The Impact of a Breast Cancer Risk Assessment on the Decision for Gender-Affirming Chest Masculinization Surgery in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals: A Pilot Single-Arm Educational Intervention Trial.

BACKGROUND: Persons assigned female or intersex at birth and identify as transgender and/or gender-diverse (TGD) may undergo gender-affirming chest masculinization surgery (GACMS); however, GACMS is not considered equivalent to risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of elevated breast cancer (BC) risk in TGD persons, compare self-perceived versus calculated risk, and determine how risk impacts the decision for GACMS versus RRM. METHODS: A prospective single-arm pilot educational intervention trial was conducted in individuals assigned female or intersex at birth, age ≥ 18 years, considering GACMS, without a BC history or a known pathogenic variant. BC risk was calculated using the Tyrer-Cuzik (all) and Gail models (age ≥ 35 years). Elevated risk was defined as ≥ 17%. RESULTS: Twenty-five (N = 25) participants were enrolled with a median age of 24.0 years (interquartile range, IQR 20.0-30.0 years). All were assigned female sex at birth, most (84%) were Non-Hispanic (NH)-White, 48% identified as transgender and 40% as nonbinary, and 52% had a first- and/or second-degree family member with BC. Thirteen (52%) had elevated risk (prevalence 95% confidence interval (CI) 31.3-72.2%). Median self-perceived risk was 12% versus 17.5% calculated risk (p = 0.60). Of the 13 with elevated risk, 5 (38.5%) underwent/are scheduled to undergo GACMS, 3 (23%) of whom underwent/are undergoing RRM. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the cohort had elevated risk, and most of those who moved forward with surgery chose to undergo RRM. A BC risk assessment should be performed for TGD persons considering GACMS. Future work is needed to examine BC incidence and collect patient-reported outcomes. Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT06239766).

Risk Factors for Skin Flap and Nipple-Areolar Necrosis in Patients Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is a surgical option for select patients with or at risk of breast cancer. However, post-operative skin flap and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis remain common complications. This study aimed to identify factors associated with necrosis in patients undergoing NSM with DIEP reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed from 2015 to 2023. 74 variables were analyzed in patients undergoing NSM with DIEP. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on post-operative skin/NAC necrosis: none, partial thickness, and full thickness. Comparative and descriptive statistics were performed via t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: 34 women with 31 breast cancers met inclusion. 44% experienced necrosis: 15% partial thickness and 29% full thickness. The majority were white (85.3%) with mean age of 50 years (SD = 9.11). In patients with immediate DIEP reconstruction, hypoperfused areas identified by SPY angiography increased risk of necrosis (P = .012). Approximately 50% of both partial thickness and full thickness necrosis patients had concerns on SPY angiography. Former smokers in the full thickness necrosis group had more pack years than those without necrosis (9 vs .65 pack years, P = .035). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving NSM with DIEP flap reconstruction, those with hypoperfusion on SPY angiography and longer smoking history had higher necrosis rates. This supports the continued used of SPY angiography and the role of pre-operative counseling in former smokers with increased pack years on their risk of necrosis and the role of preventative measures in the perioperative setting.

Robotic Repair: An Alternative Technique for Rectus Diastasis and Abdominal Bulge Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Despite advances in perforator dissection, abdominal morbidity still occurs. Traditional rectus diastasis (RD), abdominal bulge, and hernia repair with open techniques are associated with higher complication rates and recurrence. OBJECTIVES: We present a novel case series of robotic repair of symptomatic RD and/or abdominal bulge with concurrent hernia following DIEP flap surgery. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review was conducted on 10 patients who underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction and subsequent robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge and hernia. Pre-operative demographics and post-operative clinical outcomes were reviewed. RD up to 5 cm, abdominal bulge, and any concurrent ventral/umbilical hernias were repaired robotically via retrorectus plication and macroporus mesh reinforcement. RESULTS: The average age and BMI were 49 years (range 41-63) and 31 kg/m2 (range 26-44), respectively. The average number of perforators harvested per flap was 2.5 (range 1-4). Average RD and hernia size were 3.95 cm (range 2-5) and 5.8 cm2 (1-15), respectively. Eight patients stayed one night in the hospital, two went home the same day as the robotic repair. No patients converted to open technique and none experienced complications within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: For the patients who experience donor site morbidity following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, minimally invasive robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge with hernia can be performed with mesh reinforcement. This technique is effective with low complication rates and should be considered over open repair.

