Impact of intracardiac echocardiography usage on the safety of cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation: Subanalysis of the prospective FREEZE cluster cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) aiming at pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) became a standardized atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure. Life-threatening complications like cardiac tamponade exist. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) usage is associated with superior safety in radiofrequency ablation. It is unclear if ICE has an impact on safety of CBA. METHODS: The FREEZE Cohort (NCT01360008) subanalysis included patients undergoing "PVI only" CBA. Patients with intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography were excluded. Group A comprises conventional, group B ICE-guided CBA. Periprocedural results were compared. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2016, a total of 4189 patients were enrolled, and 1906 (45.5%) were included in this subanalysis, split up in two groups (A: 1066 [55.9%], B: 840 [44.1%]). Group A was younger (60.6 ± 10.8 vs. 62.4 ± 10.5 years, p < .001), with smaller left atria (41 vs. 43 mm, p < .001), and less persistent AF (23.1 vs. 38.1%, p < .001). Procedure, left atrial, and fluoroscopy times were shorter in group A as compared to group B. Dose area product was significantly higher in group A (2911 vs. 2072 cGyxcm2 , p < .001). In-hospital major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac event rates including two deaths in group A were not different between groups (0.5% vs. 0.1%, p = .18). The rate of total procedural (10.4% vs. 5.1%, p < .001) and major complications (3.2% vs. 1.3%, p < .001) was significantly higher in group A. Cardiac tamponade occurred significantly more frequently in group A (8 [0.8%] vs. 1 [0.1%], p = .046). Independent predictors for major complications were female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, p = .03) and non-ICE usage (OR 2.38, p = .02). No differences were observed for persistent phrenic nerve palsy, nor for groin complications. CONCLUSION: CBA was significantly safer and required less radiation if ICE was used, although the procedures were more complex. The risk of groin complications was not increased with ICE usage. Non-ICE usage was the only modifiable independent predictor of major complications.

Electrophysiology lab efficiency comparison between cryoballoon and point-by-point radiofrequency ablation: a German sub-analysis of the FREEZE Cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recommended to treat paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This analysis aimed to assess the hospital efficiency of single-shot cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and point-by-point radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: The discrete event simulation used PVI procedure times from the FREEZE Cohort study to establish the electrophysiology (EP) lab occupancy time. 1000 EP lab days were simulated according to an illustrative German hospital, including 3 PVI cases per day using CBA at one site and RFA at the other. RESULTS: The analysis included 1560 CBA patients and 1344 RFA patients from the FREEZE Cohort. Some baseline patients' characteristics were different between groups (age, AF type, and some concomitant diseases), without being statistically associated to ablation procedure time. Mean procedure time was 122.2 ± 39.4 min for CBA and 160.3 ± 53.5 min for RFA (p < 0.0001). RFA was associated with a more than five-fold increase of cumulative overtime compared to CBA over the simulated period (1285 h with RFA and 253 h with CBA). 70.7% of RFA lab days included overtime versus 25.7% for CBA. CBA was associated with more days with an additional hour at the end of the EP lab shift compared to RFA (47.8% vs 11.5% days with one hour left, respectively). CONCLUSION: CBA is faster and more predictable than point-by-point RFA, and enables improvements in EP lab efficiency, including: fewer cumulative overtime hours, more days where overtime is avoided and more days with remaining time for the staff or for any EP lab usage. Clinical trial registration NCT01360008 (first registration 25/05/2011).

