Silicone breast implant rupture is more prevalent in the dominant limb side: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Breast implant rupture is associated with multiple risk factors such as implant age, manufacturer, and a history of trauma to the breast. However, the exact mechanism of breast implant rupture remains unclear. We hypothesize that repetitive minor mechanical forces on the implant collectively play a significant role in the cascade that eventually leads to its rupture. Therefore, we expect a more significant cumulative effect on the breast implant in the dominant upper limb side. Thus, we aim to ascertain whether laterality in silicone breast implant rupture is associated with the dominant upper limb. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with silicone breast implants who underwent an elective breast implant removal or exchange. All patients had breast augmentations for cosmetic reasons. We collected data on implant rupture laterality and limb dominance together with known risk factors like patient age, implant age, implant pocket, and implant volume. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients with unilateral implant rupture were included in the study. Among patients with a dominant right limb (n = 133), an ipsilateral rupture was found in 77 patients (58%) (p = 0.036), while in patients with a left dominant limb (n = 21), an ipsilateral rupture was found in 14 patients (67%), (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The dominant limb was a significant risk factor for ipsilateral breast implant rupture. The prevailing theory that cyclic envelope movement carries an increased rupture risk is reinforced in this study. Extensive prospective studies are needed to clarify risk factors for implant rupture further.

Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Normal Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Atrioventricular Block.

Patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection function (EF) and atrioventricular block (AVB) who are anticipated for high-burden of right ventricular (RV) pacing possess a risk to develop pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PIC) and adverse clinical outcomes. Hence, the aim of the study is to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of RV PIC in patients with preserved LVEF, AVB, and high-burden of RV pacing. One thousand and thirteen patients with second or third-degree AVB underwent first time pacemaker implantation between January 2002 and August 2016. A total of 203 patients with a newly implanted pacemaker, normal baseline LVEF, and high burden of RV pacing were included in the present study. Follow-up echocardiography was examined for a new decrease in LVEF of 10% or higher. Alternative causes for cardiomyopathy were ruled out. Patient characteristics, echocardiographic measurements, device clinic data, mortality, and hospitalizations for heart failure were collected and compared between the PIC and the non-PIC groups. Fifty-one patients (25%) developed LV dysfunction with 22 patients (11%), showing LVEF < 40%. During a mean follow-up of 49.2 months, the risk of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the PIC group versus non-PIC group (35.3% vs 19.1%, p = 0.009). In conclusion the incidence of PIC in patients with normal LVEF and AVB, who are anticipated for high-burden of RV pacing is high. PIC in patients with a previously normal LV function is associated with unfavorable long-term clinical outcomes, including higher rates of heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality.