Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 11(9): 1057-62, 2015 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26235156

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: For the first time ever, as emphasized by inclusion in the Healthy People 2020 goals, sleep health is an emphasis of national health aims. The National Healthy Sleep Awareness Project (NHSAP) was tasked to propose questions for inclusion in the next Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a survey that includes a number of questions that target behaviors thought to impact health, as a means to measure community sleep health. The total number of questions could not exceed five, and had to include an assessment of the risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: An appointed workgroup met via teleconference and face-to-face venues to develop an inventory of published survey questions being used to identify sleep health, to develop a framework on which to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of current survey questions concerning sleep, and to develop recommendations for sleep health and disease surveillance questions going forward. RESULTS: The recommendation was to focus on certain existing BRFSS questions pertaining to sleep duration, quality, satisfaction, daytime alertness, and to add to these other BRFSS existing questions to make a modified STOP-BANG questionnaire (minus the N for neck circumference) to assess for risk of OSA. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep health is an important dimension of health that has previously received less attention in national health surveys. We believe that 5 questions recommended for the upcoming BRFSS question banks will assist as important measures of sleep health, and may help to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to improve sleep health in our nation.


Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Health Surveys/methods , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Healthy People Programs , Humans , United States/epidemiology
2.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 11(7): 773-827, 2015 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26094920

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since the previous parameter and review paper publication on oral appliances (OAs) in 2006, the relevant scientific literature has grown considerably, particularly in relation to clinical outcomes. The purpose of this new guideline is to replace the previous and update recommendations for the use of OAs in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and snoring. METHODS: The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine (AADSM) commissioned a seven-member task force. A systematic review of the literature was performed and a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the quality of evidence. The task force developed recommendations and assigned strengths based on the quality of the evidence counterbalanced by an assessment of the relative benefit of the treatment versus the potential harms. The AASM and AADSM Board of Directors approved the final guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. We recommend that sleep physicians prescribe oral appliances, rather than no therapy, for adult patients who request treatment of primary snoring (without obstructive sleep apnea). (STANDARD) 2. When oral appliance therapy is prescribed by a sleep physician for an adult patient with obstructive sleep apnea, we suggest that a qualified dentist use a custom, titratable appliance over non-custom oral devices. (GUIDELINE) 3. We recommend that sleep physicians consider prescription of oral appliances, rather than no treatment, for adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea who are intolerant of CPAP therapy or prefer alternate therapy. (STANDARD) 4. We suggest that qualified dentists provide oversight­rather than no follow-up­of oral appliance therapy in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea, to survey for dental-related side effects or occlusal changes and reduce their incidence. (GUIDELINE) 5. We suggest that sleep physicians conduct follow-up sleep testing to improve or confirm treatment efficacy, rather than conduct follow-up without sleep testing, for patients fitted with oral appliances. (GUIDELINE) 6. We suggest that sleep physicians and qualified dentists instruct adult patients treated with oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnea to return for periodic office visits­as opposed to no follow-up­with a qualified dentist and a sleep physician. (GUIDELINE). CONCLUSIONS: The AASM and AADSM expect these guidelines to have a positive impact on professional behavior, patient outcomes, and, possibly, health care costs. This guideline reflects the state of knowledge at the time of publication and will require updates if new evidence warrants significant changes to the current recommendations.


Subject(s)
Orthodontic Appliances, Removable/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Snoring/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mandibular Advancement/methods , Middle Aged , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Polysomnography/methods , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Snoring/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Arthroplasty ; 27(5): 750-7.e2, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22285258

ABSTRACT

This prospective observational study of 499 patients with hip resurfacing and 255 patients with total hip arthroplasty compared outcomes for 2 years. We used propensity scores to identify matched cohorts of 118 patients with hip resurfacing and 118 patients with total hip arthroplasty. We used these cohorts to compare improvements in the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index and Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36 physical function component (SF-36 PF) scores at 3 months and at 1 and 2 years postsurgery. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements from baseline in WOMAC and SF-36 PF. Improvements in SF-36 PF were greater for patients with hip resurfacing than for patients with total hip arthroplasty 1 and 2 years postsurgery; improvements in WOMAC were similar for both groups. The clinical significance of this observation needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Hip Joint/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Employment , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Failure , Recovery of Function , Regression Analysis , Reoperation , Smoking/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Otolaryngol ; 33(3): 172-6, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15841995

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of oral appliances in clinical practice. DESIGN: Survey of 110 subjects. SETTING: Hospital-based dental practice. METHODS: Questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance and control of sleepiness and snoring. RESULTS: Fifty-seven percent of respondents were compliant with therapy, reporting control of sleepiness and snoring. CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of those on oral appliance therapy reported continued use after at least 18 months.


Subject(s)
Orthodontic Appliances , Patient Compliance , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Snoring/therapy , Facial Pain/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Orthodontic Appliances/adverse effects , Patient Satisfaction , Sialorrhea/etiology , Sleep Stages/physiology , Treatment Refusal
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...