Cryoballoon Ablation Strategy in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: Cryoballoon ablation is established for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective was to evaluate CBA strategy in consecutive patients with persistent AF in the initial AF ablation procedure. Material and Methods: Prospectively, patients with symptomatic persistent AF scheduled for AF ablation all underwent cryoballoon PVI. Technical enhancements, laboratory management, safety, single-procedure outcome, predictors of recurrence, and durability of PVI were evaluated. Results: From 2007 to 2020, a total of 1,140 patients with persistent AF, median age 68 years, underwent cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Median left atrial (LA) diameter was 45 mm (interquantile range, IQR, 8), and Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 years (doubled), Diabetes mellitus, prior Stroke or TIA or thromboembolism (doubled), Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, Sex category (CHA2DS2-VASc) score was 3. Acute isolation was achieved in 99.6% of the pulmonary veins by CBA. Median LA time and median dose area product decreased significantly over time (p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 17 (1.5%) patients including 2 (0.2%) stroke/transitory ischemic attack (TIA), 1 (0.1%) tamponade, relevant groin complications, 1 (0.1%) significant ASD, and 4 (0.4%) persistent phrenic nerve palsy (PNP). Transient PNP occurred in 66 (5.5%) patients. No atrio-esophageal fistula was documented. Five deaths (0.4%), unrelated to the procedure, occurred very late during follow-up. After initial CBA, arrhythmia recurrences occurred in 46.6% of the patients. Freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 1-, and 2-year was 81.8 and 61.7%, respectively. Independent predictors of recurrence were LA diameter, female sex, and use of the first cryoballoon generation. Repeat ablations due to recurrences were performed in 268 (23.5%) of the 1,140 patients. No pulmonary vein (PV) reconduction was found in 49.6% of the patients and 73.5% of PVs. This rate increased to 66.4% of the patients and 88% of PVs if an advanced cryoballoon was used in the first AF ablation procedure. Conclusion: Cryoballoon ablation for symptomatic persistent AF is a reasonable strategy in the initial AF ablation procedure.

Cardiac computed tomography angiography-derived analysis of left atrial appendage morphology and left atrial dimensions for the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) is a potential source of atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers. HYPOTHESIS: LAA morphology and dimensions are associated with AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: From cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA), left atrial (LA), pulmonary vein (PV), and LAA anatomy were assessed in cryoballoon ablation (CBA) patients. RESULTS: Among 1103 patients undergoing second-generation CBA, 725 (65.7%) received CCTA with 473 (42.9%) qualifying for detailed LAA analysis (66.3 ± 9.5 years). Symptomatic AF reoccurred in 166 (35.1%) patients during a median follow-up of 19 months. Independent predictors of recurrence were LA volume, female sex, and mitral regurgitation ≥°II. LAA volume and AF-type were dependent predictors of recurrence due to their strong correlations with LA volume. LA volumes ≥122.7 ml (sensitivity 0.53, specificity 0.69, area under the curve [AUC] 0.63) and LAA volumes ≥11.25 ml (sensitivity 0.39, specificity 0.79, AUC 0.59) were associated with recurrence. LA volume was significantly smaller in females. LAA volumes showed no sex-specific difference. LAA morphology, classified as windsock (51.4%), chicken-wing (20.7%), cactus (12.5%), and cauliflower-type (15.2%), did not predict successful PVI (log-rank; p = 0.596). CONCLUSIONS: LAA volume was strongly correlated to LA volume and was a dependent predictor of recurrence after CBA. Main independent predictors were LA volume, female sex, and mitral regurgitation ≥°II. Gender differences in LA volumes were observed. Individual LAA morphology was not associated with AF recurrence after cryo-PVI. Our results indicate that preprocedural CCTA might be a useful imaging modality to evaluate ablation strategies for patients with recurrences despite successful PVI.

Impact of age on the outcome of cryoballoon ablation as the primary approach in the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: Insights from a large all-comer study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to analyze the impact of patient age on clinical characteristics, procedural results, safety, and outcome of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) as the primary approach in the interventional treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: The single-center prospective observational study investigated consecutive patients who underwent initial left atrial ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (persAF). Age groups (A-F) of less than 40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79 and more than or equal to 80 years were evaluated. Follow-up (FU) included ECG, Holter monitoring and assessment of AF-symptoms. From 2012 to 2016, a total of 786 patients (64 ± 11 years, range 21-85) underwent CBA. With advancing age, more cardiovascular comorbidities and larger LA diameter were observed, more females were included (each p < .001). PAF (57%) and persAF (43%, p = .320) were equally distributed over all age groups. Age was neither related to procedural parameters, nor to the complication rate (3.9%, p = .233). Median FU was 38 months. Two non-procedure related noncardiac deaths occurred late during FU. Freedom from arrhythmia was independent of age at 18 months (p = .210) but decreased for patients more than or equal to 70 years at 24 months (p = .02). At 36 months, freedom from arrhythmia was 66%-74% (groups A-D), 54% (E) and 49% (F), respectively (p = .002). LA diameter and persAF were independent predictors, whereas age was a dependent predictor of recurrence. CONCLUSION: CBA as the primary approach in the initial ablation procedure is safe and highly effective in the young, middle aged, and elderly population. LA diameter and persAF, but not ageing, were independent predictors for arrhythmia recurrence.

