Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Ortop Bras ; 31(spe3): e268124, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37720813

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Tibial shaft fracture is the most common long-bone fracture, and the standard treatment is intramedullary (IM) nail fixation. Regardless of the development of this technique pseudoarthrosis remains prevalent. Objectives: Evaluate the correlation between wedge fragment size and displacement, displacement of the main fragments of the 42B2 type, and pseudoarthrosis incidence. Methods: We retrospectively assessed all patients with 42B2 type fracture treated with IM nailing between January, 2015 and December, 2019. Six radiographic parameters were defined for preoperative radiographs in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. Another six parameters were defined for postoperative radiographs at three, six, and 12 months. The Radiographic Union Score for Tibial Fractures score was used to assess bone healing. Results: Of 355 patients with tibial shaft fractures, 51 were included in the study. There were 41 (82.0%) male patients, with a mean age of 36.7 years, 37 (72.5%) had open fractures, and 28 (54.9%) had associated injuries. After statistical analysis, the factors that correlated significantly with nonunion were wedge height > 18 mm, preoperative translational displacement of the fracture in the AP view > 18 mm, and final distance of the wedge in relation to its original anatomical position after IM nailing > 5 mm. Conclusion: Risk factors for nonunion related to the wedge and42B2 fracture are wedge height > 18 mm, initial translation in the AP view of the fracture > 18 mm, and distance > 5 mm of the wedge from its anatomical position after IM nailing. Evidence level III; Retrospective comparative study .


Introdução: A fratura da diáfise da tíbia é a fratura mais comum dentre os ossos longos, sendo o tratamento padrão a fixação com haste intramedular (HIM). Independentemente do desenvolvimento da técnica cirúrgica, a pseudoartrose continua prevalente. Objetivo: Avaliar a associação entre o tamanho e o desvio da cunha, os desvios dos fragmentos principais do tipo 42B2 e a incidência de pseudoartrose. Métodos: Avaliamos, retrospectivamente, todos os pacientes com fraturas tipo 42B2 tratados com hastes intramedulares entre janeiro de 2015 e dezembro de 2019. Seis parâmetros radiográficos foram definidos para as radiografias pré-operatórias nas incidências anteroposterior (AP) e perfil. Outros seis parâmetros foram definidos para as radiografias pós-operatórias em 3, 6 e 12 meses de acompanhamento pós-operatório. O Escore Radiográfico de União para as Fraturas da Tíbia (RUST) foi o instrumento usado para avaliar a consolidação óssea. Resultados: Dos 355 pacientes com fraturas da diáfise da tíbia, 51 foram incluídos no estudo. Os pacientes incluídos foram 41 (82,0%) do sexo masculino, com idade média de 36,7 anos, 37 (72,5%) com fraturas expostas e 28 (54,9%) com lesões associadas. Após análise estatística, os fatores que se correlacionaram significativamente com a não consolidação foram a altura da cunha > 18 mm, o deslocamento translacional pré-operatório da fratura na incidência AP > 18 mm e a distância final da cunha em relação à sua posição anatômica original após a cravação do MI > 5 mm. Conclusão: Os fatores de risco para a pseudartrose relacionada com a fratura em cunha e42B2 são a altura da cunha > 18 mm, a translação inicial na vista AP da fratura > 18 mm e a distância > 5 mm da cunha em relação à sua posição anatómica após a fixação IM. Nível de evidência III; estudo comparativo retrospectivo. Nível de evidência III; Estudo retrospectivo comparativo .