Microsurgical breast reconstruction and primary hypercoagulable disorders.

BACKGROUND: Primary hypercoagulable disorders pose a significant challenge to microsurgeons and have traditionally been regarded as a relative contraindication to free tissue transfer. Since free flaps offer numerous advantages in breast reconstruction, there is an effort to expand the population to whom these operations can be safely offered. The purpose of this study is to describe our chemoprophylaxis regimen in cases of primary hypercoagulability, as well as to compare flap outcomes and complications between women with and without hypercoagulability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single institution retrospective review identified 15 patients (25 flaps) with known primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from 2010 through 2020. There were 785 patients (1268 flaps) without primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction, including 40 patients (73 flaps) with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), evaluated for comparison. Patient characteristics, thromboprophylaxis regimen, and surgical outcomes were collected. In carrying out this cohort study, we have adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with primary hypercoagulability were identified, including heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation (n = 12), protein S deficiency (n = 1), prothrombin mutation (n = 1), and primary antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 1). Thirteen of these (87%) were discharged with an extended LMWH course. There was no postoperative VTE or mortality in this cohort, and no significant difference in hematoma or transfusion compared with the control group (p = .31, p = .87, respectively). The flap loss rate was 4% in the hypercoagulable group compared with 0.92% in the control group (p = .15). The salvage for arterial or venous compromise in the hypercoagulable group was poor (0% vs. 52%, p = .3). CONCLUSION: Microsurgical breast reconstruction in women with primary hypercoagulability disorders is feasible with acceptable risk of flap loss but poor salvage potential. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis with extended prophylactic LMWH in this population appears to be a safe regimen.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in lower extremity free tissue transfers.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) an immunologically mediated reaction to heparin products, can lead to severe thrombocytopenia and potentially life-threatening thrombotic events. In microsurgery, a missed or delayed diagnosis of HIT can cause complications requiring revision operations, flap loss, or limb loss. Surgeons must remain vigilant for this uncommon yet potentially devastating condition and keep abreast of management strategies. METHODS: CPT and ICD-10 codes in electronic medical records were used to collect demographic information, clinical courses, and outcomes for patients with a HIT diagnosis who underwent lower extremity free tissue transfer in one institution. RESULTS: The authors' institution performed 415 lower extremity free flaps in 411 patients during the 10-year study period. Flap salvage rate was 71% for compromised lower extremity flaps without HIT, and 25% in those with HIT. Four patients (four flaps) met study inclusion criteria during the study period. Three of the four flaps failed and were later debrided; one was rescued after a takeback for anastomosis revision. Two patients successfully underwent a delayed second free flap procedure after recovery, and one was salvaged with a pedicled muscle flap. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should monitor for HIT by establishing coagulation panel and platelet count baselines and trending these values in the early post-operative period for patients treated with heparin products. The 4T score can be used to screen for HIT with high clinical suspicion. Arterial thrombosis or poor flap perfusion despite sound microvascular technique could suggest HIT. Surgical and medical management including strict heparin avoidance can prevent adverse events for these patients.

