Decision making and visibility in cats (Felis catus) in a progressive elimination task.

When making decisions animals can rely on information stored in memory and/or on information available through perceptual processes. Under some circumstances, perceptual access to a relevant piece of information can be lost as when a prey hides under a cover. If this piece of information is critical, the animal must be able to keep it active in the working memory until the final decision is made. Species endowed with object permanence can to a certain extent overcome such a lack of perceptual access. Numerous studies have investigated object permanence in animals, but no study systematically examined the interaction when making a decision between an information directly available through perception and an information that can no longer be perceived. In the present study, domestic cats (Felis catus) were administered a progressive elimination task in which they had to visit and deplete either two visible and one hidden target (e.g., Experiments 1 and 2) or one visible and two hidden targets (e.g., Experiments 3 and 4). The cats were brought back to the starting point after each visit to any target whether that target had been previously visited or not. The results revealed that the cats searched at the visible target(s) first and at the hidden target(s) last, which was referred to as the visibility rule. The results also revealed that the position of the bowl that was distinct (e.g., the visible bowl when the two other ones were hidden and the opposite) influenced the way this cognitive rule was implemented. More specifically, when the intermediate bowl was distinct the visibility rule was readily implemented but when either the right of the left bowl was distinct the visibility was violated. That is the cats did no longer choose the visible target(s) first. The visibility rule was interpreted in terms of optimization principles, the external distinct target effect was interpreted in terms of divided attention and lateralization.

Strategy planning in dogs (Canis familiaris) in a progressive elimination task.

Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) were administered a progressive elimination task in which they had to visit and deplete three baited sites. Dogs were brought back to the starting point after each visit to any site whether they had made a correct or an incorrect choice. In Experiment 1 (n=10) the results revealed that the dogs randomly selected among the sites when they were equidistant from the starting point whereas they relied on the least distance rule when one of sites was closer to the starting point than were the other sites. In Experiment 2 (n=12), the dogs first chose the left target when angular deviation between adjacent targets varied whether the least angular deviation was on the right of the left. Results are interpreted in terms of Gibson's hypothesis about cooperative hunters. The discussion also emphasizes comparisons with cats (i.e., solitary hunters).