Catheter Ablation in Complex Atrial Arrhythmias: Pilot Study Evaluating a 3D Wide-Band Dielectric Imaging System.

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a standard in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation but might not be enough in complex atrial arrhythmias (AA). An open three-dimensional wide-band dielectric imaging system (3D-WBDIS) has been introduced to guide CBA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pilot study evaluating feasibility and safety of 3D-WBDIS in combination with CBA and optional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with complex AA defined as (1) history of persistent AF, (2) additional atrial tachycardia/flutter, or (3) previous left atrial ablation. RESULTS: Prospectively, seventeen patients, 68.9 ± 12.2 years of age, with complex AA were enrolled. In 70 pulmonary veins (PV), balloon positioning maneuvers (n = 129) were guided additionally by the occlusion tool (1.84/PV). Compared to angiography, its sensitivity and specificity was 94.5, and 85%, respectively. CBA-PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs including variants. In 68 maps, the median number of mapping points was 251.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 298.0) with a median map volume of 52.8 (IQR 83.9) mL. Following CBA, six additional arrhythmias (two right and two left atrial flutter, one left atrial appendage tachycardia, and one atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia) were identified and successfully ablated by means of RFA in five patients (29.4%). Left atrial and fluoroscopy times were 88 (IQR 40) and 20 (IQR 10) minutes, respectively. Dose area product was 1,100 (IQR 1252) cGyxcm2. Freedom from AA after 6 months follow-up time and 90 days blanking period was documented in 10/17 (59%) patients, and 8/17 (47%) without a blanking period. No major complication was observed. CONCLUSION: The combined use of CBA with optional RFA guided by a novel 3D-WBDIS is feasible and safe in patients suffering from complex AA. The occlusion tool shows high sensitivity and specificity for assessment of the balloon occlusion. Additional arrhythmias were successfully mapped and ablated. Short-term outcome is promising, and subsequent prospective, larger outcome studies are necessary to confirm our observations.

Benefit of ultra-high-density mapping-guided radiofrequency reablation in pulmonary vein isolation non-responders after initial cryoballoon procedure.

AIMS: Symptomatic atrial arrhythmias despite complete pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are common. The purpose was to evaluate ultra-high-density multi-electrode electroanatomical mapping-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in PVI non-responders. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ultra-high-density multi-electrode electroanatomical mapping-guided RFA in consecutive symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after initial cryoballoon PVI was performed. Patients were included if all pulmonary veins (PVs) were still isolated. Radiofrequency targets were atrial tachycardia (AT), extra-PV trigger, and/or substrate. Procedural results and outcome were evaluated. Of 95 patients, 67 (70.5%) with complete PVI were included (70 years, CHA2DS2Vasc 2.9, left atrium 45 mm, persistent AF 45%, AT 45%). The median time to reablation was 26 months. One hundred and seven maps (1.6/patient) and 11.890 ± 9.018 electrograms were acquired in 33 ± 12 min. Twenty-eight percent of the left atrial (LA) wall showed pathological voltage signals, predominantly at the anterior (37%) and septal wall (26%). Atrial tachycardia (49 left, 4 right) were ablated in 35 patients (52%), extra-PV trigger in two patients (3%). One atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia and seven right atrial isthmus ablation (10%) were performed. In 32 patients (48%), no AT was present and substrate-based ablation was performed. Mean LA area ablated was 7 ± 6 cm2 (7%). No major complication occurred. The mean follow-up time was 772 ± 317 days. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence off antiarrhythmic drugs was 49% at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vein isolation non-responders are older, mainly suffering from complex atrial arrhythmias. Left atrial substrate is predominantly located at the anterior and septal wall. Ultra-high-density multi-electrode electroanatomical mapping-guided RFA is safe and effective. At 1 year, 5 out of 10 patients were in stable sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic drugs.

