Indirect comparisons of ixekizumab versus three interleukin-23 p19 inhibitors in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis - efficacy findings up to week 12.

BACKGROUND: It is challenging to select the most appropriate biologic treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To compare speed of onset and level of skin improvement between the interleukin (IL)-17A antagonist ixekizumab and the IL-23 p19 inhibitors guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Using data from controlled clinical trials, both adjusted indirect comparisons (AICs) and matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were performed to determine the risk difference (RD) between ixekizumab and each IL-23 p19 inhibitor for the proportion of patients with ≥75%/90%/100% improvement compared with baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75/90/100) up to week 12. Placebo, etanercept, or ustekinumab were used as the comparator bridge. RESULTS: In all (M)AICs, RDs generally significantly favored ixekizumab over guselkumab (placebo bridge), tildrakizumab (placebo or etanercept bridge), and risankizumab (placebo or ustekinumab bridge) from the earliest assessment time (≥ week 2) to week 12 when considering PASI 75/90/100 responses. CONCLUSION: Ixekizumab provides a faster onset of effect and earlier clinical benefits than guselkumab, tildrakizumab, or risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, as reflected by higher levels of skin improvement than with these IL-23 p19 inhibitors up to week 12.

Greater cumulative benefits from ixekizumab versus ustekinumab treatment over 52 weeks for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in a randomized, double-blinded phase 3b clinical trial.

Background: Ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A, has shown superiority to ustekinumab (UST) and etanercept in skin clearance from randomized clinical trials in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.Objective: To compare cumulative benefits of IXE versus UST over 52 weeks of treatment.Methods: Cumulative clinical benefit of IXE and UST was assessed by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC) for responders of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), itch numeric rating scale (Itch NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) outcomes over 52 weeks using data from IXORA-S trial comparing IXE (N = 136) and UST (N = 166). Normalized cumulative benefit was calculated to obtain the percentage of the maximum AUC for each outcome measure. Missing values were imputed using non-responder imputation.Results: Significantly greater cumulative benefits were obtained for IXE compared with UST. Normalized cumulative benefit with IXE versus UST for PASI 75/90/100, Itch NRS (0), and DLQI (0,1) were 83.1% and 67.6%; 68.9% and 46.5%; 41.1% and 23.4%; 40.4% and 30.9%; and 62.2% and 46.6%, respectively. Cumulative clinical benefit ratios for IXE:UST were 1.23 for PASI 75, 1.48 for PASI 90, and 1.76 for PASI 100, indicating an increase in the cumulative clinical benefit for IXE versus UST as the clearance levels increased.Conclusions: IXE showed greater cumulative clinical benefit than UST.

Absolute and Relative Psoriasis Area and Severity Indices (PASI) for Comparison of the Efficacy of Ixekizumab to Etanercept and Placebo in Patients with Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis: An Integrated Analysis of UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 Outcomes.

Treatment goals defined by the absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores offer certain advantages in the clinical setting. In order to investigate potential treatment targets, this study evaluated absolute PASI outcomes relative to other measures of response using data from two randomized clinical trials of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with ixekizumab, etanercept, or placebo (n=2,567). Response was assessed throughout 12 weeks as the proportion of patients achieving absolute PASI band cut-offs who also reached established response criteria. Most PASI band ≤2 responders also achieved PASI 90 (70.1-100%), static Physician's Global Assessment (0,1) (91.3-96.1%), Dermatology Life Quality Index (0,1) (63.0-67.7%), Patient Global Assessment of Disease Severity (0,1) (80.3-86.7%), and Itch Numeric Rating Scale improvement ≥4 (87.2-87.6%). Agreement sharply decreased for less stringent PASI criteria. These data indicate that PASI ≤2 represents significantly meaningful clinical and health-related quality of life improvements and may be a suitable treatment target for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in patients with plaque psoriasis across different degrees of disease severity: results from UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3.