Rates of major complications and flap loss for abdominally based breast reconstruction in obese patients are independent of WHO class of obesity.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a risk factor for complications following autologous breast reconstruction. Little is known regarding outcomes based on the degree of obesity. This study compares breast reconstruction outcomes and complication rates for the three classes defined by the body mass index (BMI)-based WHO classification. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review identifying obese patients who underwent abdominally based breast reconstruction between January 2011 and January 2021. Patients were stratified by BMI class [class 1 (C1) = 30-34.99 kg/m2, class 2 (C2) = 35-39.99 kg/m2, and class 3 (C3) = 40 kg/m2 + ]. Outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients (395 flaps) were included with 138 patients were classified as C1, 68 patients as C2, and 26 patients as C3. Rates of any complication (80%) and at least one major complication (31%) did not vary significantly (P = 0.057, 0.185). Individual rates of 30-day readmission (18%) or reoperation (26%) did not vary significantly (P = 0.588 and 0.059). Rates of seroma (C1 = 15%, C2 = 16%, and C3 = 35%), hernia (C1 = 0%, C2 = 4%, and C3 = 8%), and incisional dehiscence (C1 = 30%, C2 = 44%, and C3 = 62%) were associated with significantly increased risk with higher classes of obesity (P < 0.05). The rate of flap failure did not vary significantly (P = 0.573). CONCLUSION: The risk of major complications and total flap loss associated with abdominally based breast reconstruction does not differ between the classes of obesity. Although complication rates are high overall in the obese population, detrimental complications do not vary between the classes. Patients should be counseled regarding their individual risk without the need for arbitrary BMI cutoffs.

Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction following implementation of the affordable care act: A systematic review using a minority health and disparities research framework.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review assesses racial disparities for African American (AA) women in breast reconstruction following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. METHODS: Four databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2011 and September 2021. RESULTS: Out of 917 screened articles, 61 were included. The most common metrics were breast reconstruction rates (57.4%) and clinical outcomes (14.8%). Pooled reconstruction rates were 45.7% in white and 38.5% in AA women. 95.1% of studies found disparities in breast reconstruction rates. The greatest influencers on reconstruction rates were individual interactions in the healthcare system (54%), sociocultural environment (39%), behavioral factors (31%), and community interactions with the healthcare system (36%). CONCLUSION: Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction persist. Focusing on implicit bias, communication barriers and infrastructure are the most promising strategies to create equitable access to breast reconstruction for AA women.

17ß-Estradiol promotes sex-specific dysfunction in isolated human arterioles.

Despite data showing that estrogen is vasculoprotective in large conduit arteries, hormone therapy (HT) during menopause has not proven to mitigate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Estrogen exposure through prolonged oral contraceptive use and gender-affirming therapy can also increase cis- and trans-females' risk for future CVD, respectively. The microvasculature is a unique vascular bed that when dysfunctional can independently predict future adverse cardiac events; however, studies on the influence of estrogen on human microvessels are limited. Here, we show that isolated human arterioles from females across the life span maintain nitric oxide (NO)-mediated dilation to flow, whereas chronic (16-20 h) exposure to exogenous (100 nM) 17ß-estradiol promotes microvascular endothelial dysfunction in vessels from adult females of <40 and ≥40 yr of age. The damaging effect of estrogen was more dramatic in arterioles from biological males, as they exhibited both endothelial and smooth muscle dysfunction. Furthermore, females of <40 yr have greater endothelial expression of estrogen receptor-ß (ER-ß) and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) compared with females of ≥40 yr and males. Estrogen receptor-α (ER-α), the prominent receptor associated with protective effects of estrogen, was identified within the adventitia as opposed to the endothelium across all groups. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the detrimental effects of estrogen on the human microvasculature and highlights differences in estrogen receptor expression.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Microvascular dysfunction is an independent predictor of adverse cardiac events; however, the effect of estrogen on the human microcirculation represents a critical knowledge gap. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report sex-specific detrimental effects of chronic estrogen on human microvascular reactivity. These findings may offer insight into the increased CVD risk associated with estrogen use in both cis- and trans-females.

Outcome comparison between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps after secondary orthopedic procedures.

