and topiramate (TPM) therapy, and concomitant OC and carbamazepine (CBZ) therapy in order to comparatively evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction, which may cause contraceptive failure. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, five-group study included two 28-day cycles. Five groups of female subjects received oral doses of ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 alone (cycle 1) and then concomitant with TPM or CBZ (cycle 2). The treatment groups were group 1, TPM, 50 mg/day; group 2, TPM, 100 mg/day; group 3, TPM, 200 mg/day; group 4, TPM, 200 mg/day (obese women); and group 5, CBZ, 600 mg/day. Group 4 comprised obese women whose body mass index (BMI) was between 30 and 35 kg/m(2). The BMI of the remaining four groups was < or =27 kg/m2. RESULTS: Coadministration of TPM at daily doses of 50, 100, and 200 mg (nonobese) and 200 mg (obese) nonsignificantly (p > 0.05) changed the mean area under the curve (AUC) of ethinyl estradiol by -12%, +5%, -11%, and -9%, respectively, compared with OC monotherapy. A similar nonsignificant difference was observed with the plasma levels and AUC values of norethindrone (p > 0.05). CBZ (600 mg/day) significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the AUC values of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol by 58% and 42%, respectively, and increased their respective oral clearance by 69% and 127% (p < 0.05). Because CBZ induces CYP 3A-mediated and glucuronide conjugation metabolic pathways, the significant increase in the oral clearance of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone was anticipated. CONCLUSIONS: TPM, at daily doses of 50-200 mg, does not interact with an OC containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol. The lack of the TPM-OC interaction is notable when it is compared with the CBZ-OC interaction.

Topiramate and phenytoin pharmacokinetics during repetitive monotherapy and combination therapy to epileptic patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate (TPM) and phenytoin (PHT) in patients with epilepsy by studying their pharmacokinetics (PK) after monotherapy and concomitant TPM/PHT treatment. METHODS: Twelve patients with epilepsy stabilized on PHT monotherapy were enrolled in this study, with 10 and seven patients completing the phases with 400 and 800 mg TPM daily doses, respectively. TPM was added at escalating doses, and after stabilization at the highest tolerated TPM dose, PHT doses were tapered. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for PK analysis during the monotherapy phase or the lowest PHT dose after taper and the concomitant TPM/PHT phase. Potential metabolic interaction between PHT and TPM also was studied in vitro in human liver microsomal preparations. RESULTS: In nine of the 12 patients, PHT plasma concentrations remained stable, with a mean (+/-SD) area under the curve (AUC) ratio (combination therapy/monotherapy) of 1.13 +/- 0.17 (range, 0.89-1.23). Three patients had AUC ratios of 1.25, 1.39, and 1.55, respectively, and with the addition of TPM (800, 400, and 400 mg daily, respectively), their peak PHT plasma concentrations increased from 15 to 21 mg/L, 28 to 36 mg/L, and 27 to 41 mg/L, respectively. Human liver microsomal studies with S-mephenytoin showed that TPM partially inhibited CYP2C19 at very high concentrations of 300 microM (11% inhibition) and 900 microM (29% inhibition). Such high plasma concentrations would correspond to doses in humans that are 5 to 15 times higher than the recommended dose (200-400 mg). TPM clearance was approximately twofold higher during concomitant TPM/PHT therapy CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the addition of TPM to PHT generally does not cause clinically significant PK interaction. PHT induces the metabolism of TPM, causing increased TPM clearance, which may require TPM dose adjustments when PHT therapy is added or is discontinued. TPM may affect PHT concentrations in a few patients because of inhibition by TPM of the CYP2C19-mediated minor metabolic pathway of PHT.