Outcomes of cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for symptomatic paroxysmal or drug-refractory persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective cluster cohort study in experienced CBA and RFA centres. Primary endpoint was 'atrial arrhythmia recurrence', secondary endpoints were as follows: procedural results, safety, and clinical course. A total of 4189 patients were included: CBA 2329 (55.6%) and RFA 1860 (44.4%). Cryoballoon ablation population was younger, with fewer comorbidities. Procedure time was longer in the RFA group (P = 0.01). Radiation exposure was 2487 (CBA) and 1792 cGycm2 (RFA) (P < 0.001). Follow-up duration was 441 (CBA) and 511 days (RFA) (P < 0.0001). Primary endpoint occurred in 30.7% (CBA) and 39.4% patients (RFA) [adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.04; P = 0.12). In paroxysmal AF, CBA resulted in a lower risk of recurrence (adjHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99; P = 0.047). In persistent AF, the primary outcome was not different between groups. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rates were 1.0% (CBA) and 2.8% (RFA) (adjHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.26-1.10; P = 0.088). Re-ablations (adjHR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34-0.61; P < 0.0001) and adverse events during follow-up (adjHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.88; P = 0.005) were less common after CBA. Higher rehospitalization rates with RFA were caused by re-ablations. CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint did not differ between CBA and RFA. Cryoballoon ablation was completed rapidly; the radiation exposure was greater. Rehospitalization due to re-ablations and adverse events during follow-up were observed significantly less frequently after CBA than after RFA. Subgroup analysis suggested a lower risk of recurrence after CBA in paroxysmal AF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01360008), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01360008.

The fourth cryoballoon generation with a shorter tip to facilitate real-time pulmonary vein potential recording: Feasibility and safety results.

INTRODUCTION: Time-to-isolation (TTI) guided ablation protocols have been developed to ensure durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in cryoballoon ablation (CBA). The aim was to determine the feasibility and safety of the fourth generation cryoballoon (CBG4) with a shortened tip. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients scheduled for initial atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation were prospectively included. PVI with the 28 mm CBG4 and the latest 20 mm spiral-mapping catheter (SMC) was performed. A total of 302 pulmonary veins (PVs) in 76 patients (64.8 ± 10.4 years, paroxysmal AF 49%) were treated with 617 applications. Left atrium (LA) time, fluoroscopy time, and dose-area product were 65.5 ± 19.2 minutes, 14.6 ± 5.6 minutes, and 1094 (738; 2097) cGy·cm2 , respectively. PVI in cryoballoon technique was achieved in 302 of 302 (100%) PVs. TTI was determined in 256 (84.8%) of PVs. The mean TTI was 45.3 ± 26.4 seconds. Single-shot isolation was achieved in 247 (82%) PVs. In 6 of 302 (2.0%) PV the SMC was changed to a stiff wire to isolate the PV because of instability, and in 17 of 302 (5.6%) of PVs, the 23 mm CB was used to isolate. No radiofrequency touch-up applications were applied. The mean nadir balloon temperature was -44.8°C ± 6.6°C. Balloon dislodgement during positioning occurred in 3 of 617 (0.5%) applications without complications. One PN palsy occurred which resolved until discharge. One patient suffered from the inflammatory syndrome. CONCLUSION: The CBG4 with a shorter distal tip seems to be safe and effective, and allows determining the TTI in 84.8% of PVs. In case of balloon instability, the exchange of the SMC to a stiff wire or, in small PV, the 23 mm cryoballoon facilitate PVI.

Lessons from individualized cryoballoon sizing. Is there a role for the small balloon?