Lower extremity wounds associated with fractures and bony defects often require secondary orthopedic procedures after flap coverage has been performed. In this study, we compare complications between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps after secondary orthopedic procedures. A retrospective chart review study of all lower extremity soft tissue reconstructions by a single surgeon over seven years yielded a subgroup of patients who underwent secondary orthopedic procedures, including hardware removal, hardware revision, and bone grafting after flap reconstruction. Of 355 lower extremity, soft tissue reconstructions for orthopedic coverage performed in the time period studied, 102 patients underwent secondary orthopedic procedures after flap reconstruction. Of these, 54 received muscle flaps (52.94%), and 48 received fasciocutaneous flaps (47.06%). Using this subgroup of 102 patients, we compared muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps using three categories of wound complications following these secondary procedures: There were no superficial wounds requiring local wound care only in the muscle flap group (0%, n = 0) versus 4.17% (n = 2; p = 0.130) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. There were 2 lost flaps requiring surgical debridement and additional skin grafting in the muscle flaps group (3.70%) versus 2 (4.17%; p = 0.904) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. In the third category, flap loss requiring additional soft tissue reconstruction was 18.52% (n = 10) in the muscle group versus 2.08% (n = 1; p = 0.008) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. Our data support the existing literature indicating that fasciocutaneous flaps can tolerate secondary procedures better than muscle flaps and should initially be considered in patients with higher probability of needing additional orthopedic procedures after reconstruction.

Comparative Analysis of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Recent advances in mastectomy and reconstruction have allowed for an evolution in implant-based breast reconstruction to a muscle-sparing, prepectoral approach. Advantages of this technique may include reductions in postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, less narcotic usage, and improved aesthetic outcomes. Postoperative complication rates are described as comparable to subpectoral techniques; however, little comparative data exist to adequately assess prepectoral versus subpectoral implant placement. METHODS: To address this knowledge gap, we performed a single institution retrospective review of 186 (83 prepectoral, 103 subpectoral) consecutive immediate breast reconstructions. All cases were tracked for a minimum of 2 years between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: Prepectoral patients demonstrated an overall higher seroma rate (P = 0.001), with all other postoperative complications being comparable. Prepectoral patients tolerated higher intraoperative tissue expander fill volumes (P < 0.001), shorter hospital stays (P = 0.007), fewer clinic visits for tissue expansion (P < 0.001), and experienced less animation deformity (P = 0.005). Both groups demonstrated similar pain scores (P = 0.65) and needs for narcotics (P = 0.8) as well as comparable scores of capsular contracture (P = 0.791). CONCLUSIONS: Our comparative analysis of consecutive immediate implant-based breast reconstructions finds prepectoral reconstruction to be safe and effective. Compared with subpectoral reconstruction, the prepectoral approach may offer quicker tissue expansion, less postoperative office visits, less need for muscle relaxants, and a shorter hospital stay with a comparable complication profile.

Clinical course of venous thromboembolism following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially devastating complication following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction, with a reported incidence of 0.08-4%. The authors aim to describe disease presentation and clinical course following VTE diagnosis in patients within their practice. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from January 2007 through December 2018. Patients with VTE diagnosed within 90 days of surgery were included. Demographics, co-morbidities, signs and symptoms, and characteristics of oncologic, surgical, and post-operative care were analyzed. RESULTS: Seven hundred one patients underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction. Eleven patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) and four with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were identified, resulting in VTE incidence of 2.1% (0.57% DVT, 1.6% PE). Patients were on average 51 years old and had an average body mass index (BMI) of 31.7 kg/m2. Two had a history of VTE, and none had a known hypercoagulable disorder. Using the 2005 Caprini model, all were high risk and seven were highest risk. Among those with PE, the most common symptom was shortness of breath, and the most common signs were desaturation or supplemental oxygen requirements. VTE was diagnosed on average 14.2 days post-operatively (range 2-52 days). CONCLUSION: VTE is an infrequent complication following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. We recommend a high index of suspicion in women reporting shortness of breath or having desaturation, especially in those with high BMI, high Caprini scores, post-operative complications, or early return to the operating room.