PURPOSE: To evaluate short- and long-term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in patients according to psoriasis severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were integrated from clinical trials (UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3). Patients received placebo, 80-mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W), every 4 weeks (IXEQ4W), or 50 mg etanercept (ETN) biweekly for 12 weeks, then open-label IXEQ4W (UNCOVER-3). Psoriasis severity was categorized by baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI <20 and ≥20). Efficacy was evaluated by percentage reaching PASI 75, 90, 100, and absolute PASI ≤5, ≤2, and ≤1. RESULTS: Significantly more patients with PASI ≥20 (vs. PASI <20) were male and had higher body weight. After 12 weeks, both severity groups had significantly more IXEQ2W- than ETN-treated patients reach PASI 75, 90, 100, and absolute PASI ≤5, ≤2, ≤1. Fewer PASI ≥20 vs. PASI <20 patients across treatments reached PASI ≤5, ≤2, and ≤1 at week 12. Efficacy was maintained during 156 weeks of ixekizumab treatment with no differences between groups. The IXEQ2W safety profile was similar between groups except for injection-site reactions (significantly higher in PASI <20). CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab demonstrated a high level of efficacy and had a consistent safety profile in patients with different baseline psoriasis severity levels.

Ixekizumab provides superior efficacy compared with ustekinumab over 52 weeks of treatment: Results from IXORA-S, a phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Biologics targeting interleukin 17A (IL-17A) allow for rapid clearance of psoriatic plaques, with a clinically favorable safety profile. OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of ixekizumab, an IL-17A antagonist, with the safety and efficacy of the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab through 52 weeks of treatment in the head-to-head trial IXORA-S. METHODS: Patients were randomized to ixekizumab (n = 136) or ustekinumab (n = 166) and dosed per the approved labels. After 1 year, efficacy was assessed via improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (with PASI 90 indicating a 90% or greater improvement from baseline PASI score) and a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) response of either 0 or 0 or 1, with dropouts counted as nonresponders. Safety analyses included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: At week 52, significantly more ixekizumab-treated patients (P < .01) reported PASI 90 (104 [76.5%]), an sPGA response of 0 (72 [52.9%]), or an sPGA response of 0 or 1 (110 [82.1%]) responses than did ustekinumab-treated patients (PASI 90, 98 [59.0%]; sPGA response of 0, 60 [36.1%]; and sPGA response of 0 or 1, 108 [65.1%]). Treatment-emergent AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuation rates were not different between the treatment groups. Injection site reactions occurred more frequently in the ixekizumab-treated group (ixekizumab, 22 [16.3%]; ustekinumab, 2 [1.2%]) (P < .001). LIMITATIONS: This study was not designed to compare safety end points related to rare events. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ustekinumab, ixekizumab showed superior efficacy and comparable safety outcomes through 52 weeks of treatment.

Impact of Ixekizumab Treatment on Itch and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: An Integrated Analysis of Two Phase III Randomized Studies.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated baseline itch and its impact on the efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE) in clearing psoriasis and improving quality-of-life measures, and we explored the relationship between itch and psoriatic skin improvement. METHODS: Data were analyzed from two double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III studies (UNCOVER-2/3) comparing etanercept (ETN), IXE, and placebo (PBO) in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Long-term analysis included UNCOVER-3 data from week 0 to week 156. RESULTS: At week 12, a clinically meaningful improvement in itch [Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) reduction ≥ 4] was seen in 70.0%, 88.6%, and 90.8% of the IXE-treated patients in the baseline Itch NRS 4-6, 7-8, and 9-10 groups, respectively (all itch severity groups p < 0.001 versus ETN and PBO). Also, 68.9%, 67.1%, and 73.6% of the IXE-treated patients in the baseline Itch NRS 4-6, 7-8, and 9-10 groups, respectively, showed an improvement of ≥ 90.0% in the Psoriatic Area and Severity Index (PASI) at week 12 as compared to the baseline (PASI 90) (all itch severity groups p < 0.001 versus ETN and PBO). For most patients, itch reduction preceded psoriatic plaque improvement. Sustained effects of IXE on itch and PASI were observed during 3 years of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of baseline itch severity, IXE treatment provided a rapid improvement in itch followed by clinically meaningful improvements in psoriasis. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT01597245 and NCT01646177.