2.
Injury ; 52 Suppl 3: S33-S37, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34088470

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Forearm shaft fracture is common in young adult patients and associated with soft tissue and organ injuries. In open fractures in polytrauma patients, damage control orthopaedics (DCO) is well indicated. The aim of this study is to describe intramedullary Steinmann pin fixation of the ulna as a DCO procedure for the forearm and present a case series. DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNIQUE: A 3.0 mm Steinmann pin is inserted retrograde in the ulna proximal fragment through the fracture site using the open wound as the approach. With direct visualization of the reduction, the pin is advanced into the distal fragment. The reduction of the longitudinal axis and shortening is thus achieved. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This method was used for all open fractures of forearm both-bone fractures in polytrauma patients undergoing DCO from 2014 to 2019. The alignment and length of the ulna were evaluated radiographically after pin fixation and before and after definitive fixation. Differences in the need for secondary procedures and infection rate between DCO and definitive fixation were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were 30 males (85.7%) with an average age of 32.9 ± 12.0 years and a mean ISS (Injury Severity Score) of 29.4 (range, 18.0-41.0). The most common associated injuries were thoracic trauma (62.8%) and head trauma (45.7%). In the radius and ulna, 51.4% and 60.0% of fractures, respectively, were multifragmentary (types B and C). Gustilo type IIIA represented 77.1% of the injuries. Pin fixation achieved good alignment and length in all cases. The mean time between DCO and definitive fixation was 12.0 days, and no secondary procedure was needed, nor any case developed either superficial or deep infection. The conversion from DCO to definitive fixation was considered easy in all cases. CONCLUSION: Intramedullary Steinmann pin fixation of the ulna is a viable option for DCO for forearm both-bone fractures in open fractures in polytrauma patients.


Subject(s)
Forearm Injuries , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Fractures, Open , Orthopedics , Radius Fractures , Ulna Fractures , Adult , Forearm , Forearm Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Forearm Injuries/surgery , Fractures, Open/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Open/surgery , Humans , Male , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Radius Fractures/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ulna/diagnostic imaging , Ulna/surgery , Ulna Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Ulna Fractures/surgery , Young Adult
3.
Injury ; 52 Suppl 3: S60-S64, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34088472

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Non-operative treatment is an exceptional indication for the treatment of proximal femur fracture. The aim of the study was to analyze the mortality rate in one year and associated factors in severely ill patients submitted to non-operative treatment. METHODS: It was included 28 patients treated from August 2014 to September 2019. Eighteen (64.3%) patients were female and 10 (35.7%) were male. The mean age was 78.7 ± 11.9 years old. The main outcome evaluated was the mortality rate in one year. It was also evaluated the correlation with gender, age, personal habits, number of comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: The functional result was assessed with WOMAC score via telephone call. The mortality rate in one year was 42.8% without statistical positive correlation with any of the studied parameters. Patients with three or more comorbidities didn't have a higher mortality rate comparing to survived patients (83.3% vs 81.3%). The CCI also didn't show any correlation with high mortality (6.9 vs 7.1). The functional result of the survived patients was poor (78.2 points WOMAC). CONCLUSION: The conclusion is that the mortality rate in one year of ill patients with hip fractures treated non-operatively is 42.8% without correlation with age, gender of number of comorbidities, and the functional result of the survived patients is poor.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures , Hip Fractures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251817, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010343

ABSTRACT

The transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through contact with contaminated surfaces or objects is an important form of transmissibility. Thus, in this study, we evaluated the performance of a disinfection chamber designed for instantaneous dispersion of the biocidal agent solution, in order to characterize a new device that can be used to protect individuals by reducing the transmissibility of the disease through contaminated surfaces. We proposed the necessary adjustments in the configuration to improve the dispersion on surfaces and the effectiveness of the developed equipment. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of the present technology with a chamber having six nebulizer nozzles were performed and validated through qualitative and quantitative comparisons, and experimental tests were conducted using the method Water-Sensitive Paper (WSP), with an exposure to the biocidal agent for 10 and 30 s. After evaluation, a new passage procedure for the chamber with six nozzles and a new configuration of the disinfection chamber were proposed. In the chamber with six nozzles, a deficiency was identified in its central region, where the suspended droplet concentration was close to zero. However, with the new passage procedure, there was a significant increase in wettability of the surface. With the proposition of the chamber with 12 nozzles, the suspended droplet concentration in different regions increased, with an average increase of 266%. The experimental results of the new configuration proved that there was an increase in wettability at all times of exposure, and it was more significant for an exposure of 30 s. Additionally, even in different passage procedures, there were no significant differences in the results for an exposure of 10 s, thereby showing the effectiveness of the new configuration or improved spraying and wettability by the biocidal agent, as well as in minimizing the impact caused by human factor in the performance of the disinfection technology.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Decontamination/methods , Disinfection/methods , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , COVID-19/metabolism , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Decontamination/instrumentation , Disinfectants/analysis , Disinfection/instrumentation , Humans , Hydrodynamics , Models, Theoretical , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
5.
Injury ; 52(4): 1079-1082, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33250184

ABSTRACT

Translational deformities are common complications of conservatively managed bone fractures and some surgically managed fractures with unstable patterns. Realigning the bones can be difficult when soft tissue, scars and calluses form. These deformities can be easily corrected with hexapodalic-based external fixators, but these fixators are not widely available in developing countries. We describe a stable and reliable Ilizarov frame that can be used to treat these deformities and show results of clinical cases.