Exploring the Role of Partner Satisfaction in Predicting Patient Satisfaction Regarding Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Qualitative studies have suggested that perceived partner satisfaction is an important predictor of patient satisfaction in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. To better characterize these relationships, a couple-based study employing a quantitative analysis was conducted. METHODS: BREAST-Q and a novel partner survey were used to assess relationships among patient satisfaction, perceived partner satisfaction, and reported partner satisfaction in 11 couples. Breast reconstruction patients completed the postoperative BREAST-Q, and their partners completed a survey designed to assess satisfaction with their emotional relationship, partner's breasts, partner's medical care, and sexual relationship. RESULTS: The majority of patients were married. Seventy-three percent of women had an implant-based reconstruction, while 27% had an abdominal-based reconstruction. The majority (82%) of patients reported no complications with reconstructive procedures. The mean patient BREAST-Q score was 86 (range, 48-97), and the mean partner score was 87 (64-98). There was a correlation of 0.85 between reported partner satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Fifty-eight percent of partners reported being afraid to touch their partner's reconstructed breasts out of fear of causing pain; 7% of patients reported experiencing pain in the area of their reconstructed breasts. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that partner satisfaction with breast reconstruction correlates with patient satisfaction. With this knowledge, we will be able to formulate suggestions on how preoperative consultations could be conducted as to optimize patient and partner satisfaction and bridge the gap between patient and partner knowledge of postoperative pain.

Increasing abdominal wall thickness predicts complications in abdominally based breast reconstruction: A review of 106 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) has long been the proxy for patient selection in obese patients presenting for abdominally based breast reconstruction. BMI, however, fails to accurately reflect the distribution of abdominal adipose tissue. This study aims to quantify the effect of abdominal wall thickness on the incidence of post-operative complications and contrast abdominal wall thickness and BMI as predictors of post-operative morbidity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 106 consecutive patients who underwent abdominally based breast reconstruction. Abdominal wall thickness was quantified using preoperative CT angiograms. Primary outcomes included delayed wound healing (abdomen and/or breast), flap fat necrosis, return to OR in 30 days, infection, and flap loss. RESULTS: Patients experiencing delayed abdominal wound healing (n=38), delayed breast wound healing (n=27), and flap fat necrosis (n=24) had significantly thicker abdominal wall measurements (p<0.0015). Of the 24 patients with palpable fat necrosis, 11 required excision. Increasing abdominal wall thickness significantly increased the odds of delayed abdominal wound healing (p=0.0005), delayed breast wound healing (p=0.0009), flap fat necrosis (p=0.0028), and infection (p=0.0198). Compared to BMI, abdominal wall thickness proved to be a more accurate predictor of delayed breast wound healing, any delayed wound healing, flap fat necrosis, and infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that as abdominal wall thickness increases, so does the risk of postoperative morbidity. Abdominal wall thickness outperformed BMI as a predictor of postoperative morbidity in several areas. This suggests that objective data obtained from preoperative CT scans may allow more accurate, individualized perioperative risk assessment.

Successful Salvage of Delayed Venous Congestion After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Objective: Failure rates of microvascular autologous breast reconstruction are reportedly low. When failure of the microvascular anastomoses does occur, it is most likely to be salvaged if detected early. Flap compromise or venous congestion occurring several weeks later is uncommon and with significantly lower salvage rates. Methods: We present a unique case of delayed venous congestion of a single-perforator deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction in which the usual pedicle thrombosis was not identified. Presentation of the flap compromise occurred 72 hours postoperatively and again in the delayed setting 5 weeks after surgery, from suspected compression at the perforator level. Results: The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap was successfully salvaged with conservative measures, and the flap healed without fat necrosis or further complication. Conclusion: This case highlights the higher risk of flap compromise with reconstructions in a radiated field and potentially with single-perforator flaps.

Microsurgery Competency During Plastic Surgery Residency: An Objective Skills Assessment of an Integrated Residency Training Program.