BACKGROUND: Cryoablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is well established. The single-big-balloon strategy has been preferred for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the second generation cryoballoon (CBG2). Individual PV-morphologies raise the question if an individualized anatomic approach using the 23-mm or 28-mm CB is reasonable. METHODS: Consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in the non-randomized single-center study. Patients were treated with the 28-mm CB, if any PV was >21mm, the 23-mm CB, if all PV were ≤21mm, or both sizes, if PVI was difficult. The primary endpoint was arrhythmia-free survival. The secondary endpoint considered procedural results and complications. RESULTS: Overall, 197 patients with symptomatic PAF (64±11 years, 36% female) were included. Acute PVI was achieved in 99.9% of PV. Based on preprocedural imaging, the 28-mm CB was applied as the primary catheter in 47% (92/197 patients), the 23-mm CB in 53% (105/197, p=0.23). The 23-mm CB group included more females, patients with short left atrial (LA)-diameters (each p<0.01), and smaller patients (p=0.04). Both CB-sizes were used in 24% (47/197). Additional 23-mm CB usage was necessary in 23% (21/92) of patients, mainly because of insufficient PV-occlusion with the 28-mm CB. Additional 28-mm CB usage was necessary in 25% (26/105, p=0.82), mainly because PV diameters were larger than initially measured. Both CB-sizes were equally safe and effective with a low complication rate and an overall success rate of 86% at 12 and 71% at 18 months (6% on antiarrhythmic drugs). No predictors for AF-recurrence were identified. CONCLUSION: CB ablation can sometimes be challenging. The 28-mm CB is the preferred catheter in all patients. If balloon positioning is difficult, the 23-mm CB is an option to achieve PVI in small veins. Further studies need to investigate if the 23-mm CB could be beneficial as the primary CB in females with small body height and short LA diameter.

Cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation - Large single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Different catheter ablation (CA) strategies have been established in the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only might be an option for the initial ablation procedure. There is a paucity of outcome data on second-generation cryoballoon (CBG2) PVI in persAF. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic drug-refractory persAF who underwent initial CA of AF were prospectively enrolled and PVI was performed with CBG2. The primary composite endpoint was freedom from AF, atrial tachycardia, or related symptoms after a 3-month blanking period. The secondary endpoint referred to periprocedural complications. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three consecutive patients (64±10 years, 29% female) with symptomatic drug-refractory persAF were identified. Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of pulmonary veins with the CB technique. The left atrial procedure time was 112±30min. Major complications occurred in 1.7% (3 of 173 patients) including two phrenic nerve palsies (1%), which resolved until discharge, and one pericardial effusion (0.6%). Follow-up ≥12 months was completed for 157 of 173 patients (91%). Median follow-up was 14 months. At 12 months, the primary composite endpoint was achieved in 129 of 157 patients (82%). However, 22 of 129 patients at risk (17%) were still on antiarrhythmic drugs. A relapse during the blanking period was identified as the only independent predictor for AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: PVI using the second-generation cryoballoon is a reasonable treatment option for patients with symptomatic drug-refractory persAF with a favorable rate of freedom from AF and a low complication rate.

First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.

AIMS: First-line ablation prior to antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy is an option for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); however, the optimal ablation technique, radiofrequency (RF), or cryoballoon (CB) has to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The FREEZE Cohort Study compares RF and CB ablation. Treatment-naïve patients were documented in the FREEZEplus Registry. Periprocedural data and outcome were analysed. From 2011 to 2014, a total of 373/4184 (8.9%) patients with PAF naïve to AAD were identified. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed with RF (n = 180) or CB (n = 193). In the RF group, patients were older (65 vs. 61 years, P < 0.01) compared with the CB group. The procedure time was significantly shorter and radiation exposure higher in the CB group. Major adverse events occurred in 1.6% (CB) and 3.7% (RF) of patients (P = 0.22). AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence until discharge was 4.5% (RF) and 8.5% (CB, P = 0.2). Follow-up (FU) ≥12 months was available in 99 (RF) and 107 (CB) patients. After 1.4 years of FU, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) was 61% (RF) and 71% (CB, P = 0.11). In the RF group, more patients underwent cardioversion, and a trend for more repeat ablations was observed. Persistent phrenic nerve palsy was observed in one patient treated by CB. CONCLUSION: First-line ablation for PAF is safe and effective with either RF or CB. The procedure was faster with the CB, but the radiation exposure was higher. Although there was a trend for more recurrences and complications in the RF group, a more favourable risk profile in patients undergoing CB ablation might have biased the results. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01360008.

Outcome of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with the cryoballoon using two different application times: the 4- versus 3-min protocol.