Clinical consequences of switching from olanzapine to risperidone and vice versa in outpatients with schizophrenia: 36-month results from the Worldwide Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (W-SOHO) study.

BACKGROUND: With many atypical antipsychotics now available in the market, it has become a common clinical practice to switch between atypical agents as a means of achieving the best clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the impact of switching from olanzapine to risperidone and vice versa on clinical status and tolerability outcomes in outpatients with schizophrenia in a naturalistic setting. METHODS: W-SOHO was a 3-year observational study that involved over 17,000 outpatients with schizophrenia from 37 countries worldwide. The present post hoc study focused on the subgroup of patients who started taking olanzapine at baseline and subsequently made the first switch to risperidone (n=162) and vice versa (n=136). Clinical status was assessed at the visit when the first switch was made (i.e. before switching) and after switching. Logistic regression models examined the impact of medication switch on tolerability outcomes, and linear regression models assessed the association between medication switch and change in the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH) overall score or change in weight. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox-proportional hazards models were used to analyze the time to medication switch as well as time to relapse (symptom worsening as assessed by the CGI-SCH scale or hospitalization). RESULTS: 48% and 39% of patients switching to olanzapine and risperidone, respectively, remained on the medication without further switches (p=0.019). Patients switching to olanzapine were significantly less likely to experience relapse (hazard ratio: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.43, 8.26), extrapyramidal symptoms (odds ratio [OR]: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.49, 10.89) and amenorrhea/galactorrhea (OR: 8.99, 95% CI: 2.30, 35.13). No significant difference in weight change was, however, found between the two groups. While the CGI-SCH overall score improved in both groups after switching, there was a significantly greater change in those who switched to olanzapine (difference of 0.29 points, p=0.013). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that patients who switched from risperidone to olanzapine were likely to experience a more favorable treatment course than those who switched from olanzapine to risperidone. Given the nature of observational study design and small sample size, additional studies are warranted.

Regional differences in treatment response and three year course of schizophrenia across the world.

Data from the Worldwide-Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (W-SOHO) study was used to determine the frequency of response and describe the course of disease in outpatients with schizophrenia in different regions of the world. The W-SOHO study was a 3-year, prospective, observational study that included over 17,000 outpatients with schizophrenia from 37 countries classified into six regions (Northern Europe, Southern Europe, Latin America, East Asia, Central & Eastern Europe, North Africa & Middle East). Cox proportional-hazards regression was employed to assess the factors associated with response. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the correlates of disease course. We found that approximately two-thirds of the patients (66.4%) achieved response during the 3-year follow up. Response rates varied across regions, and were highest in North Africa & Middle East (84.6%) and Latin America (78.6%) and lowest in Southern Europe (62.1%) and East Asia (60.9%). There were significant differences between the regions in the proportion of patients experiencing continuous remission, remission plus relapse and a persistent symptomatic course, and between the regions in the duration of remission. Overall, Latin America, East Asia, and North Africa & Middle East had more favorable outcomes because they had the largest proportion of people who achieved continuous remission, the longest time in remission and lowest percentage with a persistent symptomatic course. Having good social functioning at baseline was consistently associated with better clinical outcome. These results seem to indicate that patients from Latin America, East Asia, North Africa & Middle East may have a more favorable disease course than patients from European nations.

Frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction and treatment effectiveness during SSRI or duloxetine therapy: 8-week data from a 6-month observational study.