Objective: Microsurgical education is an integral aspect of plastic surgery training. Like most traditional surgical education models, microsurgical skills are taught on an apprenticeship model. This study aims at evaluating microsurgery skill acquisition within an integrated plastic surgery residency using electromagnetic hand-motion analysis and a global rating scale. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of an integrated plastic surgery residency program. Participants performed microsurgical arterial anastomoses on cryopreserved rat aortas. Hand-motion analysis was recorded using a trakSTAR hand-motion tracker. Total time to complete the task, number of hand movements, and path length (mm) were recorded. Participant videos were graded using a subjective global rating scale (scored 0-100). Results: The data demonstrated construct validity, as hand-motion analysis outcome measures statistically varied according to the level of skill. Mean global rating scale scores increased with level of experience but lacked statistical significance. Conclusions: These data suggest that the objective assessment of hand motion is a valid tool for the evaluation of microsurgical skill. It is more accurate and reflective of the level of skill than a global rating scale. Identifying the predictive validity of hand-motion analysis will be a useful tool to establish clinical safe training and practice thresholds, and the application of both assessment tools simultaneously can yield better evaluation.

U.S. Epidemiology of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a distinctive type of T-cell lymphoma that arises around breast implants. Although rare, all cases with adequate history have involved a textured breast implant. The objective of this study was to determine the U.S. incidence and lifetime prevalence of breast implant-associated ALCL in women with textured breast implants. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of documented cases of breast implant-associated ALCL in the United States from 1996 to 2015. The incidence and prevalence were determined based on a literature and institutional database review of breast implant-associated ALCL cases and textured breast implant sales figures from implant manufacturers' annualized data. RESULTS: One hundred pathologically confirmed breast implant-associated ALCL cases were identified in the United States. Mean age at diagnosis was 53.2 ± 12.3 years. Mean interval from implant placement to diagnosis was 10.7 ± 4.6 years. Forty-nine patients had breast implants placed for cosmetic reasons, 44 for mastectomy reconstruction, and seven for unknown reasons. Assuming that breast implant-associated ALCL occurs only in textured breast implants, the incidence rate is 2.03 per 1 million person-years (203 per 100 million person-years), which is 67.6 times higher than that of primary ALCL of the breast in the general population (three per 100 million per year; p < 0.001). Lifetime prevalence was 33 per 1 million persons with textured breast implants. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a statistically significant association between textured breast implants and breast implant-associated ALCL. Although women with a textured breast implant have a low risk of developing breast implant-associated ALCL, the current U.S. incidence is significantly higher than that of primary ALCL of the breast in the general population.

Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Contoured cohesive gel breast implants have been recently approved in the United States. These implants have been available for premarket approval studies for selected surgeons. The purpose of this study was to assess a single surgeon's outcomes in three specific clinical situations-breast augmentation, secondary augmentation, and breast reconstruction-using implants of all three contoured cohesive gel implant manufacturers (Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra) over a 10-year period. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective study of contoured cohesive silicone gel breast implants. Demographic and outcomes data were recorded. Complication rates were compared among the three implant manufacturers. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2013, 695 patients were included from U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trials. Mean age at implantation was 42.7 years (range, 18 to 82 years), and mean time enrolled was 5.3 years (range, <1 to 10 years). One hundred sixty-four patients (24 percent) received Allergan implants, 245 (35 percent) received Mentor implants, and 286 (41 percent) received Sientra implants. Three hundred eighty-four patients (55 percent) underwent primary augmentation, 198 (29 percent) underwent secondary augmentation, and 113 (16 percent) underwent breast reconstruction. The total complication rate was the lowest for primary augmentation of the Mentor group compared with the Allergan and Sientra groups (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in complication rates when used for secondary augmentation and reconstruction. There was no statistically significant difference between implant group reoperation, explantation, or capsular contracture rates. Overall implant rupture and rotation rates were low (0.7 percent and 1.3 percent, respectively). Patient and surgeon satisfaction was high. CONCLUSIONS: Contoured cohesive gel breast implants overall have low complication rates and high patient and surgeon satisfaction. The authors believe these implants to be safe and effective in breast augmentation and reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Change in Body Mass Index After Breast Reconstruction and Associated Complications.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence and prevalence of breast cancer continue to rise. Therapies may contribute to patient weight gain. Obesity, a major predictor of surgical complications, may affect reconstructive outcome. The goal of this study was to quantify weight gain/change after the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in women choosing reconstruction after mastectomy. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction at a dedicated Cancer Center from 1996 to 2011 was conducted. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), and surgical complications were reported. Patients were stratified as normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m(2)) and overweight/obese (BMI >25 kg/m(2)). Body mass index at the time of mastectomy was compared with BMI postreconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 443 patients had mastectomy and reconstruction. Forty-nine percent of patients were classified as normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m(2)) at the time of mastectomy and 51% as overweight/obese (body mass index > 25 kg/m(2)). Mean body mass index at the time of mastectomy was 26.1 kg/m(2) (4.9 SD) and 26.4 kg/m(2) (5.1 SD) at the final follow-up. Median follow-up time was 2.7 years (range <1 to 15 years). There was no statistically significant change in BMI before and after cancer treatment (P > .05). However, overweight/obese patients with complications were more likely to require an unanticipated return to the operating room (P = .0124). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the stress of breast cancer diagnosis, surgical treatment, and reconstruction, we find that patients' weight does not change significantly over time. Overweight and obese patients are not always at higher risk for surgical complications but may have more severe complications when they do occur.