PURPOSE: The second-generation cryoballoon (CBG2) is highly effective for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). One-year outcome data are consistent among different research groups. First results suggest that a shortened application time might be equally effective. The objective of the study was to compare procedural and outcome data for a 240 and 180-s protocol. METHODS: Prospectively, consecutive patients with symptomatic PAF underwent initial PVI with CBG2. In succession, two groups were created: the application time was 240 s in group 1 and 180 s in group 2. In both groups, a bonus application was applied. Periprocedural data, complications, and freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF)/AT/symptoms were compared between the groups. RESULTS: From May 2012 to June 2013, 114 patients (57 per group, 38% female) were included. The mean left atrial dwelling time decreased by 19 min (-16%) in group 2 compared to group 1 (p = 0.005). Intraprocedural pulmonary vein (PV) reconduction occurred infrequently (0.4% in both groups, p = 1.0). One persistent PNP occurred and resolved during the follow-up. Complications were without significant differences. One patient was lost to follow-up. The cumulative rates of freedom from recurrence at 12 months are 76.8% in group 1 and 83.6% in group 2. After a mean follow-up of 491 ± 208 days, the rates of freedom from AF/AT/symptoms at last visit were 38/57 (67%) and 44/56 (78.6%) in groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.14), respectively. Female sex was identified as a predictor for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a protocol with cryoballoon applications of 240 s, a shortened application time to 180 s results in a faster procedure with comparable high rates of freedom from AF at 16 months. Female sex seems to be predictive for recurrences; this finding has to be reconfirmed in a larger population.

German ablation registry: Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation--One-year outcome data.

BACKGROUND: Although radiofrequency (RF) ablation has long been the standard of care for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, cryoballoon technology has emerged as a feasible approach with promising results. Prospective multicenter registry data referring to both ablation technologies in AF ablation are lacking so far. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report data from the German ablation registry with respect to efficacy and safety in pulmonary vein ablation with different energy sources for paroxysmal AF after 1-year follow-up. METHODS: A total of 2306 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF from the German ablation registry were included in this analysis. The cohort was divided into two groups according to the ablation energy source used: cryoballoon and RF ablation. MACCE was defined as a combination of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS: AF recurrence rate after a single ablation procedure at 1 year follow-up was not significantly different between the two groups (45.8% after cryoablation and 45.4% after RF ablation, P = .87). Also, the rate of patients without AF recurrence and free of antiarrhythmic drug at 12-month follow-up was similar (cryoablation 44.2% and RF 41.4%, P = .25). MACCE occurred with an incidence of 0.7% within 500 days after cryoablation and 1.4% after RF ablation (P = .30). Persistent phrenic nerve palsy was more common after cryoablation compared to RF ablation (1.1% vs. 0.3%, P <.05). CONCLUSION: AF recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up was similar in RF ablation compared to cryoablation, whereas the spectrum and relevance of complications were significantly different between the two ablation methods. This finding might influence the choice of ablation method offered to the individual paroxysmal AF patient.

[Advances in cryoballoon technology: benefits and risks in daily practice]. / Fortschritte der Kryoballon-Technik : Nutzen und Risiken in der täglichen Anwendung.

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation is nowadays a standard approach for pulmonary vein isolation in symptomatic atrial fibrillation. The second generation cryoballoon was introduced in 2012 and modifications and enhancement to the system promised a higher efficiency. OBJECTIVES, MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive overview of advances in cryoballoon ablation is provided and the consequences for daily practice are described based on a PubMed literature search, taking into account own experiences. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Advances in cryoballoon ablation result in a significantly higher efficiency. To maintain the overall safety of the procedure and to avoid phrenic nerve palsy and esophageal lesions, special care needs to be taken by following some safety aspects and cut-off criteria. More data are necessary to clarify if recommendations for cryoenergy titration with the new balloon are reasonable. Ongoing prospective studies comparing cryoballoon and radiofrequency (RF) ablation will give answers to the question which energy source is more favorable, and upcoming studies will evaluate the impact of cryoballoon ablation as a first line treatment option.

Differences of two cryoballoon generations: insights from the prospective multicentre, multinational FREEZE Cohort Substudy.