BACKGROUND: In randomised controlled trials, the frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) at week 8 was lower with duloxetine than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. METHODS: This 6-month, prospective, observational study compared the frequency of TESD (using the Arizona Sexual Experience [ASEX] scale) in MDD patients treated with duloxetine or SSRI monotherapy in the first 8 weeks in normal clinical practice. RESULTS: Physician-assessed TESD frequency at week 8 was comparable with duloxetine and SSRI monotherapy (23.9 and 26.2%, respectively; P = 0.545). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (QIDS-SR(16)), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores and remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy (P < 0.001, 0.010, <0.001, and 0.002, respectively), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures (EuroQoL questionnaire-5 dimensions [EQ-5D] and Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS] scores: ≤0.012). Several factors were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 in this study. CONCLUSIONS: TESD rates with duloxetine and SSRIs at week 8 were comparable, however, significant differences in effectiveness were observed in favour of duloxetine. Antidepressant tolerability with respect to TESD must be managed to maximize remission of depressed patients.

The integral inventory for depression, a new, self-rated clinimetric instrument for the emotional and painful dimensions in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) scale using post hoc analyses of data from a multi-country study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00561509) of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Patients (N = 1629) completed the IID (comprising two separate dimensions for emotional and physically painful symptoms; maximum score of 65) and a reference scale (16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report) at baseline and at follow-up (8 and 24 weeks). Physicians rated MDD symptoms using the Clinical Global Impressions of Severity scale at each visit. Inter-item correlation, internal consistency, external validity, factor structure, and exploratory analysis of an optimal severity cut-off point were assessed. RESULTS: The IID displayed two distinct dimensions (i.e. painful and emotional) with little item redundancy and good internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.83 at each visit). The IID displayed good external validity (Pearson's correlations coefficients >0.60 at each visit) and statistically significant agreement (McNemar's test; P < 0.001 at follow-up) with the reference scale. Results suggest that a cut-off score of ≤24 had adequate precision (>80%) to identify patients with and without moderate MDD. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the IID may be a reliable and valid tool for assessing emotional and painful symptoms of MDD.

Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction with SSRIs and duloxetine: effectiveness and functional outcomes over a 6-month observational period.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate frequencies of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) treated with duloxetine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) monotherapy for up to 6 months in a prospective, observational study. METHODS: Sexually active MDD patients without sexual dysfunction at entry were enrolled from twelve countries (N = 1,647). TESD was assessed over the study period using the Arizona sexual experience (ASEX) scale. A priori-specified secondary 6-month clinical endpoints were also examined. RESULTS: The frequency of TESD at 6 months with duloxetine was comparable to that with SSRI monotherapy (23.4 and 28.7%, respectively; P = 0.087). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR(16)), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores, remission and sustained remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy at 6 months (P < 0.001 for each), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures. Four factors were consistently significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Six-month TESD rates were comparable between duloxetine and SSRIs, with greater MDD effectiveness in favour of duloxetine. Improved recognition and management of TESD may improve quality of life for MDD patients in usual clinical practice.

Cross-national clinical and functional remission rates: Worldwide Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (W-SOHO) study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that schizophrenia may have a better outcome for individuals living in low- and middle-income countries compared with affluent settings. AIMS: To determine the frequency of symptom and functional remission in out-patients with schizophrenia in different regions of the world. METHOD: Using data from the Worldwide-Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (W-SOHO) study we measured clinical and functional remission in out-patients with schizophrenia in different regions of the world, and examined sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with these outcomes. The 11 078 participants analysed from 37 participating countries were grouped into 6 regions: South Europe, North Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America, North Africa and Middle East, and East Asia. RESULTS: In total, 66.1% achieved clinical remission during the 3-year follow-up (range: 60.1% in North Europe to 84.4% in East Asia) and 25.4% achieved functional remission (range: 17.8% in North Africa and Middle East to 35.0% in North Europe). Regional differences were not explained by participants' clinical characteristics. Baseline social functioning, being female and previously untreated were consistent predictors of remission across regions. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes of schizophrenia seem to be worse in Europe compared with other regions. However, functional remission follows a different pattern.