Subject(s)
Bone Diseases , Ilizarov Technique , Tibial Fractures , External Fixators , Fracture Healing , Humans
6.
Acta Ortop Bras ; 27(5): 273-275, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31839738

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Non-union and persistence of infection at a fracture site for long periods are always described as a challenge to orthopedists, especially in cases of severe compound fractures with comminution and segmental bone loss. This is a case series of septic non-unions, using S53P4 bioactive glass for adjunctive treatment, using internal syntheses or external fixators. The objective is to retrospectively evaluate the results of the use of S53P4 bioglass for the adjunctive treatment of septic non-unions. METHODS: We reviewed 18 patients with septic non-unions. The patients were preoperatively classified using the Non-union Scoring System (NUSS) and union outcomes were assessed by the modified radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures. Of the 18 patients treated, six underwent internal osteosynthesis and 12 were treated with external fixators in combination with bioactive glass grafting. RESULTS: The patients had a mean NUSS score of 56.6 (standard deviation of 7.6) and fracture union was achieved according to the RUST score in 17 of 18 cases (94.4%), with a mean value of 10.2 (standard deviation of 1.0). One patient was lost to follow-up. Reevaluation using the modified RUST score was 12.3 (SD = 1.0), maintaining union of 17/18. CONCLUSION: The fracture union rate was high, according to the literature, as was control of infection. Level of Evidence IV, Case series.


OBJETIVO: A não união e a persistência de infecção no local de uma fratura por períodos prolongados são sempre descritas como desafios para os ortopedistas, especialmente em casos de fraturas expostas graves, com cominuição e perdas de segmentos ósseos. Esta é uma série de casos de não consolidações infectadas, utilizando o vidro bioativo S53P4 como adjuvante no tratamento, utilizando-se sínteses internas ou fixadores externos. O objetivo é avaliar retrospectivamente os resultados do uso do biovidro S53P4 como adjuvante no tratamento de não uniões infectadas. MÉTODOS: Foram revistos 18 pacientes com não consolidações infectadas. Os pacientes foram classificados antes da cirurgia pelo Non-Union Severity Score (NUSS), e os resultados quanto à consolidação foram avaliados pelo escore de RUST modificado (escala radiográfica de consolidação da tíbia). Dos 18 pacientes tratados, seis foram submetidos à osteossíntese interna e 12 foram tratados com fixadores externos, associados à enxertia com vidro bioativo. RESULTADOS: Os pacientes tinham resultado NUSS médio de 56,6 (desvio padrão de 7,6) e a consolidação foi obtida segundo o escore de RUST em 17 de 18 casos (94,4%), com valor médio de 10,2 (desvio padrão de 1.0). Um paciente abandonou o seguimento. A reavaliação pelo escore de RUST modificado foi de 12,3 (PF=1,0), mantendo a consolidação de 17/18. CONCLUSÃO: O índice de consolidação foi elevado, segundo a literatura, bem como controle infeccioso. Nível de evidência IV, série de casos.

7.
Acta Ortop Bras ; 23(5): 263-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26981035

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional results of ankle fractures treated with metallic and absorbable plates. Twenty patients were randomized into two groups (metallic and absorbable implant groups) and followed prospectively. In the immediate postoperative period, patients were immobilized with plaster casts for one week, which was replaced by a removable cast for another four weeks. Partial weight-bearing was allowed after three weeks, and full weight-bearing after six weeks. Functional recovery was similar in both groups. At six months, three patients in the metallic group complained of local pain, and had their implants removed. One patient in the absorbable group exhibited early dehiscence of the suture and underwent debridement and suturing with good evolution. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was similar between the two groups after six and nine months of follow-up. The absorbable implants showed clinical and functional results that were similar to those of metallic implants. Level of Evidence II, Prospective Comparative Study.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...