AIMS: Cryoballoon (CB) ablation with the second-generation cryoballoon (CBG2) seems to be more effective than its predecessor [first-generation cryoballoon (CBG1)], but phrenic nerve palsies were observed more frequently. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of CBG1 and CBG2 in a substudy of the prospective multicentre, multinational FREEZE Cohort Study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Periprocedural data were analysed, and a total of 532 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were examined (n = 224 for CBG1 and n = 308 for CBG2). Procedure time decreased significantly from 149 to 130 min when comparing CBG1 with CBG2 (P < 0.0001), and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in 97.8 and 97.6% of PVs with CBG1 and CBG2 (P = 0.77), respectively. The need for dual-balloon usage within a procedure dropped (20.1 vs. 9.0%, P < 0.001), and the fluoroscopy time was reduced when operating the CBG2. Atrial fibrillation recurrence rates until discharge were similar (5.0 vs. 5.8%, P = 0.69). Comparable low rates of major complications were observed with both CBs, and there was a non-significant trend for more phrenic nerve palsies. CONCLUSION: Second-generation cryoballoon demonstrated a high rate of acute PVI in a significant faster procedure, which also utilized less radiation exposure and less dual-balloon usage during an average procedure. The safety profile remains favourable with a non-significant trend for more phrenic nerve palsies. If the enhancements lead to a higher clinical benefit has to be determined. The 1-year outcome data from the ongoing FREEZE Cohort Study comparing radiofrequency and CB ablation will shed some light on that issue. CLINICAL TRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01360008.

Comparison of the first and second cryoballoon: high-volume single-center safety and efficacy analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon (CB) ablation results in >70% freedom from atrial fibrillation at 1 year. Single-center data of the first (CBG1) and second (CBG2) cryoballoon, recently introduced, were analyzed to compare safety and efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2011 to December 2012, CB ablation with spiral mapping was performed consecutively in 484 patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation. CBG1 was used in 364 of 484 (75%) and CBG2 in 120 of 484 (25%) patients. Periprocedural data were analyzed. Acute pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with CB only was achieved in 99.86% and 100% of veins with CBG1 and CBG2, respectively (P=0.43). Number of applications until PV isolation decreased significantly with CBG2 (1.45±0.81 versus 1.28±0.64; P=0.001). Procedural, left atrial, and fluoroscopy time were reduced by -5%, -11%, and -15% (P<0.05), respectively. Two balloons were used less frequently. Time to isolation decreased significantly with 23-mm (48 versus 33 seconds; P<0.0001) and 28-mm CBG2 (76 versus 52 seconds; P<0.0001). Early PV reconduction rarely occurred with CBG2 (2.6% versus 0.42%; P=0.0023). In-hospital atrial fibrillation recurrence rates were similar. Balloon temperatures were significantly warmer with 23-mm CBG2 and a trend for colder balloon temperature with 28-mm CBG2 were observed compared with their predecessors. Comparable low rates of phrenic nerve palsy were recorded (1.1% versus 1.7%; P=0.64). Esophageal temperatures were similar. Major complication rates were low (3.3% versus 3.33%; P=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: CBG2 attains high rates of acute PV isolation within a significant faster and less complex procedure. Time to isolation is shorter, and PV isolation is achieved with fewer applications using CBG2. These enhancements were not at the cost of complications. Long-term success rates remain to be demonstrated.

Cryoballoon versus RF ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is used extensively with curative intention in atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation has long been a standard of care, while cryoballoon technology has emerged as a feasible approach with promising results. Prospective multicenter registry data referring to both ablation technologies in AF ablation therapy are lacking. METHODS: Between January 2007 and August 2011, a total of 3,775 consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF who underwent PV ablation in their respective centers were enrolled. The cohort was divided into 2 groups according to the ablation energy source used: cryoballoon ablation (group 1, n = 905 [24.0%], median age 63 years, 64.3% men) and RF ablation (group 2, n = 2870 [76.0%], median age 63 years, 62.7% men). Comorbidities and baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. RESULTS: Acute success rate was similar in both groups (97.5% in cryo vs 97.6% in RF; P = 0.81). Procedure times were similar, ablation and fluoroscopy times were higher in cryoballoon when compared to RF ablation. Overall complication rate was similar in cryo- (4.6%) and RF-ablation (4.6%; P = 1.0). Phrenic nerve palsy was more often in cryo versus RF ablation (2.1% in cryo vs 0.0% in RF; P < 0.001). Other complications were more common in RF compared to cryoablation (4.6% in RF vs 2.7% in cryo; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: RF ablation is the most widespread ablation method in Germany, but use of cryoballoon increased significantly. Procedure times were similar, but ablation and fluoroscopy times were longer in cryoballoon ablation. No significant differences were found in terms of acute success and overall complication rate.