Relative association of treatment-emergent adverse events with quality of life of patients with schizophrenia: post hoc analysis from a 3-year observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relative association of adverse events with health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients (N = 16 091) with schizophrenia, treated with antipsychotic medication. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of data from two 3-year observational studies, a mixed effects model with repeated measures was used to evaluate the association between HRQL (EuroQoL visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)) and pre-specified covariates including: severity of illness, extrapyramidal symptoms, tardive dyskinesia, sexual dysfunction, and clinically significant weight gain (> 7% increase from baseline after > or = 3 months of treatment). RESULTS: Mean EQ-VAS increased from 47.8 +/- 21.7 at baseline to 72.4 +/- 18.4 after 36 months. The rank order of the negative association of adverse events with HRQL was: sexual dysfunction (effect estimate -4.04; 95% CI -4.30 to -3.79), extrapyramidal symptoms (effect estimate -2.09; 95% CI -2.43 to -1.75), and tardive dyskinesia (effect estimate -0.89; 95% CI -1.46 to -0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Differences were observed in the direction and magnitude of the association between each adverse event and HRQL. Recognition of the relative association of adverse events with HRQL may contribute to improved adherence of patients with schizophrenia to antipsychotic therapy.

Frequency of painful physical symptoms with major depressive disorder in asia: relationship with disease severity and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently report concomitant painful physical symptoms, which may negatively impact diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency of painful physical symptoms in Asian patients treated for an acute episode of MDD and to describe the associated demographics, clinical status, treatment patterns, and socioeconomic burden. METHOD: This multicountry, observational study enrolled 909 patients with MDD (DSM-IV-TR or ICD-10 criteria) in the psychiatric care setting from June 14, 2006, to February 15, 2007. Patients were classified as positive for painful physical symptoms (PPS+) if they achieved a mean score >or= 2 on the modified Somatic Symptom Inventory. The Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) and 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D(17)) determined depression severity, and the EuroQoL Questionnaire-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) assessed subjective well-being. RESULTS: Overall, 51.8% of patients were classified as PPS+. PPS+ patients were more likely to be female (72.2% vs. 65.1%, p = .022), had relatively more medical comorbidity (29.7% vs. 21.0% with >or= 1 comorbidity, p = .003), were more significantly depressed (CGI-S mean [SE] score = 4.84 [0.03] vs. 4.63 [0.04], p < .001; HAM-D(17) mean [SE] score = 24.80 [0.26] vs. 22.39 [0.27], p < .001), and reported a lower quality of life (EQ-5D health state mean [SE] score = 42.96 [0.92] vs. 52.92 [0.95], p < .001) than PPS- patients. PPS+ and PPS- patients did not differ markedly, however, in terms of MDD medications prescribed or MDD-related disability at work. CONCLUSION: Painful physical symptoms are experienced by approximately half of patients with MDD in Asia and are associated with poor clinical status and perceived quality of life.