Transition of historial tube flaps to free flap for 2-stage total knee arthroplasty in a patient with a history of Gustilo grade IIIB tibia fracture.

We report the case of a 56-year-old patient who had posttraumatic bilateral knee arthritis and underwent sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The left knee joint required 2-stage reconstruction: a free flap for enhanced soft-tissue coverage and then left knee TKA. Uniquely, at age 16 years this patient sustained a left tibia grade IIIB high-energy crush injury in a car crash and underwent reconstruction with multiple pedicle tube flaps and transfer of soft tissues. Most of that reconstruction was done between the ages of 16 and 19. At age 56 years, staged TKA was performed. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a knee reconstructed with pedicle tube flaps for a grade IIIB tibial fracture, followed years later by free-flap coverage before TKA. This report offers insights and treatment recommendations through long-term follow-up of a unique case and a historical perspective on how reconstructive options have evolved.

Differentiating fat necrosis from recurrent malignancy in fat-grafted breasts: an imaging classification system to guide management.

BACKGROUND: In breast reconstruction with autologous fat grafting, concerns persist about the ability to differentiate palpable masses representing fat necrosis from recurrent cancer. The authors' objective was to develop standardized imaging classifications to distinguish benign from malignant lesions after fat grafting. METHODS: A database of 286 breast reconstruction patients undergoing fat grafting from 2006 to 2011 was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with imaging of clinically palpable masses. All images were reviewed independently by a radiologist blinded to prior results. Lesions were classified, using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ultrasound lexicon, as follows: A, solid mass, hypoechoic; B, solid mass, isoechoic; C, solid mass, hyperechoic; D, solid mass, complex echogenicity; E, anechoic mass with posterior acoustic enhancement; F, cystic mass with internal echoes; and G, negative. Evolutions in lesions on follow-up ultrasound were recorded. Images were correlated with histopathologic results. RESULTS: On ultrasound, 66 lesions were visualized in 37 patients with palpable masses. Twenty-two lesions (33 percent) were Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 lesions; biopsies were performed on all of them. Histopathologic results revealed that 85.7 percent (six of seven) with classification D and 100 percent with classifications A, B, C, E, F, and G were fat necrosis. The one malignant lesion (classification D) exhibited vascularity and angular margins on ultrasound and was not in the location of fat injection. Negative predictive value of avascularity and circumscribed margins for malignancy was 100 percent. Follow-up ultrasound of 29 lesions at a median of 6.5 months revealed that no masses increased in size or developed vascularity. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound analysis, with a standardized classification system, is reliable at differentiating benign from malignant lesions after fat grafting in breast reconstruction.