Long-term antipsychotic monotherapy for schizophrenia: disease burden and comparative outcomes for patients treated with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or haloperidol monotherapy in a pan-continental observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Noninterventional, naturalistic studies facilitate examination of current clinical practices and provide an understanding of the impact of the biopsychosocial aspects of schizophrenia. This article describes disease burden and patient outcomes, with an emphasis on the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of antipsychotic monotherapy. METHOD: Outpatients initiating or changing antipsychotic therapy for DSM-IV- or ICD-10-defined schizophrenia (N = 7658) were allocated to olanzapine or nonolanzapine cohorts (November 2000 to December 2001). Treatment was at the psychiatrist's discretion, including flexible dosing and use of concomitant therapies and medications, with assessments at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. Longitudinal clinical, pharmacologic, functional, and social data were collected over 36 months across 27 countries. RESULTS: At entry, 76% of patients were initiated/switched to antipsychotic monotherapy, most commonly with olanzapine (N = 3222), risperidone (N = 1117), quetiapine (N = 189), or haloperidol (N = 257). Patients prescribed olanzapine were more likely to maintain their baseline monotherapy (p < .001) and did so for a longer period (p < .001) compared with other antipsychotics. Median time to discontinuation (in months) was as follows: olanzapine 30.0, risperidone 23.1, quetiapine 13.9, haloperidol 12.5. Olanzapine-treated patients were also more likely to respond, and did so more rapidly than patients on other monotherapies (p < .001). Response data were also favorable for risperidone; median time to response (in months) was as follows: olanzapine 5.2, risperidone 6.3, quetiapine 11.3, haloperidol 11.7. Treatment-emergent adverse events varied: olanzapine patients had less favorable odds for significant weight gain (p < .001); haloperidol patients, for motor dysfunction (p < or = .002). CONCLUSION: These naturalistic data from less-studied outpatient communities highlight the variability in clinical and functional outcomes associated with long-term antipsychotic treatment.

Long-term, naturalistic treatment with olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or haloperidol monotherapy: 24-month results from the Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study.

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or haloperidol monotherapy in patients with schizophrenia who were treated in routine clinical practice settings for a period of 2 years. The incidence and persistence of adverse events encountered during long-term therapy are also reported. Method. Outpatients with schizophrenia who entered this 3-year, prospective, observational study were classified according to their initially prescribed antipsychotic monotherapy: olanzapine (n=3222), risperidone (n=1116), quetiapine (n=189), or haloperidol (n=256). Patients were included in the analysis for as long as this treatment was maintained. Results. Over 2 years, olanzapine recipients had significantly (P≤0.001) greater reduction in overall CGI-S score (and the negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms domains), lower incidence of sexual and motor dysfunction, and greater odds of response compared to risperidone or haloperidol-treated patients. However, olanzapine patients gained more weight than patients in other treatment groups. The incidence of motor dysfunction was significantly (P≤0.001) greater in haloperidol-treated patients, relative to the atypical treatment groups. Conclusion. The results of this observational study indicate that, in these patients with schizophrenia, long-term monotherapy with olanzapine may offer benefits over risperidone and haloperidol, but the potential for weight gain should be considered in the clinical management of these patients.

Olanzapine versus chlorpromazine in the treatment of schizophrenia: a pooled analysis of four 6-week, randomized, open-label studies in the Middle East and North Africa.

This pooled analysis of four 6-week, randomized, open-label, parallel trials of patients with schizophrenia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) compared the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine (5-20 mg/d) with those of chlorpromazine (200-800 mg/d). Of the 123 patients randomly allocated to olanzapine (n = 83) or chlorpromazine (n = 40), 109 completed the study (olanzapine, n = 77; chlorpromazine, n = 32). Olanzapine-treated patients showed significantly greater baseline-to-end point mean improvements in the primary efficacy measure, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total, compared with chlorpromazine-treated patients (least-squares means: olanzapine, -21.1; chlorpromazine, -10.4; P < 0.001). Response rate was significantly higher in the olanzapine group (66.3% vs. 32.4%; P = 0.001). Baseline-to-maximum changes in the UKU scores for akathisia were significantly different between the groups (P = 0.018). A decrease (improvement) in these scores was observed in 6/74 (8.1%) of olanzapine- and 1/36 (2.8%) chlorpromazine-treated patients. Weight gain was the only common (> or =10%) adverse event that occurred more frequently, although not significantly differently, in the olanzapine group (27.7%) than the chlorpromazine group (12.5%), whereas postural hypotension was the only common adverse event whose occurrence was significantly different between the groups (olanzapine, 0.0%; chlorpromazine, 10.0%; P = 0.010). Both the incidence of > or =7% weight gain from baseline (olanzapine, 26.3%; chlorpromazine, 24.3%) and baseline-to-end point changes in weight (mean +/- SD, kg: olanzapine, 3.41 +/- 3.14; chlorpromazine, 2.81 +/- 2.65) were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Baseline-to- end point changes in nonfasting glucose differed significantly between the groups (mean +/- SD, mmol/L: olanzapine, 0.09 +/- 1.11; chlorpromazine, 0.72 +/- 2.04; P = 0.042). This analysis suggests that, compared with chlorpromazine, olanzapine may be more efficacious and have a more favorable tolerability profile in treating patients with schizophrenia.

Effects of atypical and typical antipsychotic treatments on sexual function in patients with schizophrenia: 12-month results from the Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study.

PURPOSE: Sexual dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia can reduce quality of life and treatment compliance. This report will compare the effects of selected atypical and typical antipsychotics on sexual function in a large, international population of outpatients with schizophrenia who were treated over 1 year. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Outpatients with schizophrenia, who initiated or changed antipsychotic treatment, and entered this 3-year, prospective, observational study were classified according to the monotherapy prescribed at baseline: olanzapine (N=2638), risperidone (N=860), quetiapine (N=142) or haloperidol (N=188). RESULTS: Based on patient perception, the odds of experiencing sexual dysfunction during 1 year of therapy was significantly lower for patients treated with olanzapine and quetiapine when compared to patients who received risperidone or haloperidol (all P< or =0.001). Females on olanzapine (14%) or quetiapine (8%) experienced a lower rate of menstrual irregularities, compared to females on risperidone (23%) or haloperidol (29%). Significant discordance was evident between patient reports and psychiatrist perception of sexual dysfunction, with psychiatrists underestimating sexual dysfunction (P< or =0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate clinically relevant differences exist in the sexual side effect profiles of these selected antipsychotics. These factors should be considered when selecting the most appropriate treatment for outpatients with schizophrenia.

Is quality of life among minimally symptomatic patients with schizophrenia better following withdrawal or continuation of antipsychotic treatment?

This secondary report from our 52-week, double-blind, relapse prevention trial tested whether stable patients with schizophrenia who were taken off active drug treatment would experience greater improvements in long-term quality of life than those who were continued on antipsychotic treatment. On average, Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale total scores improved by 4.3 +/- 10.6 points during treatment with olanzapine (10-20 mg/d; n = 212), but decreased by 7.1 +/- 14.6 points during treatment with placebo (n = 92; P < 0.001). Mean Quality-of-Life Scale total scores worsened in both treatment groups for the relapsing patient subgroup, whereas for nonrelapsing patients, those treated with olanzapine had significantly improved mean Quality-of-Life Scale total scores compared with those given placebo. For a subset of nonrelapsing patients who were considered "nonexacerbating" on the basis of minimal non-clinically relevant increases in psychopathology, Quality-of-Life Scale total mean change was no better (P = 0.066) for those given placebo (2.7 +/- 11.0; n = 40) than those treated with olanzapine (5.7 +/- 8.9; n = 174). Path analysis indicated a direct effect of treatment (approximately 29%) on quality of life that was not accounted for by differential changes in psychopathology. In conclusion, stable patients with schizophrenia who were taken off active drug treatment experienced no greater improvements in long-term quality of life than those who were continued on antipsychotic treatment, even in the absence of psychotic symptoms.

Tardive Dyskinesia: analysis of outpatients with schizophrenia from Africa and the Middle East, Asia, Central and Eastern Europe, and Latin America.

The point prevalence of Tardive Dyskinesia (TD) in schizophrenia outpatients (n=6981) participating in a study of health outcomes was 8.9%. Duration of diagnosis, age, and prior use of typical antipsychotics were diagnostic indicators of TD in this population, with male sex further increasing risk. This study provides new data in a non-Western population with a unique regional geography comparison.